Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

SR vs Diode Rectification in LLC EV Chargers — PatSnap Eureka

SR vs Diode Rectification in LLC EV Chargers — PatSnap Eureka
LLC Resonant Converters · EV OBC

Synchronous Rectification vs. Diode Rectification in LLC EV Onboard Chargers

A patent-backed technical comparison of secondary-side rectification methods in LLC resonant converters — covering conduction losses, V2X capability, control complexity, and key industry innovators from 50+ patent records spanning 2015–2026.

SR Efficiency Gains vs Diode Rectification: Charging Mode +0.4625%, Discharging Mode +1.097% (NTUST 2021) Experimental efficiency improvements from adaptive synchronous rectification versus diode rectification in a bidirectional full-bridge LLC resonant converter, as demonstrated by National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (2021). Discharging mode shows the larger gain of 1.097%. 1.2% 0.9% 0.6% 0.3% +0.4625% Charging Mode +1.097% Discharging Mode SR Efficiency Gain vs Diode Rectification · NTUST 2021
50+
Patents & publications analysed (2015–2026)
1.097%
Peak SR efficiency gain in discharging mode (NTUST 2021)
0.6–1.0V
Diode forward voltage drop causing conduction loss
V2G/V2H
Bidirectional modes enabled only by synchronous rectification
Operating Principles

How Diode and Synchronous Rectification Work in LLC Converters

In traditional LLC resonant converter designs for EV onboard chargers (OBCs), the secondary side employs a full-bridge or center-tap diode rectifier. The transformer secondary winding feeds a diode bridge that passively converts the high-frequency AC signal into regulated DC output for battery charging. As described by Sungkyunkwan University (2019), a dual-integrated LLC resonant converter uses a six-pulse diode rectifier, enabling multiple switching patterns to cover wide output voltage ranges while keeping the rectification stage passive and straightforward.

The inherent limitation of diode rectification is conduction loss. Each diode introduces a forward voltage drop — typically 0.6–1.0 V for silicon diodes — which, at high output currents characteristic of fast EV charging, results in significant power dissipation. Mitsubishi Electric's 2018 patent specifically identifies the recovery of rectifying diodes on the secondary side as a source of surge voltage propagating to the primary resonance reactor, requiring dedicated surge suppression components. This reverse-recovery behavior is a well-documented source of electromagnetic interference (EMI) and switching losses.

Synchronous rectification replaces the passive diodes with actively controlled MOSFET switches. When a MOSFET is turned on at the correct moment, current flows through its low on-resistance channel (R_DS(on)) rather than across a diode junction, dramatically reducing conduction loss. The University of British Columbia's homopolarity-based SR patents ensure that the MOSFET channel — not its body diode — carries the current for the majority of the conduction interval, directly targeting the dominant loss mechanism. According to U.S. Department of Energy EV charging efficiency guidelines, secondary-side losses are among the most impactful factors in overall charger system efficiency.

Diode rectifiers are inherently unidirectional. Renault's OBC control patents reference a diode bridge linking the transformer secondary to the battery — an architecture that inherently precludes reverse power flow. Kia's OBC control patents explicitly reference detecting "the conduction time of a diode" in the rectifier as a timing reference for controlling the switching frequency of the LLC converter's primary side — a technique that leverages the diode's passive behavior as a diagnostic signal. Learn more about PatSnap's industry-specific analytics for power electronics innovation.

Key Loss Metrics
0.6–1.0V
Diode forward junction voltage drop (silicon)
R·I²
SR conduction loss via MOSFET R_DS(on)
ZCS
SR achieves zero current switching turn-on (IIT Delhi, 2021)
ZVS
LLC primary side inherent zero-voltage switching
Dataset Coverage
  • 50+ patent records and research publications
  • 2015–2026 filing and publication range
  • Automotive OEMs: Hyundai, Nissan, Renault, Toyota
  • Academic: UBC, NTUST, Tsinghua, Nantes
  • Industrial: Eaton, Mitsubishi Electric
Data Visualisation

Loss Mechanisms and Patent Activity: By the Numbers

All data derived from patent filings and peer-reviewed publications in the PatSnap Eureka dataset spanning 2015–2026.

Conduction Loss: Diode vs SR Mechanisms

Diode rectification incurs a fixed 0.6–1.0 V forward drop; SR loss scales with R_DS(on) × I², which is substantially lower at typical EV charging currents.

