Spent Fuel Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing has cooled since a 2020 peak of 27, with the midpoint year 2022 at just 11 — this is a mature, not a growing, filing field.
- G21C and G21F dominate the IPC mix (387 and 268 records respectively), while separation and extraction chemistry (B01D, C22B, C25C) together account for under a fifth of filings.
- The United States leads receiving offices with 154 filings, ahead of Japan (90) and the EPO (77) — jurisdiction choice tracks where storage and reprocessing infrastructure actually sits.
Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 508 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 across dry cask storage, solvent extraction, vitrification, criticality safety and decay heat management for spent nuclear fuel, drawing on IPC classes G21F9, G21C19 and C22B60. The corpus spans 508 patent families, filed across national offices and via the PCT route.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-2026 filing counts in the trend below are understated and will revise upward as later applications publish. Treat the most recent one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.
Filing trends and technology composition
Annual filing counts and the IPC subclass breakdown show where claim density has built up and where it has not.
A field past its filing peak
Filings ran 15 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 27 in 2020, and had fallen back to 11 by the 2022 midpoint. That trajectory — rise, peak, decline — is typical of a technology area where core storage and reprocessing mechanisms were claimed early and subsequent filing is largely defensive or incremental, rather than a field still being opened up.
Reactor and shielding claims dominate; separation chemistry lags
G21C (nuclear reactors, 387 records) and G21F (radiation protection and shielding, 268) between them cover the great majority of filings. Separation and metallurgical routes — B01D, C22B, C25C, B04B — sit well behind, together under 120 records, which is notable given how central solvent extraction and electrolytic reprocessing are to the underlying chemistry.
Shares are the percentage of the 508 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about spent fuel management and reprocessing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in this space
Method for reprocessing spent nuclear fuel and centrifugal extractor therefor (US9666315B2)
Filed by Toshiba, this patent describes dissolving spent nuclear fuel in aqueous nitric acid and separating nuclides by solvent extraction, with an added electrolytic valence-adjustment step that manipulates plutonium's oxidation state to control extraction efficiency before a nuclide separation step using a uranium-selective extraction solvent.Granted 2017-05-30.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6252923B1 | In-situ self-powered monitoring of stored spent nuclear fuel | 148 |
| 2 | US20110286567A1 | System and method for reclaiming energy from heat emanating from spent nuclear fuel | 52 |
| 3 | WO2007135178A1 | Process for reprocessing a spent nuclear fuel and of preparing a mixed uranium-plutonium oxide | 52 |
| 4 | US4257912A | Concrete encapsulation for spent nuclear fuel storage | 43 |
| 5 | US5708958A | Method of separating trivalent actinides and rare earth elements | 40 |
| 6 | US20130028365A1 | Power generation from decay heat for spent nuclear fuel pool cooling and monitoring | 39 |
| 7 | US20110150164A1 | Method of transferring high level radionactive materials, and system for the same | 37 |
| 8 | US3813464A | Method of dissolving spent nuclear fuel | 37 |
| 9 | US8475747B1 | Processing fissile material mixtures containing zirconium and/or carbon | 36 |
| 10 | US20040112800A1 | Centrifugal extractor of non-contact journaled construction | 31 |
Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and skew toward older filings; read them as markers of influence on later filers, not as a signal of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for strategy
Three patterns stand out once filing counts, IPC composition and jurisdiction are read together.
The core mechanisms are already claimed
A peak in 2020 followed by a decline to the 2022 midpoint suggests the foundational storage and reprocessing mechanisms in this dataset were staked out early, with recent filing skewing toward refinement rather than new mechanism disclosure.
Chemistry is under-represented relative to hardware
Reactor and radiation-shielding classifications outnumber metal extraction and electrolytic classes by a wide margin, even though solvent extraction and vitrification are named search terms — a sign that hardware and containment claims have been prioritized over process chemistry claims.
Filing geography tracks existing fuel-cycle infrastructure
The United States, Japan, the EPO and the United Kingdom together account for the large majority of receiving-office filings, while China sits far behind at 16 — filing location correlates with where reprocessing and storage facilities already operate rather than with reactor fleet size alone.
