Book a demo

Steer-by-Wire Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Steer-by-Wire Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/steer-by-wire-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · EV Platform & Chassis
Steer-by-Wire Systems: Patents Behind Redundant, Feedback-Emulated Steering
  • Filing has been flat to declining since a 2023 peak of five records, with the most recent full year showing no filings across any tracked assignee — a maturing rather than accelerating field.
  • All 21 records in scope carry a B62D classification, while only a handful touch motor control (H02P), braking (B60T) or force sensing (G01L), pointing to narrow technical spread around the core steering mechanism.
  • The ranked leader holds 7 records against a fifth-place assignee at just 1, a steep drop-off that leaves most of the ranked field as single- or double-digit filers rather than sustained programmes.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
21
Published Records
EP
Leading Jurisdiction
6
Active Filers Ranked
2023
Peak Filing Year
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the steer-by-wire patent record shows

Steer-by-wire replaces the mechanical column between the steering wheel and the road wheels with electronic actuation, sensing and force feedback. The claims that matter most are not the motor or the sensor in isolation, but how a system stays fail operational when a channel drops out, and how it fakes the road feel a driver expects without a physical linkage to carry it. This dataset scopes to records whose title or abstract names steer-by-wire or steering-by-wire directly, and whose claims or description touch redundancy architecture, force feedback emulation, fail-operational behaviour, variable steering ratio or packaging freedom — filtered to the B62D5, B62D6 and B60W50 IPC groups that cover steering control and vehicle motion control.

Twenty-one records sit in scope between 2015 and the July 2026 cut-off, ranked across six assignees. The most-cited prior art in the set dates back to the early 2000s, which is typical: citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate references, not because the underlying technology is more current.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1Sensata Technologies7
  2. 2Sensata Technologies, Inc.5
  3. 3Delphi Technologies Limited5
  4. 4Danfoss Power Solutions ApS3
  5. 5Renault Trucks1
  6. 6DECHAMP FRANCOIS1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steer-by-Wire Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 21-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose to a peak of five records in 2023, with 2022 sitting at two — a midpoint that shows growth was never steep. Recent years, including the most recent partial year, show no new filings from any tracked assignee. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in this trend will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be, but the flattening since 2023 is a real signal on top of that lag.

Filing trend, 2017–2026013450201720182019202020212022520232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

Every record in scope carries a B62D classification — motor vehicles and steering — which is expected given the search scope. What stands out is how little claim activity reaches outward: H02P (motor and generator control) appears in 9.5% of the 21 records, and B60T (braking), G01L (force and pressure measurement) and H02K (electric motors) each appear in only 4.8%. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100% and should be read against the 21-record total, not against each other.

IPC subclass distributionB62D · Motor vehicles & steering21100.0%H02P · Control of motors & generators29.5%B60T · Vehicle brakes & braking14.8%G01L · Force & pressure measurement14.8%H02K · Electric motors & generators14.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 21 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steer-by-Wire Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Steer-by-Wire Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about steer-by-wire systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The prior art anchoring this field

Representative Filing
US20250242855A12025-07-31

US20250242855A1 — Steer by wire system (Danfoss Power Solutions)

DANFOSS POWER SOLUTIONS APS

A steer by wire system for steering a vehicle with a steering mechanics, having a steering input device and a first actuating arrangement. The first actuating arrangement includes a first electric motor connected to the steering input device and a first hydraulic unit operatively coupled to that motor, with the hydraulic unit configured to be fluidly connected to the steering mechanics.Filed 2025-07-31. Hydraulic actuation coupled to an electric motor is a distinct design choice from the fully electromechanical actuators claimed in the oldest, most-cited records in this set.

US20250242855A1 — patent drawing 1
View full filing
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6370460B1Steer-by-wire system183
2US6363305B1Steer-by-wire system57
3US20020035424A1Steer-by-wire system36
4US20210070361A1Steer by wire system with redundant angular position sensing and an end-of-travel stop34
5WO2007031817A1Method of controlling a steer by wire steering system11
6WO2002022397A1Steer-by-wire system11
7WO2023153973A1A steering system, a method for providing steering feedback in such a system and a steering system feedback a…5
8SE2250146A1A steering system, a method for providing steering feedback in such a system and a steering system feedback a…3
9US20250042465A1A steering system, a method for providing steering feedback in such a system and a steering system feedback a…1

Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and skew toward older filings, which have simply had more time to be cited. Treat the ranking as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (9 of 9 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steer-by-Wire Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three findings that change where a team should look before drafting new claims in this space.

