Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026
- China dominates the filing base. 36 of the tracked receiving-office filings sit in China, versus 7 in the US and single digits everywhere else — this is a domestically-concentrated field, not a globally distributed one.
- Filing has plateaued, not accelerated. Volume ran flat from a 2022 midpoint of 7 to a 2025 peak of 14; growth over the decade is real but modest, not the steep ramp you'd expect from a technology entering mainstream grid rollout.
- Momentum has shifted to research institutes. The assignees still filing in the latest tracked year are Chinese universities and a research institute, while an established industrial filer shows a -100% year-on-year drop — incumbents may be pausing, not the field itself.
Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (6) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 59 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
A solid-state transformer (SST) replaces the bulk 50/60Hz iron-core transformer with a chain of power-electronic conversion stages built around a medium-frequency transformer and an isolated DC-DC stage — most commonly a dual active bridge topology. This dataset isolates records where the abstract or claims name SST, PET (power electronic transformer), or SST-adjacent terms, and where the claims specifically address a dual active bridge, isolated DC-DC stage, high-frequency DC-DC conversion, or a medium-frequency transformer, filtered to the IPC classes governing DC-DC conversion (H02M3/335), general power conversion (H02M5/00), and transformer/inductor construction (H01F38).
That intersection captures the isolated-conversion core of SST design rather than the whole SST literature, which also includes AC-side rectifier stages, grid-interface control, and packaging. The 59 families here are the ones where the DC-DC stage itself is the inventive subject matter.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 59-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year on year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
A decade of gradual, uneven growth
Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a 2025 peak of 14, passing through a midpoint of 7 in 2022 — growth that is real over the long run but flat across the middle years. The 2026 figure is partial by definition; publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be.
Power conversion dominates, grid and EV classes are secondary
Every record in this set touches H02M (power conversion), which is expected given the search construction. H02J (power supply and grid systems) appears in 16 records, reflecting SST's role as a grid-interface component; single-digit counts in G01R, B60L, G06F, G06N, G06Q and H01F point to secondary interests in measurement, EV integration, digital control and even AI-assisted control schemes, but none of these are claim-dense enough yet to call a distinct sub-field.
Shares are the percentage of the 59 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solid-state transformer dc-dc converter and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records and a recent representative filing
US12633816B1 — Cascaded DC modular solid-state transformer
A solid-state transformer system comprises a plurality of isolated DC-DC converter modules, each with a medium voltage port and a low voltage port. The medium voltage ports are series-connected per phase to form a medium voltage AC interface, and each module uses two quadrant switches with no active front end. A controller generates per-module voltage references combining a DC common-mode component with an AC differential-mode component, and optionally an AC common-mode component, where the DC common-mode term enforces unidirectional voltage operation.Filed by EPC Power Corporation, published 2026-05-19 — among the most recent grants in this dataset.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN107181413A | 混合型直流电力电子变压器 | 27 |
| 2 | CN103490638A | 一种单相多模块级联固态变压器均压均功率控制方法 | 27 |
| 3 | CN104638940A | 基于级联模块化多电平的电力电子变压器 | 19 |
| 4 | CN111917119A | 多级电容电压波动抑制的固态变压器及控制方法、设备 | 14 |
| 5 | CN110365215A | 用于直流配网的电力电子变压器及其控制方法 | 10 |
| 6 | US20250279730A1 | Solid-state transformer | 8 |
| 7 | CN111371117A | 面向港口供电的基于模块化多电平矩阵型电力电子变压器拓扑及其控制方法 | 8 |
| 8 | CN115021594A | 一种固态变压器两级联动微分平坦控制方法 | 6 |
| 9 | CN112600431A | 基于MMC的SST新型DAB DC-DC变换器的模型预测控制方法 | 6 |
| 10 | CN111404381A | 基于DAB的电力电子变压器子模块拓扑及其控制方法 | 6 |
Citation counts reward older filings simply because they've had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read this as a map of influential prior art, not a ranking of current best practice.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Four read-throughs of the same 59-family set, focused on where the claim space is dense, where it is thin, and who is actually still active.
This is a China-centred filing pattern
With 36 China filings against 7 in the US, 5 in India, 4 at the EPO and 4 via PCT, most of the substantive prior art risk sits under Chinese examination practice. A freedom-to-operate check that only covers US/EPO prior art will miss most of the dense claim territory here.
Flat-to-modest growth, not a boom
Filing volume roughly doubled from its 2022 midpoint to its 2025 peak, which is steady interest rather than a land-grab. High density in H02M means the core DC-DC claim space is occupied, not that the underlying technology has matured or stalled.
The most-cited prior art predates the current filers
The two highest-cited records, both Chinese cascaded/modular SST filings, sit well ahead of anything filed in the last three years on citation count alone — an artefact of accumulation time, but also a signal that cascaded modular topology claims are the ones later filers had to work around.
