https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/thermal-desorption-of-contaminated-soil-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Environmental Remediation
Thermal Desorption of Contaminated Soil Patents: Where Filings Concentrate and Where They Don't
  • 95.2% of records sit in one class. B09C soil-reclamation claims appear in 59 of the 62 records in scope, while supporting classes like mixing (3.2%) and cleaning (6.5%) remain thin.
  • Filings peaked in 2019 at 11, then eased. From 2021 to 2024, the most recent complete span, filings moved from 5 to 4 — a -20% change; 2025-2026 figures are still filling in.
  • One leader, then a long tail. The 41-company ranking shows a top assignee at 17 records against a field where fifth place holds 4 and tenth place holds 2.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
62
Published Records
-20%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
41
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (4) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent landscape covers

This landscape covers 62 published patent records matching soil thermal desorption and soil thermal treatment claims, filtered to filings that also address desorption temperature, residence time, off-gas treatment, energy consumption, dioxin formation or moisture content. The scope spans 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, capturing both the process-engineering side of thermal desorption and the emissions-control systems that typically accompany it.

Coverage is concentrated around soil-reclamation process claims, with a smaller but present set of records addressing separation, incineration-linked treatment, and mechanical pre-treatment steps such as crushing and mixing. Family-level counting is used in the assignee ranking so that multi-jurisdiction and continuation filings do not distort who is actually active in this space.

Records by filing year, 2017-2026
  1. 1NANJING TECH UNIV17
  2. 2CSSC NANJING LUZHOU ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION CO LTD13
  3. 3NANJING INST OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCI MINIST OF ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA11
  4. 4NANJING GEKOF INST OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECH & EQUIP CO LTD7
  5. 5KUNMING UNIV OF SCI & TECH4
  6. 6Zhejiang Yilong Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.3
  7. 7CHINA JILIANG UNIV2
  8. 8Zhejiang Boshihua Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.2
  9. 9Guangdong Construction Engineering Supervision Co., Ltd.2
  10. 10Henan Hengtailong Machinery Co., Ltd.2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Desorption of Contaminated Soil covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The dataset covers 62 published records filed between 2015 and 2026, with the most recent years still filling in as publications catch up with filings.

Filing activity peaked in 2019

Annual filings rose to a peak of 11 records in 2019, the highest point in the covered period. From 2021 to 2024 — the most recent span that can be treated as complete once publication lag is accounted for — filings moved from 5 to 4, a -20% change. Because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures are undercounts and should not be read as a decline.

Filing activity peaked in 201903691232017201811201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Reclamation claims dominate the classification spread

B09C, the soil and contaminated-land reclamation class, appears in 95.2% of the 62 records in scope, confirming that nearly every filing frames itself as a remediation process first. Supporting classes are thinner: B01D separation processes reach 16.1%, F23G incineration 11.3%, and classes such as B01F mixing sit at 3.2%, marking the areas with the least claim density.

Reclamation claims dominate the classification spreadB09C · Soil & contaminated land recla…5995.2%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1016.1%F23G · Incinerators & waste burning711.3%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …69.7%F23J · Flues & combustion residue58.1%B02C · Crushing, grinding & pulverisi…46.5%B08B · Cleaning (general)46.5%B01F · Mixing & stirring23.2%Other2235.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 62 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Desorption of Contaminated Soil covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Thermal Desorption of Contaminated Soil with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thermal desorption of contaminated soil and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The filings shaping this field

Representative Recent Filing
WO2026041798A12026-02-26

Enhancing soil thermal desorption treatment with an energy-efficient and adaptive soil temperature profiling system

HAEMERS TECHNOLOGIES SA

The invention relocates flame production closer to the soil area needing treatment, enabling a more targeted heating profile and better contaminant targeting while reducing energy use and treatment time compared with classical thermal desorption. It supports gaseous or liquid fuels, with a two-stage vaporization-then-combustion process specified for liquid fuels such as diesel or biodiesel.Filed by Haemers Technologies SA, published 2026-02-26 as WO2026041798A1.

WO2026041798A1 — patent drawing 1WO2026041798A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN105032913A热脱附装置、热脱附修复系统以及污染土壤的热脱附方法29
2CN108714621A一种热脱附处理有机污染土壤及脱附废气处理的方法及系统20
3CN204448809U一种用于污染土壤的热处理修复方法中的系统17
4CN204769861U微波土壤热解吸装置15
5CN107388265A一种有机污染土壤热脱附尾气净化处理系统及方法12
6CN111701997A一种污染土壤的修复方法11
7CN205042874U热脱附装置和热脱附修复系统10
8CN111644454A污染土壤热脱附修复系统及方法8
9CN111482451A一种节能型蒸汽热脱附土壤修复箱7
10CN109731898A一种带非规则转筒的有机污染土壤间接热脱附装置6

Citation counts reflect references within the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence rather than current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Desorption of Contaminated Soil covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the citation and filing data actually shows

These figures come directly from the 62-record dataset and its citation graph, not from modelled projections.

