Book a demo

Space Power & Thermal Management Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Space Power & Thermal Management Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/space-power-and-thermal-management-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Space & Satellite Systems · Patent Landscape
Space power and thermal management patents: who holds the claims and where they cluster
  • 43.4% concentration at the top. The five most active filers account for 189 of the 435 records in scope, but the tenth-ranked entrant already sits at just 9 filings — a steep drop-off, not a plateau.
  • Nuclear classes dominate the claim map. G21C (nuclear reactors) and G21D (nuclear power plants) together tag well over 40% of records, ahead of spacecraft-specific classes like B64G — a sign that space power filings lean heavily on terrestrial reactor art.
  • Filing activity has cooled from its 2020 peak. Annual filings ran from 40 in 2021 down to 17 in 2024, a -57% swing over that span, though publication lag means 2025-2026 counts will still rise as records catch up.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
435
Published Records
43%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-57%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (40 records) with 2024 (17) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 435 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 435 published patent families filed against a search combining space power systems with thermal-management signals such as heat flux, working fluid, orbital position and temperature sensing. The scope spans records dated 2015 through the August 2026 cut-off, capturing both dedicated spacecraft power art and the nuclear and turbomachinery technology it draws on. Filings run through United States, European, PCT, Canadian, UK and Australian receiving offices, with the United States accounting for the largest single share at 220 records.

The mix is not purely a satellite story. Nuclear reactor and nuclear power plant classes carry more tagged records than spacecraft-specific classes, reflecting how space power systems inherit reactor, turbine and optical-collector art rather than starting from a clean sheet. That matters for freedom-to-operate work: a filing that looks novel against spacecraft prior art alone may still collide with decades of terrestrial nuclear or gas-turbine claims.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1BWXT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LLC82
  2. 2BWXT NUCLEAR ENERGY INC46
  3. 3NUGEN LLC28
  4. 4Y E HUB ARMENIA LLC18
  5. 5MICROVISION INC15
  6. 6JOINT STOCK COMPANY SCIENCE AND INNNOVATIONS15
  7. 7AKTSIONERNOE OBSHCHESTVO GOSUDARSTVENNYJ NAUCHNYJ TSENTR ROSSIJSKOJ FEDERATSII FIZIKO ENERGETICHESKIJ INST IMENI A I LEJPUNSKOGO13
  8. 8PHION TECH LLC13
  9. 9RESMED PTY LTD11
  10. 10MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space Power & Thermal Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 435 records: how filing volume moved year over year, and how those records split across the IPC subclasses that define the technical field.

A 2020 peak, then a step down

Filings rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 58 in 2020, then fell through the low-40s and settled at 17 by 2024 — a -57% move from the 40 filed in 2021. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent years will keep filling in.

A 2020 peak, then a step down01530456082017201820195820202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Nuclear and spacecraft classes lead, but overlap heavily

G21C (nuclear reactors) tags 30.8% of the 435 records and G21D (nuclear power plants) tags 15.2%, ahead of B64G (cosmonautics and spacecraft) at 14.3%. Semiconductor devices (H01L, 10.8%), positioning and radar (G01S, 8.7%), optics (G02B, 7.8%), gas turbines (F02C, 7.6%) and jet propulsion (F02K, 6.7%) round out the picture. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares add up to well over 100% of the record total — they describe overlap, not a partition of the field.

Nuclear and spacecraft classes lead, but overlap heavilyG21C · Nuclear reactors13430.8%G21D · Nuclear power plants6615.2%B64G · Cosmonautics & spacecraft6214.3%H01L · Semiconductor devices4710.8%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning388.7%G02B · Optical elements & systems347.8%F02C · Gas-turbine plants337.6%F02K · Jet & reaction propulsion296.7%Other446102.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 435 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space Power & Thermal Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Space Power & Thermal Management Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about space power & thermal management patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
US4754601A1988-07-05

US4754601A — Self-refueling space propulsion system and operating method

MINOVITCH, MICHAEL A.

A propulsion system for reusable space-based vehicles in which the propulsive working fluid is atmospheric gas: acceleration or deceleration is achieved by expelling or ingesting that gas, so working fluid spent during forward propulsive maneuvers is replenished during retro maneuvers. A large-diameter hypervelocity inlet diffuser mounted at the front of the vehicle scoops up atmospheric gas while passing through the upper atmosphere, transferring vehicle momentum into the ingested gas.Filed 1988 — among the older, foundational records in this dataset's citation graph.

