Surgical Robot HMI Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2021. The peak year so far is 2021 at 77 families; by the 2022 midpoint filings had already fallen to 33, and the trend line since reads flat to declining rather than still climbing.
- Claim activity is not siloed to surgical robotics. 384 families sit in A61B, but 79 also touch B25J manipulator claims and 38 touch G16H healthcare informatics — the interface layer is being claimed from three directions at once.
- Co-assignment is almost nonexistent. Only two co-assignee pairs exist across the entire dataset, meaning most of this claim space was built by single-owner filing programmes rather than joint development deals.
Filing growth compares 2021 (77 records) with 2024 (27) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 384 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of surgical robotics and the human-machine interface layer that sits between the surgeon and the robot arm: surgeon console controls, master input devices, haptic feedback mechanisms and immersive display interfaces. The search combines free-text and claim-level terms with IPC classes A61B34/30, A61B34/37 and A61B90/00, so it captures interface claims wherever they are filed rather than only within a single assignee’s portfolio.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional rather than final.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
384 published families anchor this landscape, spread across a filing curve that rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021, and has since eased — and across a technology mix where the interface layer overlaps heavily with manipulator and informatics claims.
A peak in 2021, then a pull-back
Filings moved from 17 in 2017 to a peak of 77 in 2021, then fell to 33 by 2022 and continued down toward 2 in the most recent (partial) year. Even allowing for publication lag understating recent counts, the shape of the curve — rise, peak, decline — is the more reliable signal than the absolute count in any single late year.
Interface claims cut across three adjacent fields
Every family in this set carries an A61B classification, but a substantial share also carries B25J (manipulators and robots, 79 families), G16H (healthcare informatics, 38) or G05B (control systems, 24). Smaller pockets sit in G06F, G06Q, H01H and G06T. That spread means a freedom-to-operate check confined to A61B alone will miss relevant prior art filed as a manipulator or control-systems invention.
Shares are the percentage of the 384 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about surgical robot human-machine interface and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe claims setting the boundaries
Master controller assembly for a robotic surgery system and method
A master controller assembly for a robotic surgery system pairs a slave robot assembly — carrying a slave surgical grip device with a defined grip degree-of-freedom — with a portable, hand-held master input tool that is mechanically unconstrained from the slave assembly. The master tool body presents a manipulandum surface for the surgeon's fingers and a grip command detector operable by radially directed pressure, decoupling the feel of the input device from the kinematics of the robot arm it drives.US12059226B2 · MEDICAL MICROINSTRUMENTS, INC. · granted 2024-08-13


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20180168592A1 | Shaft assembly comprising a clutch configured to adapt the output of a rotary firing member to two different … | 1,449 |
| 2 | US20190201137A1 | Method of robotic HUB communication, detection, and control | 1,393 |
| 3 | US20180168589A1 | Method for attaching a shaft assembly to a surgical instrument and, alternatively, to a surgical robot | 1,245 |
| 4 | US9895813B2 | Force and torque sensing in a surgical robot setup arm | 1,191 |
| 5 | US10835245B2 | Method for attaching a shaft assembly to a surgical instrument and, alternatively, to a surgical robot | 911 |
| 6 | US11419606B2 | Shaft assembly comprising a clutch configured to adapt the output of a rotary firing member to two different … | 822 |
| 7 | US10617420B2 | Surgical system comprising drive systems | 671 |
| 8 | US20200253605A1 | Method for attaching a shaft assembly to a surgical instrument and, alternatively, to a surgical robot | 559 |
| 9 | US10813710B2 | Telerobotic surgery system using minimally invasive surgical tool with variable force scaling and feedback an… | 555 |
| 10 | US20190183594A1 | Robotic attachment comprising exterior drive actuator | 552 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus; treat this as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial weight.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers imply for strategy
Three patterns matter more than the headline family count: the filing curve's shape, the cross-class spread of interface claims, and how thin collaborative filing is across the field.
The growth phase has already happened
The curve peaked in 2021 and has fallen every year since through the 2022 midpoint and beyond. A new entrant reading this trend as still-accelerating would be planning against a market that has already passed its filing peak, even accounting for publication lag understating the newest years.
Manipulator claims double as interface claims
A fifth of this set also carries a B25J manipulator classification, and smaller but real shares touch G16H informatics and G05B control systems. Interface inventions are being protected as mechanical, software and control claims simultaneously, which widens the search any competitor needs to run before filing.
This is a field of solo filers
Only two co-assignee pairs appear in the entire dataset, one an individual-inventor pairing and one linking two related corporate entities. Joint filing programmes are the exception here, not the rule, which suggests most interface IP is being built in-house rather than through cross-licensing or joint development deals.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to surgical robot human-machine interface, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee landscape and where the gate sits
Recent-year momentum is muted across the board: most tracked assignees show zero families in the latest year and negative year-on-year change, with one exception still filing at a small but positive rate. That pattern is consistent with a field where the core interface claims were staked out earlier in the window and are now being defended rather than expanded.
