Steer-by-Wire Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Peaked 2026
- Filing activity peaked in 2021 at 45 families and has trended flat to declining since, with the 2022 midpoint at 36 — a maturing filing cycle rather than an accelerating one.
- The United States receives more filings than any other office 178 of 308 records, roughly three and a half times the EPO's 51, pointing to where enforcement risk concentrates first.
- Momentum has stalled across nearly every named assignee several major filers show 0 filings in the latest year and year-over-year drops of -100%, consistent with a lag in publication rather than abandonment.
Filing growth compares 2021 (45 records) with 2024 (19) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 308 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the steer-by-wire patent record shows
Steer-by-wire replaces the mechanical column between the steering wheel and road wheels with electronic sensing, actuation and control — which is why the patent record clusters so tightly around B62D, the motor vehicle steering subclass, with all 308 records classified there. Secondary activity spills into adjacent control domains: hybrid and joint vehicle control (B60W), propulsion (B60K) and braking (B60T), reflecting that steer-by-wire rarely ships as an isolated subsystem — it is co-claimed alongside broader vehicle control architecture.
Filing activity rose from 9 families in 2017 to a peak of 45 in 2021, then eased through the 2022 midpoint of 36. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent years in this trend are understated and should not be read as a hard decline yet — but the multi-year plateau before that lag window is a genuine signal that the core mechanical-electrical architecture claims are largely staked out.
Filing trends and technology composition
The two views below cover the same 308-family dataset from different angles: one tracks filing volume over time, the other shows how activity distributes across IPC subclasses beyond the core B62D steering classification.
A plateaued filing curve
Filings climbed from 9 in 2017 to a peak of 45 in 2021, then held near that level through 2022 (36) before the expected reporting lag makes later years look artificially low. Read this as a maturing filing cycle, not a shrinking field.
Concentration in B62D with control-system spillover
Every record sits in B62D, the steering subclass, but meaningful secondary volume appears in B60W (15), B60K (10) and B60T (7) — evidence that steer-by-wire claims increasingly interlock with broader vehicle control and braking systems rather than standing alone.
Shares are the percentage of the 308 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Steer-by-Wire Technology Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about steer-by-wire technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patents everything else cites
Steer-by-wire system capable of controlling steering in case of breakdown of steering feedback actuator (US20240101187A1)
A steer-by-wire system with a steering feedback actuator, a road wheel actuator, and a steering controller that receives a signal from the steering feedback actuator and outputs a control signal to the road wheel actuator. If the steering feedback actuator fails, the controller falls back to using feedback-actuator information from another vehicle to keep controlling the road wheel actuator.Filed by HL MANDO CORPORATION, published 2024-03-28 — illustrates how current filings are shifting from basic actuator redundancy toward cross-vehicle fault recovery strategies.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6176341B1 | Vehicle steering system having master/slave configuration and method therefor | 241 |
| 2 | US6097286A | Steer by wire system with feedback | 191 |
| 3 | US6208923B1 | Fault-tolerant electromechanical steer-by-wire steering actuator | 175 |
| 4 | US6535806B2 | Tactile feedback control for steer-by-wire systems | 130 |
| 5 | US20020189888A1 | Steer-by wire handwheel actuator | 102 |
| 6 | US6505703B2 | Vehicle steering system control | 81 |
| 7 | US6728615B1 | System and method of controlling vehicle steer-by-wire systems with adjustable steering feel | 69 |
| 8 | US20040088093A1 | Expert-type vehicle steering control system and method | 68 |
| 9 | US6548969B2 | Redundant steer-by-wire system | 68 |
| 10 | US6817437B2 | Steer-by wire handwheel actuator | 66 |
Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of being searchable longer; treat this table as a map of influence on subsequent filings, not a ranking of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Three patterns in the data matter more than the raw counts: where filings physically land, how citation is distributed, and how recent momentum has shifted across named assignees.
The US is the primary battleground
With 178 of 308 records at the US office versus 51 at the EPO, 21 via WIPO/PCT, 20 in China, 16 in Germany and 13 in the UK, enforcement and freedom-to-operate risk in this field concentrates disproportionately in the United States.
Core architecture claims date back over two decades
The most-cited record, US6176341B1 on master/slave steering configuration, carries 241 citations, and three of the five most-cited patents cover fault-tolerant actuation and tactile feedback fundamentals — the architectural groundwork nearly every later filing builds on.
Recent-year activity has gone quiet across named assignees
Assignees including Hanon/Mando-affiliated filers, Ford Global Technologies and Nissan show 0 filings in the latest year, with year-over-year drops of -100% recorded for some — a pattern that fits the publication lag as much as a genuine pullback.
