Book a demo

Solid-State Battery Fast Charging Patent Landscape 2026

Solid-State Battery Fast Charging Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Solid-State Battery Fast Charging Patent Landscape in 2026

The solid-state battery fast charging space is in a Growth stage, with annual filing volume still rising and a 26% recent-window increase — yet the field remains relatively small, with 129 patent families in scope and no single incumbent commanding an overwhelming share. LG Energy Solution leads the ranked applicants, but the top five filers account for only 30% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling room for challengers to establish durable positions.

129
Patent families in scope
30%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+26%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

LG Energy Solution leads a fragmented, still-forming competitive field

LG Energy Solution holds the top position among ranked applicants, followed closely by Terawatt Technology and IBM — each with substantial patent records — and Solid Power Operating in fourth place. The ranking reflects a genuinely contested field rather than a monopoly.

The top five filers account for 30% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating moderate concentration. No single player has locked up the space, and the gap between first place and the pack of challengers ranked third through fifth is narrow enough that the order could shift as publication lag resolves on the most recent filings.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1LG Energy Solution14
2Terawatt Technology Inc.10
3IBM (International Business Machines Corporation)10
4Solid Power Operating Inc.8
5GM Global Technology Operations LLC6
6Factorial Inc.5
7Robert Bosch GmbH4
8Gaoneng Times (Shenzhen) New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.4
9Regents of the University of California4
10Ford Global Technologies LLC4
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11University of Liverpool3
12Hyundai Motor Company3
13Toyota Motor Corporation3
14Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.3
15Honda Motor Co., Ltd.2
16Tianmu Lake Institute of Advanced Energy Storage Technologies2
17TDK Corporation2
18Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences2
19LG Chem Ltd.2
20Talga Technologies Ltd.2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The presence of both dedicated solid-state specialists (Terawatt Technology, Solid Power Operating, Factorial) and large industrial incumbents (LG Energy Solution, IBM, GM, Robert Bosch, Ford) suggests the technology is attracting investment across two distinct strategic logics: focused IP-building by startups and portfolio diversification by established manufacturers.

Activity in the most recent 18–24 months is likely under-counted due to the typical patent publication lag; the filing figures for 2025 and 2026 should be treated as provisional floors rather than final totals. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Annual filing volume is rising and technology coverage is heavily concentrated in battery cell fundamentals

Two patterns define the field’s current structure: a Growth-stage filing trend with a 26% recent-window increase, and a technology mix dominated almost entirely by the H01M battery-cell class, with a thin set of adjacent IPC branches reflecting early-stage cross-domain exploration.

Annual filing trend

Filings were modest and uneven from 2017 through 2020, then accelerated sharply in 2021. Activity moderated in 2022–2023 before climbing again in 2024 and provisionally in 2025. The 2025 and 2026 bars are materially understated by publication lag and will rise as pending applications publish.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 25 in 2025.102017420181120198202019202113202214202321202425202542026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (batteries, cells, and fuel cells) accounts for the overwhelming majority of IPC-tagged records, confirming that inventive effort is concentrated on electrochemical cell architecture and materials. B60L (electric vehicle propulsion), H10N (other solid-state devices), C03C (glass and enamel compositions for electrolytes), and G01R (electrical measurement) each appear at low counts, reflecting early or opportunistic activity rather than sustained parallel tracks.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 135; B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion 5.H01M · Batteries, cells …135B60L · Electric vehicle …5H10N · Other electric so…4C03C · Glass & enamel co…3G01R · Electric & magnet…3H02J · Power supply & gr…3B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…2C01B · Non-metallic elem…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240339620A1Published 2024-10-10

Positive electrode for all-solid-state battery and…

Lg Energy SOLUTION, LTD.

The present disclosure relates to a positive electrode for an all-solid-state battery, comprising: a positive electrode active material; a perfluorinated ionomer comprising lithium substituted sulfonate; a solid electrolyte; and conductive carbon, and an all-solid-state battery comprising the same. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Positive electrode for all-solid-state battery and… — patent drawingPositive electrode for all-solid-state battery and… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Hybrid and solid-state battery architectures with …47
2Electrode body for all-solid-state battery and pro…22
3一种复合三氟化铁正极材料、制备方法及应用19
4Hybrid electrode materials for bipolar capacitor-a…18
5一种高功率全固态电池及其制备17
6Sulfide-impregnated solid-state battery15
7Anode-free solid-state battery cells with Anti-den…13
8Methods of making sulfide-impregnated solid-state …12

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a Growth lifecycle, moderate concentration, active cross-sector collaboration, and a US-dominant jurisdiction map shapes where R&D effort is most and least contested.

Growth

Growth stage — annual volume rising, foundational IP still being established

The field is classified as Growth, with annual filings still rising and recent-window growth of 26%. The most heavily cited works address hybrid architectures, electrode design, and sulfide-electrolyte impregnation — areas where foundational claims are actively being built. Entrants who file now can still target core technology positions rather than crowded incremental niches.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

Moderate concentration — top five hold 30% of the hundred largest filers’ total

The 30% share held by the top five applicants among the hundred largest filers indicates a moderately fragmented field. The narrow gap between leaders means no single player has erected a clearly dominant IP wall. Challengers ranked sixth through tenth — including Factorial, Robert Bosch, and the University of California — hold positions close enough to the top tier that focused filing campaigns could shift the ranking.

