Book a demo

Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/solid-state-fermentation-heat-management-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Solid-State Fermentation
Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management Patents
  • One assignee holds 16 of 67 records, while a long tail of single-filing entrants fills out the rest of the ranked field.
  • Filings grew 67% from 2021 to 2024, the last year the dataset treats as complete before publication lag sets in.
  • Bioreactor apparatus claims (C12M) touch 76.1% of records, leaving thermal-sensing and airflow-specific claims comparatively thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
67
Published Records
67%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+67%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
WO
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 67 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Solid-state fermentation packs microbial or fungal cultures into a static or semi-static solid substrate bed, which makes metabolic heat removal one of the harder engineering problems in scale-up: unlike liquid fermentation, there is no easy convective mixing to even out a temperature gradient. This landscape tracks 67 published records filed against IPC classes covering bioreactors, microorganism handling and fermentation processes, filtered specifically for language around bed temperature, cooling airflow, heat removal and thermal sensing. The scope is deliberately narrow — it is not solid-state fermentation broadly, but the subset of it where heat management is the documented technical problem.

The field is small and concentrated. A handful of assignees account for most of the activity, and the claim language clusters heavily around bioreactor apparatus rather than the sensing or control layer that sits on top of it.

Filing activity and technology composition
  1. 1GREEN SPOT TECH SAS16
  2. 2THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON13
  3. 3PROPHYTA BIOLOGISCHER PFLANZENSCHUTZ GMBH6
  4. 4ECOVATIVE LLC5
  5. 5BIOCON LTD5
  6. 6THE FYNDER GROUP INC4
  7. 7ECOVATIVE DESIGN LLC3
  8. 8KULKARNI SAMEER SUDHIR2
  9. 9KULKARNI SAMEER2
  10. 10ZEUS BIOTECH PVT LTD2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 67 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim language.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings peaked at 12 in 2020, then settled into a lower but rising band, up 67% from 2021 (3 filings) to 2024 (5 filings) — the most recent year the dataset treats as complete. 2025 and 2026 figures will fill in further as publication catches up with filing.

Filing trend, 2017–202603691202017201820191220202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

Bioreactor and apparatus claims (C12M) appear in 76.1% of the 67 records, and microorganism-related claims (C12N) in 53.7%. Food-application claims (A23L) and fermentation-process claims (C12P) each cover roughly a third of the field, while peptide, polymer-additive and detergent-related classes are minor threads.

Technology composition by IPC subclassC12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus5176.1%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…3653.7%A23L · Foods & non-alcoholic beverages2334.3%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…2232.8%C12R · Microorganisms (index)1420.9%C07K · Peptides & proteins46.0%C08K · Use of additives in polymers23.0%C11D · Detergents & cleaning composit…23.0%Other710.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 67 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solid-state fermentation heat management and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Record
US20240060034A12024-02-22

Producing fungal spores by solid-state fermentation (US20240060034A1)

THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON

A method of producing fungal spores utilizing solid-state fermentation (SSF), the method including steps of combining, in a solid-state fermentation vessel, fungal spores and a solid substrate to produce a fungal culture; subjecting the fungal culture in the solid-state fermentation vessel to solid-state fermentation conditions; where the solid-state fermentation conditions include conditions for targeted production of further fungal spores by fungal cells relative to growth of the fungal cells; and collecting the further fungal spores.Filed by The University of Akron, published 2024-02-22.

US20240060034A1 — patent drawing 1US20240060034A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090117633A1Process of Producing Ethanol Using Starch with Enzymes Generated Through Solid State Culture90
2US6197573B1Solid state fermentation85
3US6620614B1Solid-state fermenter and method for solid-state fermentation73
4US6664095B1Solid state fermentation67
5WO2010032260A1Stacked basket bioreactor for solid state fermentation39
6US20200102530A1Bioreactor Paradigm for the Production of Secondary extra-Particle Hyphal Matrices29
7WO2020072140A1A bioreactor paradigm for the production of secondary extra-particle hyphal matrices21
8CN105567740A农用芽孢杆菌的高密度固体发酵方法14
9US11359174B2Bioreactor paradigm for the production of secondary extra-particle hyphal matrices6
10EP1131404A1Solid state fermentation6

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs of the concentration, growth and citation data that matter before drafting a claim in this space.

