https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/technical-ceramics-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Technical Ceramics
Technical Ceramics Patents: Filing Concentration, Trends and Open Claim Space
  • 27.0% of all 1,886 records sit with just five assignees, with a single leader holding 146 records — well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 40.
  • Filings fell -74% from 2021 to 2024 (82 to 21), the last span reliable enough to compare given the roughly 18-month publication lag on more recent years.
  • C04B ceramics, cement & refractories covers 35.1% of records, but H01M battery and cell classes already touch 11.0% — the composition is broader than the category name suggests.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,886
Published Records
27%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-74%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (82 records) with 2024 (21) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,886 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the technical ceramics patent record actually covers

The dataset spans 1,886 published records filed against a search combining technical, engineering and advanced ceramic terminology with process and property terms such as firing process, particle morphology and cement hydration. That combination pulls in refractory and structural ceramics work alongside adjacent fields — battery materials, coating deposition, semiconductor processing — wherever those fields describe ceramic phases, surface layers or mechanical strength as part of their claims.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, so the most recent one to two years are necessarily incomplete: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Family-level counting is used throughout the assignee ranking to avoid overweighting applicants who file continuations or duplicate across jurisdictions.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1DEVOE LAMBERT146
  2. 2DEVOE ALAN146
  3. 3SHELL OIL CO114
  4. 4RELIGN CORP63
  5. 5HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC40
  6. 6APPL THIN FILMS INC37
  7. 7NANO ONE MATERIALS32
  8. 8PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO32
  9. 9AMERICAN SCI MATERIALS TECH31
  10. 103M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO30
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Technical Ceramics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,886-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the records fall into.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak followed by a multi-year decline

Filings peaked at 86 in 2017. The comparison that holds up against the publication lag is 2021 to 2024, where recorded filings dropped from 82 to 21 — a -74% change. Years after 2024 will fill in further as later publications post, so treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional rather than as evidence of a continuing fall.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak followed by a multi-year decline02550751008620172018201920202021202220232024202582026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition: ceramics core plus battery, coating and semiconductor overlap

C04B (ceramics, cement & refractories) is the largest single subclass at 35.1% of the 1,886 records. H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) at 11.0%, C01B (non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds) at 8.5% and C23C (coating & surface deposition) at 5.9% show the technology's reach into energy storage and surface engineering. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100% and should each be read against the 1,886-record total, not against each other.

IPC composition: ceramics core plus battery, coating and semiconductor overlapC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories66235.1%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells20811.0%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…1608.5%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)1467.7%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …1196.3%C23C · Coating & surface deposition1115.9%H01L · Semiconductor devices1095.8%B32B · Layered products & laminates995.2%Other2,162114.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,886 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Technical Ceramics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Technical Ceramics Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about technical ceramics patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative record from the corpus

Representative Filing
US5851414A1998-12-22

Tundish stopper rod for continuous casting (US5851414A)

AKECHI CERAMICS KABUSHIKI KAISHA

Filed by Akechi Ceramics, this patent covers a tundish stopper rod for continuous casting in which a nut made of engineering ceramic material is embedded in the body of the rod, attaching it onto a spindle. The design targets fast, correctly-fitted assembly along with the heat resistance and mechanical strength needed to survive molten-metal contact in harsh operating conditions.Granted 1998-12-22 — illustrates how early engineering-ceramic component claims in structural and high-temperature applications were framed.

US5851414A — patent drawing 1US5851414A — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7967839B2Electromagnetic treatment of tissues and cells1,625
2US5878752AMethod and apparatus for using, cleaning, and maintaining electrical heat sources and lighters useful in smok…1,260
3US5498855AElectrically powered ceramic composite heater1,039
4WO2005096954A2Electromagnetic treatment of tissues and cells908
5US20160045841A1New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials860
6US20040210282A1Electromagnetic treatment of tissues and cells395
7US7011154B2In situ recovery from a kerogen and liquid hydrocarbon containing formation383
8US6782947B2In situ thermal processing of a relatively impermeable formation to increase permeability of the formation364
9US7077199B2In situ thermal processing of an oil reservoir formation356
10US6880633B2In situ thermal processing of an oil shale formation to produce a desired product348

Citation counts inside this corpus favour older filings and indicate influence within the searched set, not current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Technical Ceramics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern tells a decision-maker

Three findings from the dataset that matter more for planning than the raw counts alone.