Joint filing is rare and narrow
Only four co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest being a ThyssenKrupp Presta and Honda pairing at 9 joint records, with Ford/ThyssenKrupp Presta and ThyssenKrupp Presta/thyssenkrupp AG pairs each at 2 — collaboration exists but is limited to a handful of established supplier-OEM relationships.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to steer-by-wire technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gate sits
Named assignees in this corpus span established steering-system suppliers, OEMs and newer mobility entrants, but recent-year filing momentum has cooled broadly rather than concentrating further in a single leader.
Supplier-OEM pairs anchor the strongest collaborations
The densest co-assignee relationship in the dataset links ThyssenKrupp Presta with Honda at 9 joint records, suggesting a sustained co-development program around steering actuation rather than a one-off filing.
Major OEMs show a pause in recent filings
Ford Global Technologies, Nissan and several steering-system specialists all register 0 filings in the latest year, with some showing -100% year-over-year change — likely a mix of genuine slowdown and the normal 18-month publication lag.
Newer mobility entrants are present but not yet dominant
Entities such as Lotus Technology Innovation Centre and Jidu Technology appear in the assignee set alongside established steering suppliers, indicating steer-by-wire IP activity is broadening past traditional Tier 1s even as overall filing volume plateaus.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Lotus Technology Innovation Centre Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Delphi Technologies Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Hanon/Mando Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Ford Global Technologies, LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Visteon Global Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Canoo Technologies Inc. | 0 | — |
| Steering Solutions IP Holding Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a field with occupied core claims and a cooling filing curve — the next questions are about where specific freedom-to-operate risk sits and which adjacent branches remain open.
Map claims against your own actuator architecture
Run a claim-by-claim comparison of the most-cited patents, particularly the fault-tolerant actuation and tactile feedback families, against any redundancy or feedback design under development.
Explore claims in EurekaTrack the assignees showing renewed activity
Momentum has cooled broadly, but not uniformly — watch for any assignee that breaks the -100% pattern in the next publication cycle as an early signal of a new filing wave.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaProbe the under-claimed branches directly
Cross-vehicle fault recovery and brake-by-wire arbitration show thinner direct coverage than core actuator claims — a targeted search here can surface whether that is genuine white space or simply thin classification.
Run a white space search in EurekaCommon questions about steer-by-wire patents
Steer-by-wire replaces the mechanical linkage between the steering wheel and the road wheels with electronic sensors, actuators and a control unit, so the driver's input and the wheel response are connected only by signal, not by a physical shaft. Because the core innovation is the steering mechanism itself, essentially all 308 tracked families classify under B62D, the motor vehicle steering subclass. Secondary classifications in vehicle control, propulsion and braking subclasses show that steer-by-wire is usually claimed alongside broader vehicle control systems rather than as a standalone mechanism.
Filing volume rose from 9 families in 2017 to a peak of 45 in 2021, then held near that level with 36 filings at the 2022 midpoint, which points to a plateau rather than continued acceleration. Publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the most recent years in any trend understate true activity and should not be read as a collapse. The honest read is that the field grew quickly through the late 2010s and early 2020s and has since stabilized at a steady, if not expanding, filing rate.
The most-cited patents in this corpus, including US6176341B1 on a master/slave steering configuration and US6097286A on steer-by-wire with feedback, date back to the early 2000s and underpin much of the later architecture. These foundational filings established core concepts like fault-tolerant electromechanical actuation and tactile feedback control that recur across later filings from multiple assignees. Because citation counts favour older, longer-searchable records, this list reflects historical influence on the field rather than which company is most active today.
The densest claim coverage sits around core actuator redundancy and basic tactile feedback control, both heavily cited and filed since the early 2000s. Comparatively thinner coverage appears in cross-vehicle fault recovery signalling, redundant power-path failover logic, and integration between steer-by-wire and brake-by-wire arbitration — areas that sit adjacent to the dense core but are not yet saturated in this dataset. A targeted prior-art search in these specific branches, rather than the general steer-by-wire category, is the more productive starting point.
The United States dominates this dataset with 178 of 308 records, more than three times the next largest office, the EPO at 51. WIPO/PCT filings (21), China (20), Germany (16) and the UK (13) follow at meaningfully lower volumes. Any freedom-to-operate review should prioritize US patents first given the concentration of filings there, then extend to the EPO and, depending on target markets, China and Germany.
Research Steer-by-Wire Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole steer-by-wire technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.