Tangential Flow Filtration Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Tangential Flow Filtration Product Concentration Patents
Top 5 assignees hold 30.5% of the field. 315 of the 1,032 records in scope sit with just five companies, with the leader alone at 109 filings — the rest is a long tail of single-digit filers. Annual filings rose from 34 in 2017 to a peak of 68 in 2023. Measured over a complete three-year window, 2021 to 2024, filings moved from 66 to 57, a 14% decline — a real signal, though 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.
- 1AMGEN INC109
- 2EMD MILLIPORE CORP88
- 3GENENTECH INC53
- 4CHUGAI PHARMA CO LTD33
- 5DANISCO US INC32
See the full tangential flow filtration product concentration analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about tangential flow filtration patents
Who holds the most patents in tangential flow filtration product concentration?
The assignee ranking covers 100 companies drawn from the 1,032 records in scope, and filings are concentrated at the top: the five leading assignees together hold 315 records, or 30.5% of the total, and the ten leading assignees hold 440 records, or 42.6%. The single leader alone accounts for 109 records. Beyond the leaders there is a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants, so a freedom-to-operate search should weight the leading portfolios heavily but not ignore the tail entirely.
What does US11278827B2 actually cover, and does it block standard TFF processes?
US11278827B2, assigned to EMD Millipore Corporation and granted in 2022, covers single-pass tangential flow filtration with optional partial recirculation of retentate through the same system. It does not claim tangential flow filtration in general — a conventional multi-pass batch process or a single-pass system with zero recirculation falls outside its literal claim language. Anyone evaluating exposure should check specifically whether their process recirculates any fraction of retentate back through the same membrane pass, since that is the operative fact pattern in the claims.
Which technology areas in this field are under-claimed?
Wastewater and water-treatment applications of crossflow filtration (C02F, 6.5% of the 1,032 records) and body-fluid device applications (A61M, 6.1%) both appear in the corpus but at far lower density than the pharmaceutical-manufacturing core built on B01D and C12N classes. That gap does not mean the technology is unproven — it means fewer claims have been staked there, which is where a narrowly scoped first claim is more likely to clear prior art than in the crowded retentate-recirculation space.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tangential Flow Filtration Product Concentration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.