Thermal Spray Coating Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Filing has cooled since its 2017 peak of 52. the 2026 count of 2 (partial year, publication lag applies) sits well below the 2022 midpoint of 24, suggesting the field has moved past its most active filing period rather than being early-stage.
- Momentum has narrowed to a handful of filers. recent-year activity across the tracked assignees shows just one family filed by the most active player and zero by several long-standing names, a sign the core claim space is largely staked out.
- Coating chemistry outweighs the spray hardware in citation influence. the most-cited record in the set is a ceramic coating composition, not a nozzle or gun design, meaning the highest-value prior art risk sits in what the powder is made of, not how it is thrown.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks 889 patent families filed against thermal spray coating, plasma spray and cold spray coating processes where the claims or description also address porosity, bond strength, powder feedstock, residual stress or deposition efficiency, filtered to IPC classes covering coating deposition (C23C4, C23C24) and spray equipment (B05B7). Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off.
The IPC composition confirms the field is coating-first: C23C accounts for the overwhelming majority of records, with ceramics (C04B), spraying equipment (B05B), alloys (C22C) and turbine components (F01D) trailing well behind. That ordering tells a reader where the deepest prior art actually sits — in the coating and deposition claims rather than in the spray gun or plasma torch hardware.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology mix
Two views of the same 889-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which adjacent technology classes the claims actually fall into.
Filings peaked in 2017, then declined
From 52 families in 2017, volume fell to 24 by the 2022 midpoint and to 2 in 2026 (a partial year subject to the usual ~18-month publication lag). Read this as a maturing claim landscape rather than a shrinking market: production and use of thermal spray coatings continue, but the underlying process and composition space has already been substantially claimed.
C23C dominates; equipment classes trail
C23C (coating and surface deposition) appears in 866 of 889 records, dwarfing C04B ceramics (110), B05B spraying equipment (103), C22C alloys (78), F01D turbines (73), H05H plasma (57), B05D coating processes (56) and B22F powder metallurgy (48). The gap between C23C and everything else shows filers are protecting coating composition and deposition method far more than they are protecting the delivery hardware.
Shares are the percentage of the 889 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Thermal Spray Coating Processes with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thermal spray coating processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patents everyone in this space cites
CA1298147C — Thermal spray coating with improved adherence, low residual stress and resistance to spalling (Union Carbide, 1992)
Method of thermal spray coating a substrate by projecting heat-softened particles onto it using a body of hot gases, heating the particles near, at or above their melting point, then impinging them onto the substrate. The particles are first heated to a relatively higher temperature and impinged to produce a coating with improved adherence, low residual stress and improved resistance to spalling.Abstract trimmed to its operative method steps; full text available via the linked record.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20090214825A1 | Ceramic coating comprising yttrium which is resistant to a reducing plasma | 628 |
| 2 | US20170301519A1 | Coated semiconductor processing members having chlorine and fluorine plasma erosion resistance and complex ox… | 383 |
| 3 | US5043548A | Axial flow laser plasma spraying | 286 |
| 4 | US6197438B1 | Foodware with ceramic food contacting surface | 146 |
| 5 | US5384200A | Thermal barrier coating and method of depositing the same on combustion chamber component surfaces | 137 |
| 6 | US5268045A | Method for providing metallurgically bonded thermally sprayed coatings | 134 |
| 7 | US5858470A | Small particle plasma spray apparatus, method and coated article | 121 |
| 8 | US4982067A | Plasma generating apparatus and method | 114 |
| 9 | US4696855A | Multiple port plasma spray apparatus and method for providing sprayed abradable coatings | 112 |
| 10 | US4741286A | Single torch-type plasma spray coating method and apparatus therefor | 105 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a map of foundational art, not a ranking of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data says about the state of the art
Three readings of the same corpus, aimed at where filing decisions actually get made: what's occupied, what's cited, and what's still moving.
The active filing window has passed
Volume fell from 52 families in 2017 to 24 at the 2022 midpoint and down to 2 in the most recent, still-partial year. Even allowing for publication lag, the trajectory is a steady decline rather than a plateau, which points to a claim space that has already been substantially staked out.
Coating composition, not hardware, is the crowded zone
C23C coating and deposition claims dominate the corpus; spray equipment (B05B, 103 records) and powder metallurgy (B22F, 48) are comparatively lightly claimed. New filers should expect the densest prior art in what the coating is made of and how it bonds, not in the spray apparatus itself.
The oldest foundational art still anchors the field
The most-cited record in the set is a ceramic coating resistant to reducing plasma, followed by a semiconductor-chamber erosion-resistant coating and an early laser plasma spraying method. All are compositions or processes, not incremental hardware tweaks, reinforcing that composition claims carry the most downstream influence.
