Book a demo

String Inverter Safety Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Remain 2026

String Inverter Safety Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Remain 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/string-inverter-safety-and-compliance-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Electronics · Patent Landscape
String inverter safety patents: mapping arc-fault protection, rapid shutdown and grid compliance filings
  • Filing peaked in 2025 at 40 records after a flat-to-declining run through the 2022 midpoint (24), suggesting the field is consolidating around known architectures rather than expanding into new ones.
  • H02J and H02S dominate the composition with 123 and 87 records respectively, while adjacent subclasses like G05F (20) and B60L (19) show comparatively thin coverage.
  • The US receiving office carries the bulk of filings at 119 of 207 records, more than double the EPO's 44, pointing to where enforcement risk concentrates first.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
207
Published Records
54%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+119%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (16 records) with 2024 (35) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 207 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 207 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine string or PV solar inverter hardware with arc-fault protection, rapid shutdown, or grid safety compliance claims. The search string deliberately pairs power-conversion hardware terms with safety-function terms, so the corpus captures the specific intersection where UL 1699B and NEC 690.12 rapid-shutdown requirements meet inverter design, rather than solar power generation broadly.

Publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, so the 2026 count of 2 and even the 2025 count of 40 understate the true recent filing rate. Read the trend's shape, not its most recent point.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1HANWHA SOLUTIONS CORP48
  2. 2UNIRAC INC23
  3. 3DCBEL INC17
  4. 4TIGO ENERGY INNOVATIONS LLC13
  5. 5EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD11
  6. 6MAXOUT RENEWABLES INC9
  7. 7NEWLIGHT CAPITAL LLC8
  8. 8SOLAREDGE TECH LTD8
  9. 9GAF ENERGY LLC7
  10. 10MCCUNE CHUCK7
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 207 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A flat-to-declining trend after a 2025 peak

Filings rose from 7 in 2017 to a peak of 40 in 2025, but the 2022 midpoint of 24 sits well below a straight-line extrapolation from either end, indicating the growth curve flattened mid-period before the late run-up. Treat 2025 and 2026 as provisional given publication lag.

A flat-to-declining trend after a 2025 peak01020304072017201820192020202120222023202440202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentration in grid and PV subclasses

H02J (power supply and grid systems) and H02S (photovoltaic generation) together account for 210 of the tagged classifications, well ahead of H02M power conversion (36) and H02H protective circuits (31). Measurement (G01R, 26) and control (G05F, 20) subclasses trail further, and EV propulsion (B60L, 19) appears only as a secondary tag on inverter families with shared power-electronics architecture.

Concentration in grid and PV subclassesH02J · Power supply & grid systems12359.4%H02S · Photovoltaic / solar power gen…8742.0%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)3617.4%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements3115.0%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement2612.6%G05F · Electric/magnetic variable con…209.7%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion199.2%H02B · Power switchboards & substatio…178.2%Other10550.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 207 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on String Inverter Safety and Compliance with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about string inverter safety and compliance and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this corpus

Representative filing
US11811361B12023-11-07

Rapid shutdown device for photovoltaic modules (US11811361B1)

GAF ENERGY LLC

A rapid shutdown device for rapidly de-energizing a photovoltaic module system is disclosed. The rapid shutdown device includes power lines connected to a photovoltaic string of modules on a roof of a structure. A high voltage switch on a first power line is disconnected when the high voltage switch is open. The rapid shutdown device includes a gate drive circuit that receives an electronic photovoltaic string status signal associated with an operating status of the photovoltaic string. The gate drive circuit may determine that the operating status indicates the presence of a hazard based on the electronic photovoltaic string status signal.Filed by GAF Energy LLC, granted 2023-11-07.

US11811361B1 — patent drawing 1US11811361B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records, 2015-2026
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20160329715A1Photovoltaic power system inverter detection124
2US20180191292A1Method and system for communication between inverter and solar module88
3US11811361B1Rapid shutdown device for photovoltaic modules52
4US20200336003A1Energy control system45
5US20160344192A1Systems and methods for quick dissipation of stored energy from input capacitors of power inverters33
6US20190027617A1Photovoltaic panel rapid shutdown and recovery30
7US20220396167A1Electric vehicle solar charging system27
8US20210376613A1Microgrid system controller for creating and maintaining a microgrid26
9US20190081458A1Electrical Service Adapter for Supply Side Interconnect24
10US20210143774A1Optimizing hybrid inverter system21

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations; treat them as a signal of influence rather than current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns in the data that matter more than the raw counts.

