Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (16 records) with 2024 (19) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 311 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Thermoelectric figure of merit, zT, is the metric that ties together Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity and lattice thermal conductivity into a single number engineers optimise against. This landscape pulls 311 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026 that claim inventions touching Seebeck coefficient, lattice thermal conductivity, carrier concentration, band convergence, nanostructuring or phonon scattering — the mechanisms practitioners actually use to push zT higher. The scope is deliberately mechanism-first rather than material-first, so it captures claims across semiconductor devices, alloys, ceramics and nanostructured composites alike.
The picture that emerges is a field with an identifiable set of established filers, a wide base of smaller and one-time entrants, and a technology mix that leans heavily on device-level claims (H10N, H01L) rather than deep materials chemistry claims (C01B, C22C, C04B), which sit at meaningfully lower shares of the same 311-record base.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 311 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Annual counts run from 13 in 2017 to a peak of 29 in 2025, with 2021 to 2024 alone rising from 16 to 19 filings (+19%). The 2026 figure of 1 reflects only what has published so far this year, not a drop in filing — publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the last one to two years will keep filling in.
H10N and H01L dominate at 79.1% and 61.7% of the 311 records respectively, confirming that most claims are framed at the device or semiconductor-structure level. Materials-chemistry classes — C01B (19.6%), C22C (12.9%), C04B (9.6%) — and process/structural classes like B82Y nanotechnology (7.1%), C30B crystal growth (6.4%) and C23C coating (5.1%) are present but comparatively thin, which is where deeper materials claims still have room to be staked out.
Shares are the percentage of the 311 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thermoelectric material figure of merit and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing describes a thermoelectric material and converter that adds a rare earth component to a semiconductor base to raise the figure of merit of the composite above that of the semiconductor alone, with both p-type and n-type legs of the converter able to carry the rare earth addition.US20130186449A1, filed by Micross Advanced Interconnect Technology, LLC.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20080087314A1 | Homogeneous thermoelectric nanocomposite using core-shell nanoparticles | 125 |
| 2 | US5610366A | High performance thermoelectric materials and methods of preparation | 107 |
| 3 | US6605772B2 | Nanostructured thermoelectric materials and devices | 106 |
| 4 | US20040023302A1 | Method and apparatus for screening combinatorial libraries for semiconducting properties | 104 |
| 5 | US6060656A | Si/SiGe superlattice structures for use in thermoelectric devices | 88 |
| 6 | US20020170590A1 | Enhanced thermoelectric power in bismuth nanocomposites | 81 |
| 7 | US20090178700A1 | Thermoelectric figure of merit enhancement by modification of the electronic density of states | 77 |
| 8 | US20020062854A1 | Thermoelectric materials: ternary penta telluride and selenide compounds | 68 |
| 9 | US20020053359A1 | Nanostructured thermoelectric materials and devices | 67 |
| 10 | US6670539B2 | Enhanced thermoelectric power in bismuth nanocomposites | 64 |
Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings that have simply had more years to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on the field's early direction, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three readings of the same dataset, aimed at the questions an R&D or IP team actually needs answered before committing budget.
The top 5 assignees combine for 19.6% of all 311 records and the top 10 for 30.9%. That leaves roughly seven in ten records spread across a long tail of smaller and single-filing entrants — a structure where an incumbent's portfolio is a strong signal of activity but not a hard barrier to entry.
Annual filings rose from 16 in 2021 to 19 in 2024, a 19% increase over three years, with 2025 recording the highest count in the series so far. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the low 2026 count reflects incomplete data rather than a slowdown.
H10N and H01L together touch the large majority of the 311 records, while ceramics (C04B), nanotechnology (B82Y) and crystal growth (C30B) each sit under 10%. That gap suggests device-integration claims are more crowded than claims on the underlying material systems themselves.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thermoelectric material figure of merit, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum among the more active assignees has flattened to zero in the latest year for several established names — consistent with the broader publication lag rather than a retreat from the field.