EV integration and AI-assisted control are barely claimed
Six of the eight IPC subclasses touched by this corpus carry only one or two records each. That is a signal of unclaimed adjacency, not irrelevance — EV-side SST integration and AI/data-driven control of the DC-DC stage both remain open for a well-drafted first claim.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solid-state transformer dc-dc converter, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research Institute | Jiangsu Electric Power Test & Research Institute Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research Institute | State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Lianyungang Power Supply Branch | 1 |
| State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research Institute | State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research Institute | State Grid Corporation of China | 1 |
| State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research Institute | NR Electric Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research Institute | NR Engineering Co., Ltd. | 1 |
Only 6 co-assignee pairs appear across the whole corpus, and the strongest links are between a single Chinese provincial grid research institute and its own subsidiary/supply-chain entities — evidence of internal grid-company R&D structure rather than cross-industry joint filing.
Who is filing, and who has stopped
Assignee activity splits into two groups: legacy industrial and utility filers whose output has gone quiet, and a newer cohort of Chinese university and institute filers still active in the most recent tracked year.
Research institutes are the current filers
Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Electrical Engineering, CAS) filed 2 records in the latest tracked year, with Nanjing Normal University and Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee each contributing one. These are university/institute-driven filings rather than large-scale industrial programmes.
An established industrial filer has gone to zero
Delta Electronics, Inc. (Delta Electronics) shows 0 filings in the latest year against a prior baseline, a -100% year-on-year drop. LS Electric Co., Ltd. and North China Electric Power University show the same zero-in-latest-year pattern, suggesting a pause among established filers rather than sustained industrial momentum.
Early Chinese cascaded-topology filings still anchor the field
The two most-cited records in the corpus are Chinese filings on hybrid DC power-electronic transformers and single-phase multi-module cascaded voltage/power balancing control — both foundational to the cascaded modular SST approach that later filers, in China and elsewhere, have had to differentiate around.
Filing collaboration is limited and utility-internal
With only 6 co-assignee pairs in the whole set, and the strongest ones linking a provincial grid research institute to its own affiliated companies, this field shows little cross-organisation joint IP development compared to fields with heavier industry consortium activity.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences | 2 | — |
| Nanjing Normal University | 1 | — |
| INDIAN INST OF TECHNOLGOY ROORKEE | 1 | — |
| LS Electric Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Delta Electronics, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| North China Electric Power University | 0 | — |
| Infineon Technologies Austria AG | 0 | — |
| Hitachi Energy Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this from here
The dataset points to specific next questions rather than a single verdict — use them to scope a deeper search or a design-around review.
Run a China-specific FTO check
With 36 of 59 filings routed through China, any freedom-to-operate review that stops at US and EPO prior art is working with roughly a fifth of the relevant claim landscape.
Explore China filings in EurekaTrack the incumbent slowdown
Delta Electronics and LS Electric both show zero filings in the latest tracked year after prior activity — worth confirming whether that's a filing pause, a shift to trade secret, or a genuine step back from the DC-DC stage.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaScope the under-claimed adjacencies
EV-side integration, AI-assisted modulation, and insulation-monitoring overlaps each carry only one or two records — a targeted prior-art search before drafting could confirm how open they really are.
Search white space in EurekaCommon questions about SST DC-DC converter patents
A solid-state transformer replaces the single magnetic core of a conventional transformer with a chain of power-electronic conversion stages, and the isolated DC-DC stage — typically built around a dual active bridge and a medium-frequency transformer — is where most of the switching, control and topology innovation actually happens. Patent claims tend to target this stage specifically because it's where efficiency, component count and control complexity are won or lost, separate from the magnetic core itself or the AC-side rectification. That's why a search restricted to DC-DC-specific claim language (dual active bridge, isolated DC-DC stage, high-frequency DC-DC) returns a materially different, more focused set than a general SST search.
The corpus shows a mix of Chinese grid-affiliated research institutes, universities and established industrial power-electronics firms, with citation influence still concentrated in early Chinese filings on cascaded modular topologies. In the most recent tracked year, activity skews toward research institutes and universities rather than large industrial programmes. Some previously active industrial filers show a sharp year-on-year drop to zero filings, so 'leading' by cumulative filings and 'leading' by current momentum point to different organisations.
Of the tracked receiving-office filings, 36 out of roughly 58 documented routes are in China, far ahead of the US, India, the EPO and PCT combined. This reflects both the scale of China's grid modernisation programme, which has driven heavy utility and university R&D into SST for DC distribution networks, and the presence of large state grid research institutes that file domestically as a matter of course. Anyone assessing risk or opportunity in this space needs to treat Chinese prior art as the primary body, not a secondary check.
Filing volume grew from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 14 in 2025, passing through a midpoint of 7 in 2022 — a real increase over the decade but not a steep or accelerating one, and the middle years were essentially flat. The 2026 figure will look lower than it eventually is, because patent publication typically lags the actual filing date by around 18 months. Overall, this reads as steady, moderate interest rather than a technology in a hype phase.
The core DC-DC and power-conversion classification (H02M) is dense, appearing in every record in this dataset, so a claim aimed squarely at cascaded modular topology or standard dual-active-bridge control is competing against a crowded field. Secondary IPC classes — EV propulsion overlap, digital-processing-based fault prediction, AI-based control, and insulation/measurement overlap — each carry only one or two records, which suggests those adjacencies haven't been claimed exhaustively yet. A first claim combining the DC-DC stage with one of these adjacencies, rather than restating the core topology, has more room to stand on its own.
Research Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole solid-state transformer dc-dc converter corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.