https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/syngas-fermentation-gas-liquid-transfer-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Syngas Fermentation
Syngas Fermentation Gas-Liquid Transfer Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
  • 61.5% concentration. The top 5 of 71 ranked assignees account for 206 of 335 records in scope — filing here is dominated by a small cluster, not a fragmented field.
  • Filings cooled after 2017. The peak year was 2017 at 38 records, and 2021-to-2024 filings fell 71% (14 to 4) — though 2025-2026 counts are still filling in under the usual 18-month publication lag.
  • Apparatus claims outweigh biology claims. C12M bioreactor and apparatus classes touch 48.4% of the 335 records, close behind the 95.5% carrying core fermentation process claims — the hardware side is heavily claimed too.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
335
Published Records
61%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-71%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (14 records) with 2024 (4) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 335 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Syngas fermentation converts CO, CO2 and H2 into ethanol, acetic acid and other products using acetogenic microorganisms, and the rate-limiting step is almost always getting gas into the liquid phase fast enough to feed the microbes. This landscape isolates the subset of syngas and gas fermentation patents that specifically claim mass transfer, bubble size, gas holdup, sparger design, transfer coefficients or liquid circulation — the engineering layer that sits underneath the microbiology and determines whether a bioreactor design can scale past bench volume. It draws on 335 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 and classified under the core fermentation and bioreactor IPC codes.

The scope deliberately excludes patents on strain engineering or downstream product separation that do not also touch gas-liquid transfer mechanics, so the picture here is narrower than the full syngas fermentation field but sharper on the apparatus and process-control claims that decide reactor economics.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1LANZATECH INC70
  2. 2SYNATA BIO INC43
  3. 3LANZATECH NZ INC41
  4. 4LANZATECH NEW ZEALAND LTD36
  5. 5INEOS BIO SA16
  6. 6IOGEN CORPORATION13
  7. 7KIVERDI INC13
  8. 8GINKGO BIOWORKS INC11
  9. 9JUPENG BIO HK LTD9
  10. 10Q POWER OY8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Syngas Fermentation Gas-Liquid Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 335 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then a steady pullback

Filings peaked at 38 records in 2017 and have not returned to that level since. The 2021-to-2024 window shows a 71% drop, from 14 records down to 4 — a real decline in disclosed filing activity within a period the data treats as complete, not an artifact of publication lag. Counts for 2025 and 2026 will keep rising as later filings publish, so treat the most recent one or two years as incomplete rather than as confirmation the field has gone quiet.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then a steady pullback0102030403820172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition: apparatus claims run almost as deep as process claims

C12P fermentation and enzymatic synthesis claims touch 95.5% of the 335 records, which is expected given the search scope. What stands out is C12M bioreactor and apparatus hardware at 48.4% and C12N microorganism/genetic engineering at 39.7% — both filed alongside the core process claims often enough that reactor hardware is not a peripheral afterthought. Electrolytic production (C25B, 8.4%) and separation processes (B01D, 6.0%) appear as smaller adjacent clusters, since a record can carry more than one class these shares sum above 100%.

Technology composition: apparatus claims run almost as deep as process claimsC12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…32095.5%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus16248.4%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…13339.7%C12R · Microorganisms (index)329.6%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…288.4%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…278.1%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…206.0%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds154.5%Other7522.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 335 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Syngas Fermentation Gas-Liquid Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Syngas Fermentation Gas-Liquid Transfer with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about syngas fermentation gas-liquid transfer and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Foundational and representative filings

Representative recent filing
US12338428B22025-06-24

Materials and methods for managing aerobic gas fermentation (US12338428B2)

INV NYLON CHEMICALS AMERICAS, LLC

Disclosed are materials and methods for managing aerobic biosynthesis. The materials include a fermenter system comprising a fermenter, a microorganism provided to the fermenter, and at least two control loops. The methods are directed to measuring and controlling different oxygen concentrations within the fermenter.Filed by INV NYLON CHEMICALS AMERICAS, LLC and published 2025-06-24, this filing shows aerobic gas fermentation control loops for oxygen concentration entering the same claim space traditionally dominated by anaerobic syngas fermentation apparatus patents.

