Book a demo

Surgical Robot Patent Landscape 2026

Surgical Robot Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Surgical Robot Patent Landscape in 2026

The surgical robot patent field is at a mature stage, with annual filings having plateaued near their 2021 peak and recent-window growth at roughly 1%. Two applicants — CMR Surgical and Intuitive Surgical — are virtually tied at the top, together commanding a dominant share of activity among the hundred largest filers in a highly concentrated competitive field.

2,965
Patent families in scope
41%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+1%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

CMR Surgical and Intuitive Surgical lead a tightly contested top tier

CMR Surgical Ltd and Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc are effectively co-leaders, ranked first and second respectively among all applicants, with the top five filers together accounting for 41% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers — a sign of strong concentration at the apex of this field.

Below these two leaders, the next three ranked applicants — Cilag GmbH International, Meere Co Inc, and Globus Medical Inc — are meaningfully smaller, creating a clear two-tier structure. The gap between the top pair and the rest suggests entrenched incumbency that would require sustained investment to challenge.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1CMR Surgical Ltd561
2Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc560
3Cilag GmbH International137
4Meere Co Inc129
5Globus Medical Inc117
6Digital Global Systems Inc102
7Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd100
8Auris Health Inc97
9Johns Hopkins University84
10Shanghai Microport MedBot (Group) Co Ltd76
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Samsung Electronics Co Ltd68
12Riverfield Inc61
13Mazor Robotics61
14Wuhan United Imaging Healthcare Surgical Technology Co Ltd61
15Sony Group Corp60
16Cornerstone Technology (Shenzhen) Ltd47
17Mako Surgical Corp41
18Kohyoung Technology Inc41
19NHK Spring Co Ltd37
20Harbin Sizherui Intelligent Medical Equipment Co Ltd35
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dual leadership positions of CMR Surgical and Intuitive Surgical imply that core surgical robotics IP — particularly manipulator mechanics and surgical diagnosis and surgery procedures — is heavily defended, narrowing the space for undifferentiated platform-level filings by new entrants.

The most recent filing periods should be treated as under-counted given typical patent publication lags of 12–18 months; apparent softness in 20242026 data does not reflect actual recent inventive activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume has plateaued since 2021; manipulator mechanics and surgery dominate the technology mix

Two charts capture the field’s temporal rhythm and technology breadth: the annual filing trend reveals a field that scaled rapidly through 2021 and has since plateaued, while the IPC composition chart shows an overwhelming concentration in robotic manipulators and surgical procedures, with a long tail of adjacent digital and control-system classes.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 2017 through a 2021 peak, then eased back toward the 2017–2019 baseline range by 2023. Data for 2024–2026 is materially under-counted due to publication lag and should not be read as a further decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 422 in 2021.270201724820182642019362202042220214062022363202329020243092025312026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B25J (Manipulators & robots) and A61B (Diagnosis & surgery) together account for the dominant share of IPC classifications, confirming the field is still anchored in core hardware and procedural IP. Classes such as G06F (digital data processing), G05B (control systems), G16H (healthcare informatics), G06T (image processing), and G06N (AI models) each hold a smaller but meaningful presence, indicating software and intelligence layers are growing adjacencies.

Technology compositionB25J · Manipulators & robots leads with 4,499; A61B · Diagnosis & surgery 3,766.B25J · Manipulators & ro…4,499A61B · Diagnosis & surgery3,766G06F · Electric digital …267G05B · Control & regulat…259G16H · Healthcare inform…254G06T · Image data proces…184G06N · Computing based o…171H04L · Digital informati…168↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US9649164B2Published 2017-05-16

Surgical robot system and surgical robot control m…

CUREXO, INC.

Disclosed are a surgical robot system and a surgical robot control method. The surgical robot system includes a surgical tool configured to perform surgery on each of a plurality of procedure regions in a surgical region which is divided into the plurality of procedure regions, a robot arm on which the surgical tool is mounted, and a driver configured to… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Surgical robot system and surgical robot control m… — patent drawingSurgical robot system and surgical robot control m… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Ceiling and floor mounted surgical robot set-up arms2,041
2Method of HUB communication, processing, storage a…1,702
3Surgical robotic system and hydraulic actuator the…1,392
4Hybrid surgical robot system and control method th…1,344
5Active-constraint robots1,242
6Force and torque sensing in a surgical robot setup…1,182
7Force and torque sensing for surgical instruments1,173
8Surgical instrument motor pack latch1,139

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a mature lifecycle, high top-tier concentration, selective cross-sector collaboration, and strong US and European jurisdictional coverage shapes where new entrants and challengers can realistically find room to maneuver.

Maturity

Field has plateaued near its 2021 peak

Annual filings plateaued near their 2021 peak, and the lifecycle stage is Maturity with recent-window growth of approximately 1%. This means incremental platform patents in core manipulator or laparoscopic robotic surgery areas face a crowded prior-art environment. R&D investment is better directed toward differentiated subsystems — force sensing, AI-guided navigation, or miniaturized instruments — where the prior art is less dense.

Lifecycle: Maturity
Concentration

Top-two incumbents create a narrow moat at the platform level

The top five filers account for 41% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, with CMR Surgical and Intuitive Surgical nearly tied for the lead. This concentration signals strong incumbency risk for platform-level entrants. Challengers such as Cilag GmbH International, Meere Co Inc, and Globus Medical Inc occupy a distinct second tier, suggesting viable mid-tier positioning is possible but requires a focused specialty (e.g., orthopedic, spinal, or endoluminal robotics).