Concentration: Moderate
Collaboration

LG Energy Solution is the most active co-filer, partnering with academia

The most active co-filing relationships involve LG Energy Solution (LG New Energy) paired with the Regents of the University of California (3 joint filings) and, separately, with Hanyang University (1 joint filing). These partnerships suggest a model in which large battery manufacturers are accessing novel electrolyte and materials science through university channels rather than purely internal R&D — a path worth monitoring for IP entanglement risk.

Collaboration: Industry–Academia
Geography

US is the dominant filing jurisdiction; China and Europe are secondary battlegrounds

The United States leads all jurisdictions by a substantial margin, followed by China and Europe (EPO). WIPO PCT filings indicate applicants pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection on their most strategically important assets. India appears as a fifth jurisdiction, reflecting either local manufacturing interest or cost-effective supplemental filing strategies. Germany’s separate national filings (beyond EPO) are minimal.

Lead Office: US
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
LG Energy SolutionRegents of the University of California3
LG Energy Solution汉阳大学校产学协力团1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights grounded in applicant ranking, collaboration, lifecycle, and jurisdiction data from the evidence set.Explore insights →
Leaders

LG Energy Solution and Solid Power lead on volume; IBM and Terawatt Technology bring distinct technical emphases

The top ranked applicants divide broadly into two groups: battery-specialist incumbents building cell-architecture IP, and cross-sector players (IBM, GM) whose portfolios span electrochemistry alongside adjacent device classes.

Leader · LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution leads with 14 patent records, concentrated entirely in H01M battery-cell and electrode subclasses. Its applicant momentum is classified as a new entrant in the fast-charging-specific corpus, meaning its recent filing activity (5 records in the recent window) is building from a newly established base in this precise technology cluster. The university co-filing partnerships with UC and Hanyang suggest active external R&D intake alongside internal development.

families: 14
Challenger · Solid Power Operating

Solid Power Operating

Solid Power Operating holds 8 patent records and its momentum is also classified as a new entrant in this corpus, with 6 records in the recent filing window — the highest recent-window count among all momentum-tracked applicants. Its focus is tightly concentrated in H01M10 (secondary batteries) and H01M4 (electrodes), consistent with its publicly known sulfide electrolyte program. The highly cited ‘sulfide-impregnated solid-state battery’ and ‘methods of making sulfide-impregnated solid-state battery’ documents in the top-cited list likely originate from or relate to this organization’s technology area.

families: 8
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 20 tracked applicants, including momentum trends and IPC focus maps.
Terawatt TechnologyIBM+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
LG Energy Solution5▲ new entrant
Solid Power Operating Inc.6▲ new entrant
Factorial Inc.2▲ new entrant
Gaoneng Times (Shenzhen) New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.4▲ new entrant
Ford Global Technologies LLC3▲ new entrant
Regents of the University of California2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent record counts and technology focus derived from the applicant ranking and IPC focus data in the evidence set.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served IPC branches adjacent to the dominant battery-cell cluster

Five IPC classes sit at the periphery of the current filing activity with low record counts and share, each representing a distinct technical angle on solid-state fast charging that remains largely unclaimed.

G01R · Electrical and magnetic measurement

Only 3 records appear under G01R, covering measurement techniques applicable to solid-state cell characterization and state-of-charge sensing during fast charge. Accurate in-situ diagnostics are a known bottleneck for safe fast charging of solid-state cells — thermal runaway and lithium-plating detection are unresolved engineering problems. An applicant with sensor or instrumentation expertise could stake early claims here before the dominant H01M filers expand their scope.

Search this in Eureka →

H02J · Power supply and grid systems

With only 3 records, H02J — covering charging infrastructure, power conversion, and grid interface — is sparsely populated relative to the cell-chemistry focus of the field. Fast charging of solid-state batteries requires purpose-built power delivery profiles (high-current pulse protocols, thermal management coordination) that differ from lithium-ion charging systems. This branch is under-served and has a plausible entry path for power-electronics or charging-infrastructure specialists who can tie grid-side innovations to solid-state cell requirements.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See detailed analysis of all five adjacent branches, including record counts, filing velocity, and recommended search strategies.
B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion integrationC03C · Glass electrolyte compositions+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches identified from IPC classes with low record counts relative to the dominant H01M class in the corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by IPC technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 50 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 2 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 6 · Batteries, cells & fuel cells
IBM (International Business Machines Corporation)Strong · 10Strong · 10Strong · 10Strong · 10Moderate · 5
LG Energy SolutionStrong · 14Strong · 11Moderate · 3AbsentAbsent
Terawatt Technology Inc.Strong · 10Strong · 6Strong · 6Emerging · 2Absent
Robert Bosch GmbHStrong · 4Strong · 4Strong · 4AbsentAbsent
Regents of the University of CaliforniaStrong · 4Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsent
Factorial Inc.Strong · 4Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsent
Gaoneng Times (Shenzhen) New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Strong · 4Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own solid-state battery fast charging landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.