Collaboration is concentrated among a small set of French entities
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairing links a national energy commission with a reprocessing specialist — collaborative filing here is the exception, not the norm.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to spent fuel management and reprocessing, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground
Recent-year momentum data shows several long-standing assignees recording zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the broader post-2020 filing decline rather than any single company's retreat.
Flat momentum is dataset-wide, not company-specific
British Nuclear Fuels, the French atomic energy commission, Westinghouse, Hitachi and the Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation all show zero filings in the latest tracked year. That pattern lines up with the overall 2020-to-2022 decline rather than signalling any one firm exiting the field.
French state entities anchor the densest partnership
The strongest co-assignee relationship links a national atomic energy commission with a reprocessing specialist, followed closely by a pairing with a national scientific research centre — collaborative activity clusters around France's state-backed fuel-cycle programme.
Monitoring and encapsulation IP still anchors the field
The most-cited record in the corpus concerns in-situ self-powered monitoring of stored fuel, followed by heat-reclamation and reprocessing patents — these older records remain reference points that newer filings are drafted around.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Hertek International | 0 | -100% |
| British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL) | 0 | — |
| French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) | 0 | — |
| Westinghouse Electric Company | 0 | — |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation (PNC) | 0 | — |
| Toshiba Corporation | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The trends above point to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or deciding where to file.
Map the solvent extraction sub-cluster in detail
With B01D and C22B together under 120 records against 387 in G21C, a finer-grained pull of extraction and electrolytic reprocessing claims would clarify how open that chemistry space really is.
Explore in EurekaTrack the French co-filing cluster
The strongest co-assignee pairs sit around a national atomic energy commission and its reprocessing and research partners — worth watching for how that cluster licenses or spins out IP.
Explore in EurekaRe-run the trend once 2025-2026 filings publish
Given the 18-month publication lag, the apparent decline into 2026 should be revisited once the most recent application years have fully published.
Explore in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
The dataset's assignee ranking (rendered separately on this page) shows filing concentrated among a handful of national nuclear programmes and major reactor vendors, including entities tied to France's state-backed fuel-cycle programme and established reactor manufacturers such as Toshiba and Westinghouse. Several of these top assignees show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, which reflects the dataset's broader decline from its 2020 peak rather than any single company exiting. Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, current-year rankings should be treated as provisional.
Filing peaked at 27 records in 2020 and had fallen to 11 by the 2022 midpoint, indicating the field is past its filing peak rather than still expanding. This pattern is consistent with a technology area where the core storage and reprocessing mechanisms were claimed in earlier years, leaving recent activity more incremental. The 2025-2026 figures will revise upward as later applications publish, but the overall trajectory is flat-to-declining rather than growing.
US9666315B2, assigned to Toshiba, covers a spent fuel reprocessing method that dissolves fuel in nitric acid and separates nuclides by solvent extraction, with a specific electrolytic valence-adjustment step that manipulates plutonium's oxidation state before a nuclide separation stage using a uranium-selective extraction solvent. It does not block solvent extraction reprocessing generally — it blocks the specific combination of electrolytic valence control timed and parameterized as claimed. Alternative reprocessing routes that adjust valence by other chemical means, or that omit the electrolytic step entirely, sit outside its claim scope.
Relative to the 387 records classified under G21C (nuclear reactors) and 268 under G21F (radiation shielding), separation and metallurgical chemistry classes such as B01D, C22B, C25C and B04B are thinly represented, together covering well under a fifth of the corpus. That gap suggests process chemistry — particularly centrifugal extraction hardware, electrolytic valence adjustment, and vitrification matrix formulation — carries lower filing density than the storage and shielding hardware around it. A first claim in these branches has more room to establish novel ground than one filed against the crowded G21C or G21F classes.
The United States leads receiving offices with 154 filings, followed by Japan at 90 and the European Patent Office at 77; the United Kingdom and the WIPO PCT route each sit in the 50s, while China trails at 16. This spread tracks where fuel storage and reprocessing infrastructure is concentrated rather than reactor fleet size alone, since countries with large operating reactor fleets but limited domestic reprocessing capacity file comparatively less in this specific dataset.
Research Spent Fuel Management and Reprocessing in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole spent fuel management and reprocessing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.