Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (4) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
This landscape covers 62 published patent records matching soil thermal desorption and soil thermal treatment claims, filtered to filings that also address desorption temperature, residence time, off-gas treatment, energy consumption, dioxin formation or moisture content. The scope spans 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, capturing both the process-engineering side of thermal desorption and the emissions-control systems that typically accompany it.
Coverage is concentrated around soil-reclamation process claims, with a smaller but present set of records addressing separation, incineration-linked treatment, and mechanical pre-treatment steps such as crushing and mixing. Family-level counting is used in the assignee ranking so that multi-jurisdiction and continuation filings do not distort who is actually active in this space.
The dataset covers 62 published records filed between 2015 and 2026, with the most recent years still filling in as publications catch up with filings.
Annual filings rose to a peak of 11 records in 2019, the highest point in the covered period. From 2021 to 2024 — the most recent span that can be treated as complete once publication lag is accounted for — filings moved from 5 to 4, a -20% change. Because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures are undercounts and should not be read as a decline.
B09C, the soil and contaminated-land reclamation class, appears in 95.2% of the 62 records in scope, confirming that nearly every filing frames itself as a remediation process first. Supporting classes are thinner: B01D separation processes reach 16.1%, F23G incineration 11.3%, and classes such as B01F mixing sit at 3.2%, marking the areas with the least claim density.
Shares are the percentage of the 62 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thermal desorption of contaminated soil and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe invention relocates flame production closer to the soil area needing treatment, enabling a more targeted heating profile and better contaminant targeting while reducing energy use and treatment time compared with classical thermal desorption. It supports gaseous or liquid fuels, with a two-stage vaporization-then-combustion process specified for liquid fuels such as diesel or biodiesel.Filed by Haemers Technologies SA, published 2026-02-26 as WO2026041798A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN105032913A | 热脱附装置、热脱附修复系统以及污染土壤的热脱附方法 | 29 |
| 2 | CN108714621A | 一种热脱附处理有机污染土壤及脱附废气处理的方法及系统 | 20 |
| 3 | CN204448809U | 一种用于污染土壤的热处理修复方法中的系统 | 17 |
| 4 | CN204769861U | 微波土壤热解吸装置 | 15 |
| 5 | CN107388265A | 一种有机污染土壤热脱附尾气净化处理系统及方法 | 12 |
| 6 | CN111701997A | 一种污染土壤的修复方法 | 11 |
| 7 | CN205042874U | 热脱附装置和热脱附修复系统 | 10 |
| 8 | CN111644454A | 污染土壤热脱附修复系统及方法 | 8 |
| 9 | CN111482451A | 一种节能型蒸汽热脱附土壤修复箱 | 7 |
| 10 | CN109731898A | 一种带非规则转筒的有机污染土壤间接热脱附装置 | 6 |
Citation counts reflect references within the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence rather than current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →These figures come directly from the 62-record dataset and its citation graph, not from modelled projections.
CN105032913A, covering a thermal desorption device and remediation system, carries 29 citations — the highest in this corpus — and pairs the desorption unit with downstream treatment rather than claiming desorption alone.
After peaking at 11 records in 2019, filings moved from 5 in 2021 to 4 in 2024, a -20% change over that span. Later years are undercounted due to publication lag and should not be read into this trend.
Nearly every record in scope carries a B09C soil-reclamation classification, while supporting classes such as B01F mixing (3.2%) and B08B cleaning (6.5%) are comparatively undeveloped.
Of the 62 records, 53 were filed through China, 7 through the United States, and 2 through WIPO's PCT route, indicating where enforcement and freedom-to-operate checks matter most.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thermal desorption of contaminated soil, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee ranking returned by this dataset lists 41 companies, counted in records, led by a single assignee at 17 records ahead of a broad field of smaller filers.
The leading assignee in the 41-company ranking holds 17 records, well ahead of fifth place at 4 and tenth place at 2, indicating a single dominant filer rather than several closely matched competitors.
