Temperature Calibration Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- 39.8% held by five. The top 5 assignees combine for 99 of the 249 records in scope — a leader holding 32, with the field thinning quickly after that.
- Filing has pulled back since 2021. From 11 filings in 2021 to 4 in 2024, a -64% swing over three years, after peaking at 15 in 2020.
- Two disciplines overlap here. G01K temperature measurement sits in 49.8% of records, but B01L lab apparatus (32.1%) and C12Q/C12M/C12P bio-assay classes each appear in a fifth or more, meaning calibration claims are being written for thermal-cycler and assay hardware as often as for lab standards work.
Filing growth compares 2021 (11 records) with 2024 (4) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 249 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Temperature calibration and fixed-point patents cover the hardware and methods used to establish, transfer and verify a known temperature: fixed-point cells, dry-block calibrators, reference thermometers, and the correction routines that account for immersion depth, self-heating and stem conduction errors. This search set pulls 249 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine calibration-specific language with these named error sources or an interpolation equation, so the set is narrower than general thermometry.
A meaningful share of the corpus sits at the intersection of calibration and biological instrumentation — thermal cyclers, PCR systems and enzyme assay apparatus that need tight, repeatable temperature control rather than metrology-grade fixed points. That mix shapes the technology composition below and explains why classes like C12Q and C12M appear alongside G01K.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 249 records: filing activity by year, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry. Because a single record can carry several classes, the technology shares add up to more than 100% of the record total — treat each share independently against the 249-record base, not against each other.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings peaked at 15 in 2020, then declined to 11 in 2021 and 4 in 2024 — a -64% drop over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 show fewer records only because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months; those years are not yet complete and should not be read as a further slowdown.
Technology composition by IPC subclass
G01K (temperature measurement) appears in 49.8% of the 249 records, the largest single class. B01L (lab apparatus, 32.1%) and G05D (control of non-electric variables, 30.9%) follow, with the C12-series bio-assay classes (C12Q 21.7%, C12M 18.9%, C12P 16.1%) and G05B control systems (15.7%) rounding out the mix — evidence that calibration claims here are written as much for lab and bioreactor hardware as for standalone metrology instruments.
Shares are the percentage of the 249 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Temperature Calibration and Fixed Points with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about temperature calibration and fixed points and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records in this set
GB2361536A — Temperature calibration apparatus (Isothermal Technology Limited, 2001)
Temperature calibration apparatus (1) is provided for calibrating a plurality of different types of temperature sensors. A body (2) has a well (4). A plurality of inserts is provided, each of which can be inserted into the well (4) to adapt the body (2) to be used in the calibration of different types of temperature sensors. The plurality of inserts includes at least a block (20) having at least one recess (21) for receiving a temperature sensor to be calibrated; a substantially solid block (30); a hollow container (40) containing a liquid (43); a black body insert (50) to adapt the well (4) to be substantially a black body; and a fixed point cell (60).Filed well before the 2015-2026 window in scope, this record still frames the interchangeable-insert approach that recurs across later calibration-well designs in the set.
View full filing| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5475610A | Thermal cycler for automatic performance of the polymerase chain reaction with close temperature control | 796 |
| 2 | US6045260A | Switch for selectively coupling a sensor or calibration element to a terminal block | 563 |
| 3 | US6293700B1 | Calibrated isothermal assembly for a thermocouple thermometer | 554 |
| 4 | US5602756A | Thermal cycler for automatic performance of the polymerase chain reaction with close temperature control | 486 |
| 5 | EP0488769A2 | Thermal cycler for automatic performance of the polymerase chain reaction with close temperature control | 206 |
| 6 | US6703236B2 | Thermal cycler for automatic performance of the polymerase chain reaction with close temperature control | 166 |
| 7 | US5669713A | Calibration of process control temperature transmitter | 139 |
| 8 | US6015534A | PCR sample tube | 137 |
| 9 | EP0810030A1 | Apparatus and containers for performing polymerase chain reaction | 137 |
| 10 | US20020072112A1 | Thermal cycler for automatic performance of the polymerase chain reaction with close temperature control | 136 |
Citation counts reward older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as markers of influence on the field's vocabulary and claim structure, not as a ranking of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for decisions
Three findings that change where you'd look next, drawn directly from the concentration, trend and citation figures above.
The top of the field is dense, the rest is thin
Five assignees hold 99 of the 249 records in scope, with the leader alone accounting for 32. Past the top 10 (60.6% combined), the ranked list of 67 companies thins into single- and double-digit filers — a long tail rather than a second concentrated tier.
Activity has cooled from its 2020 peak
Filings peaked at 15 in 2020 and fell to 4 by 2024. That decline predates the publication-lag window, so it reflects a real pullback in new filing rather than an artefact of recent data still filling in.
