Book a demo

Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/textile-dyeing-and-finishing-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Textile Dyeing & Finishing
Textile dyeing and finishing patents: who holds the ground and where it opens up
  • 73.1% of the field sits with five filers. Of 342 records in scope, the top five assignees combined account for 250 — a strong signal that adjacent, differently-claimed approaches are worth checking before filing near the leaders.
  • Nonwovens dominate the technology mix. D04H (nonwovens & felts) touches 33.3% of the 342 records, roughly 14 points ahead of the next-largest class, C03C glass and enamel compositions at 19.6%.
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown, since 2021. Published counts moved from 2 in 2021 to 2 in 2024 — flat over that three-year span — with 2018 still the single busiest year on record at 25 filings.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
342
Published Records
73%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 342 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this dataset covers

This landscape draws on 342 published patent records filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine textile dyeing, fiber finishing and nonwoven web-structure claims with signal-processing or representation-learning language — a niche intersection rather than the whole of textile dyeing chemistry. The scope was built with a compound search string, so every record in it touches both a physical fiber/web/coating claim and a data-representation or signal term, which explains why classes like H05K (printed circuits) and D21H (pulp and paper) appear alongside core fiber classes.

Coverage runs through a 2026-08-31 cut-off. Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so counts for 2025 and 2026 will keep rising as more applications publish; they should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015–2026
  1. 1EASTMAN CHEM CO107
  2. 2PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC75
  3. 3SPINNOVA OY27
  4. 4JNC CORP22
  5. 53M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO19
  6. 6ECCO SKO A S18
  7. 7JNC FILTER14
  8. 8POLYMER GROUP INC10
  9. 9BLUCHER GMBH8
  10. 10KURARAY CO LTD8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 342-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the subclass shares below sum to more than 100% of the record total.

Filing trend: a flat plateau after 2021

Published filings ran from 1 in 2017 to a peak of 25 in 2018, then settled into a lower, largely flat band — 2021 and 2024 both register 2 published records, a 0% change over that span. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as still filling in given publication lag.

Filing trend: a flat plateau after 20210613192512017252018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology mix: nonwovens lead, but the field is fragmented

D04H (nonwovens & felts) is the largest single class at 33.3% of the 342 records. C03C (glass & enamel compositions), C08J (polymer processing & solutions) and H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) each sit in the 18-20% range, with D21H and D01D each under 10% — evidence of a technically fragmented space rather than one dominated by a single claim family.

Technology mix: nonwovens lead, but the field is fragmentedD04H · Nonwovens & felts11433.3%C03C · Glass & enamel compositions6719.6%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions6519.0%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies6318.4%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…5516.1%D01F · Chemical filament & fibre feat…5114.9%D21H · Pulp & paper compositions339.6%D01D · Man-made filament spinning319.1%Other28182.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 342 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about textile dyeing & finishing patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this space

Representative filing
US20220193586A12022-06-23

Depth filter (US20220193586A1, JNC Corporation, 2022-06-23)

JNC CORPORATION

The filing describes a depth filter built from a substrate layer, a filtration layer and a skin layer, where the substrate and skin layers are formed by winding and thermally fusing nonwoven cloth with an average fiber diameter of 150 μm or more, while the filtration layer winds a layered body containing a net and a nonwoven cloth exclusive to that layer at a smaller average fiber diameter than the outer layers.Claim scope centres on the specific layer-order and the relative fiber-diameter relationship between substrate/skin and filtration layers, not on filtration media generally.

US20220193586A1 — patent drawing 1US20220193586A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6503855B1Laminated composites193
2US20050025967A1Fiber product coated with particles to adjust the friction of the coating and the interfilament bonding107
3US20120183862A1Battery separator103
4US6903034B1Hydroentanglement of continuous polymer filaments102
5US5562966AMethod of applying oxidation resistant coating on carbon fibers97
6US6593255B1Impregnated glass fiber strands and products including the same85
7US20020058140A1Glass fiber coating for inhibiting conductive anodic filament formation in electronic supports81
8US20110151738A1Dimensionally stable nonwoven fibrous webs, melt blown fine fibers, and methods of making and using the same79
9US6378179B1System and method for reconstituting fibers from recyclable waste material75
10US20120175074A1Nonwoven article with ribbon fibers68

Citation counts favour older filings by construction — a searched corpus has had more years to accumulate citations against records published a decade ago. Read these as markers of influence on later filings, not as a ranking of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for strategy

Three patterns stand out once the filing trend and technology mix are read together: concentration at the top, a fragmented mid-field, and a plateau that predates the publication-lag window.

