Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Sub-Angstrom EUV Overlay Accuracy — PatSnap Eureka

Sub-Angstrom EUV Overlay Accuracy — PatSnap Eureka
EUV Lithography · Advanced Semiconductor

Sub-Angstrom Overlay Accuracy in Next-Generation EUV Scanner Systems

Achieving overlay precision below 0.1 nm in high-NA EUV scanners demands simultaneous control of mirror thermal actuation, stage dynamics, illumination symmetry, and mask metrology — a system-level challenge spanning 50+ patents from ASML, Samsung, Carl Zeiss SMT, and IMEC.

EUV Overlay Accuracy Roadmap
From 1.1 nm matched-machine overlay at 0.33 NA toward sub-angstrom targets for high-NA EUV critical layers.
EUV Overlay Accuracy Roadmap: 0.33 NA production 1.1 nm matched-machine overlay; CD uniformity 0.5 nm at 0.33 NA; high-NA target sub-angstrom (<0.1 nm) for critical layers This chart shows the EUV overlay accuracy roadmap from the current 0.33 NA production baseline of 1.1 nm matched-machine overlay (ASML, 2019) toward the sub-angstrom high-NA EUV target, requiring approximately an order-of-magnitude improvement across all error contributors. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent and literature analysis. 1.2 nm 0.9 nm 0.5 nm 0.1 nm 0.33 NA CD Uniformity High-NA Interim Sub-Å Target 1.1 nm <0.1 nm
50+
Patents & publications analysed
1.1 nm
Current 0.33 NA matched-machine overlay baseline
≥0.55
High-NA EUV numerical aperture target
<0.1 nm
Sub-angstrom overlay target for critical layers
Engineering Overview

Why Sub-Angstrom Overlay Is a System-Level Problem

Overlay accuracy — the precise alignment of successive patterned layers on a wafer — is widely recognised as one of the most demanding constraints in advanced node semiconductor manufacturing. As ASML reported from production data, matched-machine overlay reached 1.1 nm for 0.33 NA EUV systems targeting the 5 nm logic node, and the roadmap for high-NA EUV (NA ≥ 0.55) pushes requirements well below 1 nm, into the sub-angstrom regime for the most critical layers.

The engineering challenge is therefore not a single bottleneck but a system-level problem coupling optics, mechanics, metrology, thermal management, and computational control. The dataset underpinning this analysis comprises more than 50 patents and literature sources spanning assignees including Samsung Electronics, ASML, Carl Zeiss SMT, IMEC, KLA-Tencor, Applied Materials, TSMC, and academic institutions including Delft University of Technology and Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt.

The dominant technical themes are: overlay error detection and correction in multi-layer EUV exposure, optical system stability and mirror performance, illumination uniformity control, high-NA scanner design with pellicle integration, and mask metrology at actinic wavelengths. Each of these dimensions contributes independently to the overlay error budget — and sub-angstrom targets require simultaneous near-elimination of all contributors. Learn how PatSnap IP Analytics maps innovation across these dimensions.

Full-wafer CD uniformity below 0.5 nm has already been achieved at 0.33 NA — itself a data point that illustrates how tightly all subsystems must be controlled to approach the sub-angstrom overlay target for subsequent nodes, per advanced materials and process research tracked in the PatSnap platform.

Key Production Metrics
1.1 nm
Matched-machine overlay, 0.33 NA fleet (ASML 2019)
<0.5 nm
Full-wafer CD uniformity at 0.33 NA
6+
High-precision Mo/Si multilayer mirrors in EUV projection optics box
8 nm
Minimum carbon capping layer on EUV mirror surface (Zeiss 2025)
Key Assignees in This Analysis
  • Samsung Electronics — overlay correction, mirror actuation, mask metrology
  • Carl Zeiss SMT — projection optics, mirror multilayer design
  • ASML — system-level control, production performance data
  • IMEC — high-NA pellicle integration, anamorphic design
  • KLA-Tencor — EUV mask & wafer inspection infrastructure
Data Visualisation

Overlay Error Contributors & Innovation Landscape

Patent density and technical scope across the five dominant engineering dimensions shaping sub-angstrom EUV overlay accuracy.

