Book a demo

Spent Fuel Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Spent Fuel Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/spent-fuel-management-and-reprocessing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Nuclear Energy · Patent Landscape
Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing Patents
  • Filing has cooled since a 2020 peak of 27, with the midpoint year 2022 at just 11 — this is a mature, not a growing, filing field.
  • G21C and G21F dominate the IPC mix (387 and 268 records respectively), while separation and extraction chemistry (B01D, C22B, C25C) together account for under a fifth of filings.
  • The United States leads receiving offices with 154 filings, ahead of Japan (90) and the EPO (77) — jurisdiction choice tracks where storage and reprocessing infrastructure actually sits.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
508
Published Records
40%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-8%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 508 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 across dry cask storage, solvent extraction, vitrification, criticality safety and decay heat management for spent nuclear fuel, drawing on IPC classes G21F9, G21C19 and C22B60. The corpus spans 508 patent families, filed across national offices and via the PCT route.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-2026 filing counts in the trend below are understated and will revise upward as later applications publish. Treat the most recent one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1HOLTEC INTERNATIONAL INC60
  2. 2BRITISH NUCLEAR FUELS PLC45
  3. 3WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP38
  4. 4COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES38
  5. 5HITACHI LTD24
  6. 6KK TOSHIBA17
  7. 7DORYOKURO KAKUNENRYO KAIHATSU JIGYODAN16
  8. 8MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD16
  9. 9NEXIA SOLUTIONS15
  10. 10NUSCALE POWER LLC14
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Annual filing counts and the IPC subclass breakdown show where claim density has built up and where it has not.

A field past its filing peak

Filings ran 15 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 27 in 2020, and had fallen back to 11 by the 2022 midpoint. That trajectory — rise, peak, decline — is typical of a technology area where core storage and reprocessing mechanisms were claimed early and subsequent filing is largely defensive or incremental, rather than a field still being opened up.

A field past its filing peak08152330152017201820192720202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Reactor and shielding claims dominate; separation chemistry lags

G21C (nuclear reactors, 387 records) and G21F (radiation protection and shielding, 268) between them cover the great majority of filings. Separation and metallurgical routes — B01D, C22B, C25C, B04B — sit well behind, together under 120 records, which is notable given how central solvent extraction and electrolytic reprocessing are to the underlying chemistry.

Reactor and shielding claims dominate; separation chemistry lagsG21C · Nuclear reactors38776.2%G21F · Radiation protection & shieldi…26852.8%C01G · Compounds of other metals5611.0%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…489.4%C22B · Metal extraction & refining458.9%C25C · Electrolytic metal production153.0%G21D · Nuclear power plants132.6%B04B · Centrifuges112.2%Other11723.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 508 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about spent fuel management and reprocessing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Filing
US9666315B22017-05-30

Method for reprocessing spent nuclear fuel and centrifugal extractor therefor (US9666315B2)

KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA

Filed by Toshiba, this patent describes dissolving spent nuclear fuel in aqueous nitric acid and separating nuclides by solvent extraction, with an added electrolytic valence-adjustment step that manipulates plutonium's oxidation state to control extraction efficiency before a nuclide separation step using a uranium-selective extraction solvent.Granted 2017-05-30.

US9666315B2 — patent drawing 1US9666315B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6252923B1In-situ self-powered monitoring of stored spent nuclear fuel148
2US20110286567A1System and method for reclaiming energy from heat emanating from spent nuclear fuel52
3WO2007135178A1Process for reprocessing a spent nuclear fuel and of preparing a mixed uranium-plutonium oxide52
4US4257912AConcrete encapsulation for spent nuclear fuel storage43
5US5708958AMethod of separating trivalent actinides and rare earth elements40
6US20130028365A1Power generation from decay heat for spent nuclear fuel pool cooling and monitoring39
7US20110150164A1Method of transferring high level radionactive materials, and system for the same37
8US3813464AMethod of dissolving spent nuclear fuel37
9US8475747B1Processing fissile material mixtures containing zirconium and/or carbon36
10US20040112800A1Centrifugal extractor of non-contact journaled construction31

Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and skew toward older filings; read them as markers of influence on later filers, not as a signal of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for strategy

Three patterns stand out once filing counts, IPC composition and jurisdiction are read together.

Filing Momentum
27 in 2020 → 11 by 2022
peak-to-midpoint decline

The core mechanisms are already claimed

A peak in 2020 followed by a decline to the 2022 midpoint suggests the foundational storage and reprocessing mechanisms in this dataset were staked out early, with recent filing skewing toward refinement rather than new mechanism disclosure.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology Mix
387 G21C vs 45 C22B
reactor/shielding vs metal extraction records

Chemistry is under-represented relative to hardware

Reactor and radiation-shielding classifications outnumber metal extraction and electrolytic classes by a wide margin, even though solvent extraction and vitrification are named search terms — a sign that hardware and containment claims have been prioritized over process chemistry claims.

IPC composition
Jurisdiction Spread
US 154 vs China 16
receiving-office filings

Filing geography tracks existing fuel-cycle infrastructure

The United States, Japan, the EPO and the United Kingdom together account for the large majority of receiving-office filings, while China sits far behind at 16 — filing location correlates with where reprocessing and storage facilities already operate rather than with reactor fleet size alone.

Receiving offices
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
joint-filing relationships

Collaboration is concentrated among a small set of French entities

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairing links a national energy commission with a reprocessing specialist — collaborative filing here is the exception, not the norm.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to spent fuel management and reprocessing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground

Recent-year momentum data shows several long-standing assignees recording zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the broader post-2020 filing decline rather than any single company's retreat.

Momentum Signal
0 filings, latest year
across multiple top assignees

Flat momentum is dataset-wide, not company-specific

British Nuclear Fuels, the French atomic energy commission, Westinghouse, Hitachi and the Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation all show zero filings in the latest tracked year. That pattern lines up with the overall 2020-to-2022 decline rather than signalling any one firm exiting the field.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Co-filing
11 joint filings
strongest pair

French state entities anchor the densest partnership

The strongest co-assignee relationship links a national atomic energy commission with a reprocessing specialist, followed closely by a pairing with a national scientific research centre — collaborative activity clusters around France's state-backed fuel-cycle programme.

Co-assignee pairs
Cited Prior Art
148 citations
top-cited record

Monitoring and encapsulation IP still anchors the field

The most-cited record in the corpus concerns in-situ self-powered monitoring of stored fuel, followed by heat-reclamation and reprocessing patents — these older records remain reference points that newer filings are drafted around.

Most-cited records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches where filing density is thin relative to the core storage and reprocessing classes.
Electrolytic valence adjustment for actinide separationCentrifugal contactor extraction hardwareDecay-heat-to-energy reclamation systemsTrivalent actinide/rare-earth separation chemistryVitrification matrix formulation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Hertek International0-100%
British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL)0
French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)0
Westinghouse Electric Company0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation (PNC)0
Toshiba Corporation0
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trends above point to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or deciding where to file.

Map the solvent extraction sub-cluster in detail

With B01D and C22B together under 120 records against 387 in G21C, a finer-grained pull of extraction and electrolytic reprocessing claims would clarify how open that chemistry space really is.

Explore in Eureka

Track the French co-filing cluster

The strongest co-assignee pairs sit around a national atomic energy commission and its reprocessing and research partners — worth watching for how that cluster licenses or spins out IP.

Explore in Eureka

Re-run the trend once 2025-2026 filings publish

Given the 18-month publication lag, the apparent decline into 2026 should be revisited once the most recent application years have fully published.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole spent fuel management and reprocessing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.