High concentration
Collaboration

Kawasaki Heavy Industries and Medicaroid are the most active co-filers

The most active co-filing pair is Kawasaki Heavy Industries and Medicaroid (22 joint filings), reflecting the joint venture that produced the hinotori surgical robot system. Intuitive Surgical has also co-filed with Siemens Healthineers (6 filings), signaling interest in imaging-robotics integration. Remaining collaborative pairs are small in volume, indicating that cross-institutional collaboration outside these relationships is still limited in this field.

Selective collaboration
Geography

United States leads filings; Europe and China are secondary battlegrounds

The United States is the leading filing jurisdiction, followed by Europe (EPO) and China — a distribution that reflects both the home markets of the dominant applicants and the commercially most-contested territories. South Korea, Germany, and the United Kingdom each represent meaningful secondary filings. India’s presence in the top ten jurisdictions by filing count signals growing regulatory and market interest in the region.

US-centric, global reach
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Kawasaki Heavy Industries LtdMedicaroid Corp22
Intuitive Surgical Operations IncSiemens Healthineers GmbH6
Intuitive Surgical Operations IncSiemens Medical Systems Ltd2
Curexo IncPusan National University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation2
Intuitive Surgical Operations IncL. Bruchheim1
Intuitive Surgical Operations IncH. Kunze1
Intuitive Surgical Operations IncC. Niebler1
Curexo IncKorea Electronics Technology Institute1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction data in the evidence set.Explore insights →
Leaders

CMR Surgical and Intuitive Surgical lead on core platform IP; Kawasaki Heavy Industries holds steady

The two co-leaders are nearly indistinguishable in scale but show diverging recent momentum, while Kawasaki Heavy Industries stands out as the only major filer with flat rather than declining recent activity.

Leader · CMR Surgical Ltd

CMR Surgical Ltd

CMR Surgical holds the top ranking with 561 patent records and concentrates its filings across A61B 34 (surgical robotics procedures) and B25J 9 (robotic manipulator configurations), with B25J 13 (controlled manipulators) as a third emphasis — a profile consistent with a full-platform surgical robot strategy. Recent momentum shows a 45% decline versus the prior period, reflecting the field-wide plateau rather than a loss of competitive standing, and publication lag means recent filings are under-counted.

patent records: 561
Challenger · Kawasaki Heavy Industries

Kawasaki Heavy Industries

Kawasaki Heavy Industries ranks seventh with 100 patent records and focuses on A61B 34 (surgical procedures) and B25J 9 (manipulators), with A61B 90 as a secondary emphasis. Crucially, its recent filing momentum is flat at 0% change versus the prior period — making it the only major filer in the evidence set that has neither grown nor declined, and the most active co-filer (with Medicaroid) in the collaboration data. This stable trajectory distinguishes it from declining incumbents.

patent records: 100
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked data for all top-100 applicants, including mid-tier specialists and academic filers.
Globus Medical IncAuris Health Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc29▼ -52%
CMR Surgical Ltd96▼ -45%
Verb Surgical Inc37▼ -47%
Globus Medical Inc24▼ -47%
Curexo Inc3▼ -82%
Digital Global Systems Inc3▲ new entrant
Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd20▬ 0%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards reflect patent-record counts from the applicant ranking and technology emphasis from IPC focus data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in software intelligence and healthcare informatics

Five IPC classes each account for 2% or less of the technology mix despite plausible technical relevance to surgical robotics; three stand out as worth monitoring for teams with software or systems integration capabilities.

G16H · Healthcare Informatics

With 254 patent records and a 2% share of the technology mix, G16H represents a relatively sparse branch compared to core hardware classes. As surgical robots become more connected to hospital information systems, outcome analytics, and remote monitoring workflows, healthcare informatics IP is a plausible adjacency. Teams with expertise in clinical data integration or surgical outcome platforms could find less crowded prior art here than in core B25J or A61B filing space.

Search this in Eureka →

G06N · Computing Based on AI Models

G06N accounts for 171 patent records at a 1% share — the lowest among the five identified adjacent branches — despite AI-driven surgical guidance, autonomous task segmentation, and intraoperative decision support being active research areas. The relative sparsity suggests that AI-model-level claims applied specifically to surgical robotics remain underdeveloped in the patent record, offering a potential differentiation path for teams combining surgical domain knowledge with machine learning expertise.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See branch-level filing density, applicant overlap, and claim-type analysis across all adjacent IPC classes.
G06T · Image data processing & generationG05B · Control & regulating systems+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are IPC classes with lower filing share relative to dominant classes; sparsity alone does not confirm commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across manipulator, surgery, and control classes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerA61B 34 · Diagnosis & surgeryB25J 9 · Manipulators & robotsA61B 17 · Diagnosis & surgeryA61B 90 · Diagnosis & surgeryB25J 13 · Manipulators & robots
Intuitive Surgical Operations IncStrong · 367Strong · 381Moderate · 100Moderate · 180Moderate · 135
CMR Surgical LtdStrong · 333Strong · 316Moderate · 69Moderate · 78Moderate · 89
Cilag GmbH InternationalStrong · 82Strong · 77Strong · 73Strong · 67Strong · 52
Verb Surgical IncStrong · 115Strong · 108Moderate · 35Moderate · 34Absent
Globus Medical IncStrong · 102AbsentStrong · 59Strong · 71Moderate · 29
Cambridge Medical Robotics LtdStrong · 110Strong · 89Moderate · 25AbsentModerate · 32
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own surgical robot patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.