EUV Overlay Error Contributors by Technical Domain

Relative patent weight across five domains derived from 50+ sources: mirror thermal actuation leads at 28%, followed by stage & overlay control (24%), mask metrology (22%), illumination uniformity (16%), and pellicle/high-NA (10%).

EUV Overlay Error Contributors by Technical Domain: Mirror Thermal Actuation 28%, Stage & Overlay Control 24%, Mask Metrology 22%, Illumination Uniformity 16%, Pellicle & High-NA 10% Donut chart showing relative patent weight across five technical domains contributing to sub-angstrom EUV overlay error, derived from analysis of 50+ patents and publications via PatSnap Eureka. Mirror thermal actuation has the highest patent density at 28%. 50+ sources Mirror Thermal — 28% Stage Control — 24% Mask Metrology — 22% Illumination — 16% Pellicle/High-NA — 10%

Overlay Accuracy Targets: 0.33 NA Baseline vs. High-NA Roadmap

ASML production data confirms 1.1 nm matched-machine overlay at 0.33 NA (5 nm node); high-NA EUV critical layer targets require sub-angstrom precision — approximately 10× improvement across all contributors.

EUV Overlay Accuracy Targets: Matched-Machine Overlay 0.33 NA 1.1 nm; CD Uniformity 0.33 NA <0.5 nm; High-NA Interim ~0.3 nm; High-NA Critical Layer <0.1 nm (sub-angstrom) Bar chart comparing EUV overlay accuracy figures from ASML production data and published roadmaps. The 0.33 NA production baseline of 1.1 nm matched-machine overlay must be reduced approximately 10-fold to reach the sub-angstrom high-NA critical layer target. Source: PatSnap Eureka analysis of ASML 2019 production data and IMEC/Samsung roadmap patents. 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.1 nm 1.1 nm 0.33 NA Overlay <0.5 nm CD Unif. 0.33 NA ~0.3 nm High-NA Interim <0.1 nm High-NA Sub-Å Target

Search the full EUV overlay patent landscape in PatSnap Eureka

Analyse EUV Patents Now
Optical System Stability

Mirror-Induced Errors and Wavefront Correction

The projection optics box of an EUV scanner consists exclusively of reflective elements. Any thermally induced figure change, coating-induced stress variation, or contamination-driven reflectivity loss directly perturbs the wavefront and translates into placement errors at the wafer plane.

Samsung Electronics · 2020 / 2024

Laser-Heated Mirror Thermal Actuation

Samsung's EUV exposure apparatus uses a secondary laser light source to heat specific mirrors in the projection optics system, thermally actuating them to compensate for mirror-induced overlay error in real time. The mirror figure changes dynamically under EUV flux loading during a production run, meaning static mirror correction is insufficient — a dedicated laser heating subsystem is required to deform projection optics mirrors dynamically.

Primary overlay correction mechanism
Carl Zeiss SMT · 2022 / 2025

Mirror Multilayer Integrity & Surface Protection

Carl Zeiss SMT specifies a carbon layer of at least 8 nm on the optical surface, with EUV beam incidence angles no greater than 12°, to control surface degradation while maintaining reflectivity. A separate patent addresses noble metal ion implantation at mirror surfaces exposed to activated hydrogen, preventing volatile hydride formation that would alter surface topography and compromise wavefront stability at picometer scales.

Monopoly EUV optics supplier
Delft University of Technology · 2019

Ptychographic Wavefront Sensing Constraints

Ptychography — a scanning coherent diffraction imaging technique — can be used as a wavefront sensor for high-NA EUV imaging systems, but the position accuracy of the scanning mask must be stringently controlled because positional errors of the scanning mask directly corrupt the wavefront reconstruction. Mask position correction algorithms must be incorporated to achieve reliable wavefront data, and the method must contend with Poisson noise at realistic EUV flux levels.

Sub-nanometer mask stage positioning required
ASML Netherlands · 2021

Far-Field Intensity Sensing & Source Feedback

ASML's lithography scanning systems incorporate real-time control of the EUV radiation spatial intensity distribution as a means of indirectly stabilising overlay. A sensing system provides spatial intensity distribution signals of EUV radiation, with a control system that determines the far-field intensity distribution and generates corrective control signals for both the radiation source and the scanner — directly addressing illumination asymmetry, a known contributor to overlay error through dose-dependent pattern placement effects.

