https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/space-domain-awareness-and-debris-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Space & Satellite Systems · Patent Landscape
Space-Domain Awareness and Debris Patents: Who Holds the Ground and Where It's Still Open
  • One filer dominates the top of the field. the leading assignee holds 80 records while fifth place sits at only 13 — a steep drop that leaves most of the ranked field with a handful of filings each.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2021 peak. 61 records in 2021 fell to 48 by 2024, a 21% pull-back over that span, though 2025-2026 figures are still filling in as publication catches up with filing.
  • Spacecraft systems carry the claim density. B64G cosmonautics and spacecraft classifications cover 58.1% of the 415 records in scope, more than any communications or positioning class in the set.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
415
Published Records
47%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-21%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (61 records) with 2024 (48) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 415 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Space-domain awareness and debris patents sit at the intersection of spacecraft engineering, wireless communication and positioning technology. The search underpinning this page pulls 415 published records filed against terms covering orbital position tracking, attitude sensing, mission trajectory planning and orbital operations, matched against space-domain-awareness and debris terminology. The result is a corpus that is heavily weighted toward spacecraft-system claims, with communications and positioning classes layered on top rather than standing alone.

Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, the technology shares below add up to more than the record total — that is expected, and it reflects how densely spacecraft, communications and positioning claims overlap in this field. Filing activity runs from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with the most recent one to two years understated because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015 to the 2026 data cut-off
  1. 1MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP80
  2. 2STAR MESH LLC64
  3. 3SES SA22
  4. 4AIRBUS DEFENCE & SPACE SAS14
  5. 5D ORBIT SPA13
  6. 6TELESAT CANADA13
  7. 7FORWARD ROBERT L11
  8. 8HOYT ROBERT P11
  9. 9NORTHSTAR EARTH & SPACE INC10
  10. 10XONA SPACE SYSTEMS INC9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space-Domain Awareness & Debris Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 415-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 44 in 2017 to a peak of 61 in 2021, then eased to 48 by 2024 — a 21% decline over that three-year window. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures (down to 8 in the partial latest year) as undercounts still catching up with the publication lag, not evidence of a further slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017-2026020406080442017201820192020612021202220232024202582026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

B64G (cosmonautics and spacecraft) anchors the field at 58.1% of the 415 records, with H04B transmission technology at 32.0% and H04W wireless networks at 16.9% forming the next tier. Positioning (G01S, 11.1%) and antenna claims (H01Q, 5.3%) are present but comparatively thin, and image-data processing (G06T, 4.3%) is the smallest class tracked.

Technology composition by IPC subclassB64G · Cosmonautics & spacecraft24158.1%H04B · Transmission (general)13332.0%H04W · Wireless communication networks7016.9%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning4611.1%H04H · Broadcast communication245.8%H04L · Digital information transmissi…245.8%H01Q · Antennas225.3%G06T · Image data processing & genera…184.3%Other18945.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 415 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space-Domain Awareness & Debris Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Space-Domain Awareness & Debris Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about space-domain awareness & debris patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A representative record and the most-cited prior art

Representative Record
US20230211896A12023-07-06

Method for estimating collision between at least one piece of space debris and a satellite

AIRBUS DEFENCE AND SPACE SAS

Filed by Airbus Defence and Space, this record covers an on-board method for a satellite to determine its own true orbital position, propagate its orbit forward, and calculate a probability of collision with a tracked piece of debris using state transition ephemeris data communicated from the ground. The claim structure splits work between ground-side orbit determination and on-board propagation and probability calculation.Filed 2023-07-06 · US20230211896A1

US20230211896A1 — patent drawing 1US20230211896A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record →
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20170036783A1In-space manufacturing and assembly of spacecraft device and techniques127
2US5667167AMethods and apparatus for reusable launch platform and reusable spacecraft102
3US20190389602A1Small satellite capable of formation flying, and formation of multiple small satellites93
4US6942186B1Method and apparatus for propulsion and power generation using spinning electrodynamic tethers67
5US6419191B1Electrodynamic tether control62
6US20150097084A1Spacecraft system for debris disposal and other operations and methods pertaining to the same61
7US6116544AElectrodynamic tether and method of use61
8US20190181946A1Dual leo satellite system and method for global coverage60
9US10085200B1Radio system using nodes with high gain antennas48
10US10084536B1Radio system using satellites48

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence within this searched set, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space-Domain Awareness & Debris Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Reading the Data

What the concentration and trend numbers mean for filing strategy

The ranking and trend figures point to a field with one entrenched leader, a fast-thinning tail, and a technology mix concentrated on spacecraft-system claims rather than the communications or sensing layers around them.

