https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/thermoelectric-material-figure-of-merit-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Functional Materials
Thermoelectric material figure-of-merit patents: who leads and where the field is still open
  • Concentrated but not locked up. the top 5 assignees hold 19.6% of all 311 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 30.9% — leadership exists but a long tail of single-digit and single-filing entrants still has room to build a position.
  • Filing kept climbing through the last complete year. 2021 to 2024 filings rose 16 to 19, a 19% increase, with 2025 posting the highest count so far before the usual publication lag thins out the most recent year.
  • Claims cluster hard around two IPC classes. H10N (other electric solid-state devices) and H01L (semiconductor devices) between them touch the large majority of records, while nanotechnology and crystal-growth classes stay in single digits by share.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
311
Published Records
20%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+19%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (16 records) with 2024 (19) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 311 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Thermoelectric figure of merit, zT, is the metric that ties together Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity and lattice thermal conductivity into a single number engineers optimise against. This landscape pulls 311 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026 that claim inventions touching Seebeck coefficient, lattice thermal conductivity, carrier concentration, band convergence, nanostructuring or phonon scattering — the mechanisms practitioners actually use to push zT higher. The scope is deliberately mechanism-first rather than material-first, so it captures claims across semiconductor devices, alloys, ceramics and nanostructured composites alike.

The picture that emerges is a field with an identifiable set of established filers, a wide base of smaller and one-time entrants, and a technology mix that leans heavily on device-level claims (H10N, H01L) rather than deep materials chemistry claims (C01B, C22C, C04B), which sit at meaningfully lower shares of the same 311-record base.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1LG CHEM LTD17
  2. 2ROBERT BOSCH GMBH11
  3. 3CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH11
  4. 4MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH11
  5. 5CORNING INC11
  6. 6DIAMOND INNOVATIONS INC10
  7. 7DIRECTOR GENERAL DEFENCE RES & DEV ORG7
  8. 8ACAD SINICA6
  9. 9JAPAN AVIATION ELECTRONICS IND LTD6
  10. 10RES TRIANGLE INST6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoelectric Material Figure of Merit covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 311 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing activity, 2017–2026

Annual counts run from 13 in 2017 to a peak of 29 in 2025, with 2021 to 2024 alone rising from 16 to 19 filings (+19%). The 2026 figure of 1 reflects only what has published so far this year, not a drop in filing — publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the last one to two years will keep filling in.

Filing activity, 2017–202608152330132017201820192020202120222023202429202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H10N and H01L dominate at 79.1% and 61.7% of the 311 records respectively, confirming that most claims are framed at the device or semiconductor-structure level. Materials-chemistry classes — C01B (19.6%), C22C (12.9%), C04B (9.6%) — and process/structural classes like B82Y nanotechnology (7.1%), C30B crystal growth (6.4%) and C23C coating (5.1%) are present but comparatively thin, which is where deeper materials claims still have room to be staked out.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH10N · Other electric solid-state dev…24679.1%H01L · Semiconductor devices19261.7%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…6119.6%C22C · Alloys4012.9%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories309.6%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications227.1%C30B · Crystal growth206.4%C23C · Coating & surface deposition165.1%Other14145.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 311 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoelectric Material Figure of Merit covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Thermoelectric Material Figure of Merit with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thermoelectric material figure of merit and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this space

Representative Filing
US20130186449A12013-07-25

Rare earth-doped materials with enhanced thermoelectric figure of merit

MICROSS ADVANCED INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGY, LLC

The filing describes a thermoelectric material and converter that adds a rare earth component to a semiconductor base to raise the figure of merit of the composite above that of the semiconductor alone, with both p-type and n-type legs of the converter able to carry the rare earth addition.US20130186449A1, filed by Micross Advanced Interconnect Technology, LLC.

US20130186449A1 — patent drawing 1US20130186449A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited thermoelectric zT patents
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080087314A1Homogeneous thermoelectric nanocomposite using core-shell nanoparticles125
2US5610366AHigh performance thermoelectric materials and methods of preparation107
3US6605772B2Nanostructured thermoelectric materials and devices106
4US20040023302A1Method and apparatus for screening combinatorial libraries for semiconducting properties104
5US6060656ASi/SiGe superlattice structures for use in thermoelectric devices88
6US20020170590A1Enhanced thermoelectric power in bismuth nanocomposites81
7US20090178700A1Thermoelectric figure of merit enhancement by modification of the electronic density of states77
8US20020062854A1Thermoelectric materials: ternary penta telluride and selenide compounds68
9US20020053359A1Nanostructured thermoelectric materials and devices67
10US6670539B2Enhanced thermoelectric power in bismuth nanocomposites64

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings that have simply had more years to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on the field's early direction, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoelectric Material Figure of Merit covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the field

Three readings of the same dataset, aimed at the questions an R&D or IP team actually needs answered before committing budget.

