Book a demo

Thermomechanical Controlled Processing Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026

Thermomechanical Controlled Processing Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/thermomechanical-controlled-processing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Hot Rolling & Steel Processing
Thermomechanical Controlled Processing Patents: Who Leads and Where the Claim Space Opens Up
  • 53.0% concentration. The top 5 assignees hold 1,153 of 2,174 records in scope — more than half the field sits with a handful of steelmakers.
  • Filings peaked in 2022 at 118. Growth from 2021 to 2024 fell 32% (74 → 50), though 2025-26 counts are still filling in as publications lag filing.
  • C22C and C21D dominate. 83.8% of records touch alloy composition and 78.8% touch heat treatment — rolling process claims (B21B, 18.1%) are comparatively thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,174
Published Records
53%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-32%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (74 records) with 2024 (50) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,174 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What thermomechanical controlled processing patents cover

Thermomechanical controlled processing (TMCP) links rolling schedule, cooling path and alloy design into a single control problem: austenite conditioning during finish rolling, coiling temperature and accelerated cooling rate after the mill, all tuned to hit a target property set without added alloy cost. The search set spans 2,174 published records from 2015 through the July 2026 cut-off, drawn from filings that combine controlled rolling or grain-refinement language with process variables like finish rolling temperature, coiling temperature or property prediction.

Because a single record can carry claims across composition, heat treatment and rolling equipment, the technology composition figures below add up to well over 100% of the record total — that overlap is itself informative: it shows how tightly alloy chemistry and process control are co-claimed in this field.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015–2026
  1. 1NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION313
  2. 2JFE STEEL CORP272
  3. 3BAOSHAN IRON & STEEL CO LTD245
  4. 4EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY(US)220
  5. 5NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP103
  6. 6POHANG IRON & STEEL CO LTD80
  7. 7SUMITOMO METAL IND LTD67
  8. 8KAWASAKI STEEL CORP53
  9. 9NANJING IRON & STEEL CO LTD43
  10. 10ARCELORMITTAL SA41
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermomechanical Controlled Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Annual filing counts and IPC subclass coverage across the 2,174 records in scope, plus where applicants are choosing to seek protection.

A 2022 peak, then a measured pullback

Filings ran from 81 in 2017 to a peak of 118 in 2022. The 2021-to-2024 window shows a 32% decline (74 to 50) — a real signal, but 2025 and 2026 counts (down to 5 in the partial final year) are not comparable yet because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

A 2022 peak, then a measured pullback03060901208120172018201920202021118202220232024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Alloy and heat-treatment claims dominate; rolling equipment claims are thinner

C22C (alloys) and C21D (heat treatment) each cover the large majority of records — 83.8% and 78.8% of the 2,174 in scope respectively — confirming that most applicants claim TMCP through composition and thermal path rather than mill hardware. B21B (metal rolling) sits at 18.1%, and casting, welding, extrusion and laminate classes each register under 6%.

Alloy and heat-treatment claims dominate; rolling equipment claims are thinnerC22C · Alloys1,82183.8%C21D · Heat treatment of metals1,71478.8%B21B · Metal rolling39418.1%C21C · Steelmaking1285.9%B22D · Metal casting894.1%B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing592.7%B21C · Metal extrusion & drawing582.7%B32B · Layered products & laminates552.5%Other29313.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,174 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermomechanical Controlled Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Thermomechanical Controlled Processing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thermomechanical controlled processing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A representative claim construction in this space

Representative Record — US20200123630A1
US20200123630A12020-04-23

Hot Rolled Precipitation Strengthened and Grain Refined High Strength Dual Phase Steel Sheet (Tata Steel)

TATA STEEL LIMITED

A process for producing dual phase steel sheet: casting a liquid steel composition into a slab, hot rolling at a finish rolling temperature of 840±30°C, cooling on the run-out table at 40-70°C/s to an intermediate temperature band, then a natural cooling pause of 5-7 seconds before further rapid cooling — targeting a minimum 600 MPa tensile strength dual phase microstructure.Composition, finish rolling temperature and a two-stage cooling schedule are claimed together as a single dependent process.