Filing momentum
2023 peak: 5 records
then flat to zero

The field has stopped accelerating

Filing rose to a peak of five records in 2023 from a midpoint of two in 2022, then dropped to zero in the most recent full year across every tracked assignee. Read the last one to two years cautiously given the usual 18-month publication lag, but the flattening trend predates that window.

Source: filing trend, 2017-2026
Claim concentration
21/21 records in B62D
100% of records

Claims cluster tightly on the core mechanism

Every record in scope carries a B62D classification, and the next most common subclass, H02P, reaches only 9.5% of the 21 records. Adjacent systems — braking integration, force sensing, motor control architecture — are each touched by one or two records at most.

Source: IPC subclass distribution
Assignee spread
Leader: 7, fifth place: 1
steep drop-off

One sustained programme, a long tail behind it

The ranked leader holds seven records; by fifth place the count is down to one. With only six assignees in the ranking and a single co-assignee pairing recorded, this reads as one established filer surrounded by isolated or exploratory filings rather than a crowded competitive field.

Source: assignee ranking, 6 companies
Jurisdiction spread
EPO 7, US 7, PCT 4
receiving offices

Filing strategy leans European and US, with PCT as a bridge

Europe and the United States each account for seven records, with four routed through the WIPO PCT system and smaller counts in Sweden and India. This suggests filers are protecting core markets directly while using PCT to keep other jurisdictions open rather than committing early.

Source: receiving office counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to steer-by-wire systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steer-by-Wire Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and what is still open

The ranked assignee field is small — six companies — and recent-year momentum has gone quiet across all of them. That combination, rather than a crowded field, is what defines the competitive picture here.

Leader
7 records
top of ranking

One assignee holds a clear lead

The top-ranked assignee holds seven of the records in the ranking, well ahead of the rest of the field. Even so, its recent-year filing count is zero, consistent with the broader flattening seen since the 2023 peak.

Source: assignee ranking
Long tail
Fifth place: 1 record
single filings

Most ranked assignees hold only one or two records

Beyond the leader, the ranking drops quickly to single- and low-double-digit counts, with fifth place holding just one record. This is a field with one sustained programme and several exploratory or opportunistic filers rather than several competing programmes.

Source: assignee ranking
Collaboration
1 co-assignee pair
recorded pairing

Co-filing is essentially absent

Only one co-assignee pairing appears across the entire dataset, linking a truck manufacturer with an individual inventor. There is no evidence here of joint-venture or cross-licensing filing patterns typical of more mature automotive component fields.

Source: co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before drafting
Sub-areas that sit inside the search scope but carry only one or two records — worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming they are occupied.
Redundant angular position sensingHydraulic-electric hybrid actuationForce feedback via braking system couplingEnd-of-travel stop mechanismsMotor control for fail-operational channels
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Sensata Technologies0
Sensata Technologies, Inc.0
Delphi Technologies Limited0
Danfoss Power Solutions ApS0-100%
Renault Trucks0
DECHAMP FRANCOIS0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steer-by-Wire Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to a narrow, low-activity field with one dominant filer — useful context before committing drafting time.

Check freedom to operate on adjacent branches

Motor control, braking integration and force sensing each carry only one or two records despite sitting inside the search scope. A targeted search before drafting could reveal whether that gap is real or an artefact of this scope.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Watch the leader's next move

With filing flat since 2023 and the leading assignee showing zero recent-year activity, a resumption of filing from that assignee would be the clearest early signal of renewed competitive pressure.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Re-run this scope closer to the 2026 cut-off

Publication lag means the most recent one to two years understate true filing activity. Revisiting this same search string in six to twelve months will sharpen the 2025-2026 picture.

Set up a monitoring search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steer-by-Wire Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about steer-by-wire patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Steer-by-Wire Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Steer-by-Wire Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole steer-by-wire systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.