https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/surgical-smoke-evacuation-and-safety-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Medical Equipment
Surgical smoke evacuation patents: mapping the filers, the filing surge and the gaps still open
  • 86.7% of all 45 records sit with just five assignees, so the field is concentrated at the top rather than fragmented across many small filers.
  • +700% filing growth from 2021 (1 filing) to 2024 (8 filings), the last year the dataset treats as complete.
  • A61M, G01F and G08B claims trail far behind the dominant A61B class, pointing to flow-sensing and alarm integration as comparatively open ground.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
45
Published Records
87%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+700%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 45 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this patent set covers

Surgical smoke evacuation covers the instruments, filters and control systems used to remove electrosurgical plume from the operating field and the operating room air. The scope here spans 45 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search string tied to particulate capture, chemical content, capture efficiency, integrated evacuation instruments, noise, suction balance, operating room air and regulatory mandate. Patent families are the fairer unit for judging real activity, since they strip out duplicate continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction copies of the same invention.

Filing activity in this set is recent and concentrated: the earliest years in the trend show no activity, and the growth from a single filing in 2021 to eight in 2024 marks the field's inflection point rather than a mature, steady-state technology.

Filing activity by year
  1. 1FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD17
  2. 2ACUDERM9
  3. 3STRYKER CORP5
  4. 4COVIDIEN LP5
  5. 5CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL3
  6. 6CONMED CORP2
  7. 7MICROTEK MEDICAL INC1
  8. 8HARWOOD JONATHAN DAVID1
  9. 9KIRSCHMAN DAVID LOUIS1
  10. 10BAIN DAVID JOHN1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Smoke Evacuation and Safety covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 45 records: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A late, sharp filing ramp

Filings sat at zero through the earlier years covered, then rose to a peak of 8 in 2024 -- a +700% increase from the single 2021 filing. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the apparent softness in 2025 and 2026 reflects the reporting lag, not a slowdown; 2024 is the most recent year the trend can be read as complete.

A late, sharp filing ramp024680201720182019202020212022202382024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Claims cluster in surgery and fluid handling

A61B (diagnosis & surgery) covers 86.7% of the 45 records and A61M (devices for body fluids) covers 37.8%, confirming that most claims are written around the surgical instrument and evacuation conduit itself. G01F (flow measuring) and G08B (signalling & alarms) each sit at 15.6%, well behind the leading classes -- these are the smaller, more specialised branches of the same field.

Claims cluster in surgery and fluid handlingA61B · Diagnosis & surgery3986.7%A61M · Devices for body fluids1737.8%G01F · Flow, level & volume measuring715.6%G08B · Signalling & alarm systems715.6%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting48.9%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…36.7%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …24.4%F24F · Air conditioning & ventilation12.2%Other12.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 45 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Smoke Evacuation and Safety covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Surgical Smoke Evacuation and Safety with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about surgical smoke evacuation and safety and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this field

Representative Filing
US20220409764A12022-12-29

Disinfecting device for surgical smoke evacuation system

COVIDIEN LP

A surgical smoke evacuation system includes a smoke evacuator, a suction instrument, a suction conduit, and a disinfecting device. The smoke evacuator includes a suction generator configured to create a vacuum force. The suction instrument is configured to couple to the smoke evacuator via the suction conduit. The disinfecting device is operably coupled to the suction conduit or the smoke evacuator, and includes a housing defining an inner chamber, an inlet, an outlet, and an ultraviolet disinfecting element.Filed by Covidien LP, published 2022-12-29 as US20220409764A1.