Citation Leader
29 cites
CN105032913A

The most-referenced filing covers an integrated system

CN105032913A, covering a thermal desorption device and remediation system, carries 29 citations — the highest in this corpus — and pairs the desorption unit with downstream treatment rather than claiming desorption alone.

Most-cited records table
Filing Trend
-20%
2021 to 2024

Activity has eased from its 2019 peak

After peaking at 11 records in 2019, filings moved from 5 in 2021 to 4 in 2024, a -20% change over that span. Later years are undercounted due to publication lag and should not be read into this trend.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Classification Spread
95.2%
of 62 records in B09C

Reclamation claims dominate the IPC spread

Nearly every record in scope carries a B09C soil-reclamation classification, while supporting classes such as B01F mixing (3.2%) and B08B cleaning (6.5%) are comparatively undeveloped.

IPC composition table
Geographic Filing
53 of 62
filed via China

Filing activity is concentrated in one receiving office

Of the 62 records, 53 were filed through China, 7 through the United States, and 2 through WIPO's PCT route, indicating where enforcement and freedom-to-operate checks matter most.

Receiving office breakdown
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thermal desorption of contaminated soil, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Desorption of Contaminated Soil covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where the field is open

The assignee ranking returned by this dataset lists 41 companies, counted in records, led by a single assignee at 17 records ahead of a broad field of smaller filers.

Leader
17 records
top-ranked assignee

One filer well ahead of the field

The leading assignee in the 41-company ranking holds 17 records, well ahead of fifth place at 4 and tenth place at 2, indicating a single dominant filer rather than several closely matched competitors.

Assignee ranking, 41 companies
Collaboration
11 shared records
strongest co-assignee pair

Filing is partly coordinated between institutes and firms

Eight co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest pairing sharing 11 records and two other pairings each sharing 10, pointing to sustained joint filing between a small cluster of Chinese research institutes and environmental-technology companies.

Co-assignee pairs
Geography
53 of 62
filed via China

Filing activity is concentrated in one jurisdiction

Of the 62 records, 53 were filed through China's receiving office, with 7 through the United States and 2 through WIPO's PCT route — a distribution worth checking against your own target markets before assuming freedom to operate.

Receiving office breakdown
Momentum
0 in latest year
across leading assignees

Recent-year activity has gone quiet across top filers

Every one of the assignees with the strongest historical filing counts, including the top-ranked leader and its closest collaborators, shows zero filings in the latest year — consistent with publication lag rather than necessarily a pullback.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before you file
These sub-areas carry markedly fewer records than the core desorption-and-off-gas combination, based on IPC class shares in this dataset.
Soil pre-conditioning ahead of desorptionParticle-size reduction for feed uniformityEquipment cleaning cycles between batchesMixing/stirring for moisture homogenisationMobile or zone-targeted burner placement
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Nanjing Tech University0
CSSC Nanjing Luzhou Environment Protection Co., Ltd.0
Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment0
Nanjing Gekof Institute of Environmental Protection Technology & Equipment Co., Ltd.0
Kunming University of Science and Technology0
Zhejiang Yilong Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.0
Zhejiang Boshihua Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.0
Guangdong Construction Engineering Supervision Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Desorption of Contaminated Soil covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The trends above point to a densely claimed core process and a thinner set of adjacent sub-areas. The next steps depend on whether you are filing, licensing, or checking freedom to operate.

Check freedom to operate against the top-cited claims

The most-cited records in this corpus integrate desorption with off-gas treatment; any new filing or product in that combination should be checked against those specific claim sets before development proceeds.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Explore the under-claimed sub-areas directly

Classes like mixing, crushing and cleaning show markedly lower record counts than the core desorption process, suggesting room for narrowly scoped claims in soil pre-conditioning and equipment design.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the newest filings as they publish

Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the true 2025-2026 filing rate is not yet visible in this dataset; monitoring newly published records will sharpen the current-activity picture.

Set up filing alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Desorption of Contaminated Soil covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Desorption of Contaminated Soil covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Thermal Desorption of Contaminated Soil in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole thermal desorption of contaminated soil corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.