Book a demo

Strain Wave Gearing Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Strain Wave Gearing Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/strain-wave-gearing-and-precision-reducers-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Bearings & Rotating Machinery
Strain wave gearing patents: one assignee dominates a field that peaked in 2017
  • One filer, most of the field. Of 8 ranked assignees, the leader holds 26 records against 2 for the fifth-place filer — a long tail of single- and double-digit entrants below it.
  • Filing has cooled since a 2017 peak. The trend ran from 8 filings in 2017 to 0 by the 2022 midpoint, with the most recent year still partial under normal publication lag.
  • Claims concentrate in gearing, not controls. All 29 records in scope carry an F16H gearing classification; only 13.8% also touch G05D or H02P motor-control classes, leaving control-side integration comparatively open.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
29
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
8
Active Filers Ranked
2017
Peak Filing Year
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks 29 published records at the intersection of strain wave gearing, flexspline reducers and precision speed reducers, filtered to filings that address hysteresis and torsional stiffness, flexspline fatigue, lubrication and grease life, transmission error, or backdrivability. The scope is narrowed by IPC to F16H49 (wave gearing), F16H1 (gearing generally) and B25J9 (robot manipulator joints), which is why the results skew toward mechanical gearing claims rather than broader robotics or actuator patents.

Coverage runs from 2015-01-01 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year of the trend understates actual filing activity and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1Harmonic Drive Systems Inc.26
  2. 2Nagoya Institute of Technology6
  3. 3California Institute of Technology2
  4. 4OKITSU YOSHIFUMI2
  5. 5IWASAKI MAKOTO2
  6. 6YAMAMOTO MASAFUMI1
  7. 7YAJIMA TOSHIO1
  8. 8SASAKI KOZO1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Strain Wave Gearing and Precision Reducers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 29-record dataset: filings by year, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry. Because a single record can carry more than one classification, the composition shares sum to more than 100% of the record total.

Filings peaked in 2017 and have not recovered

Filings ran from 8 in 2017 down to 0 at the 2022 midpoint and stayed flat or declining through the most recent partial year, consistent with a mature, consolidated claim space rather than an expanding one.

Filings peaked in 2017 and have not recovered02468820172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Gearing dominates; control-layer classes are thinner

F16H (gearing and transmissions) appears in 100.0% of the 29 records in scope. F16C (shafts, bearings and couplings) follows at 27.6%, while G05D and H02P — the classes covering non-electric variable control and motor control — each sit at 13.8%, and G05B (control and regulating systems) at 10.3%.

Gearing dominates; control-layer classes are thinnerF16H · Gearing & transmissions29100.0%F16C · Shafts, bearings & couplings827.6%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…413.8%H02P · Control of motors & generators413.8%G05B · Control & regulating systems310.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 29 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Strain Wave Gearing and Precision Reducers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Strain Wave Gearing and Precision Reducers with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about strain wave gearing and precision reducers and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this dataset

Representative filing
US10365628B22019-07-30

Positioning control device of actuator provided with strain wave gearing using H-∞ control (US10365628B2, Harmonic Drive Systems, 2019-07-30)

HARMONIC DRIVE SYSTEMS INC.

A positioning control device for an actuator with strain wave gearing uses a full-closed control system that feeds back load-shaft position and applies an H-infinity compensator. The compensator is designed against a generalized plant that treats angular transmission error in the strain wave gearing as a disturbance input, bounding the H-infinity norm of the transfer function from that disturbance to the evaluation output. The stated aim is suppressing mechanical vibration during positioning response that would otherwise be caused by the gearing's angular transmission error.Abstract reproduced from the filing as indexed; wording is the applicant's.

US10365628B2 — patent drawing 1US10365628B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record in Eureka
Highest-citation records, strain wave gearing and precision reducers
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200278017A1Rounded Strain Wave Gear Flexspline Utilizing Bulk Metallic Glass-Based Materials and Methods of Manufacture …17
2JP2010244343AMethod for compensating for angular transmission error in strain wave gearing17
3WO2010116607A1Method for compensating for angular transmission error in strain wave gearing13
4US20170254403A1Wave generator and strain wave gearing5
5US20200032891A1Strain wave gearing4
6US20200040978A1Strain wave gearing and wave generator4
7US10816073B2Strain wave gearing3
8US20180023678A1Wave generator and strain wave gearing3
9JP5207071B2波動歯車装置の角度伝達誤差補償方法2
10US9075399B2Positioning control system for actuator provided with wave gear device1

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence within this dataset, not as a measure of current technical importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Strain Wave Gearing and Precision Reducers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for a filing decision

Read together, the trend, the citation table and the assignee concentration point to a field where the core mechanical claims are settled and where remaining activity clusters around control integration and materials.