Conduction Loss Comparison: Silicon Diode 0.6–1.0V drop, Schottky Diode slightly lower, MOSFET SR R_DS(on)×I² (lowest), Body Diode (fallback) comparable to Schottky Relative conduction loss levels across rectification device types used in LLC converter secondary stages for EV OBCs. MOSFET synchronous rectification achieves the lowest conduction loss when correctly timed. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent and literature analysis, 2015–2026. High Mid Low 0.6–1.0V Si Diode Lower Schottky Moderate Body Diode R·I² MOSFET SR

Key Patent Assignees: LLC OBC Rectification (2015–2026)

Hyundai/Kia leads in LLC OBC control patents; UBC holds the most focused SR methodology portfolio; Nissan drives bidirectional charger IP.

LLC OBC Patent Assignees: Hyundai/Kia 5+ patents, UBC 4 patents (SR focus), Nissan 3 patents (bidirectional), Renault 2 patents, Eaton 1 patent (2015–2026) Relative patent filing activity by key assignees in LLC resonant converter rectification for EV onboard chargers, based on PatSnap Eureka dataset of 50+ records spanning 2015–2026. Hyundai Motor Company and Kia are the most prolific assignees in LLC-based OBC control. 2 3 4 5+ Number of Patents Hyundai/Kia 5+ UBC (SR) 4 Nissan 3 Renault 2 Eaton 1

Search the full LLC rectification patent landscape with AI-powered analysis

Run a Live Patent Search on Eureka
Head-to-Head Analysis

Diode Rectification vs. Synchronous Rectification: Parameter Comparison

All parameters sourced directly from patent filings and peer-reviewed literature in the PatSnap Eureka dataset.

Parameter Diode Rectification Synchronous Rectification
Conduction loss High — junction forward drop 0.6–1.0 V Higher Low — R_DS(on) × I² Lower
Control complexity None — passive operation Simpler High — timing-critical gate drive Complex
Cost Low Lower Higher — gate drivers, DSP, sensing Higher
Bidirectionality No — inherently unidirectional None Yes — native V2G/V2H/V2L support Native
Reverse recovery Present — EMI and surge voltage EMI risk Absent — controllable turn-off Eliminated
ZCS capability Passive natural only Active, controllable ZCS turn-on Active
Thermal stress Higher at heavy load Higher Lower, better distributed Lower
🔒
Unlock V2X Compatibility & Control Reference Rows
See how diode conduction timing is used as a primary-side frequency lock signal by Hyundai/Kia, and why V2X requires hardware redesign with diode stages.
V2X compatibility Primary control reference Surge suppression
View Full Analysis on Eureka →

Analyse LLC rectification patents across 120+ countries

PatSnap Eureka searches 2B+ data points to surface the innovations that matter for your OBC design decisions.

Search EV Charger Patents
Bidirectionality & V2X

Why Synchronous Rectification Is Essential for V2G and V2X Operation

Diode rectifiers are fundamentally one-way devices. The shift to V2G, V2H, and V2L operation requires active secondary-side control that only synchronous rectification can provide.

Bidirectional LLC Architecture

Diode Bridges Cannot Support Reverse Power Flow

Diode rectifiers block reverse current by design. Renault's OBC patents reference a diode bridge linking the transformer secondary to the battery — an architecture that inherently precludes reverse power flow. The Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (2021) confirms that V2X operation requires bidirectional capability in the DC-DC stage, making diode-only secondary stages incompatible with V2G/V2H/V2L without full hardware redesign. See PatSnap's EV technology solutions for sector-specific intelligence.

V2X requires hardware redesign with diode stages
Nissan Bidirectional Design

Transistor-Diode-Capacitor Parallel Structures

Nissan's DC-DC Converter for Bi-Directional Charger patents (France, 2019 and 2021) illustrate the practical hybrid approach: each rectifier leg comprises a transistor, a diode, and a capacitor in parallel. The transistor enables synchronous rectification and bidirectional operation, the diode provides the passive freewheeling path, and the capacitor supports ZVS. A cancellation device eliminates the capacitor's effect in V2G mode — demonstrating the additional circuit complexity required for full bidirectionality while maintaining soft-switching performance in both directions.

