Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets Patents: Top Filers 2026
- 43.2% of all 549 records sit with the five leading assignees, a concentration that narrows further once co-filing pairs are counted.
- Filings nearly tripled from 4 in 2021 to 12 in 2024 (+200%), with 2023 the peak year so far at 33 records.
- A47F shop-fitting claims dominate at 71.8% of records, while air-conditioning and heat-exchange classes stay under 3% each — a sign of where claim space is still thin.
Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 549 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the filing record shows
Supermarket refrigerated display cabinet patenting sits at the intersection of shop-fitting mechanics and cooling engineering. The search set spans 549 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, built around claim language on air curtains, door retrofits, defrost strategy, product temperature control, lighting heat load and energy test standards. Most records classify under A47F (shop and display fittings) and F25D (refrigerators and cooling), which together describe the dominant engineering pattern: a display fixture built around a refrigeration circuit, with airflow management as the recurring point of novelty.
Filing offices skew toward the United States, United Kingdom and EPO, with meaningful WIPO and Commonwealth filing (Australia, Canada) reflecting the retail-chain geography this equipment serves. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real activity rather than signal a slowdown.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 549-record set: filing activity by year, and the IPC subclasses those records carry. Because a single record can carry more than one classification, the technology shares add up to more than 100%.
A three-year filing acceleration, then a data-lag dip
Annual filings rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 33 in 2023, and the 2021-to-2024 span alone shows filings nearly tripling (4 to 12, +200%). 2025 and 2026 read low only because publication has not caught up with those filing years yet.
Shop-fitting claims dominate; cooling-circuit and ventilation classes stay thin
A47F (shop and display fittings) appears in 71.8% of the 549 records and F25D (refrigerators and cooling) in 41.9%, confirming that most novelty is claimed at the fixture level. F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps) trails at 16.8%, and F24F (air conditioning and ventilation), F28D (heat-exchange apparatus), A47B and G09F each sit at 2.2% or below — narrow bands of the field with comparatively little claim density.
Shares are the percentage of the 549 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about supermarket refrigerated display cabinets and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative and most-cited filings
WO2016081393A1 — Air curtain type refrigerated display cabinet (Carrier Corporation, 2016-05-26)
The filing describes a cold air auxiliary passage built into the display rack, drawing from the main cold air passage and directing output toward an interior hot-spot region to reinforce the air curtain at that point. The approach targets the known weak point of open-front cabinets: localized warming where the air curtain is least effective.Abstract text drawn directly from the published filing.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4949554A | Single pane, curved glass lid, frozen food merchandiser | 85 |
| 2 | US3850003A | Air defrost air curtain display case | 84 |
| 3 | US3937033A | Air defrost display case | 73 |
| 4 | US5475987A | Refrigerated display case apparatus with enhanced airflow and improved insulation construction | 65 |
| 5 | US20010003248A1 | Airflow arrangement for a refrigerator | 62 |
| 6 | US6393851B1 | Vapor compression system | 59 |
| 7 | US4369632A | Refrigerated merchandiser display case | 59 |
| 8 | US4299092A | Energy conserving refrigerated merchandiser display case | 58 |
| 9 | US5477702A | Refrigerated display cabinet | 55 |
| 10 | US4741171A | Refrigerated display cabinet | 54 |
Citation counts accumulate over time inside this corpus, so older records such as the 1970s and 1990s filings lead the table. That reflects influence on later filings, not current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once concentration, technology mix and citation depth are read together.
The leading tier is compact, the tail is long
The top 5 assignees hold 43.2% of all 549 records, and the top 10 extend that to 57.2%. The leader alone accounts for 93 records against a fifth-place figure of 19 and a tenth-place figure of 13 — a steep drop-off that leaves the remaining 90 ranked assignees holding single-digit or low-double-digit counts each.
Fixture-level claims crowd the field; circuit-level claims stay open
A47F shop-fitting claims cover 71.8% of the 549 records, while F24F air-conditioning and ventilation claims cover only 2.0% and F28D heat-exchange apparatus just 1.3%. That gap suggests the mechanical fixture design space is well mapped, but the underlying thermal and airflow engineering has comparatively few dedicated filings.
