Tail Rotor and Anti-Torque Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
Tail Rotor and Anti-Torque System Patents
Concentrated at the top. The five leading assignees hold 52.3% of all 128 records in scope, and the top ten hold 73.4% — a small group of filers controls most of the documented claim space. Filings climbed from 9 in 2021 to a peak of 17 in 2024, an 89% increase over that span. The two most recent years are undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 should not be read as a slowdown.
- 1BLR AEROSPACE LLC19
- 2HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC17
- 3SKYRYSE INC11
- 4OLIVER VTOL10
- 5THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND10
See the full tail rotor and anti torque systems analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about tail rotor and anti-torque patents
Who holds the most patents on tail rotor and anti-torque systems?
One assignee leads with 19 of the 128 records in this dataset, well ahead of the fifth-ranked holder at 10 and the tenth at 4. The top five assignees combined hold 52.3% of all records, and the top ten hold 73.4%, so the field has a genuine leader plus a fragmented long tail rather than a tight cluster of equally sized competitors. Anyone assessing this space should check the leader’s portfolio first, since it covers the largest single block of claim space.
Is tail rotor patent filing activity growing?
Yes — filings rose from 9 in 2021 to a peak of 17 in 2024, an 89% increase over that three-year span. The years after 2024 show lower counts in the raw data, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than an actual slowdown; 2024 is the most recent year that can be treated as complete. Anyone tracking momentum should wait for later data cuts before concluding the field has cooled.
What does US11801936B2 actually cover?
US11801936B2, assigned to Textron Innovations Inc. and published 2023-10-31, covers a flight control system that translates pilot pedal input into a tail rotor actuator command while applying yaw rate limits tied to a vortex ring state envelope. In practice this means the claim ties electronic actuation of the tail rotor to a specific control-input pathway (pedal input) and a specific limiting condition (avoiding loss of tail rotor effectiveness via VRS limits). Designs that use a different control input path, a different envelope basis, or purely mechanical (non-electronic) actuation sit further from this claim’s core.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tail Rotor and Anti Torque Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.