https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/surge-protection-and-lightning-immunity-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Electromagnetic Compatibility
Surge Protection and Lightning Immunity Patents
  • Concentration is real but shallow: the ranked leader holds 127 records, yet the top 5 assignees together account for only 19.9% of all 2,225 records in scope — most of the field sits with a long tail.
  • Filing pulled back after 2021: annual filings fell from 106 in 2021 to 60 in 2024, a 43% drop over that three-year span, before the peak year of 2023 at 131 shows the trend is not a straight line down.
  • Resistor and protective-circuit classes dominate: H01C and H02H each cover roughly 40% of records, while power conversion (H02M) and connectors (H01R) sit under 4% — a sign of where claim space is still open.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,225
Published Records
20%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-43%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (106 records) with 2024 (60) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,225 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Surge protection and lightning immunity patenting sits at the intersection of component design — metal oxide varistors, gas discharge tubes and spark-gap arresters — and the system-level problem of coordination of stages: making sure a fast primary device and a slower downstream device share the energy of a transient without either failing first. The search underlying this page pairs surge protective device, lightning immunity and surge arrester terms with the specific mechanisms — follow current, residual voltage, end of life — that distinguish a real protection claim from a generic circuit-breaker filing.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the mid-2026 data cut-off across 2,225 published records. Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart are still filling in and should not be read as a decline.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1RIPD IP DEVELOPMENT LTD127
  2. 2HUBBELL INC121
  3. 3BOWTHORPE INDS68
  4. 4COOPER IND INC66
  5. 5DEHN SOHNE GMBH CO KG61
  6. 6HITACHI ENERGY LTD61
  7. 7RAYCAP IP DEV LTD60
  8. 8EMPRIMUS LLC52
  9. 9RIPD RESEARCH AND IP DEVELOPMENT LTD51
  10. 10ABB AB49
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surge Protection and Lightning Immunity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 2,225-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings ran at 127 in 2017 and peaked at 131 in 2023 before easing to 60 by 2024, a complete year showing a 43% pullback from the 106 filed in 2021. 2025 and 2026 figures (down to 5 in 2026) are still incomplete because of publication lag and should not be read as the trend's true endpoint.

Filing trend, 2017–20260387511315012720172018201920202021202213120232024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H01C (resistors, 40.8% of records) and H02H (protective circuit arrangements, 40.5%) anchor the field, with H01T spark-gap and arc devices close behind at 29.7%. Switches and relays (H01H, 14.3%) and measurement (G01R, 5.1%) trail well behind, and power conversion (H02M, 3.2%) and connectors (H01R, 3.5%) are the thinnest-claimed classes among those tracked — each record can carry more than one class, so shares sum above 100%.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH01C · Resistors90840.8%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements90140.5%H01T · Spark gaps & arc devices66029.7%H01H · Switches & relays31914.3%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement1135.1%H02J · Power supply & grid systems904.0%H01R · Connectors & current collectors783.5%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)713.2%Other68530.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,225 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surge Protection and Lightning Immunity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Surge Protection and Lightning Immunity with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about surge protection and lightning immunity and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
US4908730A1990-03-13

US4908730A — Surge arrester with shunt gap

KEARNEY, 1928 MONTREAL ROAD, P.O. BOX 49167 ATLANTA, GA 30359

A modular metal oxide varistor disk arrester with a coaxial shunt gap formed by electrode plates projecting into a central hole in the disk, sealed for under-oil use or housed as a standalone arrester component.Filed by Kearney (Cooper Industries lineage), granted 1990 — illustrates how early shunt-gap and disk geometry claims still frame later coordination-of-stages designs.

