Book a demo

Surgical Robot HMI Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Surgical Robot HMI Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/surgical-robot-human-machine-interface-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Biomedical Devices
Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface Patents: Consoles, Haptics and the Fight Over Master Control
  • Filing has cooled since 2021. The peak year so far is 2021 at 77 families; by the 2022 midpoint filings had already fallen to 33, and the trend line since reads flat to declining rather than still climbing.
  • Claim activity is not siloed to surgical robotics. 384 families sit in A61B, but 79 also touch B25J manipulator claims and 38 touch G16H healthcare informatics — the interface layer is being claimed from three directions at once.
  • Co-assignment is almost nonexistent. Only two co-assignee pairs exist across the entire dataset, meaning most of this claim space was built by single-owner filing programmes rather than joint development deals.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
384
Published Records
72%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-65%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (77 records) with 2024 (27) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 384 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of surgical robotics and the human-machine interface layer that sits between the surgeon and the robot arm: surgeon console controls, master input devices, haptic feedback mechanisms and immersive display interfaces. The search combines free-text and claim-level terms with IPC classes A61B34/30, A61B34/37 and A61B90/00, so it captures interface claims wherever they are filed rather than only within a single assignee’s portfolio.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional rather than final.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1MEDICAL MICROINSTRUMENTS INC87
  2. 2INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS INC65
  3. 3DISTALMOTION44
  4. 4AURIS HEALTH INC43
  5. 5CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL37
  6. 6CMR SURGICAL LTD19
  7. 7BRUBAKER WILLIAM18
  8. 8DAVIS PAUL18
  9. 9KINDHEART12
  10. 10ETHICON INC8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

384 published families anchor this landscape, spread across a filing curve that rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021, and has since eased — and across a technology mix where the interface layer overlaps heavily with manipulator and informatics claims.

A peak in 2021, then a pull-back

Filings moved from 17 in 2017 to a peak of 77 in 2021, then fell to 33 by 2022 and continued down toward 2 in the most recent (partial) year. Even allowing for publication lag understating recent counts, the shape of the curve — rise, peak, decline — is the more reliable signal than the absolute count in any single late year.

A peak in 2021, then a pull-back020406080172017201820192020772021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Interface claims cut across three adjacent fields

Every family in this set carries an A61B classification, but a substantial share also carries B25J (manipulators and robots, 79 families), G16H (healthcare informatics, 38) or G05B (control systems, 24). Smaller pockets sit in G06F, G06Q, H01H and G06T. That spread means a freedom-to-operate check confined to A61B alone will miss relevant prior art filed as a manipulator or control-systems invention.

Interface claims cut across three adjacent fieldsA61B · Diagnosis & surgery384100.0%B25J · Manipulators & robots7920.6%G16H · Healthcare informatics389.9%G05B · Control & regulating systems246.3%G06F · Electric digital data processi…143.6%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…133.4%H01H · Switches & relays133.4%G06T · Image data processing & genera…92.3%Other4511.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 384 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about surgical robot human-machine interface and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The claims setting the boundaries

Representative Filing
US12059226B22024-08-13

Master controller assembly for a robotic surgery system and method

MEDICAL MICROINSTRUMENTS, INC.

A master controller assembly for a robotic surgery system pairs a slave robot assembly — carrying a slave surgical grip device with a defined grip degree-of-freedom — with a portable, hand-held master input tool that is mechanically unconstrained from the slave assembly. The master tool body presents a manipulandum surface for the surgeon's fingers and a grip command detector operable by radially directed pressure, decoupling the feel of the input device from the kinematics of the robot arm it drives.US12059226B2 · MEDICAL MICROINSTRUMENTS, INC. · granted 2024-08-13

US12059226B2 — patent drawing 1US12059226B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20180168592A1Shaft assembly comprising a clutch configured to adapt the output of a rotary firing member to two different …1,449
2US20190201137A1Method of robotic HUB communication, detection, and control1,393
3US20180168589A1Method for attaching a shaft assembly to a surgical instrument and, alternatively, to a surgical robot1,245
4US9895813B2Force and torque sensing in a surgical robot setup arm1,191
5US10835245B2Method for attaching a shaft assembly to a surgical instrument and, alternatively, to a surgical robot911
6US11419606B2Shaft assembly comprising a clutch configured to adapt the output of a rotary firing member to two different …822
7US10617420B2Surgical system comprising drive systems671
8US20200253605A1Method for attaching a shaft assembly to a surgical instrument and, alternatively, to a surgical robot559
9US10813710B2Telerobotic surgery system using minimally invasive surgical tool with variable force scaling and feedback an…555
10US20190183594A1Robotic attachment comprising exterior drive actuator552

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus; treat this as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial weight.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal

What the numbers imply for strategy

Three patterns matter more than the headline family count: the filing curve's shape, the cross-class spread of interface claims, and how thin collaborative filing is across the field.