Concentration
67.2%
of 67 records held by the top 5 assignees

Ownership sits with a small group

The top 5 assignees combined account for 45 of the 67 records in scope, and the top 10 climb to 86.6%. A single leader holds 16 records outright. For a new entrant, this means the core apparatus and process claims in solid-state fermentation heat management are already staked out by a small set of holders rather than diffused across the field.

Based on the assignee ranking of 28 companies.
Growth
+67%
filing growth, 2021 to 2024

Activity is rebuilding after a 2020 peak

Filings peaked at 12 in 2020, dipped, and have since grown from 3 in 2021 to 5 in 2024 — a 67% increase over that span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures are not yet a reliable read on whether that growth is continuing.

Peak year: 2020 (12 filings).
Claim distribution
76.1%
of records carry a C12M bioreactor claim

Apparatus claims dominate over control-layer claims

C12M bioreactor and apparatus claims appear in more than three-quarters of records, while narrower classes tied to additives, peptides and detergents each cover a few percent. Heavy density in apparatus claims means the vessel and bed design space is well-occupied; the instrumentation and control logic layered on top of it is comparatively open.

IPC shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solid-state fermentation heat management, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claims, and where the gaps sit

The ranked field covers 28 companies, counted by patent family. Ownership is front-loaded, but the momentum data shows the leading assignees are not currently active in the latest tracked year, which leaves room for new filers willing to work the less-crowded corners.

Leader
16 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

A single holder anchors the field

The leading assignee's 16 records set the pace for the entire ranking; the fifth-ranked holder has 5 and the tenth has just 2, showing how quickly the field thins out below the top few names.

Ranking counted in patent families, 67 total.
Long tail
28 companies
make up the full ranked field

Most holders appear once or twice

Below the top ten, assignees drop to single-digit and often single-record counts. That long tail includes university and small-company filers working on specific fungal or fermenter-design applications rather than broad platform claims.

Top 10 combined hold 86.6% of all 67 records.
Momentum
0 in latest year
for every top-ranked assignee tracked

Leading holders have gone quiet recently

Assignee-level momentum data shows the top-ranked holders recording zero filings in the most recent tracked year, including a -100% year-on-year drop for at least one. Given publication lag, this understates true recent activity but still signals an opening for newer filers to establish position while the historical leaders are not actively adding to their claim base.

Momentum measured year-on-year by assignee.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth scouting
Pockets of the technology space with thin claim density relative to the core bioreactor apparatus cluster.
Bed thermal-gradient sensing arraysCooling-airflow control algorithmsSubstrate-embedded temperature probesDetergent-compatible thermal cleaning cyclesPeptide-yield heat-stress correlation claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Green Spot Tech SAS0
The University of Akron0-100%
Ecovative Design LLC0
PROPHYTA BIOLOGISCHER PFLANZENSCHUTZ GMBH0
Biocon Ltd0
The Fynder Group Inc0
ZEUS BIOTECH PVT LTD0
KULKARNI SAMEER SUDHIR0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is defensive clearance or active filing.

Map the apparatus claims before drafting

With 76.1% of records carrying a C12M bioreactor claim, any new vessel or bed-design filing needs a freedom-to-operate check against the top-held assignees before drafting begins.

Explore bioreactor claims in Eureka

Watch the control-layer gap

Thermal sensing and cooling-airflow control show thinner claim density than the apparatus cluster around them, and the current leaders show no recent filings there.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track citation-heavy prior art

The most-cited records in this set date back over a decade; confirming which of their claims remain in force is a necessary step before relying on the surrounding space as open.

Check prior art status in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Solid-State Fermentation Heat Management in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole solid-state fermentation heat management corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.