Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (251 records) with 2024 (216) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 7,420 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape draws on 7,420 patent records published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine gamma camera or SPECT imaging claims with detector and reconstruction terms such as energy resolution, collimator sensitivity, cadmium zinc telluride and attenuation correction. The scope spans hardware — detector materials, collimator geometry, gantry design — and the software layer that turns raw counts into a usable image.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend understate real filing activity for those years; the last year that can be read as a complete data point is 2024.
Two views of the same 7,420-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Annual filings climbed from 293 in 2017 to a peak of 432 in 2018. The last complete comparison window, 2021 to 2024, shows a 14% decline (251 to 216) — a cooling rather than a collapse, and the 2025-2026 tail is still being backfilled by the normal publication lag.
G01T (nuclear and X-radiation measurement) appears on 35.3% of records and A61B (diagnosis and surgery) on 29.7%, confirming that hardware and acquisition claims dominate. A61K and A61P reflect the radiopharmaceutical/tracer side of the field at 31.1% and 12.1% respectively, while G06T image processing sits comparatively lightly claimed at 10.2%.
Shares are the percentage of the 7,420 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about spect and gamma camera systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA gamma camera for use in a molecular imaging system includes a housing, a cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) camera disposed within the housing, and at least one retractable wall coupled to the housing and adapted to secure an anatomy of interest in a field-of-view of the gamma camera. The gamma camera also includes a chamfered edge to enable the gamma camera to contact a second gamma camera when the gamma camera is positioned in an L-mode imaging configuration.Filed by Smart Breast Corporation; granted 2012-02-14.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20040133095A1 | Methods and devices for detecting abnormal tissue cells | 1,208 |
| 2 | US6216540B1 | High resolution device and method for imaging concealed objects within an obscuring medium | 543 |
| 3 | US6615063B1 | Fluorescence-mediated molecular tomography | 508 |
| 4 | US5441050A | Radiation responsive surgical instrument | 450 |
| 5 | US5821541A | Method and apparatus for radiation detection | 392 |
| 6 | US5864146A | System for quantitative radiographic imaging | 385 |
| 7 | US20040054248A1 | Radioactive emission detector equipped with a position tracking system | 370 |
| 8 | US6242743B1 | Non-orbiting tomographic imaging system | 347 |
| 9 | US20030128801A1 | Multi-modality apparatus for dynamic anatomical, physiological and molecular imaging | 345 |
| 10 | US5672877A | Coregistration of multi-modality data in a medical imaging system | 318 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-outs from the corpus that matter more than the raw counts on their own.
Five assignees hold 2,000 of the 7,420 records in scope, with the leader alone at 775. Below the top ten — who together hold 34.7% — filing counts thin quickly into single- and few-filing entrants, which is where freedom-to-operate work has to be done record by record rather than by watching one competitor.
Filings peaked at 432 in 2018 and have since settled lower, with the last complete comparison window (2021-2024) showing a 14% pullback. Recent-year figures for individual large filers also show sharp YoY drops, but 2025-2026 data is still incomplete because of publication lag and should not be read as a trend on its own.
G01T nuclear measurement claims sit on more than a third of all records, and A61B diagnostic claims on nearly 30% — this is occupied claim space, not necessarily a mature or exhausted one. Image processing under G06T, by contrast, covers only 10.2% of records, a comparatively open lane relative to the hardware side.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to spect and gamma camera systems, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Philips Intellectual Property & Standards GmbH | 59 |
| Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives | Sanofi-Aventis | 24 |
| The General Hospital Corporation | President and Fellows of Harvard College | 21 |
| The General Hospital Corporation | ORGANIX INC | 21 |
| Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives | Sanofi | 19 |
| Johns Hopkins University | Northwestern University | 16 |
| Koninklijke Philips N.V. | PHILIPS GMBH | 11 |
| Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives | Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) | 10 |
Co-assignee pairings are concentrated among a small number of corporate-affiliate and academic-industry links, with the strongest pairing appearing on 59 shared records — a sign of internal group filing structure more than open collaboration.