Filing Momentum
77 → 33 → 2
families, 2021 → 2022 → latest year

The growth phase has already happened

The curve peaked in 2021 and has fallen every year since through the 2022 midpoint and beyond. A new entrant reading this trend as still-accelerating would be planning against a market that has already passed its filing peak, even accounting for publication lag understating the newest years.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Cross-Class Claims
79 families in B25J
alongside 384 in A61B

Manipulator claims double as interface claims

A fifth of this set also carries a B25J manipulator classification, and smaller but real shares touch G16H informatics and G05B control systems. Interface inventions are being protected as mechanical, software and control claims simultaneously, which widens the search any competitor needs to run before filing.

IPC composition
Collaboration
2 co-assignee pairs
across 384 families

This is a field of solo filers

Only two co-assignee pairs appear in the entire dataset, one an individual-inventor pairing and one linking two related corporate entities. Joint filing programmes are the exception here, not the rule, which suggests most interface IP is being built in-house rather than through cross-licensing or joint development deals.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to surgical robot human-machine interface, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape and where the gate sits

Recent-year momentum is muted across the board: most tracked assignees show zero families in the latest year and negative year-on-year change, with one exception still filing at a small but positive rate. That pattern is consistent with a field where the core interface claims were staked out earlier in the window and are now being defended rather than expanded.

Momentum Leader
+100% YoY
2 families in the latest year

One assignee still filing while others pull back

Auris Health is the one tracked assignee showing positive year-on-year momentum in the latest year, filing 2 families against a field where most peers show zero. That divergence is worth watching even at small absolute volume, because it may signal a renewed push into interface claims while competitors consolidate.

Recent-year momentum
Established Filers
-100% YoY
across several major assignees

Several large portfolios went quiet in the latest year

Medical Microinstruments, Intuitive Surgical, Distalmotion and EndoQuest all show zero families filed in the latest tracked year, each a -100% year-on-year change from prior activity. Given publication lag, some of this is filings not yet public rather than genuine pauses, but the pattern is consistent across multiple established names.

Recent-year momentum
Citation Anchors
1,449 citations
on the most-cited record

The heaviest-cited claims are older shaft-assembly and hub patents

The most-cited records in this set concern shaft assembly attachment and robotic hub communication rather than the console or haptic layer itself, a reminder that citation weight in this corpus rewards early, broadly-drafted mechanical and systems claims over newer interface-specific ones.

Most-cited records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer FTO look
Branches with thinner filing density inside this same search, based on the smaller IPC pockets and the interface-specific claim gaps they imply.
Immersive display calibration for depth perceptionTactile force-scaling algorithms for haptic feedbackVoice or gesture co-control of master input toolsSwitch and relay design for sterile console interfacesImage-guided overlay on surgeon console displays
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Auris Health, Inc.2+100%
Medical Microinstruments, Inc.0-100%
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.0-100%
Distalmotion SA0-100%
MEDICAL MICROINSTR SRL0
EndoQuest Robotics, Inc.0
DAVIS PAUL0-100%
BRUBAKER WILLIAM0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

A landscape this size is a starting map, not a clearance opinion. These are the follow-up steps worth running before committing engineering or legal resources.

Run a claims-level FTO on B25J and G16H overlap

Because interface claims are filed under manipulator and informatics classes as often as under A61B, a search confined to surgical-robot IPC codes alone will miss relevant prior art. Cross-check any planned filing against the B25J and G16H pockets identified here.

Explore claim charts in Eureka

Watch Auris Health's next filing cycle

Auris Health is the only tracked assignee with positive momentum in the latest year against a field where most peers show none. A small volume increase from an otherwise quiet competitor set is worth monitoring for signs of a renewed filing push.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Model design-arounds for the shaft-assembly and hub claims

The most-cited records in this set are not console or haptic patents but shaft-attachment and hub-communication claims with citation counts in the thousands. Any new mechanical interface between instrument and robot arm should be checked against these first.

Compare claims in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about surgical robot HMI patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Surgical Robot Human-Machine Interface in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole surgical robot human-machine interface corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.