Book a demo

Solid-State Battery Patent Landscape 2026

Competitive Landscape

Solid-State Battery Patent Landscape in 2026

The solid-state battery patent field is in a sustained growth phase, with Toyota holding a commanding lead of 2,077 patent families and the top five applicants collectively accounting for 73% of the leading filers’ combined total. Activity is heavily concentrated among Japanese and Korean automotive and electronics conglomerates, with Korean battery makers showing the sharpest recent momentum.

14,856
Patent families in scope
73%
Top-5 share of ranked filers
+14%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Toyota leads a highly concentrated field dominated by Japanese and Korean incumbents

Toyota Motor Corporation tops the applicant ranking with 2,077 patent families, nearly 500 families ahead of second-ranked Panasonic Intellectual Property Management (1,579 families). The top ten applicants span automotive OEMs, battery specialists, and electronics conglomerates, all with substantial portfolios.The top five applicants together represent 73% of the leading filers’ combined total — a concentration level that signals high barriers to entry and limited room for new challengers to displace incumbents through volume alone. A clear tier gap exists between Toyota and Panasonic at the summit and the cluster of Korean players (LG Energy Solution, Samsung SDI, Samsung Electronics) in the 500–800 family range.
Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Toyota Motor Corporation2,077
2Panasonic Intellectual Property Management (Panasonic)1,579
3LG Energy Solution804
4Samsung SDI759
5Samsung Electronics (Korea)501
6Fujifilm Corporation454
7Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.442
8Hyundai Motor Company418
9Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.414
10LG Chem391
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka
Toyota’s and Panasonic’s positions reflect decade-long investment in sulfide and oxide solid electrolytes aligned with automotive commercialization timelines. The Korean challengers’ accelerating momentum — Samsung SDI at 3.4× and LG Energy Solution at 3.1× their prior three-year filing rates — suggests an aggressive catch-up strategy that could reshape concentration within the next filing cycle.Applicant rankings and the corpus total of 14,856 are measured at the patent-family level. Technology-branch (IPC), jurisdiction, and route-matrix figures are at the patent-record level, where a single family can carry multiple IPC classes or appear in multiple offices; those counts therefore exceed the family total and are not directly comparable to it. The most recent 18–24 months of data are systematically under-counted due to publication lag and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.
Source — PatSnap Eureka. The applicant ranking chart shows each filer’s total patent families in the corpus. Applicant family counts can overlap where a family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volumes are still rising on a multi-year basis with technology concentrated in core battery IPC classes

Annual filing data and technology-branch composition together reveal both the pace of competition and the degree to which the field remains anchored in electrochemical cell fundamentals versus adjacent material-science branches.

Annual filing trend

Recorded filings grew from 853 families in 2017 to a visible peak of 2,143 in 2023, with a 14% net gain across the recent window. The 2024 and 2025 figures are materially under-counted due to publication lag and should not be read as a slowdown; the lifecycle evidence indicates the field remains in a growth stage. 2026 data (24 families recorded) represents only partial-year visibility.

Annual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2,143 in 2023.85320171,17920181,60820191,87020201,93320212,06720222,14320231,98320241,1962025242026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (Batteries, cells & fuel cells) dominates at the patent-record level with 19,831 records — far exceeding all other classes. The second-largest branch, H01B (Cables, conductors & insulators), at 2,901 records, reflects intense work on solid electrolyte conductor materials. Inorganic chemistry classes C01B and C01G, ceramics class C04B, and capacitor class H01G each carry hundreds of records, indicating that upstream materials innovation is a meaningful secondary front. Polymer-related classes (C08L, C08G, C08F) are present but relatively sparse, pointing to a field that currently skews toward inorganic electrolyte systems.

H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 19,831; H01B · Cables, conductors & insulators 2,901.H01M · Batteries, cells …19,831H01B · Cables, conductor…2,901C01B · Non-metallic elem…1,490C01G · Compounds of othe…1,173C04B · Ceramics, cement …654H01G · Capacitors618C08L · Polymer compositi…395C08G · Condensation poly…356↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source — PatSnap Eureka. IPC record counts reflect patent-record-level classification; one family may contribute to multiple branches.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Foundational and most-cited patents

The most-cited families that anchor this space — hover a row and click to open it in Eureka.
Featured patent
US20250357530A1Published 2025-11-20

