Book a demo

Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026

Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/solid-state-transformer-dc-dc-converter-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Electronics · Patent Landscape
Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter Patents: Filing Trends and Gaps
  • China dominates the filing base. 36 of the tracked receiving-office filings sit in China, versus 7 in the US and single digits everywhere else — this is a domestically-concentrated field, not a globally distributed one.
  • Filing has plateaued, not accelerated. Volume ran flat from a 2022 midpoint of 7 to a 2025 peak of 14; growth over the decade is real but modest, not the steep ramp you'd expect from a technology entering mainstream grid rollout.
  • Momentum has shifted to research institutes. The assignees still filing in the latest tracked year are Chinese universities and a research institute, while an established industrial filer shows a -100% year-on-year drop — incumbents may be pausing, not the field itself.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
59
Published Records
41%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+50%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (6) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 59 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

A solid-state transformer (SST) replaces the bulk 50/60Hz iron-core transformer with a chain of power-electronic conversion stages built around a medium-frequency transformer and an isolated DC-DC stage — most commonly a dual active bridge topology. This dataset isolates records where the abstract or claims name SST, PET (power electronic transformer), or SST-adjacent terms, and where the claims specifically address a dual active bridge, isolated DC-DC stage, high-frequency DC-DC conversion, or a medium-frequency transformer, filtered to the IPC classes governing DC-DC conversion (H02M3/335), general power conversion (H02M5/00), and transformer/inductor construction (H01F38).

That intersection captures the isolated-conversion core of SST design rather than the whole SST literature, which also includes AC-side rectifier stages, grid-interface control, and packaging. The 59 families here are the ones where the DC-DC stage itself is the inventive subject matter.

Filing activity by year, 2015–2026
  1. 1LS ELECTRIC CO LTD6
  2. 2DELTA ELECTRONICS INC(CN)5
  3. 3NANJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY5
  4. 4INDIAN INST OF TECHNOLGOY ROORKEE4
  5. 5NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIV4
  6. 6INST OF ELECTRICAL ENG CHINESE ACAD OF SCI3
  7. 7INFINEON TECH AUSTRIA AG2
  8. 8STATE GRID SHANGHAI MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC POWER CO2
  9. 9STATE GRID JIANGSU ELECTRIC POWER CO LTD RESEARCH INSTITUTE2
  10. 10STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 59-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year on year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A decade of gradual, uneven growth

Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a 2025 peak of 14, passing through a midpoint of 7 in 2022 — growth that is real over the long run but flat across the middle years. The 2026 figure is partial by definition; publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be.

A decade of gradual, uneven growth048111512017201820192020202120222023202414202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Power conversion dominates, grid and EV classes are secondary

Every record in this set touches H02M (power conversion), which is expected given the search construction. H02J (power supply and grid systems) appears in 16 records, reflecting SST's role as a grid-interface component; single-digit counts in G01R, B60L, G06F, G06N, G06Q and H01F point to secondary interests in measurement, EV integration, digital control and even AI-assisted control schemes, but none of these are claim-dense enough yet to call a distinct sub-field.

Power conversion dominates, grid and EV classes are secondaryH02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)59100.0%H02J · Power supply & grid systems1627.1%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement23.4%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion11.7%G06F · Electric digital data processi…11.7%G06N · Computing based on AI models11.7%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…11.7%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…11.7%Other23.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 59 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solid-state transformer dc-dc converter and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records and a recent representative filing

Representative recent filing
US12633816B12026-05-19

US12633816B1 — Cascaded DC modular solid-state transformer

EPC POWER CORPORATION

A solid-state transformer system comprises a plurality of isolated DC-DC converter modules, each with a medium voltage port and a low voltage port. The medium voltage ports are series-connected per phase to form a medium voltage AC interface, and each module uses two quadrant switches with no active front end. A controller generates per-module voltage references combining a DC common-mode component with an AC differential-mode component, and optionally an AC common-mode component, where the DC common-mode term enforces unidirectional voltage operation.Filed by EPC Power Corporation, published 2026-05-19 — among the most recent grants in this dataset.

US12633816B1 — patent drawing 1US12633816B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN107181413A混合型直流电力电子变压器27
2CN103490638A一种单相多模块级联固态变压器均压均功率控制方法27
3CN104638940A基于级联模块化多电平的电力电子变压器19
4CN111917119A多级电容电压波动抑制的固态变压器及控制方法、设备14
5CN110365215A用于直流配网的电力电子变压器及其控制方法10
6US20250279730A1Solid-state transformer8
7CN111371117A面向港口供电的基于模块化多电平矩阵型电力电子变压器拓扑及其控制方法8
8CN115021594A一种固态变压器两级联动微分平坦控制方法6
9CN112600431A基于MMC的SST新型DAB DC-DC变换器的模型预测控制方法6
10CN111404381A基于DAB的电力电子变压器子模块拓扑及其控制方法6

Citation counts reward older filings simply because they've had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read this as a map of influential prior art, not a ranking of current best practice.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Four read-throughs of the same 59-family set, focused on where the claim space is dense, where it is thin, and who is actually still active.