US20220409764A1 — patent drawing 1US20220409764A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5226939ASurgical smoke evacuation system66
2US20130131580A1Relating to systems for laparoscopic surgery37
3WO2011078701A1Improvements relating to systems for laparoscopic surgery19
4US20170136195A1Systems for laparoscopic surgery8
5US20210068864A1Surgical access system6
6US10426902B2Systems for laparoscopic surgery5
7CA2241516A1Surgical smoke evacuation apparatus5
8US20230126084A1Systems for laparoscopic surgery3
9US20190351157A1Systems for laparoscopic surgery3
10WO1997023167A1Surgical smoke evacuation apparatus3

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Smoke Evacuation and Safety covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern tells a competitive team

Three findings that shape where to file, where to watch, and where the record space is still thin.

Concentration
86.7% top 5
of 45 records

Five filers hold most of the field

The top five assignees combined account for 86.7% of all 45 records in scope, while the top ten cover the full 100.0%. That leaves no meaningful long tail beyond the ranked leaders -- anyone entering now is filing into a field where the claim space is already occupied by a small group.

Based on the 45-record assignee ranking
Momentum
1 → 8 filings
2021 to 2024

The surge is recent, not historical

Filing volume moved from a single record in 2021 to eight in 2024, a +700% rise over three years. This is a young filing wave rather than a settled one, and the leaders' recent-year momentum has already cooled from that 2024 peak.

Peak year 2024 at 8 filings
Composition
37.8% A61M
of 45 records

Fluid-handling claims are the second pillar

After A61B's 86.7% coverage, A61M (devices for body fluids) at 37.8% is the next largest class, well ahead of G01F and G08B at 15.6% each. Claims on the core suction and evacuation path are dense; claims on flow sensing and alarm signalling are comparatively sparse.

IPC subclass shares, 45 records in scope
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to surgical smoke evacuation and safety, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Smoke Evacuation and Safety covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

The assignee landscape

Fifteen companies make up the entire ranked list returned for this search -- not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the whole field as the dataset defines it.

Leader
17 records
of 45 total

One filer well ahead of the rest

The leading assignee holds 17 of the 45 records in scope, roughly double the fifth-place filer's count of 3. That gap suggests one company built an early, broad filing position around the core evacuation instrument rather than a single narrow claim.

Leader vs. fifth place: 17 vs. 3
Mid-field
3 records
fifth place

A tight cluster behind the leader

From second through fifth place the counts sit close together before dropping off sharply -- fifth place holds 3 records and tenth place holds just 1. This is a field with one dominant filer and a compressed group of competitors behind it, not a gradual long tail.

Tenth place: 1 record
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs

Co-filing is limited but repeats

Ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest pairings repeating twice each around the same individual inventor-assignee. This points to small, stable inventor teams rather than broad cross-company joint filings.

Strongest pairs recur at 2 records each
🔍
Under-claimed technical branches
Sub-areas where the record count is thin relative to the core instrument claims
Real-time capture-efficiency sensingSuction-noise attenuation designChemical-content alarm thresholdsVentilation-integrated evacuation ductingSuction-balance control logic
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd0
ACUDERM0
Covidien LP0
Stryker Corp0-100%
Cilag GmbH International0-100%
Conmed Corp0
KIRSCHMAN DAVID LOUIS0
HARWOOD JONATHAN DAVID0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Smoke Evacuation and Safety covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a young, concentrated field with specific gaps. These are the practical next steps for an IP or R&D team.

Check freedom to operate around the leader's claims

With one assignee holding 17 of 45 records, any new instrument design should be checked against that filer's claim scope before committing to a build, particularly around the core suction conduit and evacuator housing.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Watch the under-claimed sensing and alarm branches

G01F and G08B classes sit at 15.6% of records each, far behind the core A61B and A61M claims. Flow-sensing and alarm-signalling designs have comparatively more open claim space today.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the post-2024 filing lag

Publication lag means 2025 and 2026 filings are still arriving. Re-running this search periodically will reveal whether the 2024 peak was a one-off surge or the start of a sustained wave.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Smoke Evacuation and Safety covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Surgical Smoke Evacuation and Safety covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Surgical Smoke Evacuation and Safety in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole surgical smoke evacuation and safety corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.