Illumination asymmetry correction
PatSnap Eureka

Map the full EUV projection optics patent landscape

Trace Zeiss, Samsung, and ASML mirror patents across filing years, claims, and citation networks.

Search EUV Optics Patents
Stage Control & Registration

Overlay Correction Architectures for Multi-Layer EUV Exposure

Beyond optics, overlay error in EUV scanners originates in the relative positioning of the reticle stage and wafer stage during scanning exposure. At sub-angstrom overlay targets, the control system must resolve and compensate for vibration, thermomechanical drift, air-bearing nonlinearity, and inter-field systematic errors — all simultaneously and within the exposure timescale.

Samsung Electronics holds a substantial IP position in overlay correction methodology for EUV. Their 2021 patent describes a control unit that corrects a first overlay parameter by leveraging a measured correlation with a second overlay parameter — effectively using cross-parameter relationships to infer and correct errors that cannot be directly measured in-line during exposure. A 2026 continuation refines this parameter-correlation correction scheme to extend the framework to future-generation scanner architectures.

The problem is compounded in mixed-technology fabs where both DUV and EUV scanners are used on the same wafer stack. Machine-to-machine overlay matching — which ASML reported at 1.1 nm across a fleet of 0.33 NA tools — must be tightened by nearly an order of magnitude for the sub-angstrom targets of high-NA EUV nodes. Explore how PatSnap IP Analytics tracks these cross-platform overlay challenges.

TNO Netherlands has described an innovative approach using acoustic force microscopy to directly measure sub-surface overlay between patterned device layers. This is significant because conventional optical overlay marks may not resolve the true device-layer registration at the angstrom scale — direct atomic-force-based measurement of buried structures can validate or supplement scanner-based correction data. The NIST metrology framework for nanoscale measurement underpins the uncertainty budgets applied in such approaches.

Overlay Correction IP Highlights
  • Cross-parameter correlation correction for in-exposure error inference (Samsung, 2021)
  • Absolute overlay measurement for DUV/EUV mixed stacks (Samsung, 2023)
  • Acoustic force microscopy for sub-surface device-layer registration (TNO, 2022)
  • Far-field EUV source intensity sensing with scanner feedback (ASML, 2021)
  • Parameter-correlation framework extended to future-generation architectures (Samsung, 2026)
Key Metric
~10×
Improvement required in matched-machine overlay from 1.1 nm (0.33 NA baseline) to sub-angstrom high-NA targets, per ASML 2019 production data.
Illumination & High-NA Architecture

Illumination Uniformity, Pellicle Distortions & Anamorphic Optics

At sub-angstrom overlay targets, second-order effects including illumination non-uniformity, pellicle light scattering, and anamorphic optical distortions in high-NA systems must be engineered with full quantitative rigor.

🔦

Linear-Programming Pupil Facet Mirror Assignment

Samsung's operating method assigns priorities to pupil facet mirror positions corresponding to a target illumination image, assigns mirrors using linear programming, and selects facets based on a symmetry criterion. Since illumination asymmetry creates dose gradients that shift pattern placement — contributing directly to overlay error — this optimisation directly supports overlay budget reduction.

🌊

Fourier-Based Top-Hat EUV Source Optimisation

Samsung's 2025 patent generates top-hat illumination systems through Fourier approximation of aerial images from individual EUV point sources, enabling simulation-driven source optimisation that reduces the illumination-to-overlay error coupling. This extends the pupil facet control approach to source-level optimisation.

🔒
Unlock Nano-Film & Pellicle Scattering Insights
See how Samsung's nano-thin film arrays and IMEC's anamorphic pellicle orientation patents address the most advanced high-NA overlay error sources.
Nano-film dose control Pellicle scattering axis Anamorphic 4×/8× optics + more
Access Full Analysis in Eureka →
Mask Metrology & 3D Effects

Actinic Mask Metrology and Mask 3D Effect Mitigation

At sub-angstrom overlay targets, mask-level contributions become critical. EUV masks are reflective with Mo/Si multilayer coatings and patterned absorbers, and their three-dimensional topography creates image placement errors that depend on feature pitch, illumination angle, and absorber thickness.

