Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- 73.1% of the field sits with five filers. Of 342 records in scope, the top five assignees combined account for 250 — a strong signal that adjacent, differently-claimed approaches are worth checking before filing near the leaders.
- Nonwovens dominate the technology mix. D04H (nonwovens & felts) touches 33.3% of the 342 records, roughly 14 points ahead of the next-largest class, C03C glass and enamel compositions at 19.6%.
- Filing has plateaued, not grown, since 2021. Published counts moved from 2 in 2021 to 2 in 2024 — flat over that three-year span — with 2018 still the single busiest year on record at 25 filings.
Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 342 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this dataset covers
This landscape draws on 342 published patent records filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine textile dyeing, fiber finishing and nonwoven web-structure claims with signal-processing or representation-learning language — a niche intersection rather than the whole of textile dyeing chemistry. The scope was built with a compound search string, so every record in it touches both a physical fiber/web/coating claim and a data-representation or signal term, which explains why classes like H05K (printed circuits) and D21H (pulp and paper) appear alongside core fiber classes.
Coverage runs through a 2026-08-31 cut-off. Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so counts for 2025 and 2026 will keep rising as more applications publish; they should not be read as a slowdown.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 342-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the subclass shares below sum to more than 100% of the record total.
Filing trend: a flat plateau after 2021
Published filings ran from 1 in 2017 to a peak of 25 in 2018, then settled into a lower, largely flat band — 2021 and 2024 both register 2 published records, a 0% change over that span. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as still filling in given publication lag.
Technology mix: nonwovens lead, but the field is fragmented
D04H (nonwovens & felts) is the largest single class at 33.3% of the 342 records. C03C (glass & enamel compositions), C08J (polymer processing & solutions) and H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) each sit in the 18-20% range, with D21H and D01D each under 10% — evidence of a technically fragmented space rather than one dominated by a single claim family.
Shares are the percentage of the 342 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about textile dyeing & finishing patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records in this space
Depth filter (US20220193586A1, JNC Corporation, 2022-06-23)
The filing describes a depth filter built from a substrate layer, a filtration layer and a skin layer, where the substrate and skin layers are formed by winding and thermally fusing nonwoven cloth with an average fiber diameter of 150 μm or more, while the filtration layer winds a layered body containing a net and a nonwoven cloth exclusive to that layer at a smaller average fiber diameter than the outer layers.Claim scope centres on the specific layer-order and the relative fiber-diameter relationship between substrate/skin and filtration layers, not on filtration media generally.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6503855B1 | Laminated composites | 193 |
| 2 | US20050025967A1 | Fiber product coated with particles to adjust the friction of the coating and the interfilament bonding | 107 |
| 3 | US20120183862A1 | Battery separator | 103 |
| 4 | US6903034B1 | Hydroentanglement of continuous polymer filaments | 102 |
| 5 | US5562966A | Method of applying oxidation resistant coating on carbon fibers | 97 |
| 6 | US6593255B1 | Impregnated glass fiber strands and products including the same | 85 |
| 7 | US20020058140A1 | Glass fiber coating for inhibiting conductive anodic filament formation in electronic supports | 81 |
| 8 | US20110151738A1 | Dimensionally stable nonwoven fibrous webs, melt blown fine fibers, and methods of making and using the same | 79 |
| 9 | US6378179B1 | System and method for reconstituting fibers from recyclable waste material | 75 |
| 10 | US20120175074A1 | Nonwoven article with ribbon fibers | 68 |
Citation counts favour older filings by construction — a searched corpus has had more years to accumulate citations against records published a decade ago. Read these as markers of influence on later filings, not as a ranking of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for strategy
Three patterns stand out once the filing trend and technology mix are read together: concentration at the top, a fragmented mid-field, and a plateau that predates the publication-lag window.
Five filers hold most of the documented ground
The top five assignees combined account for 250 of the 342 records in scope — a level of concentration that makes freedom-to-operate checks against those five a first, non-optional step for anyone filing near their claim language.
Nonwovens is the largest class but far from a majority
D04H leads at 33.3% of the 342 records, but no single IPC subclass clears even 40% — C03C, C08J and H05K each hold meaningful double-digit shares, meaning the technical claim space is split across fiber structure, coating chemistry and polymer processing routes rather than owned by one approach.
