Book a demo

Solid-State Transformer for Agricultural Irrigation Patent Landscape

Solid-State Transformer for Agricultural Irrigation Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Solid-State Transformer for Agricultural Irrigation Patent Landscape in 2026

The defined intersection of solid-state transformer technology and agricultural irrigation is an exceptionally nascent space, with a single patent family on record filed in 2021 and concentrated in the H02J power-supply class. No established corporate leaders have staked positions, leaving the field almost entirely open for structured R&D entry.

1
Patent families in scope
100%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-100%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Australia
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

A single-applicant field with no incumbent concentration

The corpus covers 1 patent family in scope, attributed jointly to four individual co-inventors — Shivpal Ramtirth Verma, Makarand Sudhakar Ballal, Rohit Rajkumar Deshmukh, and Sarvesh Ashok Wakode — who together represent the entirety of documented activity in this technology intersection.

The top five filers’ share of the hundred largest filers stands at 100%, which in practice reflects a field so early-stage that a single cooperative filing constitutes the full documented record. There is no discernible tier gap between incumbents and challengers because no second tier exists yet.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Shivpal Ramtirth Verma1
2Makarand Sudhakar Ballal1
3Rohit Rajkumar Deshmukh1
4Sarvesh Ashok Wakode1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The absence of corporate or institutional assignees implies that the technology has not yet attracted organized R&D investment; the field is shaped by individual inventor activity rather than strategic portfolio building.

Filings from the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and may undercount actual activity; the corpus should be treated as a minimum bound rather than a complete picture. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A single 2021 filing defines the entire trend; technology is tightly focused on H02J

The annual filing trend and technology composition together describe a field that has not yet developed momentum or breadth. Both charts reflect a single data point rather than an evolving pattern.

Annual filing trend

Activity is confined to a single filing in 2021, with zero recorded filings in all other years from 2017 through 2026. The apparent post-2021 absence should be read cautiously given publication lag affecting recent years, but the overall volume signal is unambiguous: sustained filing activity has not yet emerged.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1 in 2021.02017020180201902020120210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

All documented activity falls under H02J (Power supply and grid systems), with no representation in adjacent IPC classes such as power electronics conversion (H02M), agricultural machinery controls (A01), or sensor and control systems. The single-branch concentration is consistent with an early, proof-of-concept stage.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 1.H02J · Power supply & gr…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
AU2021103175A4Published 2021-07-22

Solar Energy Management for Agriculture and Rural …

Makarand SUDHAKAR,BALLAL

Abstract Solar Energy Management for Agriculture and Rural Transformation (SMART) A SMART methodology (SM) is developed to provide cost effective and more reliable electric power supply to cold storage, irrigation pumps, and local loads. The effective operation of multiple sources in on-grid as well as in off-grid mode is possible with SM. The SM is a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the structural evidence means for R&D positioning

With one patent family on record and no corporate incumbents, the strategic reads are necessarily constrained. The following cards summarize what the available evidence does and does not support.

Decline

Nascent / pre-competitive stage

The lifecycle stage is classified as Decline by annual filing metrics, reflecting that the sole filing peak occurred in 2021 and no subsequent filings have been recorded. In practical terms this signals a pre-competitive field that never reached sustained growth, not a maturing one. Engineers entering now would face minimal prior-art density.

Pre-competitive
Concentration

No incumbent blocking positions

The top five filers’ share of the hundred largest filers is 100%, attributable entirely to one cooperative filing by four individual inventors. No corporate entity holds a blocking portfolio. This creates unusual freedom to operate but also signals that the technology’s commercial viability has not yet been validated by organized R&D investment.

Open field
Collaboration

Four co-inventors; no institutional co-filers on record

The single patent record (AU2021103175A4) lists four individual co-inventors — Shivpal Ramtirth Verma, Makarand Sudhakar Ballal, Rohit Rajkumar Deshmukh, and Sarvesh Ashok Wakode — filing cooperatively. No university, research institute, or corporate co-applicant appears in the collaboration data. The ecosystem of potential partners remains uncharted at this stage.

Individual inventors
Geography

Australia is the sole jurisdiction on record

The only jurisdiction with documented activity is Australia, with one patent record. Major agricultural economies — the United States, India, Brazil, the European Union, and China — show no filings in this intersection. This geographic sparsity means national patent offices in key irrigation markets represent entirely uncontested filing territory.

Australia only
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards are grounded in the applicant ranking, lifecycle classification, collaboration data, and jurisdiction coverage from the evidence corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Four individual co-inventors share the only filing on record

There are no corporate leaders or institutional assignees in this field. The ranked applicants are individual inventors who co-filed the single documented patent, each credited with 1 patent record.

Leader · Shivpal Ramtirth Verma

Shivpal Ramtirth Verma

Credited with 1 patent record (AU2021103175A4, filed 2021 in Australia), with technology focus spanning H02J3, H02J7, and H02J9 sub-classes within power supply and grid systems. Applicant momentum data is not available in evidence.

patent records: 1
Challenger · Makarand Sudhakar Ballal

Makarand Sudhakar Ballal

Co-listed on the same single filing with an identical technology focus across H02J3, H02J7, and H02J9. At the current corpus scale, all four co-inventors are functionally co-equal; no differentiated portfolio trajectory can be inferred. Applicant momentum data is not available in evidence.

patent records: 1
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
View all ranked filers, their technology focus, and filing trajectories in PatSnap Eureka.
Rohit Rajkumar DeshmukhSarvesh Ashok Wakode+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player rankings reflect patent records per applicant within the defined technology intersection.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served IPC branches adjacent to the documented activity

Given that the entire corpus sits within H02J, several technically relevant IPC branches have no recorded filings at this intersection and represent observations of relative sparsity worth monitoring.

H02M · Power conversion electronics

H02M covers AC-DC and DC-DC converters, inverters, and rectifiers — the core power-electronics building blocks of any solid-state transformer implementation. No filings in this sub-class appear in the corpus. For engineers developing hardware architectures for irrigation-load solid-state transformers, H02M is the most technically proximate unoccupied branch, and entry here would directly protect converter topology choices.

Search this in Eureka →

A01G · Horticulture and irrigation methods

A01G encompasses irrigation system design, scheduling, and plant-growth controls — the application-side counterpart to the power-supply claims in H02J. No filings linking solid-state transformer technology to A01G irrigation methods appear in evidence. Claims bridging power delivery efficiency to irrigation scheduling or soil-moisture feedback could occupy this gap and differentiate from purely electrical approaches.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
PatSnap Eureka can map claim-level gaps across all IPC branches relevant to solid-state transformer and irrigation technology.
H02P · Control of electric motors for pump drivesG05B · Control systems for irrigation automation+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent-branch observations are inferred from the absence of filings in technically related IPC classes relative to the documented H02J activity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

Technology route differentiation across applicants

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsH02J 7 · Power supply & grid systemsH02J 9 · Power supply & grid systems
Makarand Sudhakar BallalStrong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1
Rohit Rajkumar DeshmukhStrong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1
Sarvesh Ashok WakodeStrong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1
Shivpal Ramtirth VermaStrong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own solid-state transformer landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.