One assignee still filing while others pull back
Auris Health is the one tracked assignee showing positive year-on-year momentum in the latest year, filing 2 families against a field where most peers show zero. That divergence is worth watching even at small absolute volume, because it may signal a renewed push into interface claims while competitors consolidate.
Several large portfolios went quiet in the latest year
Medical Microinstruments, Intuitive Surgical, Distalmotion and EndoQuest all show zero families filed in the latest tracked year, each a -100% year-on-year change from prior activity. Given publication lag, some of this is filings not yet public rather than genuine pauses, but the pattern is consistent across multiple established names.
The heaviest-cited claims are older shaft-assembly and hub patents
The most-cited records in this set concern shaft assembly attachment and robotic hub communication rather than the console or haptic layer itself, a reminder that citation weight in this corpus rewards early, broadly-drafted mechanical and systems claims over newer interface-specific ones.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Auris Health, Inc. | 2 | +100% |
| Medical Microinstruments, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Distalmotion SA | 0 | -100% |
| MEDICAL MICROINSTR SRL | 0 | — |
| EndoQuest Robotics, Inc. | 0 | — |
| DAVIS PAUL | 0 | -100% |
| BRUBAKER WILLIAM | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
A landscape this size is a starting map, not a clearance opinion. These are the follow-up steps worth running before committing engineering or legal resources.
Run a claims-level FTO on B25J and G16H overlap
Because interface claims are filed under manipulator and informatics classes as often as under A61B, a search confined to surgical-robot IPC codes alone will miss relevant prior art. Cross-check any planned filing against the B25J and G16H pockets identified here.
Explore claim charts in EurekaWatch Auris Health's next filing cycle
Auris Health is the only tracked assignee with positive momentum in the latest year against a field where most peers show none. A small volume increase from an otherwise quiet competitor set is worth monitoring for signs of a renewed filing push.
Track assignee activity in EurekaModel design-arounds for the shaft-assembly and hub claims
The most-cited records in this set are not console or haptic patents but shaft-attachment and hub-communication claims with citation counts in the thousands. Any new mechanical interface between instrument and robot arm should be checked against these first.
Compare claims in EurekaCommon questions about surgical robot HMI patents
Filing in this space is dominated by a small number of medical device and surgical robotics companies, with Medical Microinstruments, Intuitive Surgical, Distalmotion and Auris Health among the tracked assignees with the deepest activity. Most of these portfolios were built through single-owner filing programmes rather than joint ventures — only two co-assignee pairs appear across the full 384-family dataset. Recent-year momentum has slowed for most of these established filers, with several showing zero families in the latest tracked year, so current leadership reflects historical filing depth more than active-year output.
No — the filing trend peaked in 2021 at 77 families and has declined since, falling to 33 by the 2022 midpoint and continuing lower toward the most recent partial year. Some of that recent decline is a publication-lag artefact, since filings typically take around 18 months to publish and the newest years in any dataset are always undercounted. But the multi-year decline from the 2021 peak through 2022 is too large to explain by lag alone, and points to a genuine cooling in new interface-specific filing.
US12059226B2, granted 2024-08-13 to Medical Microinstruments, Inc., covers a master controller assembly in which a hand-held master input tool is mechanically unconstrained from the slave robot assembly it drives. The claims center on a manipulandum surface held by the surgeon's fingers and a grip command detector operated by radially directed pressure, decoupling the physical feel of the controller from the robot arm's own kinematics. Anyone designing a portable or detached master input device for a surgical robot should review this claim set closely before finalizing a mechanical architecture.
The smaller IPC pockets in this dataset — G06T image processing, H01H switches and relays, and G06Q administrative data processing — sit well below the 79-family B25J and 38-family G16H pockets, suggesting thinner claim density around display calibration, sterile switch design, and workflow administration layered on top of the console. Immersive display calibration for depth perception and tactile force-scaling algorithms for haptic feedback stand out as technically specific branches with comparatively few dedicated filings inside this search. That does not guarantee freedom to operate, but it does mean a narrower, more targeted prior-art search is warranted before assuming the space is closed.
It is concentrated at the level of named assignees but not through collaboration — a handful of surgical robotics companies account for the bulk of filing, yet almost none of it happens jointly, with only two co-assignee pairs found across 384 families. Receiving-office data shows the United States and the European Patent Office carrying the largest share of filings, with the PCT route, Australia, India and Canada trailing behind, indicating that protection strategies center on the largest device markets first. A new entrant should expect to compete against a small number of well-defended single-owner portfolios rather than a fragmented long tail.
Research Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole surgical robot human-machine interface corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.