Book a demo

Solid-State Supercapacitor Patents: Trends, Leaders & Gaps 2026

Solid-State Supercapacitor Patents: Trends, Leaders & Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/solid-state-supercapacitor-reliability-and-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Supercapacitors
Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability Patents
  • Filing has cooled since 2018. Activity peaked at 26 filings that year and fell to just 4 in the partial 2026 count, pointing to a field whose core claims were staked early.
  • H01G capacitor claims dominate. 117 of 157 families sit in the core capacitor classification, leaving coatings, ceramics and semiconductor-integrated branches comparatively thin.
  • The US and India lead filing volume. 53 US and 37 India-origin records outpace WIPO, China, Europe and Canada combined among receiving offices in this corpus.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
157
Published Records
46%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 157 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families addressing cycling stability, bending durability and interfacial stability in solid-state and all-solid-state supercapacitors and related solid-state capacitor designs. The search spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off and captures 157 patent families across capacitor, battery, inorganic-chemistry and coatings classifications. The core technical problem across the corpus is maintaining a stable, low-resistance electrode-electrolyte interface through repeated charge cycles or mechanical flexing, rather than simply achieving high initial capacitance.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, activity in 2025 and 2026 is understated relative to earlier years; the multi-year trend from the 2018 peak is the more reliable signal of where the field is heading.

Filing activity and classification spread, 2015–2026
  1. 1RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA34
  2. 2COUNCIL OF SCI & IND RES15
  3. 3NANOTECH ENERGY INC10
  4. 4UNIV OF TECH SYDNEY8
  5. 5ROWAN UNIVERSITY5
  6. 6NORTHWESTERN UNIV5
  7. 7UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR NAT AERONAUTICS & SPACE ADMINISTRATION5
  8. 8INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY4
  9. 9D Y PATIL EDUCATION SOCIETY (DEEMED TO BE UNIV) KASABA BAWADA KOLHAPUR3
  10. 10TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

157 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off map a field concentrated in capacitor electrode and electrolyte engineering, with filing activity that has cooled since its 2018 peak.

Filing activity has declined from a 2018 peak

Filings ran at 17 in 2017, peaked at 26 in 2018, then fell to 7 by the 2022 midpoint and 4 in the partial 2026 year. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years will read low regardless of underlying activity, but the multi-year decline from the 2018 peak points to a field that filed its core claims early rather than one still accelerating.

Filing activity has declined from a 2018 peak08152330172017262018201920202021202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H01G capacitor claims dominate the classification spread

H01G (Capacitors) accounts for 117 of the 157 records, roughly three-quarters of the corpus, with H01M (batteries and cells) and C01B (inorganic compounds) as the next-largest supporting classes at 49 and 44 respectively. Nanotechnology applications (B82Y, 20 records), coatings (C09D, 10), other metal compounds (C01G, 9), semiconductor devices (H01L, 8) and ceramics (C04B, 7) trail well behind, marking where claim density is thin relative to the core.

H01G capacitor claims dominate the classification spreadH01G · Capacitors11774.5%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells4931.2%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…4428.0%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications2012.7%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks106.4%C01G · Compounds of other metals95.7%H01L · Semiconductor devices85.1%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories74.5%Other9459.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 157 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solid-state supercapacitor reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Filings

The most-cited records in this corpus

Representative Filing
US20160055983A12016-02-25

All-solid-state-supercapacitor and a process for the fabrication thereof

COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH

The present invention discloses an all-solid-state supercapacitor (ASSP) with an enhanced electrode-electrolyte interface that delivers high specific capacitance and areal capacitance with very low internal resistance (ESR). The invention discloses fabrication by intercalating a solid-state polymer electrolyte inside a conducting porous substrate coated with a charge-storage electrode material.Filed by the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, published 2016-02-25 — a direct example of the interfacial-engineering route this search string targets.

US20160055983A1 — patent drawing 1US20160055983A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited patent records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2015069332A1Three-dimensional graphene framework-based high-performance supercapacitors89
2US20140322608A1Modified graphitic electrodes for electrochemical energy storage enhancement55
3US20180366280A1Electrodes and electrolytes for aqueous electrochemical energy storage systems46
4US20140120453A1Patterned graphite oxide films and methods to make and use same41
5US20160055983A1All-solid-state-supercapacitor and a process for the fabrication thereof40
6US20180290891A1Reduced graphene oxide-metal oxynitride aerogel electrodes37
7US20180355194A1Flexible, biodegradable, and biocompatible supercapacitors32
8US20160284481A1Three-dimensional graphene framework-based high-performance supercapacitors22
9US20160141114A1Nanocomposite of multilayer fullerenes with transition metal oxide nanoparticles and a process for the prepar…20
10WO2016191564A1Dispersions of holey graphene materials and applications thereof19

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older filings are naturally favoured, so treat this as a map of foundational influence rather than current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the filing data actually tells you

Three patterns stand out once the 157-family corpus is broken down by classification, geography and citation weight — each with a direct implication for where to file next.

