https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/surface-and-underground-mining-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Mining & Minerals
Surface and underground mining patents: who is filing, and where the claim space is still open
  • Concentrated but not locked up. the leading assignee alone accounts for 209 records, yet the top 5 combined hold only 29.9% of all 1,928 records in scope — most of the field sits with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • Filing has plateaued, not declined. 2021 to 2024 (the last complete filing year) moved from 85 to 87 records, a flat +2% — recent-year dips in the raw trend reflect publication lag, not falling interest.
  • Extraction chemistry outweighs digital mining. C22B metal extraction and refining and E21B drilling together cover more records than G06Q business-data-processing claims, which sit at 8.5% of the 1,928 records despite heavy promotion of 'digital twin' mining systems.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,928
Published Records
30%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+2%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (85 records) with 2024 (87) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,928 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers 1,928 published records filed or published between 2015 and 2026 that combine surface or underground mining terms with downstream processing language — ore composition, metal recovery, separation reagents, process residue, extraction process and ore processing. That search string deliberately pulls in the chemistry and mechanical engineering of getting valuable material out of rock, not just mine-site software or equipment safety patents that happen to mention mining.

Because families are the fairer unit for comparing filing behaviour across jurisdictions, the assignee ranking below is counted in families rather than raw document counts. The technology composition section instead reports on the full record set, since an individual filing can carry more than one IPC subclass.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015-2026
  1. 1RED LEAF RESOURCES INC209
  2. 2FREEPORT MCMORAN INC125
  3. 3SDG LLC110
  4. 4JETTI RESOURCES LLC84
  5. 5STRONG FORCE IOT PORTFOLIO 2016 LLC48
  6. 6KEMIRA OY43
  7. 7EVONIK OPERATIONS GMBH37
  8. 8CARBON HLDG INTPROP LLC35
  9. 9PROCTER & GAMBLE CO35
  10. 10COMMONWEALTH SCI & IND RES ORG28
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface & Underground Mining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,928 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which technical subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Recorded filings ran from 56 in 2017 to a peak of 94 in 2020, then held roughly flat through the last complete year: 85 in 2021 to 87 in 2024, a +2% move. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so the apparent tail-off at the end of the chart should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017-202602550751005620172018201994202020212022202320242025162026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

C22B (metal extraction and refining) leads at 26.9% of the 1,928 records, with E21B (earth and rock drilling) close behind at 20.0%. C10G (hydrocarbon oil refining) and B03D (flotation) each cover more than an eighth of the set, reflecting how much of this corpus is wet chemistry and separations rather than excavation hardware. G06Q (business and data processing) appears in 8.5% of records, showing digital-mining claims are present but a minority strand next to the extraction chemistry.

Technology composition by IPC subclassC22B · Metal extraction & refining51926.9%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)38620.0%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining26914.0%B03D · Flotation25213.1%E21C · Mining & quarrying22411.6%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…1648.5%C01G · Compounds of other metals1226.3%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment1075.5%Other1,79393.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,928 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface & Underground Mining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Surface & Underground Mining Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about surface & underground mining patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative filing

Representative Record
US7128375B22006-10-31

Method and means for recovering hydrocarbons from oil sands by underground mining (US7128375B2)

OSUM OIL SANDS CORP.

The present invention is directed generally to the combined use of slurry mining and hydrocyclones to recover hydrocarbons, such as bitumen, from hydrocarbon-containing materials, such as oil sands, and to selective mining of valuable materials, particularly hydrocarbon-containing materials, using a plurality of excavating devices and corresponding inputs for the excavated material. The excavated material captured by each input can be switched back-and-forth between two or more destinations depending on the value of the stream.Filed by Osum Oil Sands Corp., granted 2006-10-31. It ties underground slurry mining directly to hydrocyclone-based hydrocarbon separation, one of the more concrete process-integration claims in the set.

