Book a demo

Thermal Spray Coating Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Thermal Spray Coating Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/thermal-spray-coating-processes-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Coatings & Surface Treatment
Thermal Spray Coating Patents: Who Holds the Claims and Where the Gaps Sit
  • Filing has cooled since its 2017 peak of 52. the 2026 count of 2 (partial year, publication lag applies) sits well below the 2022 midpoint of 24, suggesting the field has moved past its most active filing period rather than being early-stage.
  • Momentum has narrowed to a handful of filers. recent-year activity across the tracked assignees shows just one family filed by the most active player and zero by several long-standing names, a sign the core claim space is largely staked out.
  • Coating chemistry outweighs the spray hardware in citation influence. the most-cited record in the set is a ceramic coating composition, not a nozzle or gun design, meaning the highest-value prior art risk sits in what the powder is made of, not how it is thrown.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
889
Published Records
29%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-58%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 889 patent families filed against thermal spray coating, plasma spray and cold spray coating processes where the claims or description also address porosity, bond strength, powder feedstock, residual stress or deposition efficiency, filtered to IPC classes covering coating deposition (C23C4, C23C24) and spray equipment (B05B7). Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off.

The IPC composition confirms the field is coating-first: C23C accounts for the overwhelming majority of records, with ceramics (C04B), spraying equipment (B05B), alloys (C22C) and turbine components (F01D) trailing well behind. That ordering tells a reader where the deepest prior art actually sits — in the coating and deposition claims rather than in the spray gun or plasma torch hardware.

Filings by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1GENERAL ELECTRIC CO65
  2. 2OERLIKON METCO (US) INC57
  3. 3APPLIED MATERIALS INC56
  4. 4FUJIMI INCORPORATED42
  5. 5UNITED TECH CORP37
  6. 6PRAXAIR ST TECHNOLOGY INC35
  7. 7KOMICO CO LTD34
  8. 8RIKEN CO LTD23
  9. 9RTX CORP22
  10. 10ROLLS ROYCE CORP20
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Spray Coating Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The numbers

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 889-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which adjacent technology classes the claims actually fall into.

Filings peaked in 2017, then declined

From 52 families in 2017, volume fell to 24 by the 2022 midpoint and to 2 in 2026 (a partial year subject to the usual ~18-month publication lag). Read this as a maturing claim landscape rather than a shrinking market: production and use of thermal spray coatings continue, but the underlying process and composition space has already been substantially claimed.

Filings peaked in 2017, then declined0153045605220172018201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

C23C dominates; equipment classes trail

C23C (coating and surface deposition) appears in 866 of 889 records, dwarfing C04B ceramics (110), B05B spraying equipment (103), C22C alloys (78), F01D turbines (73), H05H plasma (57), B05D coating processes (56) and B22F powder metallurgy (48). The gap between C23C and everything else shows filers are protecting coating composition and deposition method far more than they are protecting the delivery hardware.

C23C dominates; equipment classes trailC23C · Coating & surface deposition86697.4%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories11012.4%B05B · Spraying & atomising10311.6%C22C · Alloys788.8%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines738.2%H05H · Plasma & particle accelerators576.4%B05D · Coating processes566.3%B22F · Powder metallurgy485.4%Other56463.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 889 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Spray Coating Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Thermal Spray Coating Processes with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thermal spray coating processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Foundational Art

The patents everyone in this space cites

Representative filing
CA1298147C1992-03-31

CA1298147C — Thermal spray coating with improved adherence, low residual stress and resistance to spalling (Union Carbide, 1992)

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION

Method of thermal spray coating a substrate by projecting heat-softened particles onto it using a body of hot gases, heating the particles near, at or above their melting point, then impinging them onto the substrate. The particles are first heated to a relatively higher temperature and impinged to produce a coating with improved adherence, low residual stress and improved resistance to spalling.Abstract trimmed to its operative method steps; full text available via the linked record.

View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090214825A1Ceramic coating comprising yttrium which is resistant to a reducing plasma628
2US20170301519A1Coated semiconductor processing members having chlorine and fluorine plasma erosion resistance and complex ox…383
3US5043548AAxial flow laser plasma spraying286
4US6197438B1Foodware with ceramic food contacting surface146
5US5384200AThermal barrier coating and method of depositing the same on combustion chamber component surfaces137
6US5268045AMethod for providing metallurgically bonded thermally sprayed coatings134
7US5858470ASmall particle plasma spray apparatus, method and coated article121
8US4982067APlasma generating apparatus and method114
9US4696855AMultiple port plasma spray apparatus and method for providing sprayed abradable coatings112
10US4741286ASingle torch-type plasma spray coating method and apparatus therefor105

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a map of foundational art, not a ranking of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Spray Coating Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the data says about the state of the art

Three readings of the same corpus, aimed at where filing decisions actually get made: what's occupied, what's cited, and what's still moving.