The ranking covers 100 assignees across the full 7,420-record corpus. A handful of large imaging OEMs and one hospital-research system anchor the top of the table; most of the rest hold only a handful of records each.
The leading assignee holds 775 records, more than five times the tenth-place holder's 113. That gap suggests a durable filing program built over years rather than a recent push, and it is the single most useful reference point when scoping a freedom-to-operate search in this field.
Combined, the top ten hold 34.7% of all 7,420 records, but individual counts fall fast past the leader — by tenth place, annual output is a fraction of the top filer's. This is typical of a field anchored by a few large OEMs with a long tail of hospital systems, university labs and single-patent entrants.
Recent-year filing momentum among the largest assignees is flat or negative — one major filer shows a 71% year-on-year drop and several others show no filings at all in the latest year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this reads as an incomplete recent window rather than confirmed withdrawal from the space.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| GE Precision Healthcare LLC | 2 | -71% |
| Johns Hopkins University | 1 | 0% |
| Koninklijke Philips N.V. | 0 | — |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| The General Hospital Corporation | 0 | — |
| UCB Pharma GmbH | 0 | — |
| Technische Universitat Munchen | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to a few concrete next steps depending on what you are trying to decide.
With 27.0% of records held by five assignees, start any FTO review against the leader's portfolio before working down the long tail of smaller filers.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaCadmium zinc telluride detector claims sit inside the densest IPC classes in this corpus; a subclass-level watch will catch new filings faster than a keyword alert.
Set up a claim watch in EurekaThe under-claimed branches identified here — attenuation correction workflows, compact CZT cameras — are a reasonable starting point for a first-claim draft session.
Draft and stress-test claims in EurekaOne assignee leads the ranked field with 775 of the 7,420 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 152 and tenth place at 113. The top 5 assignees together hold 27.0% of all records, and the top 10 hold 34.7%, which means concentration is real at the very top but drops off quickly after that. Most of the remaining ranked assignees hold only a handful of records each, forming a long tail typical of hospital systems, university labs and smaller device makers.
Filing activity peaked in 2018 at 432 records and has eased since; the last fully comparable window, 2021 to 2024, shows a 14% decline from 251 to 216 filings. Figures for 2025 and 2026 look lower still, but that is expected because publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so those years are not yet complete. The honest read is a field that has cooled from its 2018 peak rather than one in active decline.
Nuclear and X-radiation measurement claims (IPC class G01T) appear on 35.3% of the 7,420 records, and diagnosis and surgery claims (A61B) appear on 29.7%, making detector hardware and acquisition method claims the densest ground in the corpus. Radiopharmaceutical-adjacent classes A61K and A61P also carry meaningful shares at 31.1% and 12.1%, reflecting how tightly tracer chemistry and imaging hardware claims overlap in this field. Image data processing (G06T) is comparatively lighter at 10.2%, which is worth noting for anyone assessing where claim space is less crowded.
Relative to the 35.3% claim density in core detector measurement classes, image processing and reconstruction claims sit at just 10.2% of records, suggesting more room to file there than in raw detector hardware. Specific branches worth checking include real-time attenuation correction algorithms, collimator sensitivity-resolution trade-off geometries, and compact CZT-based camera designs, all of which show up as narrower slices within the broader classes rather than as heavily claimed categories on their own. Any white-space claim should still be checked against the leading assignees' existing portfolios before drafting, since large filers can hold blocking claims even in lighter-density branches.
US8115171B2 claims a gamma camera built around a cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detector housed with a retractable wall for positioning breast tissue in the field of view, plus a chamfered housing edge that lets two such cameras be paired in an L-mode configuration for nuclear mammography. It is a fairly specific mechanical and configuration claim rather than a broad claim over CZT gamma detection itself, so it primarily constrains dual-camera breast-imaging form factors with that particular retractable-wall and chamfered-edge combination. Designs using CZT detection in other anatomical applications, or breast-imaging systems that avoid the specific housing geometry, would need a separate claim-by-claim check rather than being blocked outright by this patent alone.
Go past this page: query the whole spect and gamma camera systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.