Book a demo

Steam Generation Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Steam Generation Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/steam-generation-and-distribution-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Steam Generation and Distribution
Steam generation and distribution patents: mapping filing trends, leading assignees and white space
  • Filing has cooled from its 2020 peak of 33. the leader-to-2024 count fell -67% (30 in 2021 to 10 in 2024), the last year with reasonably complete data.
  • One assignee dominates the ranking at 56 records. while the field otherwise has a long tail down to single-digit filers by fifth and tenth place.
  • Steam-specific classes sit inside a much wider IPC footprint. H02J power/grid (35.4%) and H01M batteries (24.6%) both outrank some core thermal classes, showing steam hardware is increasingly filed alongside power-integration claims.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
130
Published Records
-67%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
21
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (30 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks 130 published records filed against a search for once-through steam systems, steam splitters and distribution architecture, cross-referenced with boiler feedwater treatment, steam quality measurement, blowdown separation, metering, water recycling and generator tube scaling. The scope spans 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, capturing both classic thermal-plant steam engineering and its more recent overlap with renewable-integrated and industrial-process steam applications.

Filing activity peaked in 2020 and has since declined through 2024, the last year with reasonably complete publication data; 2025 and 2026 figures will fill in as later-filed applications publish, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. The technology composition shows steam engineering increasingly intersecting with power-grid, battery and even electrolytic-production classes rather than sitting purely inside classical boiler and turbine art.

Filing trend and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES BV56
  2. 2RONDO ENERGY INC44
  3. 3GLASSPOINT SOLAR INC18
  4. 4WARD5
  5. 5STEVENSON SCOTT5
  6. 6SCHROER JOSEPH WILLIAM5
  7. 7HUTCHINSON DAN5
  8. 8ZHAO ZHUN5
  9. 9HUCKMAN MICHAEL EDWARD5
  10. 10LAWSON KENNETH FRANCIS5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steam Generation and Distribution covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The two views below sit on different denominators: the trend line counts publications by year, while the IPC composition counts how many of the 130 records touch each subclass — a record can carry several classes, so the shares sum past 100%.

Filing trend, 2015-2026

Filings rose to a peak of 33 in 2020, then declined; the leader's count alone fell -67% from 30 in 2021 to 10 in 2024, the last year treatable as complete given publication lag.

Filing trend, 2015-202601020304012017201820193320202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H02J (power supply and grid systems) leads at 35.4% of the 130 records, followed by F01K (steam and thermal power plants) at 28.5% and F28D (heat exchange apparatus) at 27.7%; separation (B01D), battery (H01M), wind (F03D), marine propulsion (B63H) and electrolytic production (C25B) classes each appear in roughly a fifth to a quarter of records.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH02J · Power supply & grid systems4635.4%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants3728.5%F28D · Heat-exchange apparatus3627.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…3325.4%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells3224.6%F03D · Wind motors (wind turbines)3123.8%B63H · Marine propulsion & steering3023.1%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…2821.5%Other253194.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 130 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steam Generation and Distribution covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Steam Generation and Distribution with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about steam generation and distribution and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this landscape

Representative filing
US10054559B22018-08-21

Compact steam quality and flow rate measurement system (US10054559B2)

HUTCHINSON, DAN

A compact, pressure-conserving steam quality and flow-rate measurement system combining a converging/diverging nozzle with a conditioning orifice plate. The nozzle reduces pressure loss and controls flow rate; the orifice plate shortens the flow-conditioning pipe run needed and removes secondary conditioning elements. Placing both elements in series lets data from each be used together to determine two-phase steam quality in one compact assembly.Filed by Hutchinson, Dan; published 2018-08-21.

US10054559B2 — patent drawing 1US10054559B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US8701773B2Oilfield application of solar energy collection98
2WO2020150244A1Use of renewable energy in olefin synthesis73
3AU2016204109B2Direct solar steam applications64
4EP3725865A1Use of renewable energy in olefin synthesis54
5EP3730592A1Use of renewable energy in olefin synthesis39
6US20130092153A1Direct Solar Steam Generation35
7WO2012006257A2Direct solar steam generation34
8WO2022115721A2Energy storage system and applications28
9WO2020150245A1Use of renewable energy in ammonia synthesis28
10US20220119269A1Use of renewable energy in ammonia synthesis27

Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of being searchable longer; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steam Generation and Distribution covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the trend, the class composition and the assignee spread are read together.