Filing trend
52 → 2
2017 peak vs. 2026 (partial)

The active filing window has passed

Volume fell from 52 families in 2017 to 24 at the 2022 midpoint and down to 2 in the most recent, still-partial year. Even allowing for publication lag, the trajectory is a steady decline rather than a plateau, which points to a claim space that has already been substantially staked out.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Technology mix
866 of 889
records classed under C23C

Coating composition, not hardware, is the crowded zone

C23C coating and deposition claims dominate the corpus; spray equipment (B05B, 103 records) and powder metallurgy (B22F, 48) are comparatively lightly claimed. New filers should expect the densest prior art in what the coating is made of and how it bonds, not in the spray apparatus itself.

IPC composition across 8 subclasses
Citation base
628 citations
top-cited record

The oldest foundational art still anchors the field

The most-cited record in the set is a ceramic coating resistant to reducing plasma, followed by a semiconductor-chamber erosion-resistant coating and an early laser plasma spraying method. All are compositions or processes, not incremental hardware tweaks, reinforcing that composition claims carry the most downstream influence.

Most-cited records, all years
Assignee momentum
1 vs 0
latest-year filings, leading vs. trailing assignees

Activity has concentrated to a thin band of filers

Among the most recent-year filers tracked, only one assignee logged a single family; several long-established names in the space recorded zero. Co-assignee activity is also sparse, with the strongest pairing appearing in just 12 shared filings, indicating limited fresh collaborative activity.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thermal spray coating processes, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Spray Coating Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignees

Who holds the claims

The assignee ranking spans 889 families with activity concentrated among a small set of long-standing industrial and materials firms, alongside a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants.

Concentration
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Collaboration is rare and narrow

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the whole dataset, and the strongest pairing tops out at 12 shared filings. Most patenting activity in this field happens under a single owner rather than through joint filings, which limits opportunities to track alliance formation through co-assignment data alone.

Co-assignee pairs, all years
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several established assignees

Established filers have gone quiet

Several assignees with long histories in the space, spanning general industrial gas-turbine and semiconductor-equipment makers, show zero filings in the most recent tracked year. That does not mean they have exited the technology, but it does mean their claim positions are largely fixed rather than expanding.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Geography
284 US filings
leading receiving office

Filing is US- and Europe-centred

The United States (284) and the European Patent Office (177) receive far more filings than Canada (62), WIPO/PCT (57), Japan (52) or China (46). Anyone clearing freedom-to-operate should prioritise US and EP prosecution histories before assuming a clean path elsewhere.

Receiving offices, all years
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with comparatively thin coverage relative to the core coating and deposition claims
cold spray powder feedstock optimisationin-situ residual stress monitoringplasma torch nozzle geometry for deposition efficiencypowder metallurgy feedstock blends (B22F overlap)bond-strength test methods for multilayer coatings
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Fujimi Incorporated1
General Electric Company0
Applied Materials, Inc.0
United Technologies Corporation0
Sulzer Metco (US) Inc.0
Coorstek Inc.0
Praxair Surface Technologies, Inc.0
Riken Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Spray Coating Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next steps

Where to take this analysis

The trend and ranking data point to specific follow-up questions depending on whether you're clearing a new filing or scouting acquisition targets.

Map claim overlap against your own process

Run your specific coating composition and deposition parameters against the C23C-heavy core of this dataset before filing, since that is where density is highest.

Explore in Eureka →

Watch the quiet incumbents

Assignees with zero recent-year filings still hold foundational positions; monitor them for licensing moves or renewed filing rather than assuming disengagement.

Track assignees in Eureka →

Test the under-claimed branches

Cold spray feedstock optimisation and in-situ residual stress monitoring show thinner coverage than core coating claims and may offer more defensible filing positions.

Search white space in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Spray Coating Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about thermal spray coating patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermal Spray Coating Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Thermal Spray Coating Processes in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole thermal spray coating processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.