Book a demo

Starch Processing & Sweetener Patents: Top Companies, Trends 2026

Starch Processing & Sweetener Patents: Top Companies, Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/starch-processing-and-sweetener-production-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Food Processing
Starch Processing and Sweetener Production Patents
  • Filings peaked in 2021 at 6 records and have since gone flat, with 2022 at zero — a signal that claim activity in this dataset has cooled rather than accelerated.
  • The top 5 assignees hold 61.2% of all 49 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 79.6% — a field concentrated at the top with a thin tail below it.
  • C12P fermentation and enzymatic synthesis covers 75.5% of records, far ahead of C13K saccharide-extraction claims at 30.6%, showing where the claim density actually sits.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
49
Published Records
61%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers 49 published records filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine starch processing and sweetener-production search terms with IPC classes C13K, C12P and A23L — the classes covering saccharides from natural sources, fermentation-based synthesis, and food and beverage formulation. The scope centres on the technical steps that turn starch into glucose or high-fructose syrup: enzymatic liquefaction and saccharification, isomerization, ion exchange refining, DE value control, and the handling of co-products like gluten and fiber.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent year in the trend chart understates real filing activity. Family-level counting is used throughout so that repeat filings from the same invention in multiple jurisdictions do not inflate any single assignee's position.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1DANISCO US INC13
  2. 2ZHEJIANG HUAKANG PHARMA6
  3. 3ZHEJIANG UNIV OF TECH4
  4. 4SHANDONG UNIV4
  5. 5Henan Zhongyuan Yuze Biotechnology Co., Ltd.3
  6. 6NOVO NORDISK AS2
  7. 7Wuhan Jindege Sugar Co., Ltd.2
  8. 8SHANDONG SCENTS JIANYUAN BIO TECH2
  9. 9NOVOZYMES AS2
  10. 10LANTERO ORESTE1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Starch Processing and Sweetener Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 49 records: how filing activity moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Activity rose gradually from 2017, reached a peak of 6 records in 2021, then dropped to zero at the 2022 midpoint — a pattern consistent with a technology area that saw a short filing push rather than sustained growth. Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the final one or two years on the chart will fill in further as more records publish.

Filing trend, 2017-2026023561201720182019202062021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) appears on 75.5% of the 49 records, with C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) on 42.9% and C13K (saccharides from natural sources) on 30.6%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares sum to well over 100% — they show where claim attention concentrates, not a partition of the field. Smaller classes like A21D (baking and doughs) at 6.1% and A23K (animal feed) at 10.2% mark peripheral application areas rather than core process claims.

IPC subclass compositionC12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…3775.5%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…2142.9%C13K · Saccharides from natural sourc…1530.6%C12R · Microorganisms (index)1224.5%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …612.2%A23K · Animal feed510.2%A23L · Foods & non-alcoholic beverages510.2%A21D · Baking; doughs36.1%Other1122.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 49 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Starch Processing and Sweetener Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Starch Processing and Sweetener Production with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about starch processing and sweetener production and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this dataset

Representative Filing
US20220389526A12022-12-08

System and method for reducing 5-hydroxymethylfurfural content in high fructose corn syrup

ZHEJIANG HUAKANG PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.

The filing describes a purification train for high-fructose syrup that sequences ion exchange (cation then anion removal), heat exchange, chromatographic separation, blending and decolorization to bring an F42 stream up to F55 while controlling 5-hydroxymethylfurfural formation — a byproduct that forms during isomerization and affects both syrup colour and shelf stability.Filed by Zhejiang Huakang Pharmaceutical, published 2022-12-08.

US20220389526A1 — patent drawing 1
View full filing
Highest-citation patents in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO1998022613A1Use of carbohydrate-binding domain in starch processing47
2US4421852AProduction of high fructose syrup from inulin involving ultrafiltration47
3CN101979643A一种大米果葡糖浆的制备工艺21
4US8507244B2Variants of <i>bacillus </i>sp. TS-23 alpha-amylase with altered properties14
5CN102242168A用大米生产含量为55%果葡糖浆的工艺14
6US4395292AHigh fructose syrup and process for making same13
7CN104745563A葡萄糖异构酶、基因、突变体、工程菌及应用11
8JP1992500756AHeat, acid and/or alkali bacterial mutant α – amylase has high stability9
9CN106566824A一种葡萄糖异构酶、基因、载体、工程菌及其应用8
10CN111100892A一种果葡糖浆生产工艺7

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a measure of influence on later filings, not as an indicator of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Starch Processing and Sweetener Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for R&D and IP strategy

Three patterns stand out once filing volume, IPC composition and citation weight are read together.

