Book a demo

Surgical Robotics Patent Landscape 2026

Surgical Robotics Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Surgical Robotics Patent Landscape in 2026

Surgical robotics patenting is highly concentrated, with Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc holding the single largest position and the top five filers collectively dominating the leading-hundred filers. Annual volume peaked in 2022 and has since eased, though emerging challengers — notably CMR Surgical and Medical Microinstruments — are building momentum against the incumbents.

569
Patent families in scope
57%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-15%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Intuitive Surgical leads a concentrated field with a growing challenger tier

Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc ranks first with 141 patent records, well ahead of CMR Surgical Ltd at 86 and Auris Health Inc at 73. The top five filers — Intuitive Surgical, CMR Surgical, Auris Health, Medical Microinstruments Inc, and Cilag GmbH International — together account for 57% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers, indicating a field where a small group of incumbents set the structural terms of competition.

The gap between first and second place (141 vs 86 patent records) is meaningful but not insurmountable. CMR Surgical’s recent trajectory — up 106% in recent filings — suggests the challenger tier is actively narrowing the structural gap rather than ceding ground.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc141
2CMR Surgical Ltd86
3Auris Health Inc73
4Medical Microinstruments Inc62
5Cilag GmbH International46
6Verb Surgical Inc46
7Ethicon Inc24
8Shanghai MicroPort MedBot (Group) Co Ltd22
9Mako Surgical Corp12
10Regents of the University of California12
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Stryker Corporation11
12Precision Robotics (Hong Kong) Limited8
13Beijing Surgerii Tech Co Ltd8
14Cornerstone Technology (Shenzhen) Ltd7
15IP2IPO Innovations Ltd7
16Children’s National Medical Center7
17Beijing Surgerii Robotics Co Ltd7
18Chongqing Jinshan Medical Robotics Co Ltd7
19KindHeart Inc6
20Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd6
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Intuitive Surgical’s position, built on deep coverage of surgical procedure, instrument, and accessory classifications, gives it strong blocking power in core laparoscopic robotics. Challengers are differentiating through manipulator mechanics and, in the case of Medical Microinstruments, microsurgery-specific instrumentation.

Filing counts for 20242025 are subject to publication lag and are likely undercounted; the apparent trough in recent years should not be read as a structural retreat. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2022; clinical surgery classifications dominate the technology mix

Two lenses — the annual filing trend and the IPC branch composition — together show a maturing field that is still shaped overwhelmingly by core surgical-instrument innovation, with only thin coverage of software, informatics, and control-systems branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose from 48 records in 2017 to a peak of 92 in 2022, then eased to 55 in 2023 and 41 in 2024. The 2025 and 2026 figures (43 and 2, respectively) are heavily affected by publication lag and should not be interpreted as continued decline. The field’s lifecycle is best characterized as past-peak on an annual basis, though the multi-year window remains substantially above the 2017 baseline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 92 in 2022.48201768201855201990202075202192202255202341202443202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

A61B (Diagnosis & Surgery) dominates with 733 patent records, followed by B25J (Manipulators & Robots) at 189. All other IPC branches — including G16H (Healthcare Informatics), G06F (Digital Data Processing), G05B (Control & Regulating Systems), and G06T (Image Data Processing) — register in the tens, confirming that software-adjacent and informatics branches remain sparsely covered relative to hardware-centric surgical-instrument classes.

Technology compositionA61B · Diagnosis & surgery leads with 733; B25J · Manipulators & robots 189.A61B · Diagnosis & surgery733B25J · Manipulators & ro…189G16H · Healthcare inform…28G06F · Electric digital …22G05B · Control & regulat…17G06T · Image data proces…16G06Q · Business, commerc…13H01H · Switches & relays13↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20230053173A1Published 2023-02-16

Interface between a surgical robot arm and a robot…

Cmr Surgical Limited

A drive unit for a surgical robot arm, the robot arm being configured to engage a robotic surgical instrument, the drive unit comprising a plurality of drive interface elements, each drive interface element having a longitudinal axis; a plurality of actuators configured to drive the plurality of drive interface elements, each actuator of the plurality of… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Interface between a surgical robot arm and a robot… — patent drawingInterface between a surgical robot arm and a robot… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Shaft assembly comprising a clutch configured to a…1,447
2Method for attaching a shaft assembly to a surgica…1,244
3Force and torque sensing in a surgical robot setup…1,185
4Method for attaching a shaft assembly to a surgica…908
5Shaft assembly comprising a clutch configured to a…819
6Method for attaching a shaft assembly to a surgica…559
7Telerobotic surgery system using minimally invasiv…555
8Robotic attachment comprising exterior drive actua…551

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for surgical robotics R&D strategy

The combination of high concentration, a 2022 activity peak, and thin software-branch coverage creates distinct strategic signals for incumbents and new entrants alike.

Decline

Field is in a post-peak phase after a 2022 high

The lifecycle evidence indicates annual filings are easing back from the 2022 peak of 92 patent records. On a multi-year basis the field remains well above its 2017 baseline of 48 records, so this represents consolidation rather than collapse. Incumbents are likely shifting from broad land-grabbing to selective, deep prosecution around core platform IP.

Post-peak · 2022 high
Concentration

Top five filers hold 57% of the leading-hundred filers’ combined total

The top five applicants — Intuitive Surgical, CMR Surgical, Auris Health, Medical Microinstruments, and Cilag — collectively represent 57% of the combined patent records of the hundred largest filers. This level of concentration means new entrants face strong blocking positions in core surgical-instrument classes (A61B34, A61B17, A61B90) and should seek differentiation in adjacent technical branches.

