https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/solvent-assisted-heavy-oil-recovery-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Thermal & Solvent Heavy Oil Recovery
Solvent Assisted Heavy Oil Recovery Patents: Leaders and Filing Trends
  • One IPC subclass dominates. 93.7% of the 79 records in scope carry an E21B (drilling/wells) classification, versus 24.1% for C09K materials — claim activity concentrates on wellbore and process mechanics, not chemistry.
  • Filing has gone quiet, not necessarily grown. The tracked span runs from a 2018 peak of 13 filings down to 0 in 2021→2024 tracked years reaching -100% over that span; because publication lags filing by about 18 months, 2025-2026 figures are not yet a reliable read on real activity.
  • Canada is the primary filing venue. Of the offices in scope, Canada received 40 filings and the United States 29 — together they account for the large majority of where this technology is actually being protected.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
79
Published Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CA
Leading Jurisdiction
25
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 79 published patent records matched against a search string combining solvent-assisted recovery mechanisms — vapour/vapor extraction, expanding-solvent SAGD — with the operational problems that define whether they work in the field: solvent retention, asphaltene deposition, surface solvent recovery, dilution viscosity reduction, and solvent-steam ratio control. The coverage window runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off, capturing both the post-2015 refinement of ES-SAGD chamber-growth control and the more recent slowdown in new filings.

Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, the technology composition below sums to more than 100% of the record total — that is expected and reflects how heavily wellbore/drilling claims (E21B) overlap with materials claims (C09K) and instrumentation claims (G01L, G02B) in the same filings.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015-2026
  1. 1CONOCOPHILLIPS CO27
  2. 2WEATHERFORD CANADA11
  3. 3CENOVUS ENERGY INC10
  4. 4IMPERIAL OIL RESOURCES LTD10
  5. 5CEC NORTH STAR ENERGY LTD9
  6. 6SCHLUMBERGER CANADA LTD4
  7. 7SCHLUMBERGER HLDG LTD4
  8. 8SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP4
  9. 9WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC2
  10. 10LEFEBVRE PAUL1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solvent Assisted Heavy Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 79-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings ran from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2018, then declined toward 0 in the most recently completed tracked years (2021 to 2024, a -100% span). 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, so the apparent drop-off should not yet be read as the technology going cold.

Filing trend, 2017-2026048111582017132018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

E21B (earth and rock drilling / wells) appears in 93.7% of the 79 records, far ahead of C09K materials claims at 24.1% and force/pressure measurement (G01L) at 10.1%. The concentration in E21B indicates that most protected value sits in well configuration, injection/production mechanics and process control rather than in solvent chemistry itself.

IPC subclass compositionE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)7493.7%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…1924.1%G01L · Force & pressure measurement810.1%G02B · Optical elements & systems67.6%G01V · Geophysics & gravity surveying45.1%C08L · Polymer compositions22.5%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining22.5%G06F · Electric digital data processi…22.5%Other22.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 79 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solvent Assisted Heavy Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Solvent Assisted Heavy Oil Recovery with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about solvent assisted heavy oil recovery and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this landscape

Representative filing
US20150083413A12015-03-26

Reducing solvent retention in ES-SAGD

CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY

Hydrocarbons in a subterranean reservoir are recovered using Expanding Solvent-Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (ES-SAGD), including recovering hydrocarbons while reducing the solvent retention in the reservoir. Reducing solvent retention improves process economics.Filed by ConocoPhillips, published 2015-03-26 as US20150083413A1.

US20150083413A1 — patent drawing 1US20150083413A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20070295640A1Compositions and Methods of Using Same in Producing Heavy Oil and Bitumen88
2US7691788B2Compositions and methods of using same in producing heavy oil and bitumen85
3US20110229071A1Pressure sensor arrangement using an optical fiber and methodologies for performing an analysis of a subterra…70
4US20030000711A1Combined steam and vapor extraction process (SAVEX) for in situ bitumen and heavy oil production41
5WO2010123566A1Pressure sensor arrangement using an optical fiber and methodologies for performing an analysis of a subterra…28
6US9347312B2Pressure sensor arrangement using an optical fiber and methodologies for performing an analysis of a subterra…23
7US20150198027A1Anti-retention agent in steam-solvent oil recovery20
8US20140144627A1Hydrocarbon recovery with steam and solvent stages14
9US20110172924A1Forecasting asphaltic precipitation13
10US20150083413A1Reducing solvent retention in es-sagd10

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solvent Assisted Heavy Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers indicate

Read together, the ranking, the citation table and the composition chart point to a field where mechanical and process claims dominate over chemistry, and where a handful of instrumentation-heavy filings carry disproportionate citation weight.

