String Inverter Modularity Patents: Filing Trends & Leaders 2026
- Filing peaked in 2020 at 15 families and has since declined toward flat activity through the most recent full year, suggesting the core architecture claims were staked out early.
- Power conversion and grid-supply subclasses dominate H02J and H02M each cover roughly half of all records, while photovoltaic-specific H02S accounts for only 13 — modularity claims are being filed as power electronics, not solar-specific inventions.
- Citation weight sits on distributed MPPT architecture the most-cited records in this set are all variants of one distributed maximum-power-point-tracking family, still shaping how later modular designs are drafted.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of string inverters and modular, standardized power-module design — the architecture choice that lets a solar plant scale by adding identical inverter blocks rather than redesigning a central unit. It spans 82 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from filings that combine string or PV inverter language with modular, standardized-power-module or scalable-inverter-design terms.
Filing activity is concentrated in power conversion and grid-interface subclasses rather than in photovoltaic-specific classification, which tells a reader where the real claim density sits: the electronics, not the solar application layer. Publication for the most recent year is necessarily incomplete, since grant and publication typically lag filing by around eighteen months.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 82-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.
A 2020 peak followed by decline
Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 15 in 2020, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 6 and continued flat or declining into the most recent years. That pattern is more consistent with an architecture that reached its patentable core early than with a technology still opening new ground.
Power electronics, not solar, carries the claims
H02J (power supply and grid systems) and H02M (power conversion) each appear in roughly half of all records, well ahead of H02S (photovoltaic generation) at 13. Semiconductor device claims under H01L (17) and protective circuitry under H02H (13) round out the picture — this is a power-electronics landscape that happens to attach to solar, not a solar-specific one.
Shares are the percentage of the 82 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on String Inverter Modularity and Standardization with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about string inverter modularity and standardization and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe records shaping this space
Photovoltaic Solar Inverter with an AC Grid Filter Without Inductance
Filed by Power Electronics España, this application describes a three-phase inverter power module paired with an AC/AC transformer arrangement that removes a discrete grid-side inductor, using the transformer's own winding inductance and a capacitor to shape the filter response instead.Published 2022-08-04 as US20220247177A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20080238195A1 | Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process | 536 |
| 2 | US20130038124A1 | Pole-mounted power generation systems, structures and processes | 415 |
| 3 | US20120138123A1 | Enhanced solar panels, liquid delivery systems and associated processes for solar energy systems | 210 |
| 4 | US20100286836A1 | Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process | 199 |
| 5 | US7772716B2 | Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process | 196 |
| 6 | US8035249B2 | Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process | 185 |
| 7 | US8427009B2 | Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process | 179 |
| 8 | WO2008119034A1 | Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process | 154 |
| 9 | WO2011019936A1 | Enhanced solar panels, liquid delivery systems and associated processes for solar energy systems | 141 |
| 10 | EP2130286A1 | Distributed maximum power point tracking system, structure and process | 129 |
Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat them as a measure of influence on later drafting, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns worth acting on before drafting or freedom-to-operate work in this space.
The architecture race is largely over
Volume climbed from 2 filings in 2017 to a 2020 peak of 15, then fell back toward the 2022 midpoint of 6 and has stayed flat or declined since. New entrants are more likely to be filing around existing claims than establishing new core architecture.
Claims live in power conversion, not solar
The dense classification is power supply/grid systems and power conversion circuitry, not photovoltaic-specific art. Anyone drafting modular inverter claims should search H02J/H02M prior art first, not just the solar-classified literature.
One MPPT lineage anchors the field
The most-cited records in this set are successive filings around distributed maximum-power-point-tracking architecture, one reaching 536 citations. Later modular designs are drafted with that lineage's claim scope in view, whether or not they cite it directly.
Co-filing is rare and mostly inventor-linked
Only nine co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest links pair a university board with a small electronics firm or connect named individual inventors to their own holding entities. This is largely a single-assignee filing landscape, not one built on joint ventures.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to string inverter modularity and standardization, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where activity has stalled
Recent-year momentum data shows every assignee tracked in this set, including university and named-inventor entities, at zero filings in the latest year — consistent with the broader decline visible in the filing trend.