Recent-year momentum has gone quiet across the named leaders
Every assignee in the tracked recent-year momentum set shows 0 filings in the latest year, including the corporate leader and its strongest co-assignee pairs. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this reads as a data-visibility gap rather than an actual halt in R&D.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to supermarket refrigerated display cabinets, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
The ranked field runs 100 assignees deep, but activity concentrates hard at the top before thinning into a long tail of one- and two-filing entrants.
One filer sits well clear of the field
The leading assignee's 93 records compare with 19 at fifth place and 13 at tenth, a gap wide enough that displacing the top position would require sustained multi-year filing rather than a single strong year.
Collaboration is limited and clustered
Only 9 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest pairs each showing 3 shared filings. Co-filing here looks more like individual inventor relationships attached to a corporate assignee than broad industry partnership.
US, UK and EPO carry most of the filing weight
The United States leads with 99 filings, followed by the United Kingdom at 82 and the European Patent Office at 77. Australia (47), WIPO/PCT (32) and Canada (23) round out the set, tracking the geography of large supermarket chains rather than manufacturing bases.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Applied Design & Engineering Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Carrier Corporation (US) | 0 | — |
| TYLER REFRIGERATION CORP | 0 | — |
| XDX Global LLC | 0 | — |
| Enviro Cool UK Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Frigoland UK Ltd. | 0 | — |
| JTL SYST | 0 | — |
| Aerofoil Energy Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The dataset points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.
Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited claims
The most-cited records date back decades but remain the reference point for air curtain and defrost claim language; any new filing in that space should be checked against them directly.
Explore prior art in EurekaMap the under-claimed thermal and airflow classes
F24F and F28D carry a fraction of the filings that A47F does, which is either an opportunity or a sign the physics has been solved outside the patent literature — worth confirming before committing R&D spend.
Run a technology gap search in EurekaWatch for the 2025–2026 publication catch-up
The apparent drop in filings after 2024 is a publication-lag artifact, not a real decline; re-check this trend once the 2025 filing year has fully published.
Set a monitoring alert in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
One assignee leads the ranked field clearly, with 93 records against 19 at fifth place and 13 at tenth place. The top 5 assignees combined hold 43.2% of all 549 records in scope, and the top 10 extend that to 57.2%. Beyond that point the ranking runs to 100 assignees with a long tail of low-count filers, so the field is concentrated at the top but not dominated by a single company outright.
The bulk of filings classify under A47F, shop and display fittings, which covers 71.8% of the 549 records, and F25D, refrigerators and cooling, at 41.9%. Smaller shares fall under F25B refrigeration and heat pumps (16.8%), with air conditioning, heat exchange, furniture and signage classes each under 3%. Because records can carry multiple classes, these figures describe overlap, not a strict breakdown of the field.
Filings grew substantially through the middle of the period, with the count nearly tripling from 4 in 2021 to 12 in 2024, a +200% increase over that span, and 2023 stands as the peak year so far at 33 records. Figures for 2025 and 2026 look lower, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than an actual slowdown. Any read on the very latest years should account for that lag before drawing conclusions.
WO2016081393A1, assigned to Carrier Corporation and published in 2016, claims an air curtain type refrigerated display cabinet with a cold air auxiliary passage built into the display rack that draws from the main cold air passage and directs output at an interior hot-spot region. It targets the specific failure mode of open-front cabinets where the air curtain weakens locally. New designs that use a different airflow-augmentation mechanism to address the same hot-spot problem, rather than a secondary passage fed from the main circuit, would sit outside this specific claim structure, but a freedom-to-operate check against the full claim set is the only reliable way to confirm that.
The technology composition data shows claim density concentrated in shop-fitting mechanics (A47F) and general cooling (F25D), while air conditioning and ventilation (F24F) and heat-exchange apparatus (F28D) each sit at 2.2% or below of the 549 records. Sub-areas such as lighting heat-load compensation, defrost strategy tuned for multi-deck cabinets, and sensor-driven air curtain feedback control show comparatively few dedicated filings relative to the core fixture claims. These are reasonable areas to search more deeply before assuming the space is occupied, since low filing density in a functional area is not the same as the problem being unsolved.
Research Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole supermarket refrigerated display cabinets corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.