Book a demo

Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets Patents: Top Filers 2026

Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets Patents: Top Filers 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/supermarket-refrigerated-display-cabinets-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Refrigeration & Cold Chain
Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinet Patents: Who Leads and Where the Claims Sit
  • 43.2% of all 549 records sit with the five leading assignees, a concentration that narrows further once co-filing pairs are counted.
  • Filings nearly tripled from 4 in 2021 to 12 in 2024 (+200%), with 2023 the peak year so far at 33 records.
  • A47F shop-fitting claims dominate at 71.8% of records, while air-conditioning and heat-exchange classes stay under 3% each — a sign of where claim space is still thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
549
Published Records
43%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+200%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 549 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the filing record shows

Supermarket refrigerated display cabinet patenting sits at the intersection of shop-fitting mechanics and cooling engineering. The search set spans 549 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, built around claim language on air curtains, door retrofits, defrost strategy, product temperature control, lighting heat load and energy test standards. Most records classify under A47F (shop and display fittings) and F25D (refrigerators and cooling), which together describe the dominant engineering pattern: a display fixture built around a refrigeration circuit, with airflow management as the recurring point of novelty.

Filing offices skew toward the United States, United Kingdom and EPO, with meaningful WIPO and Commonwealth filing (Australia, Canada) reflecting the retail-chain geography this equipment serves. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real activity rather than signal a slowdown.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015–2026
  1. 1APPLIED DESIGN & ENG93
  2. 2CARRIER CORP57
  3. 3TYLER REFRIGERATION CORP36
  4. 4AEROFOIL ENERGY LTD32
  5. 5ENVIRO COOL UK19
  6. 6XDX TECHNOLOGY LLC18
  7. 7JTL SYST17
  8. 8KYSOR INDUSTRIAL CORP15
  9. 9SANDEN CORP14
  10. 10XDX GLOBAL LLC13
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 549-record set: filing activity by year, and the IPC subclasses those records carry. Because a single record can carry more than one classification, the technology shares add up to more than 100%.

A three-year filing acceleration, then a data-lag dip

Annual filings rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 33 in 2023, and the 2021-to-2024 span alone shows filings nearly tripling (4 to 12, +200%). 2025 and 2026 read low only because publication has not caught up with those filing years yet.

A three-year filing acceleration, then a data-lag dip01020304082017201820192020202120223320232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Shop-fitting claims dominate; cooling-circuit and ventilation classes stay thin

A47F (shop and display fittings) appears in 71.8% of the 549 records and F25D (refrigerators and cooling) in 41.9%, confirming that most novelty is claimed at the fixture level. F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps) trails at 16.8%, and F24F (air conditioning and ventilation), F28D (heat-exchange apparatus), A47B and G09F each sit at 2.2% or below — narrow bands of the field with comparatively little claim density.

Shop-fitting claims dominate; cooling-circuit and ventilation classes stay thinA47F · Shop & display fittings39471.8%F25D · Refrigerators & cooling23041.9%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps9216.8%A47J · Kitchen & cooking utensils122.2%F24F · Air conditioning & ventilation112.0%F28D · Heat-exchange apparatus71.3%A47B · Tables & furniture61.1%G09F · Displaying, advertising & signs61.1%Other397.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 549 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about supermarket refrigerated display cabinets and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
WO2016081393A12016-05-26

WO2016081393A1 — Air curtain type refrigerated display cabinet (Carrier Corporation, 2016-05-26)

CARRIER CORPORATION

The filing describes a cold air auxiliary passage built into the display rack, drawing from the main cold air passage and directing output toward an interior hot-spot region to reinforce the air curtain at that point. The approach targets the known weak point of open-front cabinets: localized warming where the air curtain is least effective.Abstract text drawn directly from the published filing.

