Book a demo

Thermoplastic Composite Forming Patent Landscape 2026

Thermoplastic Composite Forming Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Thermoplastic Composite Forming Patent Landscape in 2026

The thermoplastic composite forming space is highly concentrated, with Boeing alone accounting for the largest single block of filings among the top hundred filers. Activity reached a multi-year high in 2023 and has since eased, placing the field in a maturing phase with the United States as the dominant protection jurisdiction.

225
Patent families in scope
47%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+5%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Boeing leads a concentrated field with a wide tier gap

Boeing holds the top position in this landscape with 127 patent records, placing it well ahead of the nearest challenger Ebert Composites Corp at 23 patent records. The top five filers — Boeing, Ebert Composites, Rohr Inc, Arkema France, and Cytec Industries — together account for 47% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers, signaling a moderately concentrated but not monopolistic competitive structure.

A pronounced tier gap separates Boeing from the rest of the field. The second-ranked applicant holds fewer than one-fifth of Boeing’s patent records, and ranks three through five are tightly clustered in the 16–22 patent-record range. Below rank five, the field fragments into a long tail of single-digit contributors.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1The Boeing Company127
2Ebert Composites Corporation23
3Rohr Inc22
4Arkema France SA18
5Cytec Industries Inc16
6Spirit AeroSystems Inc13
7Johns Manville Corporation10
8General Electric Company10
9Lankhorst Pure Composites10
10Central South University9
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation8
12Web Industries Inc7
13Happe Spine LLC7
14Greene Tweed Technologies Inc5
15Toyobo Co Ltd5
16Toray Industries Inc5
17GM Global Technology Operations LLC5
18CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORP5
19Rubin Alexander M4
20BEIJING RES INST OF CHEM IND CHINA PETROLEUM & CHE…4
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Boeing’s commanding position, reinforced by its focus on B29C shaping and B29C43 compression-forming sub-classes, reflects deep vertical integration between process IP and aerospace structural applications. Challengers Ebert Composites and Rohr Inc occupy a distinct niche in pultrusion and nacelle structures respectively, suggesting that Boeing’s dominance is process-broad rather than route-specific.

Filings from the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; the apparent decline from 2024 onward should not be read as a retreat in activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2023 surge plateau and a shaping-dominated technology mix

The annual filing trend reveals a field that grew steadily through 2020, dipped in 2021–2022, surged to a peak in 2023, and has since moderated — consistent with a maturing lifecycle. The technology composition is heavily weighted toward shaping processes, with a handful of adjacent polymer and laminate branches representing secondary activity.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 16 in 2017 to a peak of 52 in 2023, then fell to 22 in 2024 and 10 in 2025 — the latter two years are affected by publication lag and should be treated as provisional. The multi-year trajectory from 2017 to 2023 is clearly upward, but the field has eased from its 2023 peak.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 52 in 2023.16201722201828201930202027202115202252202322202410202532026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B29C (Shaping of plastics) dominates the branch mix by a wide margin, reflecting the process-centric nature of the field. B29K (moulding materials index) and B29L (plastic products index) rank second and third, while B32B (layered products and laminates) and B29B (plastics preparation) represent meaningful secondary clusters. Downstream application branches — B64C for aerospace and A61F for implants — appear at low counts, indicating that application-specific IP remains sparse relative to process IP.

Technology compositionB29C · Shaping of plastics leads with 520; B29K · Plastics moulding materials (index) 164.B29C · Shaping of plastics520B29K · Plastics moulding…164B29L · Plastic products …102B32B · Layered products …96B29B · Plastics preparat…83C08J · Polymer processin…75B29D · Specific plastic …61C08L · Polymer compositi…26↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240123657A1Published 2024-04-18

Continuous compression molding machines and method…

The Boeing Company

Continuous compression molding machines (CCMMs) and methods of continuous compression molding a consolidated thermoplastic matrix composite material are disclosed herein. The CCMMs include a mold, a heat zone heating structure, a consolidation zone heating structure, and a stress relaxation zone heating structure. The CCMMs also include a press structure, a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Continuous compression molding machines and method… — patent drawingContinuous compression molding machines and method… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Fabric-faced thermoplastic composite panel162
2Method of making perforated contoured trim panel128
33D thermoplastic composite pultrusion system and m…118
43D thermoplastic composite pultrusion system and m…116
53D thermoplastic composite pultrusion system and m…115
63D thermoplastic composite pultrusion system and m…115
73D thermoplastic composite pultrusion system and m…115
83D thermoplastic composite pultrusion system and m…114

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

Four structural observations — lifecycle stage, concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic reach — frame the strategic context for any team evaluating entry or expansion in thermoplastic composite forming.

Maturity

Field at peak plateau: process innovation still active

Annual filings have plateaued near their 2023 peak, placing this field in a maturity stage. On a multi-year basis the corpus grew 5% over the recent window, but volume has eased from the 2023 high. New entrants should focus on differentiated sub-processes or application-specific forming rather than broad shaping claims, where incumbent positions are well established.

Lifecycle: Maturity
Concentration

Single dominant player, fragmented challenger tier

The top five filers hold 47% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, with Boeing alone dwarfing all challengers. The challenger tier — Ebert Composites, Rohr, Arkema, and Cytec — is tightly bunched and collectively represents Boeing’s nearest competitive check. Below rank five the field is highly fragmented, leaving open space for focused mid-tier entrants with application-specific or materials-specific IP.

