Solid-State Supercapacitor Patents: Trends, Leaders & Gaps 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2018. Activity peaked at 26 filings that year and fell to just 4 in the partial 2026 count, pointing to a field whose core claims were staked early.
- H01G capacitor claims dominate. 117 of 157 families sit in the core capacitor classification, leaving coatings, ceramics and semiconductor-integrated branches comparatively thin.
- The US and India lead filing volume. 53 US and 37 India-origin records outpace WIPO, China, Europe and Canada combined among receiving offices in this corpus.
Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 157 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks patent families addressing cycling stability, bending durability and interfacial stability in solid-state and all-solid-state supercapacitors and related solid-state capacitor designs. The search spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off and captures 157 patent families across capacitor, battery, inorganic-chemistry and coatings classifications. The core technical problem across the corpus is maintaining a stable, low-resistance electrode-electrolyte interface through repeated charge cycles or mechanical flexing, rather than simply achieving high initial capacitance.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, activity in 2025 and 2026 is understated relative to earlier years; the multi-year trend from the 2018 peak is the more reliable signal of where the field is heading.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
157 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off map a field concentrated in capacitor electrode and electrolyte engineering, with filing activity that has cooled since its 2018 peak.
Filing activity has declined from a 2018 peak
Filings ran at 17 in 2017, peaked at 26 in 2018, then fell to 7 by the 2022 midpoint and 4 in the partial 2026 year. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years will read low regardless of underlying activity, but the multi-year decline from the 2018 peak points to a field that filed its core claims early rather than one still accelerating.
H01G capacitor claims dominate the classification spread
H01G (Capacitors) accounts for 117 of the 157 records, roughly three-quarters of the corpus, with H01M (batteries and cells) and C01B (inorganic compounds) as the next-largest supporting classes at 49 and 44 respectively. Nanotechnology applications (B82Y, 20 records), coatings (C09D, 10), other metal compounds (C01G, 9), semiconductor devices (H01L, 8) and ceramics (C04B, 7) trail well behind, marking where claim density is thin relative to the core.
Shares are the percentage of the 157 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solid-state supercapacitor reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records in this corpus
All-solid-state-supercapacitor and a process for the fabrication thereof
The present invention discloses an all-solid-state supercapacitor (ASSP) with an enhanced electrode-electrolyte interface that delivers high specific capacitance and areal capacitance with very low internal resistance (ESR). The invention discloses fabrication by intercalating a solid-state polymer electrolyte inside a conducting porous substrate coated with a charge-storage electrode material.Filed by the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, published 2016-02-25 — a direct example of the interfacial-engineering route this search string targets.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2015069332A1 | Three-dimensional graphene framework-based high-performance supercapacitors | 89 |
| 2 | US20140322608A1 | Modified graphitic electrodes for electrochemical energy storage enhancement | 55 |
| 3 | US20180366280A1 | Electrodes and electrolytes for aqueous electrochemical energy storage systems | 46 |
| 4 | US20140120453A1 | Patterned graphite oxide films and methods to make and use same | 41 |
| 5 | US20160055983A1 | All-solid-state-supercapacitor and a process for the fabrication thereof | 40 |
| 6 | US20180290891A1 | Reduced graphene oxide-metal oxynitride aerogel electrodes | 37 |
| 7 | US20180355194A1 | Flexible, biodegradable, and biocompatible supercapacitors | 32 |
| 8 | US20160284481A1 | Three-dimensional graphene framework-based high-performance supercapacitors | 22 |
| 9 | US20160141114A1 | Nanocomposite of multilayer fullerenes with transition metal oxide nanoparticles and a process for the prepar… | 20 |
| 10 | WO2016191564A1 | Dispersions of holey graphene materials and applications thereof | 19 |
Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older filings are naturally favoured, so treat this as a map of foundational influence rather than current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing data actually tells you
Three patterns stand out once the 157-family corpus is broken down by classification, geography and citation weight — each with a direct implication for where to file next.
Core capacitor claims dominate the corpus
Three-quarters of all records sit in H01G, with H01M battery art and C01B inorganic-compound chemistry as the largest supporting classes. Coatings, ceramics and semiconductor-integrated approaches together account for a small fraction of filings.
Activity has declined since its 2018 peak
Filings ran at 17 in 2017, peaked at 26 in 2018, and fell to 7 by 2022 before dropping further toward the 2026 cut-off. Publication lag understates the most recent years, but the multi-year downward trend predates that window.
Influence concentrates in a handful of early filings
The most-cited records in this corpus — on graphene-framework electrodes and graphitic electrode modification — are all older filings. Citation counts in a searched corpus naturally favour age, so treat this as a map of foundational influence, not current importance.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solid-state supercapacitor reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| The Regents of the University of California | Nanotech Energy, Inc. | 10 |
The top co-assignee pair in this corpus shares 10 families, a research-university-and-industry combination that signals a concentrated joint claim position rather than a loose network of collaborators.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
Filing activity in this corpus concentrates around a small set of research institutions and a dense joint claim cluster, while recent-year momentum has slowed across the board, opening room in specific under-claimed branches.