Filing shape
40 in 2025 vs 24 in 2022
peak vs midpoint

Growth is not linear

The jump from a flat mid-period to a 2025 peak suggests a late wave of filings, likely tied to tightening rapid-shutdown code cycles, rather than sustained organic growth in the field.

Confirm against 2026 partial-year data before treating this as a trend reversal.
Jurisdiction
119 US vs 44 EPO
receiving office split

US filings dominate enforcement exposure

With more than half of all records routed through the US receiving office, freedom-to-operate risk for rapid-shutdown hardware sold into the US market is the first thing to clear before entering that market.

WIPO/PCT filings (16) indicate some applicants are still keeping international options open.
Classification spread
123 H02J records
largest single subclass

Grid-safety claims outweigh PV-specific claims

H02J's lead over H02S implies that much of the claim activity centres on grid-interface safety functions common to any inverter, not PV-specific rapid-shutdown mechanics alone.

This widens freedom-to-operate risk beyond solar-specific competitors into general grid-tied inverter makers.
Co-filing
6 shared filings, three pairs
strongest co-assignee links

A small inventor cluster drives repeat filings

The strongest co-assignee pairs each recur at six shared filings, all involving the same lead inventor, indicating a concentrated internal team rather than broad cross-company collaboration.

Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the full corpus, so most filings are single-assignee.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to string inverter safety and compliance, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity has stalled

Recent-year momentum data shows several previously active assignees dropping to zero filings in the latest year, which is as informative as who is still filing.

Momentum
0 in latest year
multiple assignees

Several named assignees have gone quiet

A number of assignees tracked in the momentum data, including firms with prior activity, show zero filings in the most recent year and year-over-year declines of -100% where a prior baseline existed.

This may reflect publication lag as much as a genuine pullback; recheck in a later data cut.
Citations
124 citations
top-cited record

Early rapid-shutdown detection art anchors the field

The most-cited record, on photovoltaic power system inverter detection, and the second-ranked communication-protocol filing together set much of the vocabulary later filings build on or design around.

Both records predate the 2025 filing peak by several years.
Co-filing
10 pairs total
co-assignee relationships

Collaboration is limited and inventor-driven

The co-assignee network is thin: ten pairs total, with the strongest links all tracing to the same lead inventor working across several named co-inventors rather than to inter-company joint filings.

Expect most competitive activity to come from single-assignee portfolios, not consortiums.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches with thinner classification density relative to the core H02J/H02S cluster.
Arc-fault signature discrimination under partial shadingRapid-shutdown communication protocol interoperabilityMeasurement-subclass diagnostic sensing (G01R)EV-to-inverter shared power-electronics safety (B60L overlap)Grid switchboard-level compliance integration (H02B)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Hanwha Solutions Corporation0-100%
SunPower Corporation0
dcbel Inc.0
Diego Energy Ltd.0-100%
Eaton Intelligent Power Limited0
Maximum Output Renewable Energy Company0
SolarEdge Technologies Ltd.0
MCCUNE CHUCK0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps rather than a single conclusion.

Clear freedom-to-operate against the top-cited records

The five most-cited records, particularly the two filed before 2018, set claim boundaries that later filings still work around; check any new rapid-shutdown design against them first.

Explore citation network in Eureka

Watch the 2025-2026 filing gap close

Publication lag means the apparent 2025 peak and 2026 drop are not yet final; revisit the trend once later filings publish to see whether the peak holds.

Track filing trends in Eureka

Assess the under-claimed measurement and switchboard branches

G01R and H02B carry meaningfully lower record counts than the core grid and PV subclasses, which may indicate open claim space for diagnostic or substation-level compliance integration.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on string inverter safety patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on String Inverter Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research String Inverter Safety and Compliance in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole string inverter safety and compliance corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.