https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/surface-engineering-coatings-and-adhesives-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Surface Engineering, Coatings & Adhesives
Surface engineering, coatings and adhesives patents: who holds the claim space and where it is still open
  • 19.4% concentration at the top. The five most active assignees combined account for 1,436 of the 7,394 records in scope — a leaders-plus-long-tail structure, not a single dominant filer.
  • Filing cooled from a 2020 peak. Volume ran 230 in 2017 to a peak of 275 in 2020, then 217 in 2021 down to 158 in 2024 — a -27% move over that span, before 2025-26 figures (still filling in under publication lag) taper further.
  • Adhesives and coatings classes lead, but overlap heavily. C09J adhesives (15.5% of records) and C09D coatings (13.8%) top the IPC mix, alongside C23C deposition and B32B laminates, showing multi-class filings are the norm, not the exception.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
7,394
Published Records
19%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-27%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (217 records) with 2024 (158) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 7,394 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the dataset covers and why it matters

This landscape draws on 7,394 published records filed against surface coating, adhesive bonding and surface modification technologies between 2015 and mid-2026, spanning deposition routes such as Physical Vapor Deposition, Chemical Vapor Deposition and Thermal Spray alongside functional and tribological coatings and adhesive bonding chemistries. The scope is deliberately cross-cutting: a single filing can sit in adhesives, coatings and layered-product classes at once, which is why the technology composition below sums to more than 100% of records.

Reading the assignee ranking and the IPC mix together tells a decision-maker two different things: who has staked claims broadly enough to be a licensing or freedom-to-operate concern, and which technical sub-areas are still thin enough to file into without immediately colliding with an incumbent's claim set.

Filing volume and technology mix, 2017-2026
  1. 1TESA SE514
  2. 23M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO467
  3. 3GENERAL ELECTRIC CO177
  4. 4PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC147
  5. 5VLAAMS INTERUNIVERSITAIR INST VOOR BIOTECHNOLOGIE VZW131
  6. 6VRIJE UNIV BRUSSEL131
  7. 7BASF SE124
  8. 8THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV123
  9. 9KIMBERLY CLARK WORLDWIDE INC112
  10. 10RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA84
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface Engineering, Coatings & Adhesives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 7,394 records: filing activity by year, and the IPC subclasses that carry the most claim density. Both should be read with the same caveat — publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years understate true filing activity.

A decade of filing, with a 2020 peak

Annual filings rose from 230 in 2017 to a peak of 275 in 2020, then declined to 217 in 2021 and 158 in 2024 — a -27% move over that three-year window. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as incomplete rather than as evidence of a continued slide.

A decade of filing, with a 2020 peak075150225300230201720182019275202020212022202320242025802026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Adhesives and coatings dominate, deposition and laminates close behind

C09J adhesives (15.5% of records) and C09D coatings, paints and inks (13.8%) are the two densest classes, with C23C coating and surface deposition (13.1%) and B32B layered products (11.8%) close behind. Medicinal preparations (A61K, 8.9%), coating processes (B05D, 6.6%), semiconductor devices (H01L, 6.2%) and condensation polymers (C08G, 6.1%) round out the mix, reflecting how far surface treatment chemistry now reaches into adjacent industries.

Adhesives and coatings dominate, deposition and laminates close behindC09J · Adhesives1,14315.5%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks1,02213.8%C23C · Coating & surface deposition97013.1%B32B · Layered products & laminates87211.8%A61K · Medicinal preparations6608.9%B05D · Coating processes4866.6%H01L · Semiconductor devices4576.2%C08G · Condensation polymers4506.1%Other8,937120.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 7,394 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface Engineering, Coatings & Adhesives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Surface Engineering, Coatings & Adhesives Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about surface engineering, coatings & adhesives patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative claim and how it sits in the landscape

Representative Record
US11843105B22023-12-12

US11843105B2 — Electrode surface engineering in lithium ion batteries

CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY

A method to form a coated cathode material via chemical vapor deposition, applying a substantially uniform and conformal interfacial layer of an organic polymer — including PEDOT — to the exterior surface of the cathode active material.Assigned to Carnegie Mellon University, published 2023-12-12. Shows how CVD-based surface engineering has migrated from classical coatings into battery electrode chemistry.

