Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (217 records) with 2024 (158) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 7,394 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape draws on 7,394 published records filed against surface coating, adhesive bonding and surface modification technologies between 2015 and mid-2026, spanning deposition routes such as Physical Vapor Deposition, Chemical Vapor Deposition and Thermal Spray alongside functional and tribological coatings and adhesive bonding chemistries. The scope is deliberately cross-cutting: a single filing can sit in adhesives, coatings and layered-product classes at once, which is why the technology composition below sums to more than 100% of records.
Reading the assignee ranking and the IPC mix together tells a decision-maker two different things: who has staked claims broadly enough to be a licensing or freedom-to-operate concern, and which technical sub-areas are still thin enough to file into without immediately colliding with an incumbent's claim set.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 7,394 records: filing activity by year, and the IPC subclasses that carry the most claim density. Both should be read with the same caveat — publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years understate true filing activity.
Annual filings rose from 230 in 2017 to a peak of 275 in 2020, then declined to 217 in 2021 and 158 in 2024 — a -27% move over that three-year window. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as incomplete rather than as evidence of a continued slide.
C09J adhesives (15.5% of records) and C09D coatings, paints and inks (13.8%) are the two densest classes, with C23C coating and surface deposition (13.1%) and B32B layered products (11.8%) close behind. Medicinal preparations (A61K, 8.9%), coating processes (B05D, 6.6%), semiconductor devices (H01L, 6.2%) and condensation polymers (C08G, 6.1%) round out the mix, reflecting how far surface treatment chemistry now reaches into adjacent industries.
Shares are the percentage of the 7,394 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about surface engineering, coatings & adhesives patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA method to form a coated cathode material via chemical vapor deposition, applying a substantially uniform and conformal interfacial layer of an organic polymer — including PEDOT — to the exterior surface of the cathode active material.Assigned to Carnegie Mellon University, published 2023-12-12. Shows how CVD-based surface engineering has migrated from classical coatings into battery electrode chemistry.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20030190584A1 | Rubber Dams With Operative Inserts Which Isolate Anatomical Structures by Effectively Resisting External Vect… | 1,092 |
| 2 | US4693935A | Polysiloxane-grafted copolymer pressure sensitive adhesive composition and sheet materials coated therewith | 1,039 |
| 3 | US20140163664A1 | Integrated system for the ballistic and nonballistic infixion and retrieval of implants with or without drug … | 967 |
| 4 | US4972037A | Polysiloxane-grafted copolymer topical binder composition with novel fluorochemical comonomer and method of c… | 870 |
| 5 | US20100210745A1 | Molecular Healing of Polymeric Materials, Coatings, Plastics, Elastomers, Composites, Laminates, Adhesives, a… | 718 |
| 6 | US6001486A | Transparent substrate with diffuser surface | 548 |
| 7 | US20040247779A1 | Ultraviolet (UV) and plasma assisted metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) system | 546 |
| 8 | US20150162168A1 | Reactor for plasma-based atomic layer etching of materials | 530 |
| 9 | US20190247050A1 | Integrated system for the infixion and retrieval of implants | 451 |
| 10 | US20040109853A1 | Biological active coating components, coatings, and coated surfaces | 437 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →The ranking and citation tables point to a field with an identifiable leadership tier, a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, and citation weight sitting on decades-old chemistry rather than the newest filings.
The five most active assignees combined hold 1,436 of the 7,394 records in scope — 19.4% of the field. That leaves roughly four-fifths of filings spread across a long tail, so freedom-to-operate risk concentrates around specific claim families rather than a single blocking owner.
Fifth place holds 131 records; tenth place holds 84. The top 10 combined reach 2,010 records, 27.2% of all records in scope — meaning most of the ranked leaders individually hold well under 100 filings each.
The most-cited records in this corpus are adhesive and polymer coating patents from the 1980s-2000s, some cited over 1,000 times. New entrants should treat these as foundational prior art to design around rather than as current competitive threats.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links run between a university-affiliated biotech institute and a Brussels-based university, plus a Stanford connection — a research-partnership pattern distinct from the corporate filers leading the volume ranking.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to surface engineering, coatings & adhesives patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The leader in this ranking holds 514 records, well ahead of a field where fifth place holds 131 and tenth place holds 84 — a steep drop-off that puts most of the 100 ranked companies in single- or double-digit territory. Recent-year momentum data shows even several of the top-ranked assignees filing at low or zero volume in the latest year, consistent with the broader publication-lag effect rather than a sign the field itself has gone cold.