WO2016081393A1 — patent drawing 1WO2016081393A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the search set
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4949554ASingle pane, curved glass lid, frozen food merchandiser85
2US3850003AAir defrost air curtain display case84
3US3937033AAir defrost display case73
4US5475987ARefrigerated display case apparatus with enhanced airflow and improved insulation construction65
5US20010003248A1Airflow arrangement for a refrigerator62
6US6393851B1Vapor compression system59
7US4369632ARefrigerated merchandiser display case59
8US4299092AEnergy conserving refrigerated merchandiser display case58
9US5477702ARefrigerated display cabinet55
10US4741171ARefrigerated display cabinet54

Citation counts accumulate over time inside this corpus, so older records such as the 1970s and 1990s filings lead the table. That reflects influence on later filings, not current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once concentration, technology mix and citation depth are read together.

Concentration
43.2% of 549 records
held by top 5 assignees

The leading tier is compact, the tail is long

The top 5 assignees hold 43.2% of all 549 records, and the top 10 extend that to 57.2%. The leader alone accounts for 93 records against a fifth-place figure of 19 and a tenth-place figure of 13 — a steep drop-off that leaves the remaining 90 ranked assignees holding single-digit or low-double-digit counts each.

Ranking covers 100 assignees, the full set the data endpoint returns.
Technology mix
71.8% vs 2.0%
A47F share vs F24F share

Fixture-level claims crowd the field; circuit-level claims stay open

A47F shop-fitting claims cover 71.8% of the 549 records, while F24F air-conditioning and ventilation claims cover only 2.0% and F28D heat-exchange apparatus just 1.3%. That gap suggests the mechanical fixture design space is well mapped, but the underlying thermal and airflow engineering has comparatively few dedicated filings.

Shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC classes.
Momentum
0 in latest year
for every top co-filing pair tracked

Recent-year momentum has gone quiet across the named leaders

Every assignee in the tracked recent-year momentum set shows 0 filings in the latest year, including the corporate leader and its strongest co-assignee pairs. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this reads as a data-visibility gap rather than an actual halt in R&D.

Momentum figures are counted per assignee, not per family.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to supermarket refrigerated display cabinets, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked field runs 100 assignees deep, but activity concentrates hard at the top before thinning into a long tail of one- and two-filing entrants.

Leader
93 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

One filer sits well clear of the field

The leading assignee's 93 records compare with 19 at fifth place and 13 at tenth, a gap wide enough that displacing the top position would require sustained multi-year filing rather than a single strong year.

Counted in records, per the assignee ranking.
Co-filing
9 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is limited and clustered

Only 9 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest pairs each showing 3 shared filings. Co-filing here looks more like individual inventor relationships attached to a corporate assignee than broad industry partnership.

Strongest pairs each recorded 3 shared filings.
Filing geography
99 US filings
leading office by volume

US, UK and EPO carry most of the filing weight

The United States leads with 99 filings, followed by the United Kingdom at 82 and the European Patent Office at 77. Australia (47), WIPO/PCT (32) and Canada (23) round out the set, tracking the geography of large supermarket chains rather than manufacturing bases.

Counts are by receiving office, not by assignee nationality.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches where filing density is low relative to the core fixture and cooling-circuit claims.
Lighting heat-load compensationDoor retrofit kits for open-front casesEnergy test standard compliance circuitryDefrost strategy for multi-deck cabinetsAir curtain sensor feedback control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Applied Design & Engineering Ltd.0
Carrier Corporation (US)0
TYLER REFRIGERATION CORP0
XDX Global LLC0
Enviro Cool UK Ltd.0
Frigoland UK Ltd.0
JTL SYST0
Aerofoil Energy Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited claims

The most-cited records date back decades but remain the reference point for air curtain and defrost claim language; any new filing in that space should be checked against them directly.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Map the under-claimed thermal and airflow classes

F24F and F28D carry a fraction of the filings that A47F does, which is either an opportunity or a sign the physics has been solved outside the patent literature — worth confirming before committing R&D spend.

Run a technology gap search in Eureka

Watch for the 2025–2026 publication catch-up

The apparent drop in filings after 2024 is a publication-lag artifact, not a real decline; re-check this trend once the 2025 filing year has fully published.

Set a monitoring alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Supermarket Refrigerated Display Cabinets in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole supermarket refrigerated display cabinets corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.