Transistor + diode + capacitor per leg
Advanced Modulation Strategies

PFM, PWM, and PSM Require Active Secondary Bridges

The Ecole Centrale de Nantes (2023) review covers Pulse Frequency Modulation (PFM), Pulse Width Modulation (PWM), and Phase-Shift Modulation (PSM) for bidirectional LLC converters. All of these advanced modulation strategies apply to both the primary and secondary active bridges — the synchronous rectifier side becomes an active inverter in V2X mode. A converter using passive diode rectification cannot participate in these control strategies. The IEC standards body increasingly addresses bidirectional EV charging interfaces.

SR side becomes active inverter in V2X mode
CLLLC Symmetrical Topology

Tsinghua's CLLLC: Active Rectification on Both Sides

Tsinghua University (2023) confirms the trend: the CLLLC topology uses active rectification on both sides and achieves consistent working characteristics in both forward and reverse operations due to its symmetrical structure and good soft-switching characteristics — a configuration that would be incompatible with passive diode rectification on the secondary side. The symmetrical design enables the same resonant tank parameters to be leveraged in both charging and discharging directions. Explore how leading OEMs use PatSnap for power electronics R&D.

Incompatible with diode secondary stages
PatSnap Eureka

Map the full V2X patent landscape instantly

Find bidirectional OBC patents from Nissan, Renault, Hyundai, and 100+ other assignees across all jurisdictions.

Explore V2X Patents on Eureka
SR Timing & Control

The Non-Trivial Challenge of Synchronous Rectifier Timing in LLC Converters

LLC converters operate with variable frequency and sinusoidal-like resonant currents, making zero-crossing detection and gate timing the central engineering challenge for SR implementation.

UBC Homopolarity Concept

The University of British Columbia's SR patents use a homopolarity cycle concept: one rectifier switch is turned ON when both inverter and rectifier voltages are simultaneously positive, and the other when both are negative. This ensures the MOSFET channel — not its body diode — carries current for the majority of the conduction interval, directly reducing the dominant loss mechanism identified in their patent family (2020–2023).

🔬

Eaton's Shunt Resistor Approach

Eaton Intelligent Power Limited's 2024 WO patent generates driving signals for synchronous rectifier switches S1–S4 using current signals measured from shunt resistors — one per switch pair — to precisely determine when each switch should conduct and when it should turn off. This per-switch sensing eliminates timing ambiguity caused by variable-frequency resonant current waveforms in LLC converters, addressing the core shoot-through risk.

🔒
Unlock NTUST V_DS Sensing & Hyundai Timing Reference Details
Discover how adaptive V_DS sensing achieves 1.097% efficiency gain and how Hyundai uses diode conduction timing as a resonant frequency lock signal.
NTUST V_DS method Hyundai frequency lock 0.4625% / 1.097% data
Access Full SR Control Analysis →
Innovation Landscape

Key Patent Assignees Driving LLC Rectification Innovation

From automotive OEMs to academic research groups, these organisations define the state of the art in LLC converter rectification for EV onboard chargers.

Automotive OEM

Hyundai Motor Company / Kia

The most prolific patent assignee in LLC-based OBC control, with multiple active US patents covering topology switching (2023, 2024), startup behavior (2020), and resonance-frequency optimisation using diode conduction timing as feedback. Their work targets both unidirectional and efficiency-optimised OBC architectures. The PatSnap Analytics platform tracks their full IP portfolio in real time.

5+ active US patents in LLC OBC control
Academic IP

University of British Columbia

Holds a family of patents specifically on synchronous rectification of LLC converters using the homopolarity concept (CA 2023; US 2021; US 2020), representing the most focused academic-originated IP portfolio on SR methodology for LLC converters in this dataset. Their primary motivation — explicitly stated in the patents — is conduction loss reduction through ensuring MOSFET channel conduction rather than body diode fallback.

4 patents — most focused SR methodology portfolio
Automotive OEM

Nissan Motor Company

Contributes a series of bidirectional LLC charger patents from France (2019, 2021), all centred on enabling reverse operation through transistor-diode-capacitor parallel structures in the rectifier bridge. Their designs demonstrate the practical compromise required for real-world bidirectional OBCs: multi-function circuit elements that simultaneously serve as synchronous rectifier, freewheeling path, and ZVS capacitor. The EPA's EV charging standards increasingly require bidirectional capability.