The single leading assignee holds 17 records, with fifth place at 11 and tenth place at 6 — a steep early drop-off that flattens into the long tail described in the concentration figures above.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairings repeat the same organisation across multiple links — pointing to a small number of research partnerships (industry-university and industry-national lab) rather than a broadly collaborative field.
China and the United States lead as receiving offices at 100 and 97 records respectively, with EPO (33), WIPO/PCT (32), India (13) and South Korea (7) trailing well behind — a reminder that a freedom-to-operate check needs to cover both jurisdictions, not just one.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| LG Chem Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Robert Bosch GmbH (Germany) | 0 | — |
| Diamond Innovations Inc. | 0 | — |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 0 | — |
| California Institute of Technology | 0 | — |
| Research Triangle Institute | 0 | — |
| Corning Inc. | 0 | — |
| Director General, Defence Research & Development Organisation | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or identifying a filing gap.
The five most-cited records anchor much of the prior art in device-level nanostructuring and superlattice approaches. Any new filing on similar mechanisms should be checked against these first, since they carry the citation weight that later filings tend to reference.
Explore prior art in EurekaCeramics, coating and crystal-growth classes each sit under 10% of the 311 records. If your technical roadmap touches these mechanisms, that thinner claim density is worth confirming before assuming the space is occupied.
Run a white-space search in EurekaWith growth holding through 2024 and 2025 posting the highest count so far, new filings from the more active assignees are still working through the publication pipeline. Monitoring newly published families is more informative right now than reading the apparent 2026 dip as a slowdown.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaThe dataset ranks 100 companies by record count, led by a single assignee with 17 records, with fifth place at 11 and tenth place at 6. The top 5 assignees combined account for 19.6% of all 311 records in scope, and the top 10 for 30.9%, which means the majority of filings sit outside the most active names. This is a field with recognisable leaders rather than one dominated by a single company, so a competitive review should look past the top few names to the wider ranked list.
Filing rose from 16 records in 2021 to 19 in 2024, a 19% increase over that three-year span, and 2025 recorded the highest annual count in the dataset so far. The apparent low count in 2026 is an artifact of publication lag, which typically runs about 18 months behind actual filing, not a real drop in activity. Based on the complete years available, the trend through 2024 is one of steady growth rather than slowdown.
The two most-claimed IPC subclasses are H10N (other electric solid-state devices) at 79.1% of the 311 records and H01L (semiconductor devices) at 61.7%, meaning most filings frame their claims at the device or semiconductor-structure level. Materials-focused classes such as C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds, 19.6%), C22C (alloys, 12.9%) and C04B (ceramics, 9.6%) are present but claimed far less densely. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to more than 100% and should be read against the 311-record total, not against each other.
The thinnest-claimed IPC classes relative to the core device classes are B82Y (nanotechnology applications, 7.1%), C30B (crystal growth, 6.4%) and C23C (coating and surface deposition, 5.1%). These correspond to mechanism-level work — phonon-scattering nanostructuring, crystal-growth-based control of grain boundaries, and coating-based thermoelectric interfaces — that is documented in far fewer filings than device-integration claims. A first claim in these branches would likely need to specify a particular processing route or material system to avoid overlapping with the small number of existing filings there.
US20130186449A1, filed by Micross Advanced Interconnect Technology, LLC, claims a thermoelectric material and converter where a rare earth component is incorporated into a semiconductor base to raise the composite's figure of merit above that of the semiconductor alone, with the rare earth addition usable in either the p-type or n-type leg of the converter. It does not block thermoelectric work generally; it is specific to rare-earth-doped semiconductor composites used this way. Filings using different dopant chemistries, different structural mechanisms such as nanostructuring or band convergence, or non-rare-earth approaches to raising zT would sit outside its claim scope, though a detailed claim chart is needed before relying on that reading.
Go past this page: query the whole thermoelectric material figure of merit corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.