HHI: moderately high
Collaboration

Sparse co-filing: Arkema–University of Lorraine partnership is most active

Co-applicant filings are limited. The most active collaboration pairs Arkema France with the University of Lorraine with 2 joint filings, indicating an academic–industrial link in specialty thermoplastic matrix research. Cytec Industries and Solvay Specialty Polymers USA have one joint filing, reflecting a materials-chemistry partnership. The overall scarcity of co-filing suggests the field is dominated by proprietary internal development rather than open-innovation consortia.

Collaboration: sparse
Geography

US-centric protection; Europe and China secondary

The United States leads jurisdiction coverage with 187 patent records, followed by Europe (EPO) at 114 and China at 57. Japan, Canada, and South Korea hold meaningful secondary positions. The US–Europe axis reflects the aerospace and automotive manufacturing bases of the leading applicants. China’s growing position — anchored by filings from Central South University and China Petroleum & Chemical Corp — signals rising domestic ambition in composite forming technology.

Lead office: US
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Arkema France SAUniversity of Lorraine2
Cytec Industries IncSolvay Specialty Polymers USA LLC1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a single family can be validated in multiple territories.Explore insights →
Leaders

Boeing leads on breadth; Rohr and Spirit Aerosystems challenge on aerospace sub-processes

Boeing’s filing volume is an order of magnitude above the nearest challenger, with its portfolio concentrated in broad B29C70 reinforced-plastics shaping. New entrants such as Spirit Aerosystems and Daher Aerospace have entered the ranking recently and show strong momentum, signaling that the aerospace supply chain is actively building its own IP positions.

Leader · Boeing

The Boeing Company

Boeing holds 127 patent records — the largest block in the top-100 ranking — with its technology focus anchored in B29C70 (reinforced-plastics shaping, 113 records), B29C43 (compression moulding, 41 records), and B29D99 (specific plastic articles, 27 records). Boeing’s recent-period momentum shows a 36% increase versus the prior three-year window, indicating the company is not standing still despite its already dominant position.

patent records: 127
Challenger · Spirit Aerosystems

Spirit AeroSystems Inc

Spirit AeroSystems holds 13 patent records and enters the recent period as a new entrant in momentum terms, meaning its recent filings represent a meaningful step-up from a low prior base. Its technology emphasis mirrors the broader field — centered on B29C70 shaping — but its aerospace-structural focus differentiates it from materials-chemistry challengers such as Arkema France, which also carries new-entrant momentum with 3 recent filings concentrated in C08J polymer processing.

patent records: 13
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Unlock rankings, momentum scores, and technology emphasis for all top-100 filers in this landscape.
Rohr IncArkema France SA+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
The Boeing Company15▲ +36%
Rohr Inc10▬ 0%
Arkema France SA3▲ new entrant
Spirit AeroSystems Inc12▲ new entrant
Daher Aerospace10▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent-record counts reflect each applicant’s position within the top-100 ranked filers.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in polymer processing and laminate design

Five IPC branches carry counts in the 61–102 range — lower than the dominant B29C class but not negligible — and sit adjacent to the core shaping process. These are observations of relative sparsity; two branches stand out for plausible technical value and a realistic entry path.

C08J · Polymer Processing & Solutions

With 75 patent records against B29C’s 520, C08J represents a comparatively sparse zone covering thermoplastic matrix formulation, consolidation chemistry, and surface treatment for composite precursors. Arkema France’s co-filing with the University of Lorraine already targets this space, suggesting that matrix-level processing innovations — such as reactive thermoplastic systems for faster cycle times — carry commercial relevance. A focused academic–industrial program in this sub-class could occupy a currently thin but technically valuable position.

Search this in Eureka →

B32B · Layered Products & Laminates

B32B carries 96 patent records versus B29C’s 520, indicating that laminate architecture and interply bonding — critical for multi-functional structural panels — remain comparatively under-claimed. The top-cited patent cluster references fabric-faced thermoplastic composite panels with 162 citations, confirming that laminate-level innovations attract heavy downstream reliance. Teams working on hybrid laminates for automotive or wind-energy applications could file in this branch with lower incumbent density than the core shaping classes.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level gap analysis with applicant density and citation heat for all IPC classes in scope.
B29B · Plastics preparationB29D · Specific plastic articles+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; share figures are relative to the top-100-filer corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerB29C 70 · Shaping of plasticsB29C 43 · Shaping of plasticsB29K 101 · Plastics moulding materials (index)B29K 105 · Plastics moulding materials (index)B29L 31 · Plastic products (index)
The Boeing CompanyStrong · 113Moderate · 41Moderate · 25Emerging · 16Moderate · 25
Ebert Composites CorporationStrong · 19Strong · 10Strong · 10Moderate · 5Strong · 10
Rohr IncStrong · 19Moderate · 8Moderate · 8Moderate · 5Moderate · 8
Happe Spine LLCAbsentStrong · 7Strong · 6Strong · 6Strong · 6
Arkema France SAStrong · 18AbsentAbsentAbsentModerate · 5
Daher AerospaceStrong · 10AbsentModerate · 4Strong · 8Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Generate your own thermoplastic composite forming landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.