US7128375B2 — patent drawing 1US7128375B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20160045841A1New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials860
2US20210157312A1Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments716
3US20220108262A1Industrial digital twin systems and methods with echelons of executive, advisory and operations messaging and…387
4US20050042151A1Nonwoven composites and related products and processes251
5WO2014153570A2New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials219
6WO2021108680A1Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments210
7US20110035154A1Utilizing salts for carbon capture and storage183
8US20230176550A1Quantum, biological, computer vision, and neural network systems for industrial internet of things176
9US4375302AProcess for the in situ recovery of both petroleum and inorganic mineral content of an oil shale deposit175
10US20090020456A1System comprising the gasification of fossil fuels to process unconventional oil sources157

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; treat them as a signal of influence, not of which technology is currently most active.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface & Underground Mining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting or licensing in this space.

Concentration
29.9%
of 1,928 records held by top 5

The top of the field is not a moat

The leading assignee holds 209 records and the top 5 combined reach 29.9% of the 1,928 records in scope — a real lead, but far short of the field. The other 70% is spread across a long tail, which means most granted claims in extraction chemistry and drilling have not been consolidated by any single filer.

Top 5 combined: 576 records
Filing momentum
+2%
2021 to 2024 filing change

Volume has plateaued, not cooled

Filings moved from 85 in 2021 to 87 in 2024, essentially flat. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the lower counts shown for 2025 and 2026 are an artefact of the data cut-off, not evidence that interest is fading.

Peak year so far: 2020 at 94 records
Technology mix
26.9%
of records in C22B metal extraction

Chemistry, not just hardware, carries the claims

C22B metal extraction and refining is the single largest subclass at 26.9% of the 1,928 records, ahead of E21B drilling at 20.0%. B03D flotation and C01G metal compounds add further separations and materials claims, meaning a search limited to mechanical mining equipment misses most of the field.

C22B 26.9% · E21B 20.0% · B03D 13.1%
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to surface & underground mining patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface & Underground Mining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and what is still open

The ranked leaders cover 100 companies drawn from the full 1,928-record set. Momentum among the largest recent filers has cooled sharply, which is consistent with a field where the biggest names are consolidating rather than expanding their filing rate.

Leader
209 records
families held by the top-ranked assignee

A single leader, well ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee holds 209 records against a fifth-place count of 48 and a tenth-place count of 28 — a steep drop-off after the leader that flattens into the long tail quickly.

5th place: 48 · 10th place: 28
Momentum
-79% YoY
latest-year change, largest recent filer

Recent-year filing has cooled among top filers

Several of the most active historical filers show sharp year-on-year declines in the latest available year, with one large filer down 79% and others reporting a single filing or none at all in the most recent period. This likely reflects publication lag as much as any real pullback.

Read latest-year counts with the 18-month publication lag in mind
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is limited and clustered

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest of them link a small number of individual inventors and a university partner to specific corporate filers rather than reflecting broad industry consortia.

Strongest pairs run 16-18 shared records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a first-mover claim
Branches with filing density well below the C22B/E21B core, based on the IPC composition above
process residue valorisationseparation reagent recycling loopswater treatment tied to flotation tailingsore composition sensing for grade controlhydrocyclone-integrated slurry mining
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.6-79%
Strong Force IOT Portfolio 2016, LLC1-50%
Red Leaf Resources, Inc.0
SDG LLC0
University of British Columbia0
Jetti Resources LLC0-100%
Kemira Oyj0
TETRA CORP0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface & Underground Mining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

The dataset points to a field with one clear leader, a wide long tail, and chemistry-heavy claim space that is easy to underweight if a search stays focused on mining equipment alone.

Map claim scope before drafting

With C22B and B03D covering a combined share of the record set larger than drilling hardware, a freedom-to-operate search that starts and ends with excavation equipment will miss the denser prior art.

Explore claim scope in Eureka

Track the long tail, not just the leader

Because the top 5 hold under a third of all records, monitoring should extend past the largest filer to the many single- and few-filing entrants that make up most of the field.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface & Underground Mining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about mining patent activity

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface & Underground Mining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Surface & Underground Mining Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole surface & underground mining patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.