Eight co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest pairing sharing 11 records and two other pairings each sharing 10, pointing to sustained joint filing between a small cluster of Chinese research institutes and environmental-technology companies.
Of the 62 records, 53 were filed through China's receiving office, with 7 through the United States and 2 through WIPO's PCT route — a distribution worth checking against your own target markets before assuming freedom to operate.
Every one of the assignees with the strongest historical filing counts, including the top-ranked leader and its closest collaborators, shows zero filings in the latest year — consistent with publication lag rather than necessarily a pullback.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Nanjing Tech University | 0 | — |
| CSSC Nanjing Luzhou Environment Protection Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment | 0 | — |
| Nanjing Gekof Institute of Environmental Protection Technology & Equipment Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Kunming University of Science and Technology | 0 | — |
| Zhejiang Yilong Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Zhejiang Boshihua Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Guangdong Construction Engineering Supervision Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The trends above point to a densely claimed core process and a thinner set of adjacent sub-areas. The next steps depend on whether you are filing, licensing, or checking freedom to operate.
The most-cited records in this corpus integrate desorption with off-gas treatment; any new filing or product in that combination should be checked against those specific claim sets before development proceeds.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaClasses like mixing, crushing and cleaning show markedly lower record counts than the core desorption process, suggesting room for narrowly scoped claims in soil pre-conditioning and equipment design.
Explore white space in EurekaBecause publication lags filing by around 18 months, the true 2025-2026 filing rate is not yet visible in this dataset; monitoring newly published records will sharpen the current-activity picture.
Set up filing alerts in EurekaSoil thermal desorption is a remediation process that heats contaminated soil to a controlled temperature to vaporise organic contaminants without necessarily combusting them, after which the resulting off-gas is captured and treated separately. Across the 62 records in this dataset, the dominant framing pairs a desorption chamber with a dedicated off-gas or tail-gas treatment stage, which the two most-cited filings in the corpus both implement. Desorption temperature, residence time and moisture content are the process variables that recur most often in the underlying search criteria, and they are the parameters most patents claim control over.
The assignee ranking in this dataset covers 41 companies, counted in records, with the leading assignee holding 17 records and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants beyond that. This is not a top-50 or top-100 list; it is the full ranking the dataset returns, and it is dominated by Chinese research institutes and environmental-technology firms, alongside international filers such as Haemers Technologies. Concentration cannot be reliably stated as a percentage from this evidence because the ranking and the total record count are measured in different units, so it is best read as showing a clear leader plus a broad field of smaller filers rather than a precise market share.
Filing activity peaked at 11 records in 2019 and, over the most recent complete span from 2021 to 2024, moved from 5 to 4 filings, a -20% change. Because patent publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in the trend are necessarily incomplete and should not be read as evidence of a slowdown. The safest reading is that filing activity has moderated from its 2019 peak but the true current-year rate will not be visible until later publications catch up.
The classification spread shows most claim density concentrated in the core B09C soil-reclamation class, present in 95.2% of the 62 records, while supporting process classes are thinner: B01F mixing and stirring appears in only 3.2% of records, and B02C crushing/grinding and B08B cleaning each sit at 6.5%. These lower-density classes point to under-claimed territory around soil pre-conditioning, particle-size control ahead of the desorption chamber, and equipment cleaning cycles, rather than the desorption process itself, which is already densely claimed.
Off-gas treatment is a defining feature of the highest-cited filings in this dataset rather than an optional add-on: both CN105032913A and CN108714621A, the two most-cited records, integrate a desorption unit with downstream exhaust treatment in the same claim set. Dioxin formation and off-gas treatment were part of the search criteria used to build this dataset, reflecting their regulatory importance whenever organic contaminants are thermally treated. Filers looking to enter this space should expect that a standalone desorption claim without an integrated off-gas or emissions-control element is filing into already well-covered ground.
Go past this page: query the whole thermal desorption of contaminated soil corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.