US12338428B2 — patent drawing 1US12338428B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5593886AClostridium stain which produces acetic acid from waste gases743
2US6136577ABiological production of ethanol from waste gases with Clostridium ljungdahlii655
3WO1998000558A1Biological production of acetic acid from waste gases576
4US5807722ABiological production of acetic acid from waste gases with Clostridium ljungdahlii515
5US6340581B1Biological production of products from waste gases407
6US20080193989A1Energy Efficient Methods to Produce Products370
7WO2017165244A1Microorganisms and artificial ecosystems for the production of protein, food, and useful co-products from c1 …116
8US20200140901A1Process for using biogenic carbon dioxide derived from non-fossil organic material60
9US20150315599A1Methods and Systems for Methylotrophic Production of Organic Compounds59
10WO2015058011A1Improved carbon capture in fermentation51

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside a searched corpus — read them as a signal of foundational influence, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Syngas Fermentation Gas-Liquid Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting claims or scoping a freedom-to-operate review in this space.

Concentration
61.5%
of 335 records held by top 5 of 71 ranked assignees

A small cluster holds the core apparatus claims

With 206 of 335 records concentrated among five assignees, most gas-liquid transfer apparatus and process-control approaches in commercial-scale syngas fermentation have already been claimed by a handful of players. New entrants should expect dense prior art on sparger geometry, bubble-column design and circulation loops from this group before assuming a clear path.

Top 5 = 206 of 335 records
Filing momentum
-71%
2021 to 2024 filing decline (14 to 4 records)

Disclosed filing activity has genuinely slowed

The drop from 14 records in 2021 to 4 in 2024 sits inside the window the dataset treats as complete, so it is not just a publication-lag artefact. It suggests the leading assignees have largely settled their core apparatus claims and are filing less around this specific mechanical problem than they were five years ago.

Peak year: 2017 at 38 records
Technology mix
48.4%
of 335 records carry C12M bioreactor/apparatus classes

Hardware claims run nearly as deep as biology claims

C12M apparatus classifications sit on close to half the record set, alongside C12N microorganism claims on 39.7%. A reactor design that only addresses strain performance without also covering gas transfer hardware is likely to run into someone else's apparatus claim.

C12M 48.4% vs C12N 39.7% of 335 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to syngas fermentation gas-liquid transfer, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Syngas Fermentation Gas-Liquid Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is thinning out

Filing here is led by a small group with long-running syngas fermentation programmes, followed by a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants.

Leader
70
records held by the top-ranked assignee

One assignee holds a filing count well above the rest of the field

The leading assignee's 70 records dwarf the fifth-place count of 16, pointing to a long-running, well-resourced programme spanning strain, apparatus and process-control claims built up over more than a decade.

Leader: 70 records; 5th place: 16
Mid-tier
8
records held by the tenth-ranked assignee

The drop-off from top 5 to top 10 is steep

Tenth place holds only 8 records against a leader at 70, and the top 10 combined reach 77.6% of all 335 records — meaning the remaining 61 ranked assignees share less than a quarter of the field between them.

Top 10 = 260 of 335 records (77.6%)
Collaboration
10
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is limited and concentrated within corporate families

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest links connect a company to its own subsidiary or named inventors rather than to external partners — cross-company collaboration on gas-liquid transfer claims is rare.

Strongest pair: 6 shared records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth scoping before filing
Branches with thinner claim density inside this same search scope
Micro-bubble sparger geometriesReal-time gas holdup sensing/control loopsLiquid circulation for tall bubble-column reactorsAerobic gas fermentation oxygen controlHollow-fibre membrane gas transfer
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
LanzaTech Inc0-100%
LanzaTech NZ Inc0
Ineos Bio SA0
LANZATECH NZ INC0
Coskata Inc0
Synata Bio Inc0
Kiverdi Inc0
IOGEN CORPORATION0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Syngas Fermentation Gas-Liquid Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with settled core claims and a shrinking but still-active edge. Two directions make sense from here.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on any new sparger or bubble-column design

Given 61.5% concentration among five assignees, a new mechanical design for gas-liquid contact should be checked against their granted claims before committing to a reactor geometry.

Explore FTO workflows in Eureka

Track the aerobic gas fermentation control-loop cluster

The representative 2025 filing on aerobic oxygen control loops suggests a newer sub-branch forming outside the traditional anaerobic apparatus claims — worth monitoring for further activity.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Syngas Fermentation Gas-Liquid Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Syngas Fermentation Gas-Liquid Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Syngas Fermentation Gas-Liquid Transfer in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole syngas fermentation gas-liquid transfer corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.