High concentration
Collaboration

Limited co-filing observed; Verb Surgical–Auris Health and Medical Microinstruments entity pair are the most active

The most active co-filing pairs in evidence are Verb Surgical Inc with Auris Health Inc (4 joint records) and the Medical Microinstruments entity pair — Medical Microinstr SRL and Medical Microinstruments Inc — also with 4 joint records. The overall collaboration signal is thin, suggesting that surgical robotics R&D at this level is largely conducted within single-entity silos rather than through structured consortium arrangements.

Low collaboration
Geography

US and EPO lead; China and UK are secondary but growing nodes

The United States leads with 260 patent records, followed by Europe (EPO) at 205 and WIPO/PCT at 79. China registers 47 records and the United Kingdom 37, reflecting the presence of CMR Surgical and Cambridge-affiliated filers. The thin coverage in South Korea (1 record) and Germany (6 records) may indicate underexploited prosecution opportunities in those jurisdictions for challengers seeking geographic diversification.

US · EPO dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Verb Surgical IncAuris Health Inc4
Medical Microinstruments SRLMedical Microinstruments Inc4

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a single family prosecuted in multiple jurisdictions contributes to each.Explore insights →
Leaders

Intuitive Surgical holds the top position; CMR Surgical is the fastest-rising challenger

The leader and primary challenger differ substantially in trajectory: Intuitive Surgical’s large, established portfolio is growing modestly, while CMR Surgical has more than doubled recent filing activity from a smaller base.

Leader · Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc

Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc

Intuitive Surgical holds 141 patent records, the largest position in the corpus. Technology emphasis is concentrated in A61B34 (surgical robotics procedures), A61B90 (surgical accessories and navigation), and A61B17 (surgical instruments), covering the full instrument-system stack. Recent filing momentum shows a ▼ –12% trend, consistent with a mature portfolio in selective-prosecution mode rather than expansion.

141 patent records
Challenger · CMR Surgical Ltd

CMR Surgical Ltd

CMR Surgical holds 86 patent records and is the field’s most dynamically expanding filer, with a ▲ +106% trend in recent versus prior filings. Its technology profile spans A61B34, A61B17, and — distinctively — B25J9 (robot manipulator mechanics), reflecting a system-architecture approach that differentiates it from Intuitive Surgical’s instrument-centric focus. This mechanical-design emphasis suggests a strategy of building independent blocking positions in the robot-arm layer.

86 patent records
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked filers, their technology mix, and filing momentum across the surgical robotics landscape.
Auris Health IncMedical Microinstruments Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc15▼ -12%
Verb Surgical Inc22▼ -59%
CMR Surgical Ltd37▲ +106%
Medical Microinstruments Inc33▲ new entrant
Auris Health Inc8▼ -47%
Medical Microinstruments SRL4▲ new entrant
Shanghai MicroPort MedBot (Group) Co Ltd3▼ -70%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Filing counts are patent records per applicant; momentum trends compare recent filings to the prior equivalent period.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Healthcare informatics and control systems are under-served relative to surgical hardware

Against a backdrop of 733 records in A61B and 189 in B25J, several software and data-processing branches have sparse coverage — a structural observation with potential R&D relevance for teams working on the intelligence and autonomy layers of surgical robots.

G16H · Healthcare Informatics

With only 28 patent records and a 2% share among the top branches, G16H — covering surgical data management, workflow analytics, and outcome informatics — is thinly contested relative to the procedural and instrument hardware classes. As surgical robots generate increasing volumes of intraoperative data, applications that structure and exploit that data represent a plausible extension of existing robotic platforms. Entry paths include outcome-tracking software, AI-assisted surgical planning tools, and hospital integration middleware — areas where hardware-focused incumbents hold limited blocking positions.

Search this in Eureka →

G05B · Control & Regulating Systems

G05B (control and regulating systems) registers only 17 patent records — a 1% share — despite being foundational to robot autonomy, haptic feedback, and motion compensation. The sparse coverage is an observation, not a validated gap: some control-layer IP may be embedded within A61B34 claims rather than separately classified under G05B. Nevertheless, teams working on closed-loop force control, autonomous suturing, or tremor-cancellation algorithms may find this branch less crowded than the hardware-instrument classes, with Intuitive Surgical and CMR Surgical holding minimal explicit G05B positions.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level analysis, including G06T image processing, G06F data processing, and G06N AI-model classes.
G06T · Image data processing & generationG06Q · Business, commerce & admin data processing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts reflect patent records; low counts indicate relative sparsity compared with dominant classes, not absence of commercial activity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across surgical robotics sub-domains

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerA61B 34 · Diagnosis & surgeryA61B 17 · Diagnosis & surgeryA61B 90 · Diagnosis & surgeryB25J 9 · Manipulators & robotsB25J 13 · Manipulators & robots
Intuitive Surgical Operations IncStrong · 127Moderate · 54Strong · 74Emerging · 18Emerging · 13
Verb Surgical IncStrong · 92Moderate · 39Moderate · 32Moderate · 26Emerging · 18
Cilag GmbH InternationalStrong · 52Strong · 49Moderate · 25Emerging · 3Emerging · 4
CMR Surgical LtdStrong · 72Moderate · 19Emerging · 10Emerging · 14Emerging · 2
Medical Microinstruments SRLStrong · 27Moderate · 7Strong · 19Strong · 22Absent
Medical Microinstruments IncStrong · 40Moderate · 10Moderate · 10Emerging · 7Absent
Auris Health IncStrong · 31AbsentStrong · 16Emerging · 5Emerging · 6
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own surgical robotics landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.