A dense joint claim cluster sits at the center
The strongest co-assignee relationship in this corpus links a research university and an energy-materials company across 10 shared families, indicating close, sustained collaboration on a specific technical approach rather than incidental overlap.
Historical leaders have gone quiet recently
Every one of the most active named assignees in this corpus shows zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the broader decline from the 2018 peak. This does not necessarily mean disengagement — it may reflect a shift toward trade secrecy or licensing of already-granted claims.
Filing activity splits between the US and India
The United States and India together account for the largest share of receiving-office filings, ahead of WIPO PCT applications, China, Europe and Canada. That split suggests two distinct filer communities rather than a single globally coordinated filing strategy.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| The Regents of the University of California | 0 | — |
| Council of Scientific & Industrial Research | 0 | — |
| Nanotech Energy, Inc. | 0 | — |
| University of Technology Sydney | 0 | — |
| National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) | 0 | — |
| Rowan University | 0 | — |
| Indian Institute of Technology | 0 | — |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The filing data points to specific follow-up questions depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or identifying a filing opportunity.
Check freedom-to-operate against the interfacial-engineering cluster
The coat-then-intercalate fabrication sequence in the most representative filing, and the graphene-framework architecture behind the most-cited record, are the two claim territories most likely to constrain a new design.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaInvestigate the thin classification branches before filing
Coatings, ceramics and semiconductor-integrated designs each carry a fraction of the filings seen in the core capacitor classification, despite being directly relevant to bending and interfacial durability.
Explore white space in EurekaTrack whether quiet incumbents are shifting to licensing
Every named top assignee shows zero filings in the latest year; confirming whether that reflects licensing activity, acquisition, or genuine disengagement changes how much competitive risk this territory still carries.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaFrequently asked questions
A solid-state supercapacitor replaces the liquid or gel electrolyte found in conventional supercapacitors with a solid or solid-polymer electrolyte, which removes the risk of leakage and generally improves mechanical flexibility. This matters for wearable and flexible electronics, where a liquid electrolyte cell cannot be bent repeatedly without failing. The tradeoff documented across this patent corpus is that the electrode-electrolyte interface in solid systems is harder to maintain over repeated cycling and bending, which is exactly the reliability problem this search string targets. Patent filings in this space concentrate heavily in the H01G capacitor classification, with supporting art in battery and inorganic-compound chemistry.
Filing activity in this dataset peaked at 26 records in 2018 and has fallen through the 2022 midpoint of 7 down to 4 in the partial 2026 year. Part of that decline is a publication-lag artifact: patents filed in 2025 and 2026 typically have not yet published, so the most recent one or two years always understate real activity. But the multi-year downward trend predating that lag window is more likely a sign that foundational claim territory in graphene-electrode and basic interfacial-engineering approaches was staked early, pushing newer filers toward narrower or adjacent claims rather than the core architecture.
The dataset shows a research-university-plus-industry pairing as the strongest co-assignee relationship, sharing ten families together, which indicates a concentrated joint claim position around a specific technical approach rather than a single dominant corporate holder. Beyond that pairing, recent-year momentum across the named assignees in this corpus shows zero new filings in the latest year for each, suggesting the most active historical filers have slowed or shifted their filing elsewhere rather than continuing to build on this specific claim territory. This is consistent with a field where core claims were filed years ago and are now being licensed or cited rather than extended.
Interfacial stability refers to maintaining low resistance and consistent capacitance at the boundary between the solid electrolyte and the electrode material through repeated charge-discharge cycles or mechanical bending, which is the specific failure mode named in this search string. It is hard to protect narrowly because most filings claim it at the device or fabrication-method level, as seen in the representative record US20160055983A1, rather than through a dedicated coating or interlayer composition. That leaves the coatings-classification branch of this corpus (C09D, 10 records) relatively thin compared to the 117-record capacitor core, which is a specific area for a first claim on a distinct interfacial coating chemistry.
The classification spread in this corpus points to ceramics-based solid electrolytes (C04B, 7 records), interfacial coatings (C09D, 10 records) and semiconductor-integrated designs (H01L, 8 records) as the thinnest branches relative to the 117-record H01G capacitor core. These are exactly the areas most relevant to the bending-durability and interfacial-stability problems named in the search criteria, yet they carry the fewest filings, which suggests the field has argued these failure modes mostly through device-level claims rather than dedicated composition or coating claims. A first claim tied to a specific coating chemistry, thickness and a quantified cycle-retention metric would sit in territory that is comparatively open today.
Research Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole solid-state supercapacitor reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.