3 patents — bidirectional charger focus
Industrial Power Electronics

Eaton Intelligent Power Limited

Represents the industrial power electronics supplier perspective, filing a WO patent (2024) on shunt-resistor-based SR timing control for full-bridge LLC converters. Their approach — one shunt resistor per switch pair — provides per-switch current sensing that precisely determines conduction windows, eliminating the timing ambiguity inherent to variable-frequency LLC operation. Renault S.A.S. separately focuses on system-level OBC control combining Vienna rectifier front ends with LLC DC-DC stages using diode bridge secondary rectification. Explore the PatSnap Open API to integrate this data into your own tools.

WO 2024 — shunt resistor SR timing
Frequently asked questions

LLC Rectification in EV OBCs — Key Questions Answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask Eureka About LLC Rectification
PatSnap Eureka

Accelerate Your EV Charger R&D with AI-Powered Patent Intelligence

Join 18,000+ innovators already using PatSnap Eureka to accelerate their R&D. Search 50+ LLC OBC patents and 2B+ data points to make better design decisions faster.

References

  1. Synchronous rectification of LLC converters based on homopolarity — The University of British Columbia, 2021
  2. Synchronous rectification of LLC converters based on homopolarity — The University of British Columbia, 2020
  3. Synchronous rectification of LLC converters based on homopolarity — The University of British Columbia, 2023
  4. Synchronous rectification of LLC converters based on homopolarity — The University of British Columbia, 2020
  5. An Adaptive Synchronous Rectification Driving Strategy for Bidirectional Full-Bridge LLC Resonant Converter — National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 2021
  6. Method for synchronous rectification of a DC-to-DC converter — Eaton Intelligent Power Limited, 2024
  7. In-vehicle charger and surge-suppression method for in-vehicle charger — Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, 2018
  8. DC-DC Converter for Bi-Directional Charger — Nissan Motor Co. Limited, 2019
  9. DC-DC Converter for Bi-Directional Charger — Nissan Motor Co. Limited, 2019
  10. DC-DC Converter for Bi-Directional Charger — Nissan Motor Co. Limited, 2021
  11. Method and system for controlling on-board charger of vehicle — Hyundai Motor Company, 2020
  12. Method and system for controlling on-board charger of vehicle — Hyundai Motor Company, 2018
  13. Apparatus and method for controlling LLC resonance converter — Hyundai Motor Company, 2024
  14. Apparatus and method for controlling LLC resonance converter — Hyundai Motor Company, 2023
  15. LLC resonance converter and charging system having the same — Hyundai Motor Company, 2020
  16. Method for controlling a charging device on board an electric or hybrid vehicle — Renault S.A.S., 2021
  17. Method for controlling a charging device on board an electric or hybrid vehicle — Renault S.A.S., 2019
  18. LLC DC-DC Converter Performances Improvement for Bidirectional Electric Vehicle Charger Application — Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes, 2021
  19. Review on Modeling and Control Strategies of DC–DC LLC Converters for Bidirectional Electric Vehicle Charger Applications — Ecole Centrale de Nantes / LS2N, 2023
  20. A Novel Dual Integrated LLC Resonant Converter Using Various Switching Patterns for a Wide Output Voltage Range Battery Charger — Sungkyunkwan University, 2019
  21. System and method for improving efficiency of EV chargers with different open circuit voltages — Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, 2021
  22. Bidirectional CLLLC Resonant Converter Based on Frequency-Conversion and Phase-Shift Hybrid Control — Tsinghua University, 2023
  23. LLC resonant converter topologies and industrial applications — A review — Guangdong University of Technology, 2020
  24. IEEE — Power Electronics Standards and Publications — Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
  25. U.S. Department of Energy — Electric Vehicle Charging Efficiency Guidelines — DOE Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
  26. IEC — International Electrotechnical Commission EV Charging Standards — IEC TC 69
  27. EPA — Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Standards — U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

All data and statistics on this page are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap's proprietary innovation intelligence platform.

Ask PatSnap Eureka
Ask PatSnap Eureka
AI innovation intelligence · always on
Ask anything about LLC rectification in EV chargers.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and research to answer instantly.
Try asking
Powered by PatSnap Eureka