Oxide solid electrolyte coated ni-based cathode fo…

Gm Global Technology Operations LLC

A sulfide all-solid-state battery and a method for forming an oxide electrolyte coated cathode is provided. The battery includes a nickel-based cathode, an electrolyte coating adhered to the nickel-based cathode, an anode, and a sulfide solid electrolyte. The nickel-based cathode includes… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Oxide solid electrolyte coated ni-based cathode fo… — patent drawingOxide solid electrolyte coated ni-based cathode fo… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Most-cited patents
#PatentCitations
1Solid electrolyte material, and cell516
2Electroactive high storage capacity polyacetylene-…394
3Electroactive high storage capacity polycarbon-sul…392
4Composite solid electrolyte for protection of acti…388
5Reversible electrode material372
6Solid polymer electrolytes348
7Sulfide solid electrolyte material, battery, and m…340
8Rechargeable thin film battery and method for maki…336

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts accrue over time, so this list favours older, broadly-cited patents and may include general-purpose work beyond the specific topic; treat it as foundational context rather than a current-activity ranking.

Source — PatSnap Eureka. Most-cited patent families for this query, ranked by total forward citations.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D strategy and market entry

The combination of lifecycle stage, applicant concentration, active co-filing networks, and geographic distribution shapes where new entrants can realistically compete and where incumbents are most defensible.
Growth

Growth stage: filings still expanding on a multi-year basis

The lifecycle evidence classifies solid-state batteries as a Growth-stage field: annual filings increased 14% across the recent window and the most recent years are understated by publication lag. This means the competitive window has not yet closed — but the incumbents’ large portfolio leads make differentiated positioning on electrolyte chemistry or cell architecture more effective than head-on volume competition.

Growth stage
Concentration

Top-heavy field with a widening gap between tier one and tier two

The top five filers account for 73% of the leading filers’ combined total, and Toyota alone holds 2,077 families versus Samsung Electronics’ 501 at fifth place. This concentration makes freedom-to-operate analysis essential before entering any of the core H01M10 sub-classes. Challengers accelerating rapidly — Samsung SDI at 3.4× and LG Energy Solution at 3.1× their prior three-year rates — are narrowing the gap, but from a smaller base.

High concentration
Collaboration

Automaker–university and intra-group co-filing partnerships dominate the ecosystem

The most active co-filing pair is Hyundai Motor Company and Kia Corporation (364 joint families), reflecting tight intra-group integration. Toyota has filed jointly with Panasonic (106 families) and Tokyo Institute of Technology (66 families), signalling an industry–academia model for fundamental electrolyte research. LG Energy Solution’s 95-family collaboration with the Regents of the University of California is notable as a cross-continental academic tie. Samsung SDI and Samsung Electronics share 48 joint families, while Hyundai also co-files with Hanyang University (50 families) and Seoul National University R&DB Foundation (21 families).

Active co-filing
Geography

US office leads at the patent-record level; EPO and PCT coverage reflects global commercial intent

At the patent-record level, the United States leads with 10,534 records, followed by the EPO at 5,601 and WIPO PCT at 3,072. This pattern reflects applicants’ prioritization of the US market for litigation and licensing, with European and PCT filings used to preserve optionality in commercial markets. Canada (361), Australia (200), and the UK (188) show meaningful but secondary coverage.

US-led, globally filed
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions — each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Hyundai Motor CompanyKia Corporation364
Toyota Motor CorporationPanasonic Corporation106
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.Regents of the University of California95
Toyota Motor CorporationTokyo Institute of Technology66
Hyundai Motor CompanyHanyang University50
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.48
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Corning Incorporated28
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Massachusetts Institute of Technology21
Hyundai Motor CompanySeoul National University R&DB Foundation21
Toyota Motor CorporationNational Institute for Materials Science (NIMS)17

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source — PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction figures are at the patent-record level and reflect multi-jurisdictional filing strategies across the 14,856-family corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Toyota dominates; Korean battery makers show the sharpest recent acceleration

The two largest filers differ substantially in trajectory: Toyota continues to expand its already dominant position, while Samsung SDI and LG Energy Solution are closing the gap at multiples of their prior filing rates. Panasonic Intellectual Property Management, despite its large absolute portfolio, is contracting.
Leader · Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota holds the largest portfolio with 2,077 patent families, concentrated almost entirely in H01M core battery and electrode classes (H01M10: 1,827 records; H01M4: 1,382 records). Recent filings are up 47% versus the prior three-year period, meaning Toyota is not only defending its lead but actively widening it. Co-filing relationships with Panasonic and Tokyo Institute of Technology suggest a dual track: manufacturing scale-up and fundamental materials research.