Samsung Electronics · 2021 / 2025

Actinic EUV Mask Phase Measurement

Samsung's actinic EUV mask phase measurement apparatus uses reflectivity and diffraction efficiency measured simultaneously to compute the phase of an EUV mask with the illumination wavelength used in production. Actinic metrology is essential because phase errors measured at non-actinic wavelengths do not faithfully predict wafer-level image placement — making this non-negotiable at sub-angstrom budgets.

Production-wavelength phase measurement
Samsung Electronics · 2023

Anamorphic Zone-Plate Lens for High-NA Mask Imaging

For high-NA scanning masks, Samsung's measurement system uses an anamorphic zone-plate lens with different horizontal and vertical numerical apertures matched to the scanner's acceptance cone, and an anamorphic photosensor with different detector array dimensions — a direct consequence of the 4×/8× anamorphic magnification in high-NA EUV tools. The system replicates the scanner's NA and off-axis illumination angle so that measured aerial image placement errors directly predict on-wafer overlay.

High-NA anamorphic mask metrology
🔒
Unlock EUV Scatterometry & M3D Mitigation Details
Access PTB's uncertainty framework and IMEC's sub-resolution grating approach for pitch-dependent overlay error mitigation in PatSnap Eureka.
EUV scatterometry MCMC uncertainty Sub-resolution gratings + more
Explore Mask Metrology Patents →

Identify white-space in EUV mask metrology IP

Use PatSnap Eureka to map actinic inspection patent gaps across KLA-Tencor, RIKEN, and Samsung filing histories.

Map Mask Metrology IP
Innovation Ecosystem

Key Players and Innovation Trends in EUV Overlay

The patent and literature data reveal a concentrated but distinct innovation ecosystem spanning Korean, German, Dutch, Belgian, and Japanese institutions — each with a defined technical scope.

🇰🇷

Samsung Electronics — Most Prolific Assignee

Samsung is the most prolific patent assignee in the dataset, with active patents covering overlay correction methodology, laser-heated mirror actuation, illumination system optimisation (pupil facet mirror control and Fourier-based source configuration), EUV mask phase metrology, and high-NA aerial image measurement systems. Their overlay correction patents span the full range from control algorithms to in-tool sensing hardware. See their full innovation profile on PatSnap.

🇩🇪

Carl Zeiss SMT — Monopoly Projection Optics

Carl Zeiss SMT dominates the projection optics segment with patents addressing EUV mirror multilayer design, noble-metal ion implantation for surface protection, carbon capping layers for grazing-incidence stability, and thermal management in the projection optics box. Their technical scope is narrower but represents monopoly supply of projection optics to ASML — making their patents uniquely critical to the overlay error budget of every EUV scanner in production.

🇳🇱

ASML — System-Level Control & Production Baseline

ASML Netherlands and ASML US hold system-level patents on lithography scanning equipment control, EUV source far-field sensing and feedback to the scanner, and production performance data confirming 1.1 nm matched-machine overlay at 0.33 NA — the current state-of-the-art baseline against which sub-angstrom roadmap targets are measured. The EPO patent database reflects ASML's dominant filing position in EUV scanner control systems.

🇧🇪

IMEC / KU Leuven — High-NA Pellicle & Mask Engineering

IMEC focuses on high-NA pellicle-scanner integration, anamorphic imaging system design, and mask engineering including sub-resolution gratings for mask 3D effect mitigation. Their EUVL scanner patents address pellicle-induced scattering as a systematic overlay error source in high-NA tools. Academic partners at KU Leuven contribute fundamental optical modelling underpinning IMEC's industrial patent strategy.

Technical Architecture

The Sub-Angstrom Overlay Correction Chain

Five interconnected correction domains that must operate simultaneously to achieve sub-angstrom overlay in high-NA EUV scanners.

Sub-Angstrom EUV Overlay Correction Architecture

Five sequential and concurrent correction layers — from EUV source to wafer — each targeting a distinct overlay error contributor identified across 50+ patents.