Filing momentum
-67% (2021→2024)
leader filings, three-year span

The 2020 peak has not held

Filings rose to 33 in 2020 and the leading assignee's own count then fell from 30 in 2021 to 10 in 2024, the last year with dependable publication coverage. That is a real pullback rather than a data artefact, though 2025-2026 counts will still rise as later filings publish.

Read the recent years as a floor, not a final count.
Class overlap
35.4% H02J vs 28.5% F01K
share of 130 records

Grid integration outranks core steam classes

Power-supply and grid-systems art (H02J) touches more of the corpus than steam and thermal power plant art (F01K) itself, and battery classes (H01M, 24.6%) appear almost as often as heat-exchange apparatus (F28D, 27.7%). Steam hardware claims are increasingly bundled with power-integration and storage claims rather than filed as standalone thermal art.

Search across power and storage classes, not just thermal ones, before assuming freedom to operate.
Ownership spread
56 vs 5 (leader vs 5th place)
records in the 21-company ranking

One filer, then a steep drop-off

The ranked leader holds 56 records against a fifth-place count of only 5 across the 21 companies in this ranking, with the tenth-place filer also at 5. Most of the field files in single digits, which suggests concentrated core IP held by one player and a long tail of narrower, single-application filings.

Check the leader's claim scope first; the tail is thinner but more numerous.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to steam generation and distribution, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steam Generation and Distribution covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranking covers 21 companies with published records in this scope. Filing is led by one industrial player, with several named individual inventors and a small solar-thermal specialist rounding out the ranked field, alongside strong co-assignee pairs that show close collaboration on a shared portfolio.

Leader
56 records
leading assignee

Concentrated core portfolio

The top-ranked assignee's 56 records dwarf the rest of the field, and its strongest co-assignee pairings each recur at 15 shared records apiece, pointing to a tightly held cluster of related filings rather than scattered single applications.

Worth a full freedom-to-operate read before filing adjacent claims.
Momentum
-100% YoY (leader)
latest-year filings

Recent-year activity has stalled across the board

Every assignee with recent-year momentum data shows zero filings in the latest year, including the leader at -100% YoY. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this reads as an incomplete latest year rather than an abrupt industry exit.

Re-check momentum once 2025-2026 filings finish publishing.
Tail
5 records (5th and 10th place)
mid-to-lower ranked filers

A long tail of narrower filers

Fifth and tenth place both sit at 5 records, indicating a fairly flat tail rather than a sharp secondary tier. Several ranked entries are named individual inventors rather than corporations, suggesting parts of this space are still served by smaller or independent filers.

Individual-inventor filings can be acquired or licensed more easily than corporate portfolios.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core steam-measurement and separation art.
boiler blowdown heat recovery integrationsteam metering for hybrid renewable-thermal loopsgenerator tube scaling mitigation coatingscross-domain steam-to-electrolysis couplingcompact two-phase flow conditioning for marine steam
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SABIC Global Technologies B.V.0-100%
Rondo Energy, Inc.0-100%
GlassPoint Solar, Inc.0
ZHAO ZHUN0
WARD0
STEVENSON SCOTT0
HUCKMAN MICHAEL EDWARD0
SCHROER JOSEPH WILLIAM0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steam Generation and Distribution covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and composition data point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or new filing strategy.

Run a full claim-scope check on the leader's portfolio

With 56 records and multiple 15-record co-assignee pairings, the leading assignee's claim boundaries are the first thing to map before filing anything adjacent in steam measurement or separation art.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Track the 2025-2026 filings as they publish

Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent -67% decline through 2024 is the most recent complete signal; later years need re-checking as they fill in.

Set up filing alerts in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed cross-domain branches

Grid-integration and battery classes already overlap steam art at meaningful rates; the sub-areas combining steam metering with hybrid renewable or electrolysis loads look comparatively open.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steam Generation and Distribution covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about steam generation and distribution patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steam Generation and Distribution covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Steam Generation and Distribution in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole steam generation and distribution corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.