Book a demo

Solid-State Battery State Estimation Patent Landscape 2026

Solid-State Battery State Estimation Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Solid-State Battery State Estimation Patent Landscape in 2026

Toyota Motor Corporation commands the solid-state battery state estimation space with 26 of 44 total patent families, producing a level of concentration rare even in early-stage technical fields. The corpus is in active growth, with annual filing volume rising sharply from 2021 onward and the most recent periods expected to gain further records as publication lag resolves.

44
Patent families in scope
73%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+283%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Japan
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Toyota leads a highly concentrated field with a clear two-tier structure

Toyota Motor Corporation holds 26 patent families in solid-state battery state estimation, placing it far ahead of every other filer. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. is the only other applicant with more than two patent families, filing five. The remaining applicants each hold one or two families.

The top five filers account for 73% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers — an unusually high concentration for a technology still in its growth phase. The gap between Toyota and the second-ranked Honda is wide enough that no single challenger can close it quickly through organic filing alone.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Toyota Motor Corporation26
2Honda Motor Co., Ltd.5
3Geely Automobile Institute (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.2
4Hyundai Motor Company2
5China FAW Co., Ltd.2
6Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.2
7State Grid Shandong Electric Power Co. Jimo Power Supply Company1
8Hunan Kejian Energy Development Co., Ltd.1
9Hanyang University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation1
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
10Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.1
11Central South University1
12Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.1
13Shenzhen Guoyi Technology Development Co., Ltd.1
14Taicang Akaxi Technology Co., Ltd.1
15Factorial Inc.1
16SHANDONG UNIV OF SCI & TECH1
17Enpower (Peking) Inc.1
18Dongfeng Motor Group1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Toyota’s dominant position, reinforced by strong coverage across battery cell, power supply, and measurement branches, suggests it has built a broad foundational estate. Any entrant must navigate this estate while identifying the adjacent branches where coverage is comparatively thin.

Filing counts for 2025 and 2026 are understated relative to their ultimate totals due to standard patent publication delays; the apparent recent softening should not be read as a real decline in activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Annual filings are rising and the technology mix is dominated by battery and power-supply branches

The filing trend and technology composition together reveal a field that is still expanding on a multi-year basis, with activity heavily anchored in core battery-cell and power-supply measurement classes and material-analysis and AI branches receiving comparatively little coverage to date.

Annual filing trend

Filings were low and uneven from 2017 through 2020 (one to three families per year), then climbed steadily from 2021 onward, reaching eleven families in 2024. The 2025 and 2026 figures are understated by publication lag and will revise upward as more applications publish.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 11 in 2024.320172201812019120204202142022820231120248202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

The H01M (batteries and cells) and H02J (power supply and grid systems) branches collectively dominate the composition, with G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) as the third pillar. The B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) branch reflects the automotive context of most filers. G01N (material analysis), G06F (digital data processing), and G06N (AI-based computing) each appear in only a handful of records, signalling under-served adjacent territory.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 39; H02J · Power supply & grid systems 33.H01M · Batteries, cells …39H02J · Power supply & gr…33G01R · Electric & magnet…20B60L · Electric vehicle …11G01N · Material analysis…2G06F · Electric digital …2G06N · Computing based o…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240413657A1Published 2024-12-12

Regeneration method of all-solid-state battery, an…

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha

A regeneration method of an all-solid-state battery includes a step of preparing an all-solid-state battery having a cathode that does not contain copper, and a step of executing overdischarge control of the all-solid-state battery. The overdischarge control is control of mitigating reaction variance that is variance in electrode reaction due to charging… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Regeneration method of all-solid-state battery, an… — patent drawingRegeneration method of all-solid-state battery, an… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1All-solid-state battery system21
2Battery system and vehicle on which battery system…20
3Control device of all-solid-state battery13
4Calculation device and all-solid-state battery sys…6
5Method of evaluating all-solid-state battery5
6All-solid-state battery system4
7All-solid-state battery system4
8一种应用于新能源的高效固态电池储能热管理系统3

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, a growth-stage lifecycle, thin coverage in AI and materials-characterisation branches, and an automotive-led collaboration ecosystem shapes where new entrants and incumbents alike should focus attention.

Growth

Growth stage with annual volume still rising

PatSnap Eureka classifies this field as Growth, with annual filings still rising and the most recent years understated by publication lag. The 283% multi-year growth rate confirms that this is not yet a mature, densely contested space. Early movers who build estate now will benefit from the widest available claim space before the field crowds.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

One dominant filer, a thin second tier, many single-family entrants

Toyota’s 26 patent families represent more than half the entire corpus. Honda sits alone in a narrow second tier with five families. All remaining filers hold one or two families each. This structure means that licensing or collaboration discussions with Toyota are likely unavoidable for any player seeking broad freedom to operate in this domain.