US11843105B2 — patent drawing 1US11843105B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20030190584A1Rubber Dams With Operative Inserts Which Isolate Anatomical Structures by Effectively Resisting External Vect…1,092
2US4693935APolysiloxane-grafted copolymer pressure sensitive adhesive composition and sheet materials coated therewith1,039
3US20140163664A1Integrated system for the ballistic and nonballistic infixion and retrieval of implants with or without drug …967
4US4972037APolysiloxane-grafted copolymer topical binder composition with novel fluorochemical comonomer and method of c…870
5US20100210745A1Molecular Healing of Polymeric Materials, Coatings, Plastics, Elastomers, Composites, Laminates, Adhesives, a…718
6US6001486ATransparent substrate with diffuser surface548
7US20040247779A1Ultraviolet (UV) and plasma assisted metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) system546
8US20150162168A1Reactor for plasma-based atomic layer etching of materials530
9US20190247050A1Integrated system for the infixion and retrieval of implants451
10US20040109853A1Biological active coating components, coatings, and coated surfaces437

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface Engineering, Coatings & Adhesives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and citation data actually indicate

The ranking and citation tables point to a field with an identifiable leadership tier, a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, and citation weight sitting on decades-old chemistry rather than the newest filings.

Concentration
19.4%
of 7,394 records held by top 5

Leadership is real but not exclusive

The five most active assignees combined hold 1,436 of the 7,394 records in scope — 19.4% of the field. That leaves roughly four-fifths of filings spread across a long tail, so freedom-to-operate risk concentrates around specific claim families rather than a single blocking owner.

Top 5 combined, 1,436 records
Extended Ranking
27.2%
of records in top 10 combined

The gap from 5th to 10th place is wide

Fifth place holds 131 records; tenth place holds 84. The top 10 combined reach 2,010 records, 27.2% of all records in scope — meaning most of the ranked leaders individually hold well under 100 filings each.

Top 10 combined, 2,010 records
Citation Weight
1,092 citations
on the most-cited record

Influence sits with older, broad filings

The most-cited records in this corpus are adhesive and polymer coating patents from the 1980s-2000s, some cited over 1,000 times. New entrants should treat these as foundational prior art to design around rather than as current competitive threats.

Most-cited record: US20030190584A1, 1,092 citations
Collaboration
129 shared records
strongest co-assignee pair

A small cluster of academic co-filers

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links run between a university-affiliated biotech institute and a Brussels-based university, plus a Stanford connection — a research-partnership pattern distinct from the corporate filers leading the volume ranking.

10 co-assignee pairs identified
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to surface engineering, coatings & adhesives patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface Engineering, Coatings & Adhesives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the activity has gone quiet

The leader in this ranking holds 514 records, well ahead of a field where fifth place holds 131 and tenth place holds 84 — a steep drop-off that puts most of the 100 ranked companies in single- or double-digit territory. Recent-year momentum data shows even several of the top-ranked assignees filing at low or zero volume in the latest year, consistent with the broader publication-lag effect rather than a sign the field itself has gone cold.

Leader
514
records

One clear volume leader

The top-ranked assignee holds 514 records, roughly four times fifth place. That scale typically reflects a diversified filing programme across multiple coating and adhesive chemistries rather than a single blocking patent family.

Leader: 514 records
Mid-tier
84
records at 10th place

A steep drop after the top five

Fifth place holds 131 records and tenth place holds 84 — a sharp decline that shows most meaningful competitive activity is concentrated in a narrow band before the ranking flattens into single-digit filers.

10th place: 84 records
Momentum
0-2 filings
latest-year activity among top filers

Latest-year counts are muted across the board

Recent-year momentum figures show several top-ranked assignees at 0-2 filings in the latest year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this understates true recent activity and should not be read as retreat from the field.

Latest-year range across leaders: 0-2 records
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is thinner relative to the core adhesive and coating classes
battery electrode interfacial coatingsbiodegradable adhesive bondingtribological coatings for semiconductor toolingconformal CVD polymer interlayersenzyme-mediated self-healing coatings
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
3M Innovative Properties Co.20%
PPG Industries Ohio, Inc.1
Tesa SE0
General Electric Co.0
Vrije Universiteit Brussel0
Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB)0
BASF SE0
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface Engineering, Coatings & Adhesives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate clearance, licensing strategy, or identifying where to file next.

Map claim boundaries around the leadership tier

With 19.4% of records held by the top 5 assignees, a focused claim-chart review of their most-cited families will clarify actual freedom-to-operate exposure before committing R&D spend.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Pressure-test white space candidates

Under-claimed branches like conformal CVD interlayers or enzyme-mediated self-healing coatings look thin in this ranking, but that needs validation against full-text claims, not just class counts.

Run a white space search in Eureka

Track the next 12-18 months of publications

Because 2025-26 filings are still emerging under normal publication lag, re-running this trend query periodically will reveal whether the post-2021 decline continues or was a temporary trough.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface Engineering, Coatings & Adhesives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surface Engineering, Coatings & Adhesives Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Surface Engineering, Coatings & Adhesives Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole surface engineering, coatings & adhesives patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.