Concentration
46.5%
of 415 records held by the top 5 assignees

The top of the field is steep, not broad

Five assignees account for 193 of the 415 records in scope, and the leader alone holds 80 — six times fifth place's 13. That gap matters for freedom-to-operate work: a handful of portfolios likely cover the load-bearing spacecraft-system claims, while the remaining 91 ranked assignees each hold comparatively small, more specific positions.

Top 5 combined, 193 of 415 records
Filing momentum
-21%
2021 peak (61) to 2024 (48)

Volume has pulled back from its 2021 high

Filing peaked at 61 records in 2021 and had settled to 48 by 2024, a complete and comparable three-year figure. That is a real pull-back rather than market exit, and it leaves 2024's claim space more open than the peak years for anyone re-entering with a narrower, better-drafted filing.

2021 → 2024, complete-year comparison
Technology mix
58.1%
of 415 records classified under B64G

Spacecraft-system claims dominate the mix

B64G cosmonautics and spacecraft classifications appear on well over half of all records, roughly double the next largest class (H04B transmission at 32.0%). Positioning-specific claims under G01S sit at just 11.1%, suggesting more of the fine-grained positioning and sensing work is still described inside spacecraft-system filings rather than staked out on its own.

IPC shares are of all 415 records; a record may carry several classes
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to space-domain awareness & debris patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Where filers pair up
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
HOYT ROBERT PFORWARD ROBERT L11
TELESAT CANADATELESAT TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION2
D ORBIT SRLD-Orbit S.p.A.2
TELESAT CANADATelesat Canada1
TELESAT CANADATelesat Canada1
D ORBIT SRLTUSSIWAND GIUSEPPE JUSSEF1
D ORBIT SRLROSSETTINI LUCA1
D ORBIT SRLPANOZZO THOMAS1

Co-assignee activity is limited to 9 pairs across the whole corpus, and it clusters around individual inventor-holder pairs and corporate affiliate pairs rather than broad industry consortia — a sign that most work here is filed solo rather than jointly developed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space-Domain Awareness & Debris Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who Is Filing

The assignee field: one leader, a thin tail

The ranking covers 96 companies counted by records, not a top-50 or top-100 cut — and the shape of it is a steep drop from the leader to everyone else.

Leader
80
records held by the top-ranked assignee

A single filer sets the pace

The leading assignee's 80 records are more than six times fifth place's 13, and well above the combined weight most of the rest of the ranked field can claim individually. Any new entrant should expect this filer's spacecraft-system claims to be the first prior art to clear.

Leader vs fifth place: 80 vs 13
Mid-field
13 → 9
records, fifth to tenth place

The drop-off continues past the top five

Fifth place holds 13 records and tenth place holds 9 — a gentler slope than the leader's gap, but still a fast thin-out. The top 10 combined hold 247 of 415 records, 59.5% of the corpus, meaning the remaining 86 ranked assignees share well under half the field between them.

Top 10 combined: 247 of 415 records, 59.5%
Collaboration
9
co-assignee pairs across the corpus

Filing is mostly solo, not joint

Only 9 co-assignee pairings appear across 415 records, and the strongest of them is an individual inventor pair rather than a corporate joint venture. That leaves most competitive intelligence work here focused on single-assignee portfolios rather than alliance mapping.

Strongest pair: 11 shared records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where the technology composition data suggests filing density is thinner than the field's overall activity would predict.
Onboard collision-probability calculationDebris-tracking sensor fusionAttitude-sensor-driven trajectory correctionImage-based debris identification (G06T)Antenna-integrated positioning payloads
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
NORTHSTAR EARTH & SPACE INC10%
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation0-100%
Star Mesh LLC0
SES S.A.0
TELESAT CANADA0
Airbus Defence and Space SAS0
D ORBIT SRL0
HOYT ROBERT P0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space-Domain Awareness & Debris Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next questions for R&D and IP teams rather than a single conclusion.

Map freedom-to-operate against the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 80 of 415 records, any new spacecraft-system filing should start by clearing that portfolio's claim scope before drafting around adjacent art.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka →

Test draft claims against the under-claimed branches

Sub-areas like onboard collision-probability calculation and debris-tracking sensor fusion show thinner filing density than the field average — worth stress-testing a draft claim there before committing to a crowded branch.

Run a claim novelty check in Eureka →

Revisit the 2024-2026 window once publication catches up

The apparent pull-back after 2021 is only confirmed through 2024; treat 2025-2026 figures as provisional until later publications land.

Track filing trends in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space-Domain Awareness & Debris Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Frequently Asked

Questions practitioners ask about this field

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space-Domain Awareness & Debris Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Space-Domain Awareness & Debris Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole space-domain awareness & debris patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.