Book a demo

Solid-State Transformer Offshore Platforms Patent Landscape

Solid-State Transformer Offshore Platforms Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Solid-State Transformer for Offshore Platforms Patent Landscape in 2026

The patent corpus for solid-state transformers applied to offshore platforms is at an embryonic stage, with only 2 patent families on record, both filed by Vestas Wind Systems in 2023. Activity is entirely concentrated in a single applicant and jurisdiction, signalling that this technology intersection has not yet attracted broad IP competition.

2
Patent families in scope
100%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
DK
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Vestas Wind Systems holds the entire documented portfolio in this nascent space

The ranked applicant list contains a single filer: Vestas Wind Systems, which accounts for all 2 patent families on record. No second-tier competitors appear in the evidence at this time.

Concentration is absolute — the top filer’s share of the hundred largest filers is 100%, a figure that reflects the extreme early-stage nature of the topic rather than a competitive moat built over many years.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Vestas Wind Systems AS2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Vestas’s position implies the company has made at least an initial IP commitment to this technology intersection, but the very small corpus size means the landscape remains almost entirely open to new entrants.

The most recent filing year shown (2023) may be subject to publication lag; patents filed in late 2023 onward may not yet be fully visible, so the true current-year corpus could be larger than evidence reflects. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A single filing cohort in 2023 defines the entire trend; technology focus is power conversion and grid integration

Both charts reflect an extremely small corpus: all activity resolves to a single year and two IPC classes, making trend and composition reads provisional at this stage.

Annual filing trend

Zero activity is recorded from 2017 through 2022 and again from 2024 onward in the evidence window. Two families appeared in 2023. Given standard 18-month publication lag, filings from 2024–2025 may not yet be visible; the apparent post-2023 silence should not be read as a halt in activity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2023.02017020180201902020020210202222023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

Both families sit simultaneously under H02J (Power Supply and Grid Systems) and H02M (Power Conversion — AC/DC), indicating that the documented work addresses both the grid-interface and the conversion-stage aspects of solid-state transformer design for offshore use.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 2; H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.) 2.H02J · Power supply & gr…2H02M · Power conversion …2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
DK202330417A1Published 2025-01-06

A wind turbine cluster

Vestas Wind Systems A/S

A wind turbine cluster (50), comprising: a group of wind turbines (10), each wind turbine (10) of the group being configured to produce a wind turbine output that is in direct current form; and a connection station (52) connected to each of the wind turbines (10) of the group to receive each wind turbine output. The connection station (52) is configured to… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the structure means for R&D investment decisions

With only 2 patent families documented, most structural signals are provisional. The observations below are grounded in available evidence but should be treated as early indicators rather than confirmed patterns.

Maturity

Pre-commercial: lifecycle stage is not yet determinable

The evidence does not yield a determinable lifecycle stage — the corpus is too small to distinguish a genuine growth curve from an isolated filing event. The concentration of all activity in a single year (2023) and a single filer points to a technology at the very beginning of its IP lifecycle. Engineers should treat this as a pre-competitive window rather than an established field.

Embryonic
Concentration

Single-filer dominance with no visible challengers

Vestas Wind Systems is the only applicant in the ranked list, holding both patent families on record. This level of concentration in a hardware-intensive offshore application is unusual and more likely reflects an absence of competing IP activity than a deliberate exclusion strategy. The space is structurally open to new entrants from power electronics, offshore energy, and grid infrastructure sectors.

Monopolar
Collaboration

No co-applicant relationships documented in the evidence

The collaboration evidence is empty: no joint filings, co-applicant pairs, or consortium activity are recorded in the current dataset. This may reflect the very small corpus size rather than a deliberate go-it-alone strategy. As the field develops, partnership activity between wind OEMs, power electronics suppliers, and offshore infrastructure companies would be a signal to monitor.

Evidence pending
Geography

Filing activity confined to Denmark; no multi-jurisdiction coverage evident

Both families are filed under the DK (Danish) jurisdiction, consistent with Vestas’s headquarters location. There is no evidence of PCT, EPO, US, or Asian family members in the current record. The absence of multi-jurisdictional filing either indicates the families are early-stage national-phase applications that have not yet propagated, or that geographic coverage is intentionally narrow — a distinction that matters for freedom-to-operate analysis.

DK only
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, jurisdiction, collaboration, and lifecycle fields in the evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Vestas Wind Systems: sole documented filer with a dual-class technology focus

The applicant ranking contains a single entry. The leader and challenger cards below both reflect Vestas, as no second applicant is present in the evidence.

Leader · Vestas Wind Systems

Vestas Wind Systems

Vestas Wind Systems holds all 2 patent families in the ranked corpus, with a technology emphasis spanning H02J 3 (grid-connected power supply systems), H02M 7 (AC/DC power conversion), and H02J 1 (DC power supply). The applicant momentum flag identifies Vestas as a new entrant in this specific topic area, meaning its recent filings represent an initial rather than sustained IP position. Whether this signals a strategic R&D pivot toward offshore solid-state transformer architecture or an exploratory filing is not determinable from the evidence alone.

families: 2
Challenger · Evidence pending

No challenger identified

No second applicant appears in the ranked evidence. The challenger position is vacant, which is itself a structurally significant finding: in a technology area with clear offshore electrification demand, the absence of challenger filers from ABB, Siemens Energy, GE Vernova, or dedicated power electronics firms represents an observation that warrants further monitoring as the field develops.

families: 0
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked filing data, momentum signals, and technology focus profiles for all applicants in this topic.
Vestas Wind Systems ASEvidence pending — no second applicant on record+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Vestas Wind Systems AS2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player counts are at the patent-family level; applicant momentum reflects recent vs. prior filing activity from the evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches in a corpus where the primary classes are already sparse

The whitespace evidence array is empty, meaning no algorithmically identified white-space candidates are available. The observations below are drawn from the IPC structure of the existing filings and plausible adjacent classes that are absent from the current corpus.

H02J 13 · Remote monitoring and control of power networks

Neither family is assigned to H02J 13, which covers remote monitoring, supervisory control, and communication interfaces for power networks — all highly relevant to unmanned offshore platform operation. Given that solid-state transformers in offshore environments require real-time health monitoring and remote fault response, this class is conspicuously absent. An entry path exists for applicants combining power electronics expertise with offshore SCADA and condition-monitoring capabilities.

Search this in Eureka →

H01F 38 / H01F 27 · Transformer core and insulation design

The documented families address power conversion and grid-system architecture but not the physical transformer design classes (H01F). For offshore deployments, salt-air corrosion resistance, compact form factor, and high-voltage insulation under marine conditions are critical design challenges. The absence of H01F-class filings in this intersection suggests that materials and construction innovations for solid-state offshore transformers remain an unoccupied adjacent space, though the evidence base is too small to confirm this as a sustained gap.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Identify uncontested IPC sub-classes and technology intersections across the broader offshore power electronics landscape.
H02J 13 · Remote network monitoringH01F 38 · Transformer construction+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch observations are inferred from IPC classes present in the corpus and plausible absences; no algorithmic whitespace candidates are available in the evidence.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

Technology route comparison across leading applicants

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsH02M 7 · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)H02J 1 · Power supply & grid systems
Vestas Wind Systems ASStrong · 2Strong · 2Moderate · 1
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own offshore power electronics landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.