Calibration claims cross into bio-assay hardware
Beyond G01K and B01L, three C12-series classes tied to enzymes, bioreactors and fermentation each cover 16-22% of records. Calibration method claims written for thermal cyclers and assay apparatus are as common here as classic fixed-point or dry-block claims.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to temperature calibration and fixed points, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee landscape
The ranking covers all 67 companies the data endpoint returns for this search — not a top-50 or top-100 cut. A single leader with 32 records sits well ahead of a fifth-place holder at 13 and a tenth-place holder at 8, and the recent-year momentum figures show several early leaders with no filings at all in the latest tracked year.
One assignee well ahead of the field
The top-ranked assignee holds 32 of the 249 records, roughly a third of the entire top-5 total of 99. That gap over fifth place (13 records) signals a genuinely dominant filer rather than a crowded top tier.
A gradual, not a cliff-edge, drop-off
Between fifth place (13 records) and tenth place (8 records), holdings decline steadily rather than falling off sharply, consistent with a handful of established players each running a modest, ongoing filing programme.
Some historic filers have gone quiet
Several assignees with meaningful historic filing counts, including some early instrument and thermal-cycler patent holders, show zero filings in the latest tracked year — consistent with the broader 2021-2024 pullback rather than isolated to one company.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Applera Corp | 0 | — |
| Canon U.S. Life Sciences, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Applied Biosystems LLC | 0 | — |
| Beamex | 0 | — |
| PERKIN ELMER CETUS INSTR | 0 | — |
| PerkinElmer | 0 | — |
| INSTRUTEK HLDG | 0 | — |
| ACCELOVANT TECHNOLOGIES CORP | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The figures above frame the field; the next steps depend on whether you're clearing a filing, tracking a competitor, or scoping a licence.
Run a freedom-to-operate check against the top assignees
Start with the leader's 32 records and the rest of the top 5's 99 combined before drafting claims in G01K or B01L territory — that is where claim density is highest.
Search assignee portfolios in Eureka →Track the under-claimed sub-areas as filing signals
Self-heating correction and stem-conduction compensation show fewer records than the core fixed-point and dry-block clusters — worth monitoring for early movement.
Set up alerts in Eureka →Verify the 2024 filing figures before drawing trend conclusions
2025-2026 records are still incomplete; confirm any recent-year trend claim against full-year 2024 data rather than the partial latest years.
Pull the latest filing data in Eureka →Common questions about this landscape
One assignee leads with 32 of the 249 records in this dataset, well ahead of the fifth-ranked holder at 13 and the tenth-ranked holder at 8. The top 5 assignees combined hold 99 records, 39.8% of the field, while the ranking runs to 67 companies total with a long tail of single- and low-digit filers. This concentration pattern means a small number of portfolios are worth checking first in any clearance or licensing exercise, but the majority of the field is fragmented across smaller players.
Filing peaked at 15 records in 2020 and declined to 11 in 2021 and 4 by 2024, a -64% drop over that three-year span. That decline is measured using 2024 as the last complete year, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months and 2025-2026 records are still being added. The pattern points to a genuine pullback in new filing activity rather than a data artefact, though it does not by itself indicate whether the underlying technology has matured or investment has simply shifted elsewhere.
GB2361536A describes a calibration apparatus with a well that accepts interchangeable inserts — a solid block, a liquid-filled container, a black-body insert and a fixed-point cell — so a single body can calibrate different sensor types. Because it predates the 2015-2026 window covered by this dataset, it functions as background art that later filings in this set had to design around or build upon, particularly for multi-insert or multi-sensor calibration wells. Anyone drafting claims around interchangeable calibration inserts should review its claim scope directly rather than relying on the abstract alone.
Within this dataset, sub-areas tied to specific correction techniques — self-heating compensation, stem-conduction error correction in immersion probes, and interpolation-equation firmware spanning multiple sensors — carry noticeably fewer records than the core fixed-point cell and dry-block calibrator clusters. Cross-calibration methods that link dry-block calibrators to fixed-point references also appear less frequently. These are not guaranteed white space, since off-dataset prior art may exist, but they warrant a closer look before assuming the space is occupied.
In this dataset, IPC classes tied to enzyme assays, bioreactors and fermentation (C12Q, C12M, C12P) each appear in 16-22% of the 249 records, alongside the dominant G01K temperature-measurement class at 49.8%. That overlap exists because thermal cyclers and PCR-style instruments need tightly controlled, calibrated temperature cycling, so calibration method claims are frequently filed as part of bio-assay hardware patents rather than as standalone metrology filings. A search limited to G01K alone would therefore miss a substantial share of relevant prior art in this field.
Research Temperature Calibration and Fixed Points in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole temperature calibration and fixed points corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.