Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (103 records) with 2024 (62) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,106 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Tandem and multijunction photovoltaic patenting sits at the intersection of semiconductor device engineering and power generation hardware. The search set spans 2,106 records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, built around claims that combine stacked-junction cell architectures with performance metrics such as irradiance response, module temperature behaviour, and energy yield. The bulk of the activity is filed as semiconductor device art rather than as dedicated solar-power-generation art, which shapes where a freedom-to-operate search needs to look first.
Filing activity peaked in 2018 at 118 records and has since eased, with 2021's 103 filings dropping to 62 by 2024 — the last year the dataset can treat as fully published. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures will keep rising as records catch up; they should not be read as a continuation of the decline.
Two views of the same 2,106-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the record set breaks down across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the class shares below add up to more than 100% of the record total.
Annual filings ran from 101 in 2017 to a peak of 118 in 2018, then fell across the following years to 62 by 2024. The 2021→2024 span alone shows a 40% drop. 2025 and 2026 counts are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, so treat the tail of the chart as a floor, not a forecast.
H01L (semiconductor devices) appears in 78.4% of the 2,106 records, far ahead of H10K organic semiconductors at 17.2% and H02S photovoltaic/solar power generation at 6.0%. Smaller but non-trivial shares sit in H10P, H10F, H01G capacitors, H02J power/grid systems and H10D general semiconductor devices — evidence that most of the claim activity is written as device structure rather than as system- or grid-level solar hardware.
Shares are the percentage of the 2,106 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about tandem & multijunction photovoltaics patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA multijunction solar cell built on a growth substrate with a graded interlayer of step-graded sublayers, each with an incrementally greater, fully relaxed lattice constant than the layer below it, a distributed Bragg reflector over the graded structure, and at least three solar subcells including a lattice-mismatched second subcell over the interlayer.Filed by SoLAero Technologies Corp, published 2022-06-16 — illustrative of the metamorphic-buffer approach to lattice-mismatched multijunction stacks.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20080170982A1 | Fabrication and Application of Nanofiber Ribbons and Sheets and Twisted and Non-Twisted Nanofiber Yarns | 1,266 |
| 2 | US20110254052A1 | Hybrid Group IV/III-V Semiconductor Structures | 595 |
| 3 | US20150014632A1 | Advanced Heterojunction Devices and Methods of Manufacturing Advanced Heterojunction Devices | 558 |
| 4 | US20110220874A1 | Inorganic Bulk Multijunction Materials and Processes for Preparing the Same | 520 |
| 5 | US6111189A | Photovoltaic module framing system with integral electrical raceways | 491 |
| 6 | US20060144435A1 | High-efficiency, monolithic, multi-bandgap, tandem photovoltaic energy converters | 460 |
| 7 | US6288325B1 | Producing thin film photovoltaic modules with high integrity interconnects and dual layer contacts | 447 |
| 8 | US6340788B1 | Multijunction photovoltaic cells and panels using a silicon or silicon-germanium active substrate cell for sp… | 428 |
| 9 | WO2007015710A2 | The fabrication and application of nanofiber ribbons and sheets and twisted and non-twisted nanofiber yarns | 383 |
| 10 | US6465724B1 | Photovoltaic module framing system with integral electrical raceways | 370 |
Citation counts accumulate over time, so older records such as the nanofiber-ribbon and Group IV/III-V structure filings lead the table; treat high citation counts as a marker of influence within this corpus, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three figures from the dataset matter more than the rest for anyone deciding where to file, litigate or partner next.
With the top 5 assignees holding 31.1% of all records and the top 10 reaching 39.1%, roughly six in ten records are spread across the remaining ranked entrants and unranked filers. That is concentration without monopoly — enough for the leaders to set the pace on core architecture claims, but not enough to foreclose the field for a well-targeted entrant.
Filings dropped from 103 in 2021 to 62 in 2024, continuing a decline from the 2018 peak of 118. This reads as consolidation of claim space among established players rather than an exit from the technology — publication lag means 2025-26 counts will still revise upward.