families: 2,077
Challenger · Samsung SDI

Samsung SDI

Samsung SDI ranks fourth overall with 759 patent families but is the fastest-growing major incumbent on a relative basis, with recent filings at 3.4× its prior three-year rate. Its technology focus mirrors the field’s core (H01M10: 710 records; H01M4: 579 records), and its 48-family co-filing overlap with Samsung Electronics creates an integrated intra-group position spanning cell chemistry and device integration. At current trajectory, Samsung SDI is positioned to close the gap with the top-two filers within the next filing cycle.

families: 759
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings, momentum trends, and technology-route profiles for all top filers in the solid-state battery space.
LG Energy SolutionPanasonic Intellectual Property Management+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.537▲ 3.1× vs prior 3-yr
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.470▲ 3.4× vs prior 3-yr
Source — PatSnap Eureka. Player family counts are from the applicant ranking at the patent-family level.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant H01M core

Several IPC classes appear at the patent-record level with relatively low record counts compared to H01M, despite clear technical adjacency to solid-state battery development. These represent observations of relative sparsity, not validated market opportunities.

C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories

With 654 patent records, the ceramics class is sparse relative to H01M’s 19,831, yet ceramic processing is central to oxide solid electrolytes (e.g., LLZO, NASICON-type materials) where sintering conditions directly determine ionic conductivity. The sparsity may reflect that ceramic processing IP is embedded in H01M claims rather than filed under C04B — or it may signal a genuine gap in manufacturing-process protection. Entrants with ceramic processing expertise could explore C04B-anchored claims on sintering atmospheres, dopant profiles, and co-firing with electrode layers.Search this in Eureka →

C08L / C08G · Polymer compositions & condensation polymers

Polymer electrolyte records total 395 (C08L) and 356 (C08G) — a small fraction of the field’s record base — despite polymer solid electrolytes being a distinct commercialization pathway for flexible and wearable applications. The dominant players’ technology profiles skew heavily toward inorganic electrolytes, suggesting the polymer electrolyte branch is less contested among the largest filers. Organizations with polymer chemistry expertise may find fewer blocking positions here, particularly in composite polymer–ceramic hybrid systems, though entry would require validating freedom-to-operate against existing H01M claims that may already cover polymer electrolyte formulations.Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all under-served branches, record counts, and applicant overlap scores across the solid-state battery IPC landscape.
C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compoundsH01G · Capacitors+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source — PatSnap Eureka. Branch record counts are at the patent-record level; sparsity is relative to the dominant H01M class and does not imply absence of existing IP.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ in their technology-route emphasis

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.
PlayerH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 50 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01B 1 · Cables, conductors & insulatorsH01M 6 · Batteries, cells & fuel cells
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.Strong — 710Strong — 579Emerging — 115AbsentAbsent
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.Strong — 788Strong — 482Emerging — 100AbsentAbsent
Source — PatSnap Eureka. Route-matrix counts are at the patent-record level; a single family can contribute to multiple routes.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

The corpus analyzed contains 14,856 patent families at the global level. This count is at the patent-family level, meaning each invention is counted once regardless of how many national offices it is filed in.
Toyota Motor Corporation leads with 2,077 patent families, followed by Panasonic Intellectual Property Management with 1,579 families. The top five applicants together account for 73% of the leading filers’ combined total.
Among major filers, Samsung SDI has grown its recent filings to 3.4× its prior three-year rate and LG Energy Solution to 3.1×. Toyota is also expanding, up 47% in the recent period. Panasonic Intellectual Property Management and Fujifilm have contracted, down 18% and 53% respectively.
The evidence classifies this field as Growth stage. Annual filing volumes rose from 853 families in 2017 to a recorded high of 2,143 in 2023, with a 14% net gain across the recent multi-year window. The most recent years are under-counted due to publication lag.
At the patent-record level, the United States leads with 10,534 records, followed by the EPO at 5,601 and WIPO PCT at 3,072. Canada, Australia, and the UK are secondary but meaningful filing destinations.
The largest co-filing pair is Hyundai Motor Company and Kia Corporation with 364 joint families, reflecting intra-group integration. Other significant partnerships include Toyota with Panasonic (106 families) and Tokyo Institute of Technology (66 families), and LG Energy Solution with the Regents of the University of California (95 families).
Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own solid-state battery patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape — search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.
18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report
Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.