US4908730A — patent drawing 1US4908730A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080077336A1Power line universal monitor764
2US7522812B2Coupling of communications signals to a power line242
3US20030204217A1MRI-safe cardiac stimulation device195
4US5142430APower line filter and surge protection circuit components and circuits161
5US5440441AApparatus for protecting, monitoring, and managing an AC/DC electrical line or a telecommunication line using…158
6US4262317ALine protector for a communications circuit158
7US5220480ALow voltage, high energy surge arrester for secondary applications146
8US4161012AHigh voltage protection apparatus137
9US5412526ASurge arrester circuit and housing therefor117
10US7433169B2Overvoltage protection devices including wafer of varistor material105

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; read them as a signal of influence on later work, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surge Protection and Lightning Immunity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting the next claim set in this space.

Concentration
19.9% of 2,225
top 5 combined share

Leadership is real but not dominant

The leading assignee holds 127 records and the top 5 combined reach 443 records, 19.9% of all 2,225 in scope. That leaves roughly four-fifths of the field held by a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants, meaning freedom-to-operate analysis has to look well past the household names.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Filing momentum
-43% (2021→2024)
three-year filing change

A pullback, not a collapse

Annual filings dropped from 106 in 2021 to 60 in 2024 — a complete, comparable three-year window. That follows a 2023 peak of 131, so the pullback reads as post-peak normalisation rather than a technology going stale.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Claim geography
40.8% vs 3.2%
H01C share vs H02M share

Component classes are crowded, conversion is not

Resistor (H01C) and protective circuit (H02H) classes each sit above 40% of records, dense enough that a new varistor or gap-geometry claim needs a real point of novelty. Power conversion (H02M, 3.2%) and connectors (H01R, 3.5%) are comparatively open.

IPC composition, 2,225 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to surge protection and lightning immunity, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surge Protection and Lightning Immunity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape and where activity is slowing

The ranked leaders sit atop a field where the largest recent-year momentum signal is retreat, not advance — several of the historically strongest filers show no filings in the latest year.

Leader
127 records
leading assignee

A single leader, no runaway margin

The top-ranked assignee holds 127 records against 61 for fifth place and 49 for tenth — a gradual taper, not a cliff, which is consistent with a field where component-level IP (varistors, gap arresters) is shared across many system integrators.

Assignee ranking, top 10
Momentum
-100% YoY
recorded for several leaders

Several historically active filers went quiet

Multiple assignees that built substantial portfolios over the period, including firms tied to the Cooper Industries and RIPD/Raycap lineages, recorded zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is as likely to reflect publication lag or portfolio consolidation as an exit from the space.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings

Co-filing is limited and concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairing recurs at a handful of filings — collaboration exists but is not a structural feature of this field the way it is in some multi-party standards-heavy technologies.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is thin relative to the core varistor and gas-discharge-tube claims
Follow-current interruption in DC microgridsEnd-of-life indication for MOV disksCoordination of stages across mixed SPD topologiesResidual-voltage control in power conversion (H02M) contextsConnector-integrated surge protection (H01R)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
RIPD IP Development Ltd0-100%
Hubbell Inc0-100%
Bowthorpe Industries0—
Cooper Industries Inc0—
RIPD Research and IP Development Ltd0-100%
Emprimus LLC0—
Raycap IP Development Ltd0-100%
General Electric Company0—
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surge Protection and Lightning Immunity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single answer.

Map claim scope on the most-cited records

The most-cited documents in this set, including the power-line monitoring and coupling patents, shaped later filings even where their original application (telecom, medical) sits outside surge protection proper. Check what they actually claim before assuming they block a new design.

Explore citation network in Eureka

Test freedom-to-operate against the long tail

With four-fifths of records held outside the top 5 assignees, a freedom-to-operate search needs to go beyond the familiar names in this space.

Run an FTO search in Eureka

Watch the under-claimed conversion and connector classes

H02M and H01R carry the thinnest coverage among the tracked IPC subclasses — worth monitoring for new entrants before density builds.

Track emerging filers in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surge Protection and Lightning Immunity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surge Protection and Lightning Immunity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Surge Protection and Lightning Immunity in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole surge protection and lightning immunity corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.