Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (20 records) with 2024 (16) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 352 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks 352 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that describe sprayer cleaning, tank rinsing, chemical residue control, cross-contamination prevention, cleaning-agent formulation, rinsate handling, closed transfer systems and related record-keeping. The scope spans agricultural sprayers alongside adjacent domains — household appliance cleaning, medical instrument disinfection and industrial heat-exchanger cleaning — that share the same underlying claim language around detergents, rinsing cycles and residue removal.
Because the search string pulls from overlapping technical vocabularies, the dataset mixes agrochemical-specific filings with general cleaning-technology patents. That mixture matters for anyone scoping freedom to operate: a claim written for glass-substrate cleaning or steam-mop appliances can still read on an agricultural sprayer rinsing cycle if the independent claim language is broad enough.
Two views of the same 352 records: how filing activity has moved year on year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Annual filings rose from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 20 in 2021, then declined to 16 by 2024 — a -20% change over that three-year window. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are still climbing as publication lag (typically around 18 months) catches up with filing dates, so the apparent recent drop should not be read as the field cooling.
C11D (detergents and cleaning compositions) touches 23.6% of the 352 records, the single largest class, followed by A47L cleaning appliances at 18.8%, A61L sterilising and disinfecting at 15.1%, and B08B general cleaning at 14.2%. Smaller but notable overlaps sit in A01N biocides (8.2%), A61K medicinal preparations (7.1%), F28F heat-exchanger details (7.1%) and A01M pest control (6.5%) — each record can carry more than one class, so these figures sum past 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 352 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about sprayer cleaning and residue management and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing describes a sprayer cleaning assembly built around a dedicated cleaning-agent reservoir and two operating configurations: an application configuration where the boom tube and nozzles connect only to the product reservoir, and a cleaning configuration where those same components switch to draw from the cleaning-agent reservoir instead, circulating cleaning agent through the boom tube.Filed by Raven Industries, published 2024-04-04.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20030014342A1 | Free-market environmental management system having insured certification to a process standard | 255 |
| 2 | US9561982B2 | Method of cleaning glass substrates | 192 |
| 3 | US20100287716A1 | Upright steam mop sweeper | 113 |
| 4 | US5782109A | Dispenser | 112 |
| 5 | US5265628A | Automated cleansing chamber | 111 |
| 6 | US6372842B1 | Methods of using an aqueous composition containing a water-soluble or water-dispersible synthetic polymer and… | 110 |
| 7 | US6143257A | Dispenser | 82 |
| 8 | US6418586B2 | Liquid extraction machine | 78 |
| 9 | US8458850B2 | Upright steam mop sweeper | 70 |
| 10 | US5975352A | Dispenser | 70 |
Citation counts accumulate over time, so older records dominate this table by construction — treat them as markers of influence on the field, not as evidence of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the concentration, trend and classification figures above.
The leading assignee holds 26 of 352 records and the top 5 combined reach only 21.6% — well short of the kind of concentration that would signal a blocking position. The remaining assignees form a long tail, mostly single- or double-digit filers.
Filings rose steadily from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 20 in 2021, then eased to 16 by 2024, a -20% change. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, the 2025-2026 figures are provisional and should not be read as a cooling trend.
Detergent and cleaning-composition claims (C11D) cover more of the corpus than any single hardware class, ahead of A47L cleaning appliances and B08B general cleaning. A filer focused purely on mechanical rinsing hardware is competing in a smaller slice of the claim space than the chemistry side.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to sprayer cleaning and residue management, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked assignee list runs to 100 companies counted by record — this is the full ranking the dataset returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut. Momentum in the latest year is muted across the board, which is more consistent with the publication lag than with filers stepping back.
The top-ranked assignee holds 26 of the 352 records in scope. That is a meaningful lead over the field but nowhere near the density needed to control the space outright — the fifth-ranked assignee still holds 11 records.
The ranking spans 100 assignees, with the tenth-place company holding just 8 records. Most of the field files in small numbers, which points to a technology area where individual companies protect specific implementations rather than broad platforms.
Several of the more active assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year, including one at -100% year on year. Given the roughly 18-month gap between filing and publication, this reads as an artefact of the data cut-off rather than a genuine pullback.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| ABEC Inc | 0 | — |
| Bissell Inc | 0 | — |
| Ecolab Inc | 0 | — |
| Deere & Co | 0 | -100% |
| Ecolab USA Inc | 0 | — |
| BLUE PENNY LLC | 0 | — |
| Crossford International LLC | 0 | — |
| Tristel PLC | 0 | -100% |
The landscape points to a fragmented ownership structure with real technical gaps still open in transfer and logging systems.
With C11D detergent and cleaning-composition claims covering the largest share of records, a new cleaning-agent formulation should be checked against that class first, not just against agricultural-specific filings.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaAutomated rinsate logging and closed-transfer interlocks show thinner claim density than the core appliance and chemistry classes, which leaves room for a tightly drafted first claim in that space.
Explore white space in EurekaThe leading assignee in this dataset holds 26 of the 352 records in scope, with the field dropping off quickly after that — the fifth-ranked company holds 11 and the tenth holds 8. The top 5 assignees combined account for only 21.6% of all records, and the top 10 for 34.4%, so ownership is spread across a long tail of smaller filers rather than concentrated in one or two companies. Anyone doing freedom-to-operate work should expect to check a wide list of assignees rather than a handful of dominant players.
Filings rose from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 20 in 2021, then eased to 16 by 2024, a -20% change over that span. Counts for 2025 and 2026 look lower still, but that is expected: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any patent dataset are undercounted. Based on the complete years through 2024, the field looks like a post-peak plateau rather than a genuine decline.
Cleaning chemistry leads: detergent and cleaning-composition claims (IPC class C11D) appear in 23.6% of the 352 records, more than any single hardware class. Cleaning and washing appliances (A47L) follow at 18.8%, sterilising and disinfecting (A61L) at 15.1%, and general cleaning apparatus (B08B) at 14.2%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these figures overlap rather than summing to 100%, but the ordering shows that formulation and chemistry claims currently occupy more of the field than mechanical rinsing hardware alone.
US20240109094A1, filed by Raven Industries, describes a sprayer cleaning assembly with a dedicated cleaning-agent reservoir and two distinct plumbing configurations: an application mode where the boom and nozzles connect only to the product reservoir, and a cleaning mode where the same lines switch over to the cleaning-agent reservoir and circulate cleaning agent through the boom tube. It is representative of a design pattern common in this landscape — reservoir isolation with a switchable flow path — rather than an unusually broad claim. A new design that avoids a dedicated switchable reservoir architecture, or that routes cleaning agent through a genuinely different physical path, would sit outside its core claim language, though a detailed claim chart against the granted claims is the only reliable way to confirm that.
The classification data shows heavier claim density in cleaning chemistry (C11D) and general appliance cleaning (A47L, B08B) than in more specific operational features like closed transfer interlocks, automated rinsate volume logging or cross-contamination sensor triggers. These narrower operational areas sit inside the search scope but do not show up as separately dense IPC clusters in this dataset, suggesting thinner claim coverage. A first claim tightly drafted around automated logging of rinsate volumes tied to a closed-transfer interlock is a plausible route into that gap, though it should be checked against the individual assignee filings before drafting.
Go past this page: query the whole sprayer cleaning and residue management corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.