US20200123630A1 — patent drawing 1US20200123630A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5454883AHigh toughness low yield ratio, high fatigue strength steel plate and process of producing same169
2US5545269AMethod for producing ultra high strength, secondary hardening steels with superior toughness and weldability146
3US5755895AHigh strength line pipe steel having low yield ratio and excellent in low temperature toughness126
4US6315946B1Ultra low carbon bainitic weathering steel116
5US4466842AFerritic steel having ultra-fine grains and a method for producing the same114
6US5080727AMetallic material having ultra-fine grain structure and method for its manufacture109
7US5545270AMethod of producing high strength dual phase steel plate with superior toughness and weldability107
8US5531842AMethod of preparing a high strength dual phase steel plate with superior toughness and weldability (LAW219)101
9JP1983123823AManufacture of high strength hot rolled steel sheet of super fine grain99
10WO1999005335A1Ultra-high strength, weldable steels with excellent ultra-low temperature toughness92

Citation counts favour older filings within a searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on later work, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermomechanical Controlled Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Landscape Signals

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns recur across the dataset and each has a direct bearing on where new claims are likely to survive prosecution.

Concentration
53.0% of 2,174
held by top 5 assignees

The top of the field is dense, not diffuse

Just five assignees account for over half of all records in scope, with the leader alone holding 313. A tenth-place assignee still holds 41 — the drop-off from leader to the ranked group is steep, meaning freedom-to-operate searches need to start with the concentrated top rather than assume a fragmented field.

Based on the 100-company ranked assignee list
Filing Momentum
-32% (2021→2024)
three-year filing change

Volume has eased off its 2022 peak

Filings hit 118 in 2022 before easing to 50 by 2024, a documented 32% decline over that window. This reads as a genuine cooling of new filing activity in the mature core of the technology, not as a data artefact — but the very latest years are still incomplete and should not be read as continuing the decline.

2025–2026 figures are provisional pending publication lag
Claim Crowding
83.8% C22C · 78.8% C21D
share of records touching each class

Composition and heat treatment are the crowded lanes

The overwhelming majority of records claim alloy composition (C22C) or heat treatment (C21D), often the same record claiming both. Rolling equipment claims (B21B, 18.1%) and casting (B22D, 4.1%) are comparatively open, suggesting mill-side process control is less exhaustively claimed than the metallurgy itself.

Classes overlap; shares sum to more than 100% of the 2,174 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thermomechanical controlled processing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermomechanical Controlled Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignee Landscape

Who holds the ranked filing positions

The ranked assignee list covers 100 companies, counted in patent families. It is not a curated top-10 or top-50 — it is the full set the underlying data endpoint returns, and the concentration sits almost entirely in its upper tier.

Leader position
313 records
single leading assignee

One assignee holds nearly triple the fifth-place count

The leading assignee's 313 records compare to 103 at fifth place and 41 at tenth — a steep gradient that points to a small set of integrated steelmakers setting the pace on grain-refinement and coiling-temperature claims.

Ranked by patent family count
Co-filing pattern
10 co-assignee pairs
documented joint filings

Joint filing is rare but concentrated where it exists

Only ten co-assignee pairs are recorded, and the strongest links pair a major integrated producer with an upstream research partner, or pair a steelmaker with its own research institute affiliate — a pattern of internal R&D-to-production filing rather than cross-company alliance.

Strongest pair recorded at 60 shared filings
Recent momentum
+100% YoY
one assignee's latest-year change

Momentum has shifted away from the historic leaders

Several of the assignees with the largest historic counts show zero filings in the latest year, while one mid-tier assignee posted a +100% year-on-year increase off a low base. Momentum data at this stage of the cycle should be read cautiously given publication lag, but it flags which filers are still active versus coasting on older grants.

Latest-year counts are partial due to publication lag
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer FTO look
Sub-areas where filing density is markedly lower than the composition and heat-treatment core
Run-out table cooling rate control hardwareIntermediate-temperature natural-cooling holdsWelding/brazing of TMCP-processed plate (B23K)Extrusion-drawing integration with controlled rolling (B21C)Layered/clad TMCP products (B32B)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (POSCO)2+100%
Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (Baosteel)1-75%
Nippon Steel Corporation0
JFE Steel Corporation0-100%
ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company0
NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP0
Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd.0
Kawasaki Steel Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermomechanical Controlled Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with a dense claimed core and several thinner branches. The next step is usually to test a specific process variable or a specific competitor against the full claim set.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on a target cooling schedule

Take a specific finish rolling temperature and cooling-rate combination and check it against the concentrated top assignees' claim scope before committing tooling changes.

Search this claim space in Eureka

Track momentum, not just historic volume

Historic leaders showing zero recent filings may be shifting effort elsewhere; monitor recent-year activity rather than relying on cumulative counts alone.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed rolling-hardware branch

With B21B claims at 18.1% against 83.8% for alloy composition, mill-side process control claims may leave more room to file than the metallurgy does.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermomechanical Controlled Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on thermomechanical controlled processing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermomechanical Controlled Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Thermomechanical Controlled Processing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole thermomechanical controlled processing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.