Activity has concentrated to a thin band of filers
Among the most recent-year filers tracked, only one assignee logged a single family; several long-established names in the space recorded zero. Co-assignee activity is also sparse, with the strongest pairing appearing in just 12 shared filings, indicating limited fresh collaborative activity.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thermal spray coating processes, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claims
The assignee ranking spans 889 families with activity concentrated among a small set of long-standing industrial and materials firms, alongside a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants.
Collaboration is rare and narrow
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the whole dataset, and the strongest pairing tops out at 12 shared filings. Most patenting activity in this field happens under a single owner rather than through joint filings, which limits opportunities to track alliance formation through co-assignment data alone.
Established filers have gone quiet
Several assignees with long histories in the space, spanning general industrial gas-turbine and semiconductor-equipment makers, show zero filings in the most recent tracked year. That does not mean they have exited the technology, but it does mean their claim positions are largely fixed rather than expanding.
Filing is US- and Europe-centred
The United States (284) and the European Patent Office (177) receive far more filings than Canada (62), WIPO/PCT (57), Japan (52) or China (46). Anyone clearing freedom-to-operate should prioritise US and EP prosecution histories before assuming a clean path elsewhere.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Fujimi Incorporated | 1 | — |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 0 | — |
| United Technologies Corporation | 0 | — |
| Sulzer Metco (US) Inc. | 0 | — |
| Coorstek Inc. | 0 | — |
| Praxair Surface Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Riken Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The trend and ranking data point to specific follow-up questions depending on whether you're clearing a new filing or scouting acquisition targets.
Map claim overlap against your own process
Run your specific coating composition and deposition parameters against the C23C-heavy core of this dataset before filing, since that is where density is highest.
Explore in Eureka →Watch the quiet incumbents
Assignees with zero recent-year filings still hold foundational positions; monitor them for licensing moves or renewed filing rather than assuming disengagement.
Track assignees in Eureka →Test the under-claimed branches
Cold spray feedstock optimisation and in-situ residual stress monitoring show thinner coverage than core coating claims and may offer more defensible filing positions.
Search white space in Eureka →Common questions about thermal spray coating patents
In this dataset all three are searched together because they share the same core claim structure: propelling particles at a substrate to build a coating, differing mainly in how the particles are heated and accelerated. Plasma spray and thermal spray claims tend to center on particle melting and deposition temperature, while cold spray claims focus on high-velocity solid-state bonding without melting the feedstock. Patent classification does not always separate them cleanly, which is why searches combining all three terms under IPC C23C4, C23C24 and B05B7 return a fuller picture than searching any one term alone.
Activity in this corpus concentrates among a small group of established industrial gas-turbine, semiconductor-equipment and materials companies that have filed steadily since before 2017, rather than being spread evenly across many entrants. Several of these established names show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, meaning their portfolios are largely settled rather than growing. A full ranking by family count is rendered in the assignee table on this page rather than summarized here, since the relative order shifts as new publications are added.
Filing fell from a peak of 52 families in 2017 to 24 at the 2022 midpoint and to 2 in the most recent partial year, a pattern consistent with a technology area where the core process and composition claims have already been substantially staked out. Declining filing volume does not indicate declining industrial use; thermal spray coatings remain widely used in turbine, semiconductor and wear-resistant applications. It more likely reflects that incremental improvements are harder to patent distinctly once the foundational composition and deposition claims are already covered, and remember the most recent year is always undercounted due to publication lag.
The IPC composition shows C23C coating and deposition claims present in 866 of 889 records, far outweighing spraying equipment (B05B, 103) and powder metallurgy (B22F, 48). That imbalance suggests spray equipment design, powder feedstock blends that cross into powder metallurgy, and in-situ process monitoring such as residual stress measurement during deposition are comparatively under-claimed relative to the coating composition itself. A first claim in one of these branches would likely center on a specific feedstock blend or monitoring method rather than a broad coating composition, which is already dense prior art.
CA1298147C, assigned to Union Carbide, claims a method of thermal spray coating that heats particles to a relatively higher temperature before impingement specifically to achieve improved adherence, low residual stress and resistance to spalling. Anyone using a similar two-stage particle heating approach to reduce residual stress in a sprayed coating should review this filing's claim scope carefully, particularly the specific temperature-staging step. Because it dates to 1992, its term has very likely expired, but it remains foundational prior art that later, still-active filings may build on or narrow around, so it is worth checking downstream citing patents rather than relying on the original filing's status alone.
Research Thermal Spray Coating Processes in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole thermal spray coating processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.