Concentration
19.6% / 30.9%
top 5 / top 10 share of 311 records

Leadership exists, but it is not a moat

The top 5 assignees combine for 19.6% of all 311 records and the top 10 for 30.9%. That leaves roughly seven in ten records spread across a long tail of smaller and single-filing entrants — a structure where an incumbent's portfolio is a strong signal of activity but not a hard barrier to entry.

Based on the full 100-company ranking returned for this dataset.
Momentum
16 → 19 (+19%)
filings, 2021 to 2024

Growth held through the last complete filing year

Annual filings rose from 16 in 2021 to 19 in 2024, a 19% increase over three years, with 2025 recording the highest count in the series so far. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the low 2026 count reflects incomplete data rather than a slowdown.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete for growth comparisons.
Composition
79.1% vs 9.6%
H10N share vs C04B (ceramics) share

Device claims outnumber deep-materials claims

H10N and H01L together touch the large majority of the 311 records, while ceramics (C04B), nanotechnology (B82Y) and crystal growth (C30B) each sit under 10%. That gap suggests device-integration claims are more crowded than claims on the underlying material systems themselves.

Class shares are counted against the same 311-record base and overlap because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thermoelectric material figure of merit, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoelectric Material Figure of Merit covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where they are not

Recent-year momentum among the more active assignees has flattened to zero in the latest year for several established names — consistent with the broader publication lag rather than a retreat from the field.

Established filers
17 records
leader's record count

A leader, then a fast drop-off

The single leading assignee holds 17 records, with fifth place at 11 and tenth place at 6 — a steep early drop-off that flattens into the long tail described in the concentration figures above.

Recent-year filings for the most active named assignees currently show zero in the latest year, a pattern consistent with the roughly 18-month publication lag rather than exits from the field.
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings identified

Collaboration is limited and concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairings repeat the same organisation across multiple links — pointing to a small number of research partnerships (industry-university and industry-national lab) rather than a broadly collaborative field.

Strongest pairings recur at 3-4 shared records each.
Filing geography
China 100 / US 97
leading receiving offices

Filing is split across two primary offices

China and the United States lead as receiving offices at 100 and 97 records respectively, with EPO (33), WIPO/PCT (32), India (13) and South Korea (7) trailing well behind — a reminder that a freedom-to-operate check needs to cover both jurisdictions, not just one.

Counts are by receiving office, not by assignee nationality.
🔍
Under-claimed technical branches
Sub-areas where filing density is thin relative to the core device classes, based on the IPC composition above.
Band-convergence engineering in bulk alloysPhonon-scattering nanostructuring via crystal growth (C30B)Coating-based thermoelectric interfaces (C23C)Carrier-concentration tuning in ceramic hosts (C04B)Core-shell nanocomposite processing routes
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
LG Chem Ltd.0
Robert Bosch GmbH (Germany)0
Diamond Innovations Inc.0
Massachusetts Institute of Technology0
California Institute of Technology0
Research Triangle Institute0
Corning Inc.0
Director General, Defence Research & Development Organisation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoelectric Material Figure of Merit covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or identifying a filing gap.

Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited records

The five most-cited records anchor much of the prior art in device-level nanostructuring and superlattice approaches. Any new filing on similar mechanisms should be checked against these first, since they carry the citation weight that later filings tend to reference.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Map the under-claimed IPC branches to your own roadmap

Ceramics, coating and crystal-growth classes each sit under 10% of the 311 records. If your technical roadmap touches these mechanisms, that thinner claim density is worth confirming before assuming the space is occupied.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track the leading assignees' next disclosures

With growth holding through 2024 and 2025 posting the highest count so far, new filings from the more active assignees are still working through the publication pipeline. Monitoring newly published families is more informative right now than reading the apparent 2026 dip as a slowdown.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoelectric Material Figure of Merit covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about thermoelectric zT patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoelectric Material Figure of Merit covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Thermoelectric Material Figure of Merit in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole thermoelectric material figure of merit corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.