A fragmented but stable ownership base
Ownership spans corporate assignees, a university board, and named individual inventors filing through personal holding entities. No single assignee's recent-year filings stand out as active; the field's early architecture claims were staked by a mix of established power-electronics firms and academic-adjacent inventors.
US-centred with a real European and PCT tail
United States filings lead by a wide margin, but European (EPO), international PCT, Indian, German and Austrian receiving offices all carry filings — enough spread that a freedom-to-operate check limited to the US would miss real prior art.
No assignee is currently pushing new filings
Every assignee named in the recent-year momentum data, including Newdoll Enterprises, Colorado State University's board, Huawei, and Power Electronics España, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That flatness across the whole assignee set, not just the leaders, supports reading this as a maturing rather than an expanding claim space.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Newdoll Enterprises LLC | 0 | — |
| POWER ELECTRONICS ESPANA SL | 0 | — |
| The Board of Governors of Colorado State University | 0 | — |
| SolarEdge Technologies Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| NEWDOLL RONALD M | 0 | — |
| BREK ELECTRONICS INC | 0 | — |
| AMPHI SOLAR PTE LTD | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is drafting, clearance, or monitoring.
Run a freedom-to-operate check across H02J/H02M
Given how much of the claim density sits outside photovoltaic-specific classification, a clearance search limited to H02S will miss the bulk of relevant prior art.
Explore this in EurekaTrack the flat filing trend for a re-acceleration signal
A jump above the 2022 midpoint of 6 filings per year in newer data would signal a second wave of architecture claims worth re-examining.
Set up monitoring in EurekaMap the distributed MPPT citation lineage before drafting
The five most-cited records in this set share a common architecture lineage; understanding their claim scope first will sharpen any new modular-inverter draft.
Trace citations in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
In this dataset, it means an inverter design built from repeatable power-module blocks that can be added or removed to scale system capacity, rather than a fixed-capacity central unit. Claims typically cover the power module itself, how modules interconnect electrically, or standardized control and protection schemes that let modules operate together. Search strings combining string/PV inverter language with modular, standardized-power-module or scalable-inverter-design terms are how this landscape was assembled, and that combination is a reasonable starting point for a novelty search in this area.
The filing trend shows growth from 2 records in 2017 to a peak of 15 in 2020, followed by a fall back toward the 2022 midpoint of 6 and continued flat-to-declining activity. This pattern is typical of a technology where the core architecture claims — the module topology, the basic scaling scheme — were filed early, leaving later entrants to file narrower improvement claims rather than foundational ones. Note that the most recent year's figures are understated because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, so a modest uptick may not yet be visible in the data.
The assignee base is fragmented across corporate filers, a university board, and named individual inventors filing through personal holding companies, with only 9 co-assignee pairs across the full 82-family set. Recent-year momentum data shows every tracked assignee, including established power-electronics firms and academic-linked entities, at zero filings in the latest year, which suggests no single company is currently pulling ahead with a new filing push. A ranking table sits elsewhere on this page with the full assignee breakdown by family count.
Filing density is thin in areas adjacent to the core power-module and MPPT claims: inductance-free AC grid coupling, fault protection specific to distributed MPPT clusters, thermal management or cleaning integrated into modular power blocks, and standardized communication protocols between inverter modules at scale. These sit next to heavily claimed territory but are not yet crowded themselves. A first claim in these branches would need to tie the specific mechanism — for example, filter-free grid coupling via transformer winding inductance — to a modular or scalable inverter architecture rather than claiming the mechanism alone.
Citation counts in this dataset are useful for identifying which architecture ideas shaped later drafting, but they structurally favour older filings that have simply had more years to accumulate citations. The five most-cited records here are all variants of one distributed maximum-power-point-tracking lineage, with the top record cited 536 times, which reflects historical influence rather than current commercial deployment. A practitioner should treat high citation counts as a signal to study claim scope carefully, not as evidence that a technology is still the most active filing area.
Research String Inverter Modularity and Standardization in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole string inverter modularity and standardization corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.