https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/tandem-and-multijunction-photovoltaics-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Solar Energy · Patent Landscape
Tandem and Multijunction Photovoltaic Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Headed
  • 31.1% concentration. The top 5 of 100 ranked assignees hold 654 of 2,106 records in scope — nearly a third of the field sits with a small group of filers.
  • H01L dominates at 78.4%. Semiconductor-device claims under H01L cover the large majority of records, with organic semiconductor (H10K) and dedicated photovoltaic (H02S) classes trailing well behind.
  • Filing down 40% since 2021. Annual filings fell from 103 in 2021 to 62 in 2024, the most recent year with a complete publication window — a real pullback, not a publication-lag artefact.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,106
Published Records
31%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-40%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (103 records) with 2024 (62) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,106 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What the tandem and multijunction PV patent record actually shows

Tandem and multijunction photovoltaic patenting sits at the intersection of semiconductor device engineering and power generation hardware. The search set spans 2,106 records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, built around claims that combine stacked-junction cell architectures with performance metrics such as irradiance response, module temperature behaviour, and energy yield. The bulk of the activity is filed as semiconductor device art rather than as dedicated solar-power-generation art, which shapes where a freedom-to-operate search needs to look first.

Filing activity peaked in 2018 at 118 records and has since eased, with 2021's 103 filings dropping to 62 by 2024 — the last year the dataset can treat as fully published. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures will keep rising as records catch up; they should not be read as a continuation of the decline.

Filing volume and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1SOLAERO TECHNOLOGIES CORP276
  2. 2THE BOEING CO221
  3. 3LG ELECTRONICS INC69
  4. 4SOLYNDRA INC48
  5. 5THE RGT UNIV OF MICHIGAN40
  6. 6THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIV36
  7. 7SHANGRAO JINKO SOLAR TECH DEV CO LTD35
  8. 8SOLYNDRA RESIDUAL TRUST34
  9. 9ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY LLC33
  10. 10BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST31
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tandem & Multijunction Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology classification

Two views of the same 2,106-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the record set breaks down across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the class shares below add up to more than 100% of the record total.

A decade of filing, with a clear post-2018 pullback

Annual filings ran from 101 in 2017 to a peak of 118 in 2018, then fell across the following years to 62 by 2024. The 2021→2024 span alone shows a 40% drop. 2025 and 2026 counts are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, so treat the tail of the chart as a floor, not a forecast.

A decade of filing, with a clear post-2018 pullback0306090120101201711820182019202020212022202320242025122026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Semiconductor-device claims dominate the classification mix

H01L (semiconductor devices) appears in 78.4% of the 2,106 records, far ahead of H10K organic semiconductors at 17.2% and H02S photovoltaic/solar power generation at 6.0%. Smaller but non-trivial shares sit in H10P, H10F, H01G capacitors, H02J power/grid systems and H10D general semiconductor devices — evidence that most of the claim activity is written as device structure rather than as system- or grid-level solar hardware.

Semiconductor-device claims dominate the classification mixH01L · Semiconductor devices1,65278.4%H10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED e…36217.2%H02S · Photovoltaic / solar power gen…1276.0%H10P1125.3%H10F · Photovoltaic & light-sensitive…974.6%H01G · Capacitors833.9%H02J · Power supply & grid systems663.1%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)582.8%Other93144.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,106 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tandem & Multijunction Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Tandem & Multijunction Photovoltaics Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about tandem & multijunction photovoltaics patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records anchoring this field

Representative Filing
US20220190181A12022-06-16

US20220190181A1 — Multijunction metamorphic solar cells

SOLAERO TECHNOLOGIES CORP

A multijunction solar cell built on a growth substrate with a graded interlayer of step-graded sublayers, each with an incrementally greater, fully relaxed lattice constant than the layer below it, a distributed Bragg reflector over the graded structure, and at least three solar subcells including a lattice-mismatched second subcell over the interlayer.Filed by SoLAero Technologies Corp, published 2022-06-16 — illustrative of the metamorphic-buffer approach to lattice-mismatched multijunction stacks.

