Book a demo

Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026

Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/supercritical-co2-waterless-dyeing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Textiles & Fibers
Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing Patents: Who Leads and Where the Field Is Heading
  • Concentrated at the top. Five assignees hold 57.1% of the 168 records in scope, and ten hold 77.4% — a long tail of single-digit and single-filing entrants fills the rest.
  • Filing has cooled since 2022. Activity peaked at 18 records that year and has since declined, with the partial 2026 count reflecting publication lag rather than a stopped field.
  • Claims cluster in two IPC subclasses. D06B (textile wet treatment) and D06P (dyeing & printing) each cover roughly half or more of all records, leaving adjacent classes comparatively open.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
168
Published Records
57%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+133%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the supercritical CO2 dyeing patent record shows

Supercritical CO2 waterless dyeing replaces the water bath in conventional textile dyeing with pressurised carbon dioxide that carries dye into fibre without a liquid effluent stream. The patent record in scope runs from 2015 to a 2026-07-31 data cut-off and covers 168 published records tied to this specific search — dyeing autoclave design, dye solubility behaviour under pressure, cycle and recycling mechanics, and applicability beyond polyester substrates. It is a narrow, mechanically-specific corner of textile wet treatment, not the whole of sustainable dyeing.

Filing is heavily weighted toward Chinese applicants and Chinese receiving offices, with a smaller but real presence in the United States, WIPO/PCT, Europe, Hong Kong and Taiwan. The composition of claims sits mostly in equipment and process classes rather than in dye chemistry itself, which shapes where a new entrant is likely to find open claim space versus dense prior art.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1SUZHOU UNIV28
  2. 2QINGDAO JIFA GROUP28
  3. 3NANTONG TEXTILE & SILK IND TECH RES INST18
  4. 4DALIAN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY12
  5. 5MARTIN PROCESSING INC10
  6. 6Zhongke Shouwang Waterless Dyeing Intelligent Equipment (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.9
  7. 7SIYANG ZHONGLIAN TEXTILE TECH CO LTD9
  8. 8KURARAY FASTENING CO LTD6
  9. 9FUJIAN ZIPPER SCI & TECH CO LTD5
  10. 10UNIVERSITY OF FUKUI5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 168-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Annual filings rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2022, then declined toward a partial count of 1 in 2026. Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years understate real activity rather than confirming a stopped field.

Filing trend, 2017–2026051015208201720182019202020211820222023202418202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

D06B (textile wet treatment) covers 64.3% of the 168 records and D06P (dyeing & printing textiles) covers 50.0%, confirming that most patent activity centres on the dyeing apparatus and process rather than on dye chemistry. Smaller shares in C09B, D06M, C08J, D06F, A44B and C07C mark adjacent branches — dye formulation, finishing, polymer solution behaviour and fastener applications — where claim density is much lower. Records can carry more than one class, so these shares sum to well over 100% of the record total.

IPC subclass compositionD06B · Textile wet treatment10864.3%D06P · Dyeing & printing textiles8450.0%C09B · Dyes & pigments (organic)1810.7%D06M · Textile chemical treatment127.1%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions106.0%D06F · Laundering, drying & ironing106.0%A44B · Buttons, buckles & fasteners74.2%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds74.2%Other3118.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 168 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about supercritical co2 waterless dyeing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
US20200378046A12020-12-03

US20200378046A1 — Waterless dyeing device and method for bobbin yarn, and product

QINGDAO JIFA GROUP CO., LTD.

A waterless dyeing device for cone yarn, with a dye autoclave, dyeing autoclave and recycle autoclave connected in a dyeing circulation system. The dyeing autoclave has a cone yarn inlet with a sealing cap and a perforated centre shaft acting as a fluid discharge outlet, arranged to circulate supercritical CO2 and dye through the wound yarn package.Filed by Qingdao Jifa Group; published 2020-12-03.