US4754601A — patent drawing 1US4754601A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5932940AMicroturbomachinery326
2US6325636B1Passive midplane for coupling web server processing cards with a network interface(s)284
3US6411506B1High density web server chassis system and method274
4US4888063AVariable aperture, variable flux density, aerospace solar collector239
5US6392313B1Microturbomachinery228
6US6100463AMethod for making advanced thermoelectric devices226
7US7150938B2Structurally embedded intelligent power unit190
8US4047093ADirect thermal-electric conversion for geothermal energy recovery160
9US6985967B1Web server network system and method151
10US20050013310A1Apparatus and method for unilateral topology discovery in network management139

Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later work, not a ranking of current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space Power & Thermal Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

The composition and concentration data point to a field where claim density and technical scope diverge sharply by sub-area.

Concentration
43.4% / top 5
share of 435 records

A steep leader, then a long tail

The leading assignee holds 82 records against a fifth-place figure of 15 and a tenth-place figure of 9. That gap suggests one or two entities set the pace on core power-system architecture while the rest of the ranked field files in narrower, adjacent niches.

Based on the 100-company ranking returned by the dataset.
Technology mix
30.8% G21C
of 435 records

Nuclear art is the load-bearing prior art

Nuclear reactor and nuclear power plant classes together tag a larger share of records than spacecraft-specific classification, meaning novelty searches limited to satellite-specific databases will miss governing prior art.

G21C and G21D shares are independent counts, not additive.
Momentum
-57% (2021-2024)
annual filings, 40 to 17

Volume has stepped down from its peak

After peaking at 58 filings in 2020, annual output fell to 17 by 2024. Read this as reduced new-entrant pressure in already-claimed architectures, not as the field going quiet — 2025-2026 figures will still revise upward as publications catch up.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete for growth comparisons.
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
across the dataset

Co-filing is rare and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairings appear in this landscape, and the strongest single pairing links two affiliated entities under one filer group. Cross-organisation joint filings are the exception here, not the norm.

Strongest pair recorded at 30 shared filings.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to space power & thermal management patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space Power & Thermal Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

One assignee leads by a wide margin, but the ranked field of 100 companies thins out quickly after the top ten, and recent-year momentum data shows even leading filers pulling back.

Leader
82 records
single top assignee

One filer sets the architecture baseline

The top-ranked assignee's filing volume is more than five times the tenth-place figure, indicating a dominant position on core space power and thermal architecture that later entrants file around rather than against directly.

Leader: 82; fifth place: 15; tenth place: 9.
Mid-field
15 records
fifth-ranked assignee

A thin second tier

Fifth place holds 15 records and tenth place holds 9 — a narrow band that suggests the mid-field is made up of specialists in adjacent sub-systems rather than broad-architecture competitors to the leader.

Top 10 combined: 250 records, 57.5% of the 435 in scope.
Momentum
-75% YoY
leading assignee, latest year

Even the leader is filing less right now

The top-ranked assignee shows just 1 filing in the latest year, down 75% year over year, and several other tracked assignees show zero filings in the latest year — consistent with the broader step-down in annual volume rather than a single company's retreat.

Recent-year counts are still subject to publication lag.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core nuclear and spacecraft classes.
Working-fluid thermal cycle control for compact reactorsPayload-data-linked orbital position adjustmentHeat-flux sensing for optical collector arraysSemiconductor thermal interfaces in radiation environmentsGas-turbine hybridisation with electric power buses
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
BWXT Advanced Technologies LLC1-75%
BWXT Nuclear Energy Inc0
NUGEN LLC0
YANDEX SELF DRIVING GRP LLC0
Luminous Technology Co., Ltd.0
PHION TECH LLC0
Joint Stock Company Science and Innovations0
ResMed Pty Ltd0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space Power & Thermal Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking, or identifying open claim space.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against nuclear classes

Because G21C and G21D together tag more records than spacecraft-specific classification, any new filing on space power architecture should be checked against nuclear reactor and power-plant prior art, not just satellite databases.

Explore prior art in Eureka →

Track the leading assignee's pullback

The leading filer's year-over-year drop to a single recent filing is worth monitoring: it may signal a shift to trade secrecy, a platform pause, or migration of R&D into adjacent classes not captured by this search string.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka →

Scope the under-claimed branches

Working-fluid thermal cycle control and payload-linked orbital positioning show thinner filing density than the core classes — both are candidates for a focused novelty search before committing engineering resources.

Search white space in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space Power & Thermal Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Space Power & Thermal Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Space Power & Thermal Management Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole space power & thermal management patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.