Concentration
61.2% top 5
share of all 49 records

Filing sits with a small group of repeat filers

The leader alone accounts for 13 records, and the top 5 combined hold 61.2% of the 49 records in scope. That leaves a long tail: most of the 30 ranked assignees appear with only one or two filings each, which points to a field where a handful of players set the claim boundaries and everyone else files defensively or opportunistically around them.

Based on the assignee ranking of 30 companies.
Process focus
75.5% C12P
of 49 records

Enzymatic and fermentation routes dominate claim language

Three in four records touch C12P fermentation and enzymatic synthesis claims, well ahead of C13K saccharide-extraction claims at 30.6%. Enzyme variant and process-condition claims are where the density is; anyone drafting around liquefaction or saccharification steps should expect to find prior art here first.

IPC shares are of all 49 records; a record can carry multiple classes.
Momentum
0 in latest year
for every top-6 assignee tracked

No leading assignee shows recent-year filing activity

Every one of the six assignees tracked for recent-year momentum — including the field leader — shows zero filings in the latest year. Combined with the 2021 peak and the flat 2022 midpoint, this suggests the current filers have either paused, shifted strategy, or their newest filings have not yet published.

Recent-year momentum tracked across six named assignees.
Geography
17 China filings
of 6 receiving offices tracked

China leads receiving-office volume, US and EPO follow closely

China accounts for 17 filings, ahead of the EPO and US at 9 each, with Canada, Japan and Germany each in single digits. That distribution suggests China is the most active filing jurisdiction for this process chain, while EPO and US filings likely represent the higher-value or export-oriented inventions.

Counts are receiving-office filings, not families.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to starch processing and sweetener production, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Starch Processing and Sweetener Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it opens up

The assignee ranking is concentrated but not closed — the gap between the top 5 and top 10 shows room for a second wave, and several sub-areas remain thinly claimed.

Leader
13 records
leader's filing count

One assignee sets the pace

The top-ranked assignee holds 13 of the 49 records in scope, more than double the fifth-place count of 3. That gap is wide enough that any new entrant should expect to negotiate around the leader's claims specifically, not just the field average.

Leader vs. fifth place, from the 30-company ranking.
Mid-tier
3 records
fifth-place filing count

A tight cluster forms behind the leader

Fifth place holds 3 records and tenth place holds just 1, meaning the field flattens quickly outside the top few. Most of the 30 ranked assignees sit at this low end, filing once or twice rather than building a sustained portfolio.

From the 30-company assignee ranking.
Co-filing
8 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is limited and inventor-linked

Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest links are between one corporate assignee and individual named inventors rather than between two companies. This points to filings built around specific inventor teams rather than formal joint-venture patenting.

Pair counts from the co-assignee analysis.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas show low IPC representation relative to the core fermentation and saccharide classes — worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming the space is clear.
5-HMF byproduct reductionDE value control in continuous liquefactionco-product gluten/fiber valorisationanimal-feed grade syrup formulationbaking-application starch derivatives
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Danisco US Inc.0
Zhejiang University of Technology0
Zhejiang Huakang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.0
Shandong University0
Novo Nordisk A/S0
Wuhan Jindege Sugar Co., Ltd.0
Shandong Xiangchi Jianyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd.0
Huangmei Nanyang Biotechnology Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Starch Processing and Sweetener Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking, or drafting.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the gate chips

The under-claimed sub-areas above — 5-HMF reduction, DE value control, co-product valorisation — show low IPC density but are not necessarily clear. Confirm against the full claim text before committing R&D spend.

Explore in Eureka

Track the leader's next filings

With every top-6 assignee showing zero filings in the latest tracked year, the next published batch will indicate whether the 2021 peak was a one-off push or the start of a new cycle.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Benchmark citation-heavy prior art before drafting

The most-cited records in this set date back to the 1990s and 2010s, meaning any new isomerization or ion-exchange claim needs to be checked against foundational patents, not just recent filings.

Review key patents in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Starch Processing and Sweetener Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on starch and sweetener patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Starch Processing and Sweetener Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Starch Processing and Sweetener Production in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole starch processing and sweetener production corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.