US20200378046A1 — patent drawing 1US20200378046A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN1807742A超临界二氧化碳染色装置中的染色釜43
2CN101812809A散纤维超临界二氧化碳染色方法34
3CN103225218A一种纤维素纤维的液氨染色方法33
4CN1944762A一种超临界二氧化碳染色装置中的染色釜33
5CN1958941A一种流体无水染色技术33
6US4055971AClosed cycle apparatus for the rapid, continuous and waterless dyeing of textile and plastic materials33
7CN1831235A一种苎麻纤维超临界二氧化碳染色新工艺26
8CN103422288A一种超临界CO2染色的色样打板机和染料称量系统20
9CN103074781A以特种甲基硅氧烷为介质的分散染料染色方法17
10US20140305170A1Supercritical fluid spectometer apparatus16

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to be cited within this corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three findings that shape where a new filing is likely to clear and where it will collide with existing claims.

Concentration
57.1% of 168 records
held by top 5 assignees

Filing sits with a small group, not a fragmented field

The top 5 assignees combined account for 57.1% of all 168 records in scope, and the top 10 account for 77.4%. That leaves a long tail of entities with one or two filings each — useful context for freedom-to-operate work, since most prior art to clear will trace back to a handful of applicants.

Assignee ranking, 70 companies
Momentum
Peak 18 in 2022
filings, then declining

The filing curve has already turned down

Volume rose from 8 records in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2022 and has since declined toward 1 in the partial 2026 count. Several of the most active historical filers show 0 filings in the latest year, consistent with a technology that consolidated its core claims earlier in the window rather than one still expanding.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Technology mix
64.3% in D06B
of 168 records

Claims cluster in apparatus and process, not chemistry

D06B and D06P together dominate the record set, while dye chemistry (C09B, 10.7%) and polymer processing (C08J, 6.0%) carry far fewer records. A new entrant working on dye formulation for supercritical CO2 rather than autoclave design is filing into comparatively lighter prior art.

IPC subclass shares, 168 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to supercritical co2 waterless dyeing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the joint activity sits

The leading assignee outpaces the rest of the ranked field, and a small cluster of Chinese research institutes and enterprises files jointly and repeatedly.

Leader
28 records
leading assignee

One applicant well ahead of the field

The leading assignee holds 28 records against a fifth-place figure of 10 and a tenth-place figure of 5 — a steep drop-off that marks this as a field with one dominant filer rather than several evenly matched competitors.

Assignee ranking, 168 records
Collaboration
26 shared records
strongest co-assignee pair

Research institute and university filing in tandem

The strongest co-assignee pair shares 26 records, with two further pairings each sharing 13. These recurring pairings point to a small number of standing research collaborations rather than one-off joint filings.

Co-assignee pairs, 10 identified
Momentum
0 in latest year
across several top filers

Historical leaders have gone quiet

Several of the most active historical assignees, including the top-ranked filer, recorded 0 filings in the latest year with year-over-year declines of -100% where prior-year activity existed. That is consistent with the broader downturn since the 2022 peak rather than a single company's retreat.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth scouting
Sub-areas with comparatively light representation in the 168-record set, based on IPC composition and abstract content.
Dye formulation for CO2 solubilityRecycling/recovery loop efficiencyNon-polyester substrate adaptationLevelness and reproducibility controlContinuous (non-batch) processing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Soochow University0-100%
Qingdao Jifa Group Co., Ltd.0-100%
Nantong Textile & Silk Industrial Technology Research Institute0
Siyang Zhonglian Textile Technology Co., Ltd.0
Dalian Polytechnic University0-100%
MARTIN PROCESSING INC0
University of Fukui0
Kuraray Fastening Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, R&D targeting, or monitoring competitor activity.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on autoclave design

With D06B and D06P covering the majority of records, any new dyeing vessel or circulation system design should be checked against the concentrated top-5 assignee portfolio before filing.

Explore in Eureka

Scout the under-claimed chemistry branches

Dye solubility and recycling claims sit in smaller IPC shares (C09B, C08J) than apparatus claims, suggesting room for formulation-focused filings distinct from the crowded vessel-design space.

Explore in Eureka

Track whether filing has genuinely stopped or is lagging

The drop to 1 record in 2026 partly reflects publication lag; monitoring filings from the historically dominant assignees over the next 18 months will clarify whether the downturn is real.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about supercritical CO2 dyeing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Supercritical CO2 Waterless Dyeing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole supercritical co2 waterless dyeing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.