Geographic concentration
36 of 59
filings via China receiving office

This is a China-centred filing pattern

With 36 China filings against 7 in the US, 5 in India, 4 at the EPO and 4 via PCT, most of the substantive prior art risk sits under Chinese examination practice. A freedom-to-operate check that only covers US/EPO prior art will miss most of the dense claim territory here.

Receiving office split
Growth shape
7 → 14
midpoint 2022 to peak 2025

Flat-to-modest growth, not a boom

Filing volume roughly doubled from its 2022 midpoint to its 2025 peak, which is steady interest rather than a land-grab. High density in H02M means the core DC-DC claim space is occupied, not that the underlying technology has matured or stalled.

Year-on-year filing volume
Citation leaders skew Chinese and older
27 citations
top two records, both CN

The most-cited prior art predates the current filers

The two highest-cited records, both Chinese cascaded/modular SST filings, sit well ahead of anything filed in the last three years on citation count alone — an artefact of accumulation time, but also a signal that cascaded modular topology claims are the ones later filers had to work around.

Citation count inside corpus
Secondary IPC classes are thin
1 record each
in B60L, G06F, G06N, G06Q, H01F

EV integration and AI-assisted control are barely claimed

Six of the eight IPC subclasses touched by this corpus carry only one or two records each. That is a signal of unclaimed adjacency, not irrelevance — EV-side SST integration and AI/data-driven control of the DC-DC stage both remain open for a well-drafted first claim.

IPC subclass distribution
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solid-state transformer dc-dc converter, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare and regionally clustered
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research InstituteJiangsu Electric Power Test & Research Institute Co., Ltd.1
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research InstituteState Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Lianyungang Power Supply Branch1
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research InstituteState Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd.1
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research InstituteState Grid Corporation of China1
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research InstituteNR Electric Co., Ltd.1
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research InstituteNR Engineering Co., Ltd.1

Only 6 co-assignee pairs appear across the whole corpus, and the strongest links are between a single Chinese provincial grid research institute and its own subsidiary/supply-chain entities — evidence of internal grid-company R&D structure rather than cross-industry joint filing.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has stopped

Assignee activity splits into two groups: legacy industrial and utility filers whose output has gone quiet, and a newer cohort of Chinese university and institute filers still active in the most recent tracked year.

Active in latest year
2 filings
Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences (latest year)

Research institutes are the current filers

Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Electrical Engineering, CAS) filed 2 records in the latest tracked year, with Nanjing Normal University and Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee each contributing one. These are university/institute-driven filings rather than large-scale industrial programmes.

Recent-year momentum
Incumbent slowdown
-100% YoY
Delta Electronics, Inc.

An established industrial filer has gone to zero

Delta Electronics, Inc. (Delta Electronics) shows 0 filings in the latest year against a prior baseline, a -100% year-on-year drop. LS Electric Co., Ltd. and North China Electric Power University show the same zero-in-latest-year pattern, suggesting a pause among established filers rather than sustained industrial momentum.

Year-on-year change
Citation influence
27 citations
top-cited CN families

Early Chinese cascaded-topology filings still anchor the field

The two most-cited records in the corpus are Chinese filings on hybrid DC power-electronic transformers and single-phase multi-module cascaded voltage/power balancing control — both foundational to the cascaded modular SST approach that later filers, in China and elsewhere, have had to differentiate around.

Citation count
Co-filing structure
6 pairs
co-assignee pairs total

Filing collaboration is limited and utility-internal

With only 6 co-assignee pairs in the whole set, and the strongest ones linking a provincial grid research institute to its own affiliated companies, this field shows little cross-organisation joint IP development compared to fields with heavier industry consortium activity.

Co-assignee network
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a first-mover claim
Sub-areas where IPC density is thin enough that a well-drafted claim could stake meaningful ground
EV-side SST DC-DC integration (B60L overlap)AI/data-driven modulation control for DAB stagesMedium-frequency transformer insulation monitoring (G01R overlap)Digital twin / G06F-based SST fault predictionUnidirectional common-mode voltage control schemes
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing activity by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences2
Nanjing Normal University1
INDIAN INST OF TECHNOLGOY ROORKEE1
LS Electric Co., Ltd.0
Delta Electronics, Inc.0-100%
North China Electric Power University0
Infineon Technologies Austria AG0
Hitachi Energy Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this from here

The dataset points to specific next questions rather than a single verdict — use them to scope a deeper search or a design-around review.

Run a China-specific FTO check

With 36 of 59 filings routed through China, any freedom-to-operate review that stops at US and EPO prior art is working with roughly a fifth of the relevant claim landscape.

Explore China filings in Eureka

Track the incumbent slowdown

Delta Electronics and LS Electric both show zero filings in the latest tracked year after prior activity — worth confirming whether that's a filing pause, a shift to trade secret, or a genuine step back from the DC-DC stage.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka

Scope the under-claimed adjacencies

EV-side integration, AI-assisted modulation, and insulation-monitoring overlaps each carry only one or two records — a targeted prior-art search before drafting could confirm how open they really are.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about SST DC-DC converter patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Solid-State Transformer DC-DC Converter in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole solid-state transformer dc-dc converter corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.