Concentration
27 vs 9
leader vs fifth place, in records

A single leader, then a real gap

The leading assignee holds 27 records against 9 at fifth place and 1 at tenth — a steep drop after the top position rather than a gradual taper, which suggests one organisation built a deliberate filing program around ES-SAGD-style processes while most others hold only a handful of records each.

Based on the 25-company ranking returned for this dataset.
Citation weight
88 citations
top-cited record

Instrumentation patents punch above their class share

Two of the five most-cited records are optical-fiber pressure-sensor arrangements for subterranean formations, not solvent-process patents, even though G02B and G01L together cover a minority of records. That is a signal of influence on downstream art, not of where filing volume actually sits.

Citation counts favour older records inside the searched corpus.
Venue
40 vs 29
Canada vs United States filings

Filing follows where the resource is produced

Canada (40) and the United States (29) account for nearly all filings in scope, consistent with heavy-oil and oil-sands operations concentrated in Alberta and the adjacent US market; WIPO, UK, MX and AE filings are minor by comparison.

Receiving-office counts across the full 79-record set.
Momentum
0 in latest year
for every top co-assignee pair

No assignee shows fresh activity in the latest tracked year

Every organisation appearing in the recent-momentum data, including the leading assignee and its most frequent co-filing partner, shows zero filings in the latest year measured. Given the ~18-month publication lag, this reads as a reporting gap in progress rather than a confirmed stop in R&D.

Recent-year momentum tracked by assignee.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to solvent assisted heavy oil recovery, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solvent Assisted Heavy Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Leaders and the long tail

The ranking covers 25 companies counted in records, from a clear leader down to single-digit filers. It is the whole ranking the dataset returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.

Leader
27 records
top-ranked assignee

One filer built sustained depth

The top-ranked assignee's 27 records place it well ahead of the field, spanning both core ES-SAGD process claims and instrumentation. That volume alone does not indicate the technology is settled — it indicates one company occupied a large share of the claim space early.

Counted in patent records, not families outside this set.
Mid-tier
9 records
fifth-ranked assignee

A cluster of mid-size filers

Fifth place holds 9 records, suggesting a small group of oil-sands operators and oilfield-service companies filed steadily but never at the leader's scale. These are the organisations most likely to hold defensible niche claims worth checking before filing nearby.

Ranking position 5 of 25.
Long tail
1 record
tenth-ranked assignee

Single-filing entrants dominate below the top ranks

By the tenth position, assignee counts fall to a single record, and the pattern likely continues further down the ranking. This long tail typically includes individual inventors and smaller service providers testing narrow process variants.

Ranking position 10 of 25.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where the composition data shows thin coverage relative to the core E21B/C09K claims.
surface solvent recovery and recycling loopsdilution viscosity reduction chemistryreal-time chamber growth rate monitoringsolvent-steam ratio control algorithmsasphaltene deposition mitigation additives
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
ConocoPhillips0
Cenovus Energy Inc.0
IMPERIAL OIL RESOURCES LTD0
LXDATA0
CEC NORTH STAR ENERGY LTD0
Schlumberger Canada Limited0
Schlumberger Holdings Limited0
Schlumberger Technology Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solvent Assisted Heavy Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The record-level data behind this page can be pushed further than a static landscape view allows.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 27 of the 79 records, any new ES-SAGD or vapour-extraction filing should be checked against that portfolio's claim scope before drafting.

Run a claim comparison in Patsnap Eureka

Track the instrumentation sub-cluster separately

Optical-fiber pressure sensing shows up disproportionately among the most-cited records; monitoring that sub-cluster on its own citation trend can flag design-around risk early.

Set up a monitoring search in Patsnap Eureka

Re-run the trend once 2025-2026 data settles

The apparent 2021-2024 decline reflects a real 25-family swing but the two most recent years are still incomplete; revisit filing volume once publication catches up.

Save this landscape in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solvent Assisted Heavy Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Solvent Assisted Heavy Oil Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Solvent Assisted Heavy Oil Recovery in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole solvent assisted heavy oil recovery corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.