Filing momentum
8 → 0
2017 peak to 2022 midpoint

The core mechanism was claimed early

The 2017 peak of 8 filings followed by a decline to 0 by 2022 suggests the fundamental flexspline and wave-generator geometry was substantially claimed in the mid-2010s. New entrants now compete on refinements — materials, control loops, manufacturing — rather than the base mechanism.

Trend, 2015-2026
Citation leaders
17 citations
shared top rank

Transmission-error compensation and flexspline materials lead influence

The two most-cited records address angular transmission-error compensation and bulk metallic glass flexspline materials respectively, each cited 17 times. Both trace back to filings from the mid-2010s or earlier, consistent with citation counts favouring older records.

Most-cited records
Classification mix
100.0% F16H
of 29 records

Gearing claims dominate; control classes are a minority

Every record in scope carries an F16H gearing classification, while G05D and H02P control-side classes each appear in only 13.8% of records. That gap is where control-layer claims — compensators, closed-loop positioning, motor-drive integration — remain comparatively thin.

IPC composition
Assignee spread
26 vs 2
leader vs fifth place

One filer anchors the field, the rest are thin

Among the 8 ranked assignees, the leader holds 26 records while fifth place holds only 2. That gap makes the leader's granted claims the reference point for freedom-to-operate work in this space, with smaller filers occupying narrow niches around it.

Assignee ranking, 8 companies
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to strain wave gearing and precision reducers, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Strain Wave Gearing and Precision Reducers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranking below covers the 8 assignees the data endpoint returns for this search — not a top-50 or top-100 list. One company accounts for the bulk of activity; the remainder are university labs and named individual inventors filing in small numbers.

Leader
26 records
of the ranked total

Harmonic Drive Systems anchors the field

Harmonic Drive Systems holds 26 of the records in the ranking, far ahead of the next-largest filer. Its strongest co-assignee link is with Nagoya Institute of Technology, appearing together on 6 records — a signal of an active applied-research collaboration rather than a one-off joint filing.

Assignee ranking
Academic partner
6 co-filings
with the leader

Nagoya Institute of Technology is the closest academic collaborator

The pairing of Harmonic Drive Systems with Nagoya Institute of Technology is the strongest co-assignee link in the dataset, well ahead of the next pairs at 1-2 shared records. This points to a sustained industry-academia channel on transmission-error and control topics rather than scattered co-filings.

Co-assignee pairs, 10 total
Independent research
Named individually
second-tier filers

California Institute of Technology and named inventors fill the long tail

Below the leader, filers include California Institute of Technology and several individually named inventors (Okitsu Yoshifumi, Iwasaki Makoto, Yamamoto Masafumi among them), each holding small numbers of records. None shows filings in the latest year, consistent with the field-wide slowdown.

Recent-year momentum
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas to check before filing
Branches where classification density is thin relative to the core gearing claims — worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming open space.
H-infinity and robust positioning control loopsgrease/lubrication life prediction modelsbulk metallic glass flexspline manufacturingbackdrivability sensing for collaborative jointsclosed-loop transmission-error compensation for motor drives
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Harmonic Drive Systems Inc.0
Nagoya Institute of Technology0
California Institute of Technology0
OKITSU YOSHIFUMI0
IWASAKI MAKOTO0
YAMAMOTO MASAFUMI0
YAJIMA TOSHIO0
SASAKI KOZO0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Strain Wave Gearing and Precision Reducers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a consolidated mechanical core and a thinner control-integration layer. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or monitoring a specific competitor.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the leader's claims

With one assignee holding 26 of the 8-company ranking, any new mechanical flexspline or wave-generator design should be checked against that portfolio's granted claims before committing to a design direction.

Open Eureka to search the leader's claims

Scope a claim in the control-integration gap

G05D and H02P classes cover only 13.8% of the 29 records against 100.0% for F16H, suggesting closed-loop control and motor-drive integration claims are comparatively under-filed relative to the mechanical base.

Draft a claim scope in Eureka

Track the academic-industry collaboration channel

The Harmonic Drive Systems and Nagoya Institute of Technology pairing is the strongest co-assignee link in the dataset; monitoring joint publications and filings from this pair is a reasonable early signal for where new claims will surface.

Set up a monitor in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Strain Wave Gearing and Precision Reducers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about strain wave gearing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Strain Wave Gearing and Precision Reducers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Strain Wave Gearing and Precision Reducers in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole strain wave gearing and precision reducers corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.