Structured Output Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Structured Output and Constrained Decoding Patents
One filer holds 9 of 22 records. the field's leader outpaces every other assignee by a wide margin, with a long tail of single- and double-filing entrants behind it. Filings ran at zero in 2017, climbed to a peak of 8 records in 2022, and have tapered since. With fewer than four complete years of data once the publication lag is accounted for, no growth rate can be stated reliably; treat 2025 and 2026 counts as floors, not ceilings.
- 1MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC40.9%
- 2PARABLE STUDIOS LTD9.1%
- 3SNAP INC9.1%
- 4GANIGA DIVIJA VIJAYA4.5%
- 5GOOGLE LLC4.5%
See the full structured output and constrained decoding analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about this landscape
What is constrained decoding in patent terms?
Constrained decoding refers to techniques that restrict a language model’s token generation to outputs matching a predefined structure, such as a grammar, finite state machine, or schema. In this dataset it covers filings that combine a decoding-constraint mechanism, like logit masking or automata-based restrictions, with a validation or vocabulary-alignment step. Patent claims in this space typically focus on how the constraint is represented and enforced during generation, rather than on the underlying language model itself.
Who holds the most patents on structured output and constrained decoding?
The ranked assignee list contains 12 companies, and one leader holds 9 of the 22 records in scope — more than triple the count of the next closest filers. The top 5 assignees combined account for 68.2% of all records, so the field is concentrated at the top with a long tail of single-filing entrants making up the rest of the ranking.
Is the filing trend for constrained decoding patents growing or slowing?
Filing activity rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 8 records in 2022, then appears to taper in the years since. That apparent slowdown should be treated cautiously: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 counts are understated and a genuine growth rate cannot yet be calculated from this data.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Structured Output and Constrained Decoding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.