Classification concentration
117 of 157
H01G capacitor records

Core capacitor claims dominate the corpus

Three-quarters of all records sit in H01G, with H01M battery art and C01B inorganic-compound chemistry as the largest supporting classes. Coatings, ceramics and semiconductor-integrated approaches together account for a small fraction of filings.

Implication: broad device-level claims in H01G face dense prior art; narrower composition or interlayer claims in the thinner classes face less.
Filing momentum
26 → 4
Peak (2018) vs. latest partial year

Activity has declined since its 2018 peak

Filings ran at 17 in 2017, peaked at 26 in 2018, and fell to 7 by 2022 before dropping further toward the 2026 cut-off. Publication lag understates the most recent years, but the multi-year downward trend predates that window.

Implication: this looks like a field defending staked ground rather than one still expanding its claim base.
Citation weight
89 citations
Most-cited record, WO2015069332A1

Influence concentrates in a handful of early filings

The most-cited records in this corpus — on graphene-framework electrodes and graphitic electrode modification — are all older filings. Citation counts in a searched corpus naturally favour age, so treat this as a map of foundational influence, not current importance.

Implication: newer filers are building narrower claims on top of these foundations rather than replacing them.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solid-state supercapacitor reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Strongest joint filing relationship
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
The Regents of the University of CaliforniaNanotech Energy, Inc.10

The top co-assignee pair in this corpus shares 10 families, a research-university-and-industry combination that signals a concentrated joint claim position rather than a loose network of collaborators.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Landscape

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Filing activity in this corpus concentrates around a small set of research institutions and a dense joint claim cluster, while recent-year momentum has slowed across the board, opening room in specific under-claimed branches.

Filing concentration
10 shared families
Strongest co-assignee pair

A dense joint claim cluster sits at the center

The strongest co-assignee relationship in this corpus links a research university and an energy-materials company across 10 shared families, indicating close, sustained collaboration on a specific technical approach rather than incidental overlap.

Third parties working near this approach should expect dense prior art from this specific pairing.
Recent momentum
0 in latest year
Across all named top assignees

Historical leaders have gone quiet recently

Every one of the most active named assignees in this corpus shows zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the broader decline from the 2018 peak. This does not necessarily mean disengagement — it may reflect a shift toward trade secrecy or licensing of already-granted claims.

A quiet incumbent is not an absent one; check licensing and litigation activity before assuming open ground.
Geographic spread
53 US / 37 India
Leading receiving offices

Filing activity splits between the US and India

The United States and India together account for the largest share of receiving-office filings, ahead of WIPO PCT applications, China, Europe and Canada. That split suggests two distinct filer communities rather than a single globally coordinated filing strategy.

Strategies aimed at the Chinese or European market specifically will find comparatively less domestic prior art here.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches carry the fewest filings relative to the 117-record H01G capacitor core, despite being directly relevant to the durability problem this search targets.
Interfacial coating chemistriesCeramic solid-electrolyte compositesSemiconductor-integrated flexible cellsBend-cycle retention metricsPolymer-electrolyte intercalation sequencing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Regents of the University of California0
Council of Scientific & Industrial Research0
Nanotech Energy, Inc.0
University of Technology Sydney0
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)0
Rowan University0
Indian Institute of Technology0
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The filing data points to specific follow-up questions depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or identifying a filing opportunity.

Check freedom-to-operate against the interfacial-engineering cluster

The coat-then-intercalate fabrication sequence in the most representative filing, and the graphene-framework architecture behind the most-cited record, are the two claim territories most likely to constrain a new design.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Investigate the thin classification branches before filing

Coatings, ceramics and semiconductor-integrated designs each carry a fraction of the filings seen in the core capacitor classification, despite being directly relevant to bending and interfacial durability.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track whether quiet incumbents are shifting to licensing

Every named top assignee shows zero filings in the latest year; confirming whether that reflects licensing activity, acquisition, or genuine disengagement changes how much competitive risk this territory still carries.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Solid-State Supercapacitor Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole solid-state supercapacitor reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.