Concentration
73.1% of 342
top-5 share of all records

Five filers hold most of the documented ground

The top five assignees combined account for 250 of the 342 records in scope — a level of concentration that makes freedom-to-operate checks against those five a first, non-optional step for anyone filing near their claim language.

Top 10 combined reach 90.1% of records, so the long tail beyond the leaders is thin.
Technology spread
33.3% D04H
share of records in nonwovens & felts

Nonwovens is the largest class but far from a majority

D04H leads at 33.3% of the 342 records, but no single IPC subclass clears even 40% — C03C, C08J and H05K each hold meaningful double-digit shares, meaning the technical claim space is split across fiber structure, coating chemistry and polymer processing routes rather than owned by one approach.

D21H and D01D each sit under 10%, marking smaller, more specialised branches.
Momentum
0% growth, 2021→2024
change in published filings

Filing has plateaued since the 2018 peak

After peaking at 25 published filings in 2018, activity settled to a low, flat level — 2 filings in both 2021 and 2024. Combined with a publication lag of roughly 18 months, this plateau should be read cautiously rather than as evidence the field is winding down.

2025-2026 counts will continue to rise as recent filings publish.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to textile dyeing & finishing patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The ranked leaders in this dataset span nonwoven filtration, coatings and fiber-spinning specialists rather than dye-house chemistry firms — a reminder that this scope captures the fiber/web-structure and signal-representation intersection, not the textile dyeing industry as a whole.

Leader
107 records
top-ranked assignee

A single filer holds a clear lead

The top-ranked assignee in the 76-company ranking holds 107 of the 342 records — more than three times the fifth-place total of 19 — putting it well ahead of every other filer in this scope.

Fifth place holds 19 records; tenth place holds 8.
Mid-field drop-off
19 to 8
records, 5th to 10th place

Filing count falls sharply after the leader

Beyond the top ranks, record counts drop quickly — from 19 at fifth place to 8 at tenth — indicating a small set of committed filers rather than a broad base of occasional entrants.

76 companies appear in the full ranking returned by the dataset.
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
joint-filing relationships

Filing partnerships cluster around a few pairs

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest joint-filing relationship recorded at 17 shared records between two entities — a sign that some of the leading filers work through fixed partnerships rather than filing solo.

Other pairs in the data show co-filing counts of 11 and 6.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Smaller IPC shares in this dataset point to sub-areas where claim density is lower relative to the core nonwoven and coating classes.
Pulp/paper composite fiber blends (D21H)Man-made filament spinning process controls (D01D)Fiber-diameter-graded multilayer filtrationSignal-representation-linked process monitoringChemical filament surface feature claims (D01F)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Eastman Chemical Company0
PPG Industries Ohio, Inc.0
Spinnova Oy0
ECCO Sko A/S0
JNC Corporation0
3M Innovative Properties Company0
JNC Filter Corporation0
Polymer Group, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next checks rather than a single answer — concentration at the top, a fragmented technology mix, and a flat recent trend each suggest a different kind of follow-up work.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the top five

With 73.1% of the 342 records held by five assignees, any new filing in nonwoven or fiber-diameter claim language should be checked against their specific claim scope before drafting.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Map the under-claimed IPC branches in detail

Classes like D21H and D01D carry single-digit-to-low-teens shares of the 342 records — worth a closer read to see whether that reflects genuine open space or simply less commercial activity.

Open the technology breakdown in Eureka

Track publication-lag-adjusted filing momentum

Recent-year counts understate real activity because of the roughly 18-month publication lag; revisit the 2024-2026 trend once more filings have published.

Set up trend tracking in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole textile dyeing & finishing patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.