The top-ranked assignee holds 514 records, roughly four times fifth place. That scale typically reflects a diversified filing programme across multiple coating and adhesive chemistries rather than a single blocking patent family.
Fifth place holds 131 records and tenth place holds 84 — a sharp decline that shows most meaningful competitive activity is concentrated in a narrow band before the ranking flattens into single-digit filers.
Recent-year momentum figures show several top-ranked assignees at 0-2 filings in the latest year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this understates true recent activity and should not be read as retreat from the field.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| 3M Innovative Properties Co. | 2 | 0% |
| PPG Industries Ohio, Inc. | 1 | — |
| Tesa SE | 0 | — |
| General Electric Co. | 0 | — |
| Vrije Universiteit Brussel | 0 | — |
| Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB) | 0 | — |
| BASF SE | 0 | — |
| The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate clearance, licensing strategy, or identifying where to file next.
With 19.4% of records held by the top 5 assignees, a focused claim-chart review of their most-cited families will clarify actual freedom-to-operate exposure before committing R&D spend.
Explore assignee claims in EurekaUnder-claimed branches like conformal CVD interlayers or enzyme-mediated self-healing coatings look thin in this ranking, but that needs validation against full-text claims, not just class counts.
Run a white space search in EurekaBecause 2025-26 filings are still emerging under normal publication lag, re-running this trend query periodically will reveal whether the post-2021 decline continues or was a temporary trough.
Set up monitoring in EurekaThe ranking covers 100 assignees, led by a single company with 514 records, well ahead of fifth place at 131 and tenth place at 84. The top 5 combined hold 19.4% of all 7,394 records in scope, and the top 10 combined hold 27.2%. That leaves the majority of filings spread across a long tail of companies and universities each holding a small number of records, so no single company dominates the field outright.
Filing rose from 230 records in 2017 to a peak of 275 in 2020, then declined to 217 in 2021 and 158 in 2024 — a -27% change over that three-year span. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are lower still, but publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so those most recent years are undercounted and should not be read as a continuing decline until later data fills in.
Adhesives (C09J) lead at 15.5% of the 7,394 records, followed by coatings, paints and inks (C09D) at 13.8%, coating and surface deposition (C23C) at 13.1%, and layered products and laminates (B32B) at 11.8%. Medicinal preparations, coating processes, semiconductor devices and condensation polymers each carry meaningful but smaller shares. Because records often carry multiple IPC classes, these percentages overlap rather than sum to 100%.
US11843105B2, assigned to Carnegie Mellon University, claims a chemical vapor deposition method for applying a conformal organic polymer interfacial layer — including PEDOT — to a lithium-ion cathode active material. Anyone using CVD to apply a uniform organic polymer coating to cathode particles for interfacial protection should review this claim closely, since it sits at the intersection of the C23C deposition and battery electrode surface engineering space this landscape tracks. Design-around options generally involve different deposition methods (e.g. atomic layer deposition) or non-conformal, patterned coatings rather than a uniform interfacial layer.
Based on the IPC composition, branches adjacent to the dense adhesive and coating classes — such as battery electrode interfacial coatings, biodegradable adhesive bonding, and tribological coatings for semiconductor tooling — show thinner relative representation than the core C09J and C09D classes. This is a starting signal from class-level density, not a full clearance search; confirming true white space requires checking full claim text against the specific chemistry or process route intended for filing.
The dataset includes both large industrial filers and academic institutions among its ranked assignees, with a small cluster of co-assignee research partnerships — 10 pairs total, the strongest linking a Brussels-based university, a biotechnology research institute, and a US university, sharing well over 100 records between pairs. This academic collaboration pattern is distinct from the corporate volume leaders, suggesting two separate filing dynamics operating within the same technology space.
Go past this page: query the whole surface engineering, coatings & adhesives patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.