Only 6.0% of records fall under H02S, the photovoltaic/solar-power-generation class, while 78.4% sit under H01L. A search built only around solar-specific classifications will miss the majority of relevant prior art, which is filed as general semiconductor-device structure.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to tandem & multijunction photovoltaics patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranking covers 100 assignees across the full 2,106-record set. A handful of names — aerospace-linked cell makers, consumer electronics majors, and university-affiliated research groups — sit well ahead of a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
The leading assignee's 276 records sit well above fifth place at 40 and tenth place at 31, a steep drop-off that marks a genuine leadership gap rather than a tight cluster at the top.
Several of the assignees with the largest historic filing counts show zero or sharply declining filings in the latest tracked year, including one leader down 100% year-on-year. That does not mean exit from the space — it can also reflect portfolios maturing into licensing or litigation phases rather than active fresh filing.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest concentrated around a small group of named inventors and their affiliated companies, rather than broad industry-wide co-development.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| SoLAero Technologies Corp | 1 | — |
| The Boeing Company | 0 | -100% |
| LG Electronics Inc. | 0 | — |
| Solyndra, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC | 0 | — |
| SolarEdge Technologies | 0 | — |
| The Regents of the University of Michigan | 0 | -100% |
| Solyndra Residual Trust | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether you're assessing freedom to operate, tracking a competitor, or scoping a new filing.
The 78.4% H01L share means a solar-specific classification search alone will miss most relevant prior art. Pull full claim sets for the leading assignee's family before drafting around lattice-mismatched or graded-interlayer architectures.
Search claims in Eureka →Several top-ranked assignees show flat or declining recent-year filings. Set up ongoing monitoring to catch the next filing wave before it publishes, given the 18-month lag between filing and disclosure.
Set up monitoring in Eureka →Thermal management, hybrid subcell stacking and module-level yield feedback all show lower filing density than the core device classes. Validate white space with a full-text search before committing R&D budget.
Explore white space in Eureka →The ranked leader in this dataset holds 276 of the 2,106 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-ranked assignee at 40 and the tenth-ranked assignee at 31. That gap indicates a genuine leadership position rather than a tight cluster of similarly sized filers. The top 5 assignees combined account for 31.1% of all records, and the top 10 reach 39.1%, so more than half the field is still held by the remaining 90 ranked assignees and unranked filers.
Filing peaked in 2018 at 118 records and has declined since, with the most recent complete year, 2024, at 62 filings versus 103 in 2021 — a 40% drop across that span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any chart will look artificially low and should not yet be read as a continuation of the decline. The honest read is a pullback from a 2018 peak, not necessarily an ongoing collapse.
H01L, the general semiconductor devices class, covers 78.4% of the 2,106 records in this dataset, far more than the dedicated photovoltaic class H02S at 6.0%. This means most claim drafting in this field is done at the device-structure level — junctions, layers, interlayers — rather than at the system or module level. A search strategy limited to solar-specific classes will miss the majority of relevant art.
The published application describes a multijunction metamorphic solar cell built around a graded interlayer of step-graded, fully relaxed sublayers with incrementally increasing lattice constants, combined with a distributed Bragg reflector and at least three solar subcells including a lattice-mismatched subcell. It is a specific architecture for managing lattice mismatch in stacked subcells, not a claim over multijunction cells generally. Anyone designing a lattice-mismatched tandem stack should check the specific sublayer-grading and DBR-placement limitations before assuming the claim reads on their design; alternative buffer or bonding approaches that avoid the same step-graded interlayer structure would sit outside its literal scope.
Relative to the dominant H01L device-structure claims, areas such as thermal-management coatings for tandem stacks, hybrid organic-inorganic subcell stacking, and module-level energy-yield feedback control show lower filing density in this dataset. These are not guaranteed to be open — a full-text and claims-level search is still required — but they are promising starting points for a first-filing strategy rather than head-on competition with the top 5 assignees' core architecture claims.
Go past this page: query the whole tandem & multijunction photovoltaics patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.