Supercritical Drying Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Supercritical and Dry Drying of Patterns: Patents Shaping High-Aspect-Ratio Wafer Processing
26.2% concentration at the top. The five most active assignees together hold 966 of the 3,688 records in scope, with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants behind them. Annual filings rose to a peak of 276 in 2018 before settling into a stable band; 2021's 182 fell to 173 by 2024, a -5% move over three years. Filing counts for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent two years understate actual filing activity and should not be read as a fresh decline.
- 1SHIN ETSU CHEMICAL CO LTD9.5%
- 2APPLIED MATERIALS INC4.6%
- 3BASF SE4.2%
- 4TOKYO OHKA KOGYO CO LTD4.1%
- 5TOKYO ELECTRON LTD3.7%
See the full supercritical and dry drying of patterns analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on this landscape
What is pattern collapse in semiconductor wafer drying, and why does it matter for patents?
Pattern collapse happens when the receding liquid meniscus during a conventional wet-drying step exerts capillary force on high-aspect-ratio features, pulling them together or breaking them before drying finishes. It becomes more severe as feature aspect ratios increase, which is why it has drawn sustained patent activity across chemistry, hardware and process routes. In this corpus, claims addressing it sit heavily inside semiconductor-device (H01L) and photolithography (G03F) classes, reflecting how tightly the problem is bound to specific device fabrication steps rather than being a generic cleaning issue.
How does supercritical CO2 drying avoid pattern collapse compared to conventional drying?
Supercritical carbon dioxide drying removes the liquid-vapour interface that causes capillary force in the first place, because the fluid transitions directly between liquid-like and gas-like states without crossing a phase boundary inside the features being dried. Marangoni drying and surface-tension-reduction chemistries take a different route, lowering the force at the interface rather than removing it. Both approaches appear as distinct claim families in this dataset, and chamber pressure control hardware is a recurring companion claim to the supercritical route specifically.
Which companies hold the most patents in supercritical and dry drying of patterns?
The assignee ranking behind this landscape covers 100 companies, with the leading assignee holding 351 of the 3,688 records in scope and a steep drop to 136 records by fifth place. That shape, a dominant leader followed by a long tail of smaller filers, is typical of a process technology that sits at the intersection of equipment, chemistry and device manufacturing. Company-level detail, including the specific assignees behind these figures, is available in the ranking table on this page.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supercritical and Dry Drying of Patterns covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.