High concentration
Collaboration

Hyundai–Kia and Geely group partnerships are the active co-filing pairs

The most active co-filing relationships pair Kia Corporation with Hyundai Motor Company (two co-filed families) and Zhejiang Geely Holding Group with Geely Automobile Institute (Ningbo) (two co-filed families). Hanyang University has collaborated with both Kia and Hyundai on one family each, indicating a university-OEM bridge in the Korean cluster. Toyota and Honda show no co-filing within this corpus, suggesting both pursue independent estate-building strategies.

OEM-led co-filing
Geography

Japan and China lead; US coverage is substantial; Korea and Europe remain thin

Japan leads with sixteen patent records, followed closely by China with fifteen and the United States with thirteen. South Korea, EPO, and WIPO collectively account for only four records, pointing to potential prosecution gaps for applicants who have not yet extended filings into those jurisdictions. For new entrants, South Korea and EPO may represent relatively accessible prosecution routes with limited incumbent density.

JP · CN · US dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Kia CorporationHyundai Motor Company2
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.Geely Automobile Institute (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.2
Kia Corporation汉阳大学校产学协力团1
Hyundai Motor Company汉阳大学校产学协力团1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards draw on applicant ranking, lifecycle classification, collaboration pairs, and jurisdiction counts from PatSnap Eureka.Explore insights →
Leaders

Toyota is the clear anchor; Honda enters as the sole meaningful challenger

Two Japanese OEMs define the competitive hierarchy. Toyota’s estate spans all three primary technical branches, while Honda concentrates on power-supply and battery-cell branches. Both are classified as new entrants in terms of momentum trajectory, reflecting that this specific sub-field is itself newly active rather than long-established.

Leader · Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota holds 26 patent families — more than five times any other applicant — with its strongest technical focus in H01M (batteries and cells, 26 records), H02J (power supply and grid systems, 21 records), and G01R (electric and magnetic measurement, 8 records). Its momentum trend is classified as a new entrant, consistent with the field’s own recent emergence. The breadth across all three core branches suggests Toyota is pursuing a foundational blocking position rather than a narrow niche.

26 patent families
Challenger · Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Honda holds 5 patent families, placing it as the sole filer in the second tier. Its emphasis falls on H02J (power supply and grid systems, 5 records) and H01M (batteries and cells, 4 records), with additional coverage in H01M 50. Like Toyota, Honda’s momentum is classified as a new entrant, indicating concentrated recent activity. Its narrower scope compared to Toyota leaves room for targeted differentiation in measurement and diagnostics branches.

5 patent families
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 18 identified filers, including Chinese OEMs, Korean automakers, and university entrants.
Geely Automobile Institute (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.Hyundai Motor Company+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Toyota Motor Corporation15▲ new entrant
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.4▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts and technology focus from PatSnap Eureka applicant-level data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Material characterisation, digital processing, and AI modelling are under-served adjacent branches

Three IPC branches appear in only two patent records each across the entire corpus, placing them well below the dominant battery-cell and power-supply branches. Each has plausible technical relevance to state estimation and merits closer examination before concluding that the low count reflects low value rather than low attention.

G01N · Material analysis and testing

With only two patent records, material-characterisation methods — such as impedance spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, or electrochemical analysis applied to solid electrolytes — are sparsely covered relative to system-level estimation approaches. For researchers developing in-situ or operando diagnostic techniques that feed state estimators, this branch represents an under-served adjacent area. An entry path exists through the Kia, Hyundai, and Hunan Kejian filings that already touch G01N, which could inform a differentiated filing strategy.

Search this in Eureka →

G06N · Computing based on AI models

AI-based computing methods appear in only two patent records, even though neural-network and physics-informed machine learning approaches to battery state-of-charge and state-of-health estimation are an active research direction in the broader lithium-ion literature. The sparse coverage here may reflect that practitioners have not yet systematically filed AI-specific claims for the solid-state context. Entrants with strengths in model-based or data-driven estimation algorithms could find relatively open territory in this branch.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See branch-level gap analysis across all IPC classes, with applicant overlap scores and prosecution jurisdiction recommendations.
G06F · Electric digital data processingG01N · Material analysis and testing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified by low patent-record counts within the corpus and assessed for technical adjacency and entry feasibility.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology branch emphasis

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH02J 7 · Power supply & grid systemsG01R 31 · Electric & magnetic measurementB60L 58 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 53 · Electric vehicle propulsion
Toyota Motor CorporationStrong · 26Strong · 21Moderate · 8Moderate · 6Emerging · 5
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Strong · 4Strong · 5AbsentEmerging · 1Emerging · 1
Geely Automobile Institute (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.Strong · 2AbsentStrong · 2Strong · 2Absent
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.Strong · 2AbsentStrong · 2Strong · 2Absent
China FAW Co., Ltd.Strong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1
Hyundai Motor CompanyStrong · 2AbsentStrong · 2AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own solid-state battery patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.