US20220190181A1 — patent drawing 1US20220190181A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080170982A1Fabrication and Application of Nanofiber Ribbons and Sheets and Twisted and Non-Twisted Nanofiber Yarns1,266
2US20110254052A1Hybrid Group IV/III-V Semiconductor Structures595
3US20150014632A1Advanced Heterojunction Devices and Methods of Manufacturing Advanced Heterojunction Devices558
4US20110220874A1Inorganic Bulk Multijunction Materials and Processes for Preparing the Same520
5US6111189APhotovoltaic module framing system with integral electrical raceways491
6US20060144435A1High-efficiency, monolithic, multi-bandgap, tandem photovoltaic energy converters460
7US6288325B1Producing thin film photovoltaic modules with high integrity interconnects and dual layer contacts447
8US6340788B1Multijunction photovoltaic cells and panels using a silicon or silicon-germanium active substrate cell for sp…428
9WO2007015710A2The fabrication and application of nanofiber ribbons and sheets and twisted and non-twisted nanofiber yarns383
10US6465724B1Photovoltaic module framing system with integral electrical raceways370

Citation counts accumulate over time, so older records such as the nanofiber-ribbon and Group IV/III-V structure filings lead the table; treat high citation counts as a marker of influence within this corpus, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tandem & Multijunction Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the filing pattern tells a competitive-intelligence team

Three figures from the dataset matter more than the rest for anyone deciding where to file, litigate or partner next.

Concentration
31.1%
of 2,106 records held by top 5 of 100 ranked assignees

The field has a defined leadership tier and a long tail

With the top 5 assignees holding 31.1% of all records and the top 10 reaching 39.1%, roughly six in ten records are spread across the remaining ranked entrants and unranked filers. That is concentration without monopoly — enough for the leaders to set the pace on core architecture claims, but not enough to foreclose the field for a well-targeted entrant.

Based on the full 100-company ranking, not a top-50 subset.
Filing momentum
-40%
filing change, 2021 to 2024

Volume has pulled back from its post-peak plateau

Filings dropped from 103 in 2021 to 62 in 2024, continuing a decline from the 2018 peak of 118. This reads as consolidation of claim space among established players rather than an exit from the technology — publication lag means 2025-26 counts will still revise upward.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete.
Classification skew
78.4%
of records classed under H01L

Most claims are written as semiconductor devices, not solar systems

Only 6.0% of records fall under H02S, the photovoltaic/solar-power-generation class, while 78.4% sit under H01L. A search built only around solar-specific classifications will miss the majority of relevant prior art, which is filed as general semiconductor-device structure.

Class shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to tandem & multijunction photovoltaics patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tandem & Multijunction Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

The assignee landscape

The ranking covers 100 assignees across the full 2,106-record set. A handful of names — aerospace-linked cell makers, consumer electronics majors, and university-affiliated research groups — sit well ahead of a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.

Leader
276 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

One filer holds a clear lead over the rest of the ranking

The leading assignee's 276 records sit well above fifth place at 40 and tenth place at 31, a steep drop-off that marks a genuine leadership gap rather than a tight cluster at the top.

Counted in patent families, the fairer unit across jurisdictions.
Recent momentum
-100% YoY
for at least one major legacy filer

Momentum has shifted away from several historic leaders

Several of the assignees with the largest historic filing counts show zero or sharply declining filings in the latest tracked year, including one leader down 100% year-on-year. That does not mean exit from the space — it can also reflect portfolios maturing into licensing or litigation phases rather than active fresh filing.

Momentum reflects the latest available year, which is still under-published.
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

Collaboration is limited and clusters around a few individuals

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest concentrated around a small group of named inventors and their affiliated companies, rather than broad industry-wide co-development.

Pair counts are relationship instances, not unique companies.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before you file
Branches with lower filing density inside the broader classification set — worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming they're occupied.
graded-interlayer lattice-matching schemestandem cell thermal-management coatingsorganic-inorganic hybrid subcell stackingmodule-level energy-yield feedback controlcapacitor-integrated tandem power conditioning
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SoLAero Technologies Corp1
The Boeing Company0-100%
LG Electronics Inc.0
Solyndra, Inc.0
Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC0
SolarEdge Technologies0
The Regents of the University of Michigan0-100%
Solyndra Residual Trust0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tandem & Multijunction Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether you're assessing freedom to operate, tracking a competitor, or scoping a new filing.

Run a claims-level freedom-to-operate check

The 78.4% H01L share means a solar-specific classification search alone will miss most relevant prior art. Pull full claim sets for the leading assignee's family before drafting around lattice-mismatched or graded-interlayer architectures.

Search claims in Eureka →

Track momentum shifts among legacy leaders

Several top-ranked assignees show flat or declining recent-year filings. Set up ongoing monitoring to catch the next filing wave before it publishes, given the 18-month lag between filing and disclosure.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →

Scope the under-claimed branches

Thermal management, hybrid subcell stacking and module-level yield feedback all show lower filing density than the core device classes. Validate white space with a full-text search before committing R&D budget.

Explore white space in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tandem & Multijunction Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on tandem and multijunction PV patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tandem & Multijunction Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Tandem & Multijunction Photovoltaics Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole tandem & multijunction photovoltaics patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.