Book a demo

String Inverter Modularity Patents: Filing Trends & Leaders 2026

String Inverter Modularity Patents: Filing Trends & Leaders 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/string-inverter-modularity-and-standardization-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Electronics · Patent Landscape
String Inverter Modularity and Standardization Patents
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 15 families and has since declined toward flat activity through the most recent full year, suggesting the core architecture claims were staked out early.
  • Power conversion and grid-supply subclasses dominate H02J and H02M each cover roughly half of all records, while photovoltaic-specific H02S accounts for only 13 — modularity claims are being filed as power electronics, not solar-specific inventions.
  • Citation weight sits on distributed MPPT architecture the most-cited records in this set are all variants of one distributed maximum-power-point-tracking family, still shaping how later modular designs are drafted.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
82
Published Records
66%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-80%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of string inverters and modular, standardized power-module design — the architecture choice that lets a solar plant scale by adding identical inverter blocks rather than redesigning a central unit. It spans 82 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from filings that combine string or PV inverter language with modular, standardized-power-module or scalable-inverter-design terms.

Filing activity is concentrated in power conversion and grid-interface subclasses rather than in photovoltaic-specific classification, which tells a reader where the real claim density sits: the electronics, not the solar application layer. Publication for the most recent year is necessarily incomplete, since grant and publication typically lag filing by around eighteen months.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1SOLAREDGE TECH LTD17
  2. 2NEWDOLL ENTERPRISES12
  3. 3POWER ELECTRONICS ESPANA SL10
  4. 4THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO9
  5. 5UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC6
  6. 6BREK ELECTRONICS INC6
  7. 7AMPHI SOLAR PTE LTD5
  8. 8HUAWEI TECH CO LTD5
  9. 9ACCURATE SOLAR POWER LLC4
  10. 10KRIPYA LLC4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 82-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

A 2020 peak followed by decline

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 15 in 2020, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 6 and continued flat or declining into the most recent years. That pattern is more consistent with an architecture that reached its patentable core early than with a technology still opening new ground.

A 2020 peak followed by decline048111522017201820191520202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Power electronics, not solar, carries the claims

H02J (power supply and grid systems) and H02M (power conversion) each appear in roughly half of all records, well ahead of H02S (photovoltaic generation) at 13. Semiconductor device claims under H01L (17) and protective circuitry under H02H (13) round out the picture — this is a power-electronics landscape that happens to attach to solar, not a solar-specific one.

Power electronics, not solar, carries the claimsH02J · Power supply & grid systems4554.9%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)4453.7%H01L · Semiconductor devices1720.7%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements1315.9%H02S · Photovoltaic / solar power gen…1315.9%H02N · Electric machines (other)56.1%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies56.1%B08B · Cleaning (general)44.9%Other2024.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 82 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on String Inverter Modularity and Standardization with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about string inverter modularity and standardization and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The records shaping this space

Representative filing
US20220247177A12022-08-04

Photovoltaic Solar Inverter with an AC Grid Filter Without Inductance

POWER ELECTRONICS ESPAÑA, S.L.

Filed by Power Electronics España, this application describes a three-phase inverter power module paired with an AC/AC transformer arrangement that removes a discrete grid-side inductor, using the transformer's own winding inductance and a capacitor to shape the filter response instead.Published 2022-08-04 as US20220247177A1.

US20220247177A1 — patent drawing 1US20220247177A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080238195A1Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process536
2US20130038124A1Pole-mounted power generation systems, structures and processes415
3US20120138123A1Enhanced solar panels, liquid delivery systems and associated processes for solar energy systems210
4US20100286836A1Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process199
5US7772716B2Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process196
6US8035249B2Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process185
7US8427009B2Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process179
8WO2008119034A1Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process154
9WO2011019936A1Enhanced solar panels, liquid delivery systems and associated processes for solar energy systems141
10EP2130286A1Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process129

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat them as a measure of influence on later drafting, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting or freedom-to-operate work in this space.

Filing momentum
Peak 2020: 15 filings
families per year

The architecture race is largely over

Volume climbed from 2 filings in 2017 to a 2020 peak of 15, then fell back toward the 2022 midpoint of 6 and has stayed flat or declined since. New entrants are more likely to be filing around existing claims than establishing new core architecture.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Classification split
H02J 45 · H02M 44 vs H02S 13
records by IPC subclass

Claims live in power conversion, not solar

The dense classification is power supply/grid systems and power conversion circuitry, not photovoltaic-specific art. Anyone drafting modular inverter claims should search H02J/H02M prior art first, not just the solar-classified literature.

IPC composition, 82 families
Citation concentration
Top record cited 536 times
of a five-record cluster on one architecture

One MPPT lineage anchors the field

The most-cited records in this set are successive filings around distributed maximum-power-point-tracking architecture, one reaching 536 citations. Later modular designs are drafted with that lineage's claim scope in view, whether or not they cite it directly.

Most-cited records table
Collaboration pattern
9 co-assignee pairs
across 82 families

Co-filing is rare and mostly inventor-linked

Only nine co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest links pair a university board with a small electronics firm or connect named individual inventors to their own holding entities. This is largely a single-assignee filing landscape, not one built on joint ventures.

Co-assignee pairs, this dataset
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to string inverter modularity and standardization, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where activity has stalled

Recent-year momentum data shows every assignee tracked in this set, including university and named-inventor entities, at zero filings in the latest year — consistent with the broader decline visible in the filing trend.

Assignee type
82 families, single-assignee dominant
co-filing is the exception

A fragmented but stable ownership base

Ownership spans corporate assignees, a university board, and named individual inventors filing through personal holding entities. No single assignee's recent-year filings stand out as active; the field's early architecture claims were staked by a mix of established power-electronics firms and academic-adjacent inventors.

Assignee ranking, 82 families
Geographic filing
US 39 · EPO 16 · WIPO 9
receiving office counts

US-centred with a real European and PCT tail

United States filings lead by a wide margin, but European (EPO), international PCT, Indian, German and Austrian receiving offices all carry filings — enough spread that a freedom-to-operate check limited to the US would miss real prior art.

Receiving office distribution
Momentum check
0 latest-year filings, all tracked assignees
recent-year momentum

No assignee is currently pushing new filings

Every assignee named in the recent-year momentum data, including Newdoll Enterprises, Colorado State University's board, Huawei, and Power Electronics España, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That flatness across the whole assignee set, not just the leaders, supports reading this as a maturing rather than an expanding claim space.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is thin relative to the core architecture claims
AC/AC transformer filter integrationinductance-free grid couplingdistributed MPPT fault protectionmodular power-module thermal cleaningscalable inverter cluster protocols
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Newdoll Enterprises LLC0
POWER ELECTRONICS ESPANA SL0
The Board of Governors of Colorado State University0
SolarEdge Technologies Ltd.0
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0
NEWDOLL RONALD M0
BREK ELECTRONICS INC0
AMPHI SOLAR PTE LTD0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is drafting, clearance, or monitoring.

Run a freedom-to-operate check across H02J/H02M

Given how much of the claim density sits outside photovoltaic-specific classification, a clearance search limited to H02S will miss the bulk of relevant prior art.

Explore this in Eureka

Track the flat filing trend for a re-acceleration signal

A jump above the 2022 midpoint of 6 filings per year in newer data would signal a second wave of architecture claims worth re-examining.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Map the distributed MPPT citation lineage before drafting

The five most-cited records in this set share a common architecture lineage; understanding their claim scope first will sharpen any new modular-inverter draft.

Trace citations in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research String Inverter Modularity and Standardization in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole string inverter modularity and standardization corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.