Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (85 records) with 2024 (87) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,928 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This review covers 1,928 published records filed or published between 2015 and 2026 that combine surface or underground mining terms with downstream processing language — ore composition, metal recovery, separation reagents, process residue, extraction process and ore processing. That search string deliberately pulls in the chemistry and mechanical engineering of getting valuable material out of rock, not just mine-site software or equipment safety patents that happen to mention mining.
Because families are the fairer unit for comparing filing behaviour across jurisdictions, the assignee ranking below is counted in families rather than raw document counts. The technology composition section instead reports on the full record set, since an individual filing can carry more than one IPC subclass.
Two views of the same 1,928 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which technical subclasses carry the claims.
Recorded filings ran from 56 in 2017 to a peak of 94 in 2020, then held roughly flat through the last complete year: 85 in 2021 to 87 in 2024, a +2% move. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so the apparent tail-off at the end of the chart should not be read as a slowdown.
C22B (metal extraction and refining) leads at 26.9% of the 1,928 records, with E21B (earth and rock drilling) close behind at 20.0%. C10G (hydrocarbon oil refining) and B03D (flotation) each cover more than an eighth of the set, reflecting how much of this corpus is wet chemistry and separations rather than excavation hardware. G06Q (business and data processing) appears in 8.5% of records, showing digital-mining claims are present but a minority strand next to the extraction chemistry.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,928 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about surface & underground mining patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe present invention is directed generally to the combined use of slurry mining and hydrocyclones to recover hydrocarbons, such as bitumen, from hydrocarbon-containing materials, such as oil sands, and to selective mining of valuable materials, particularly hydrocarbon-containing materials, using a plurality of excavating devices and corresponding inputs for the excavated material. The excavated material captured by each input can be switched back-and-forth between two or more destinations depending on the value of the stream.Filed by Osum Oil Sands Corp., granted 2006-10-31. It ties underground slurry mining directly to hydrocyclone-based hydrocarbon separation, one of the more concrete process-integration claims in the set.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20160045841A1 | New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials | 860 |
| 2 | US20210157312A1 | Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments | 716 |
| 3 | US20220108262A1 | Industrial digital twin systems and methods with echelons of executive, advisory and operations messaging and… | 387 |
| 4 | US20050042151A1 | Nonwoven composites and related products and processes | 251 |
| 5 | WO2014153570A2 | New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials | 219 |
| 6 | WO2021108680A1 | Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments | 210 |
| 7 | US20110035154A1 | Utilizing salts for carbon capture and storage | 183 |
| 8 | US20230176550A1 | Quantum, biological, computer vision, and neural network systems for industrial internet of things | 176 |
| 9 | US4375302A | Process for the in situ recovery of both petroleum and inorganic mineral content of an oil shale deposit | 175 |
| 10 | US20090020456A1 | System comprising the gasification of fossil fuels to process unconventional oil sources | 157 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; treat them as a signal of influence, not of which technology is currently most active.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns worth acting on before drafting or licensing in this space.
The leading assignee holds 209 records and the top 5 combined reach 29.9% of the 1,928 records in scope — a real lead, but far short of the field. The other 70% is spread across a long tail, which means most granted claims in extraction chemistry and drilling have not been consolidated by any single filer.
Filings moved from 85 in 2021 to 87 in 2024, essentially flat. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the lower counts shown for 2025 and 2026 are an artefact of the data cut-off, not evidence that interest is fading.
C22B metal extraction and refining is the single largest subclass at 26.9% of the 1,928 records, ahead of E21B drilling at 20.0%. B03D flotation and C01G metal compounds add further separations and materials claims, meaning a search limited to mechanical mining equipment misses most of the field.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to surface & underground mining patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders cover 100 companies drawn from the full 1,928-record set. Momentum among the largest recent filers has cooled sharply, which is consistent with a field where the biggest names are consolidating rather than expanding their filing rate.
The top-ranked assignee holds 209 records against a fifth-place count of 48 and a tenth-place count of 28 — a steep drop-off after the leader that flattens into the long tail quickly.
Several of the most active historical filers show sharp year-on-year declines in the latest available year, with one large filer down 79% and others reporting a single filing or none at all in the most recent period. This likely reflects publication lag as much as any real pullback.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest of them link a small number of individual inventors and a university partner to specific corporate filers rather than reflecting broad industry consortia.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 6 | -79% |
| Strong Force IOT Portfolio 2016, LLC | 1 | -50% |
| Red Leaf Resources, Inc. | 0 | — |
| SDG LLC | 0 | — |
| University of British Columbia | 0 | — |
| Jetti Resources LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Kemira Oyj | 0 | — |
| TETRA CORP | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a field with one clear leader, a wide long tail, and chemistry-heavy claim space that is easy to underweight if a search stays focused on mining equipment alone.
With C22B and B03D covering a combined share of the record set larger than drilling hardware, a freedom-to-operate search that starts and ends with excavation equipment will miss the denser prior art.
Explore claim scope in EurekaBecause the top 5 hold under a third of all records, monitoring should extend past the largest filer to the many single- and few-filing entrants that make up most of the field.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaOne assignee leads this dataset clearly, with 209 of the 1,928 records in scope, roughly four times the count held by the fifth-ranked filer at 48. Even so, the top 5 assignees combined account for only 29.9% of all records, so leadership at the top does not translate into control of the field. Most of the remaining records are spread across a long tail of companies and inventors with far fewer filings each, which is where freedom-to-operate risk tends to concentrate because it is harder to track many small filers than one dominant one.
Filing volume has plateaued rather than grown or shrunk sharply: the last complete filing year comparison shows 85 records in 2021 rising to 87 in 2024, a flat +2% move. The dataset's peak year so far is 2020, at 94 records. Any apparent decline in 2025 and 2026 in the raw counts is expected, because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so those years are still filling in rather than reflecting a real drop in activity.
Metal extraction and refining (IPC class C22B) is the largest single subclass, appearing in 26.9% of the 1,928 records, followed by earth and rock drilling (E21B) at 20.0%. Flotation (B03D) and hydrocarbon oil processing (C10G) each cover more than an eighth of the record set, showing that separations chemistry and downstream processing claims are as significant as mining hardware itself. Business and data-processing claims under G06Q, often associated with digital-twin or smart-mining systems, cover a comparatively small 8.5% of records.
Based on the IPC composition, sub-areas adjacent to the dominant C22B and E21B classes carry much lower filing density, including process residue valorisation, separation reagent recycling, and water treatment tied specifically to flotation tailings rather than general effluent. These branches touch classes like C02F, which sits at only 5.5% of records, well below the extraction and drilling core. A first claim in one of these areas would typically need to tie a specific reagent, residue stream or sensing method to a named recovery or treatment step to avoid the denser prior art in the core classes.
US7128375B2, assigned to Osum Oil Sands Corp., claims the combined use of slurry mining and hydrocyclone separation to recover hydrocarbons such as bitumen from oil sands, along with selective excavation that routes material to different destinations depending on value. It is a process-integration patent rather than a claim over hydrocyclones or slurry mining individually. Work that avoids combining those two specific steps in that specific sequence, or that uses a different separation mechanism after excavation, sits outside its core claim scope, though a full freedom-to-operate opinion would need to check the granted claim language directly.
Go past this page: query the whole surface & underground mining patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.