Filing has plateaued since the 2018 peak
After peaking at 25 published filings in 2018, activity settled to a low, flat level — 2 filings in both 2021 and 2024. Combined with a publication lag of roughly 18 months, this plateau should be read cautiously rather than as evidence the field is winding down.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to textile dyeing & finishing patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gate sits
The ranked leaders in this dataset span nonwoven filtration, coatings and fiber-spinning specialists rather than dye-house chemistry firms — a reminder that this scope captures the fiber/web-structure and signal-representation intersection, not the textile dyeing industry as a whole.
A single filer holds a clear lead
The top-ranked assignee in the 76-company ranking holds 107 of the 342 records — more than three times the fifth-place total of 19 — putting it well ahead of every other filer in this scope.
Filing count falls sharply after the leader
Beyond the top ranks, record counts drop quickly — from 19 at fifth place to 8 at tenth — indicating a small set of committed filers rather than a broad base of occasional entrants.
Filing partnerships cluster around a few pairs
Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest joint-filing relationship recorded at 17 shared records between two entities — a sign that some of the leading filers work through fixed partnerships rather than filing solo.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Eastman Chemical Company | 0 | — |
| PPG Industries Ohio, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Spinnova Oy | 0 | — |
| ECCO Sko A/S | 0 | — |
| JNC Corporation | 0 | — |
| 3M Innovative Properties Company | 0 | — |
| JNC Filter Corporation | 0 | — |
| Polymer Group, Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next checks rather than a single answer — concentration at the top, a fragmented technology mix, and a flat recent trend each suggest a different kind of follow-up work.
Run a freedom-to-operate check against the top five
With 73.1% of the 342 records held by five assignees, any new filing in nonwoven or fiber-diameter claim language should be checked against their specific claim scope before drafting.
Explore assignee claims in EurekaMap the under-claimed IPC branches in detail
Classes like D21H and D01D carry single-digit-to-low-teens shares of the 342 records — worth a closer read to see whether that reflects genuine open space or simply less commercial activity.
Open the technology breakdown in EurekaTrack publication-lag-adjusted filing momentum
Recent-year counts understate real activity because of the roughly 18-month publication lag; revisit the 2024-2026 trend once more filings have published.
Set up trend tracking in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
In this 342-record dataset, filing is heavily concentrated: the top-ranked assignee alone holds 107 records, and the top five combined account for 250 records, or 73.1% of everything in scope. The ranking covers 76 companies in total, but counts fall off sharply after the leaders — fifth place holds 19 records and tenth place only 8. That pattern means a small group of committed filers, largely in nonwoven filtration, coatings and fiber-spinning, drives most of the documented activity rather than a broad field of occasional entrants.
Filing activity peaked in 2018 at 25 published records and has since settled to a much lower, flat level, with published counts unchanged at 2 in both 2021 and 2024 — a 0% change over that span. It would be premature to call this a decline, however, because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and will rise as more applications publish. The honest read is a plateau since the 2018 peak rather than either growth or collapse.
Nonwovens and felts (IPC class D04H) is the largest single category, appearing in 33.3% of the 342 records in scope. Glass and enamel compositions (C03C), polymer processing (C08J) and printed circuits and assemblies (H05K) each hold shares in the high teens, and no single class exceeds 40% of records. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to more than 100%, which itself signals that the technology is spread across several overlapping claim types rather than concentrated in one.
The smallest IPC shares in this dataset — D21H pulp and paper compositions at 9.6% and D01D man-made filament spinning at 9.1% — mark branches with comparatively lower claim density relative to the dominant nonwoven and coating classes. That does not guarantee those areas are commercially unexplored, but it does mean fewer granted claims currently sit there, which is worth investigating before assuming the space is blocked. Fiber-diameter-graded multilayer structures and process-monitoring approaches tied to signal representation also show up thinly across the dataset.
US20220193586A1, assigned to JNC Corporation and dated 2022-06-23, describes a depth filter built from a substrate layer, a filtration layer and a skin layer, where the outer layers use nonwoven cloth with an average fiber diameter of 150 micrometres or more, and the filtration layer uses a smaller average fiber diameter than the outer layers. Its claim scope is tied specifically to that layer order and the relative fiber-diameter relationship, not to depth filtration or nonwoven filters generally. A design that varies the layer sequence, uses a different diameter relationship, or departs from the wound-and-thermally-fused construction would sit outside its likely claim scope, though a formal freedom-to-operate review is the only way to confirm that.
Research Textile Dyeing & Finishing Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole textile dyeing & finishing patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.