Concentration
27.0% / 5 assignees
share of 1,886 records

A narrow top tier, then a long tail

The top five assignees combined hold 27.0% of all 1,886 records, and the top ten hold 35.6%. The leader alone accounts for 146 records against a fifth-place figure of 40 — a steep drop-off that signals one applicant built a substantial position early while most other filers appear only a handful of times.

Ranked leaders, 100 companies covered
Momentum
82 → 21 (2021–2024)
-74% over three years

Filing activity has cooled from its 2017 peak

After peaking at 86 filings in 2017, the field saw a -74% drop from 82 filings in 2021 to 21 in 2024, the most recent year with reliable comparison. Recent-year momentum tables show several long-standing filers, including the leading assignee pair, recording zero filings in the latest year — consistent with a maturing rather than an expanding filing pattern.

2017 peak: 86 filings
Composition
35.1% C04B
share of 1,886 records

Core ceramics claims share space with adjacent fields

C04B remains the largest subclass by a wide margin, but H01M, C01B, E21B and C23C each carry meaningful shares — from 5.9% to 11.0% of records. That spread means technical ceramics claim activity is as much about where ceramics interface with batteries, drilling equipment and coatings as it is about ceramics processing on its own.

8 IPC subclasses tracked
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to technical ceramics patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Technical Ceramics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the openings sit

Filing concentration is steep at the very top, but the density of single-record co-assignee pairs and the drop-off after the leading names suggests most of the field remains open to new entrants with a defensible process or composition claim.

Leader
146 records
vs. 40 at fifth place

One applicant built an early, durable lead

The top-ranked assignee's 146 records dwarf the fifth-place figure of 40, and its strongest co-assignee pairing appears 146 times — indicating a long-running, tightly held filing programme rather than a recent surge.

Top 5 combined: 27.0% of 1,886 records
Mid tier
40 to 30 records
fifth to tenth place

A shallow gradient from fifth to tenth

The gap between fifth place (40 records) and tenth place (30 records) is far shallower than the gap to the leader, suggesting a cluster of mid-size filers with comparable but modest portfolios rather than a second dominant player.

Top 10 combined: 35.6% of 1,886 records
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several ranked assignees

Recent-year activity has gone quiet across ranked filers

Several of the most-cited assignees, including the leading co-filing pair, show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this understates true recent activity somewhat, but it is consistent with the broader 2021-2024 decline rather than contradicting it.

Recent-year momentum tracked across ranked assignees
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core C04B and C01B classes.
ceramic-metal interface joints for casting equipmentsurface layer adhesion on drilled well componentsparticle morphology control in low-fire cement blendsceramic coatings for battery electrode substratesfiring-process optimisation for laminated ceramic layers
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
DEVOE ALAN0
DEVOE LAMBERT0
Shell Oil Company0
Relign Corp0
Honeywell International Inc0
Applied Thin Films Inc0
Phillips Petroleum Co0
American Scientific Materials Technologies LP0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Technical Ceramics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio positioning or identifying acquisition targets.

Map claims against the leader's co-filing cluster

With the top assignee and its closest co-filers accounting for a disproportionate share of records, a claim chart against that cluster specifically — not the field as a whole — will tell you fastest whether a planned filing is crowded.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Track the under-claimed branches as they mature

Coating, drilling-component and battery-adjacent ceramic branches show lighter filing density than core C04B classes today. Monitoring quarterly filing activity in these branches flags competitive entry before it shows up in citation counts.

Set up branch monitoring in Eureka

Revisit the 2024–2026 window once publication catches up

Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent decline through 2026 needs re-checking once 2025 and 2026 data fully populates, rather than being treated as settled now.

Explore the current dataset in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Technical Ceramics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about technical ceramics patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Technical Ceramics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Technical Ceramics Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole technical ceramics patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.