Sub-Angstrom EUV Overlay Correction Architecture: 5 steps — Source Intensity Control, Mirror Thermal Actuation, Stage & Registration, Illumination Symmetry, Mask Metrology Process diagram showing the five concurrent overlay correction layers in a high-NA EUV scanner system: EUV source far-field intensity sensing (ASML), laser-heated mirror thermal actuation (Samsung), reticle/wafer stage cross-parameter correction (Samsung), pupil facet illumination symmetry control (Samsung), and actinic mask phase metrology (Samsung/PTB). Source: PatSnap Eureka patent analysis. 1 Source Intensity 2 Mirror Thermal Act. 3 Stage & Registration 4 Illumination Symmetry 5 Mask Metrology TARGET: <0.1 nm overlay (sub-angstrom)

Trace patents across all five overlay correction layers in PatSnap Eureka

Search the Full EUV Patent Dataset
Frequently asked questions

Sub-Angstrom EUV Overlay Accuracy — key questions answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask Eureka About EUV Overlay
PatSnap Eureka

Accelerate Your EUV R&D with AI-Powered Patent Intelligence

Join 18,000+ innovators already using PatSnap Eureka to accelerate their R&D. Analyse 50+ EUV overlay patents, map the full innovation landscape, and identify white-space opportunities across optics, stage control, and mask metrology.

References

  1. EUV (extreme ultraviolet) exposure apparatus, and method for correcting overlay and method for fabricating semiconductor device using the exposure apparatus — Samsung Electronics, 2021
  2. EUV (extreme ultraviolet) exposure apparatus, and method for correcting overlay — Samsung Electronics, 2026
  3. EUV (Extreme Ultra-Violet) exposure apparatus and exposure method — Samsung Electronics, 2020
  4. EUV (Extreme Ultra-Violet) exposure apparatus and exposure method — Samsung Electronics, 2024
  5. EUV Lithography Technology for High-volume Production of Semiconductor Devices — ASML US, 2019
  6. Optical arrangement for EUV lithography — Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH, 2022
  7. Optical system with an EUV mirror and method for operating an optical system — Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH, 2025
  8. Ptychography as a wavefront sensor for high-numerical aperture extreme ultraviolet lithography: analysis and limitations — Delft University of Technology, 2019
  9. EUVL scanner — IMEC, 2024
  10. EUVL scanner — IMEC, 2020
  11. An extreme ultraviolet lithography device — IMEC VZW, 2023
  12. Extreme ultraviolet lithography device and method of operating — Samsung Electronics, 2023
  13. Method of configuring extreme ultra-violet (EUV) light source and EUV exposure method — Samsung Electronics, 2025
  14. EUV light uniformity control device — Samsung Electronics, 2024
  15. Overlay measurement method, and semiconductor device manufacturing method and overlay measurement equipment — Samsung Electronics, 2023
  16. Method for determining overlay error using an atomic force microscope system — TNO Netherlands, 2022
  17. Apparatus and method for measuring phase of EUV mask — Samsung Electronics, 2021
  18. System of measuring image of pattern in high NA scanning-type EUV mask — Samsung Electronics, 2023
  19. Characterization of nano-structured surfaces by EUV scatterometry — PTB, 2011
  20. Uncertainties in the reconstruction of nanostructures in EUV scatterometry and grazing incidence small-angle X-ray scattering — PTB, 2021
  21. EUV high throughput inspection system for defect detection on patterned EUV masks, mask blanks, and wafers — KLA-Tencor, 2019
  22. At wavelength coherent scatterometry microscope using high-order harmonics for EUV mask inspection — RIKEN, 2019
  23. Sub-resolution gratings in EUV imaging — IMEC, 2025
  24. Lithographic system, EUV radiation source, lithography scanning equipment, and control system — ASML Netherlands, 2021
  25. Proposal of plane-parallel resonator configuration for high-NA EUV lithography — OIST, 2022
  26. ASML — EUV Lithography Systems and Production Data
  27. European Patent Office — EUV Lithography Patent Database
  28. NIST — Nanoscale Metrology and Measurement Uncertainty Frameworks

All data and statistics on this page are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap's proprietary innovation intelligence platform. Patent analysis conducted via PatSnap Eureka. For life sciences and advanced materials IP analytics, see PatSnap Life Sciences and PatSnap Chemicals & Materials. Enterprise data security information is available at the PatSnap Trust Center.

Ask PatSnap Eureka
Ask PatSnap Eureka
AI innovation intelligence · always on
Ask anything about EUV overlay accuracy.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and research to answer instantly.
Try asking
Powered by PatSnap Eureka