Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (718 records) with 2024 (296) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 205,132 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Thermoplastics patenting spans a wide processing and formulation stack: polymer compositions, additive packages, layered laminates, and the shaping and moulding equipment that turns resin into parts. The 205,132 records in scope here run from 2015 through the current data cut-off, and the technology classes that carry the most volume — polymer compositions, polymer processing, and shaping of plastics — sit closer to formulation and fabrication than to novel base chemistries. That skew matters for anyone scoping freedom-to-operate: dense classes mean occupied claim space, not necessarily settled science.
Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has declined most years since, with the most recent complete year showing well under half the 2021 filing volume. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the final one or two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than they will eventually turn out to be — but the multi-year decline through 2024 is real and worth taking at face value.
Two views of the same 205,132-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the most patent activity today.
Annual filings ran near 800-1,000 through 2018, then eased off; the 718-to-296 drop between 2021 and 2024 (-59%) is the clearest complete-year signal in the dataset. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional given the roughly 18-month publication lag.
Polymer compositions (C08L) lead at 3.8% of all records, followed by polymer processing and solutions (C08J) and shaping of plastics (B29C), each above 2%. Addition polymers (C08F) and condensation polymers (C08G) — the classes closest to novel base-resin chemistry — sit further down, near 1.1% each, suggesting most recent activity is in formulating and processing existing polymer families rather than inventing new ones.
Shares are the percentage of the 205,132 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thermoplastics patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA polymer processing aid composition, a melt processable polymer composition that uses the polymer processing aid, and a method of improving the melt processability of a thermoplastic polymer are provided. The polymer processing aid composition comprises a multimodal fluoropolymer that preferably comprises interpolymerized units derived from an ethylenically unsaturated fluoromonomer tetrafluoroethylene and at least one ethylenically copolymerizable alpha-olefin monomer.Filed by 3M Innovative Properties Company; granted 2001-08-21.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5272236A | Elastic substantially linear olefin polymers | 5,604 |
| 2 | US3849241A | Non-woven mats by melt blowing | 4,582 |
| 3 | US20100191292A1 | Oriented polymer implantable device and process for making same | 1,245 |
| 4 | US6622731B2 | Bone-treatment instrument and method | 1,147 |
| 5 | WO1996023010A2 | alpha -OLEFINS AND OLEFIN POLYMERS AND PROCESSES THEREFOR | 1,065 |
| 6 | US4539256A | Microporous sheet material, method of making and articles made therewith | 918 |
| 7 | US6160084A | Biodegradable shape memory polymers | 916 |
| 8 | US20070187857A1 | Methods for making and using composites, polymer scaffolds, and composite scaffolds | 780 |
| 9 | US4726989A | Microporous materials incorporating a nucleating agent and methods for making same | 756 |
| 10 | US20100210745A1 | Molecular Healing of Polymeric Materials, Coatings, Plastics, Elastomers, Composites, Laminates, Adhesives, a… | 718 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a ranking of current importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns come out of the concentration, class and citation data that matter more than the raw record count.
The leading assignee holds 6,799 records and the top 5 combined reach 12.6% of the entire 205,132-record field. That is meaningful scale for individual players but nowhere near a chokehold — the remaining records are spread across a long tail of filers, which is the pattern you'd expect in a formulation- and processing-heavy field rather than one built on a handful of pioneering compositions.
Filings dropped from 718 in 2021 to 296 in 2024, and several of the historically largest assignees show zero records in the latest tracked year. Because both 2021 and 2024 are complete years for publication purposes, this decline is a real signal about filing appetite, not an artefact of the lag that always understates the most recent year or two.
Polymer compositions, processing and shaping classes each carry more record share than the addition- and condensation-polymer classes that cover new base resins. Filing energy in this corpus is concentrated on how thermoplastics are compounded, processed and layered — additive packages, laminates, moulding — rather than on inventing new polymer backbones.
The United States receives the largest single share of filings in this corpus, with the EPO and WIPO's PCT route as the next-largest channels and Canada, Australia and the UK trailing behind. That pattern points to where competitive clearance searches and freedom-to-operate work should start, even though it says nothing about where manufacturing or end use actually sits.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thermoplastics patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders sit alongside a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants. Co-assignee pairings show where formal collaboration exists; recent-year momentum shows where even the largest historical filers have gone quiet.
The top assignee's 6,799 records lead a field where fifth place still holds 3,552 and tenth place 2,101 — a gradual taper rather than a cliff. That shape suggests durable, broad-based filing programs rather than one company having cornered a specific chemistry.
Only ten co-assignee pairings appear in this dataset, and the strongest of them recur across dozens of shared records — evidence of sustained joint development programs rather than one-off co-filings. That concentration also means most filers in this field are going it alone.
Multiple assignees that built substantial historical portfolios show zero records and -100% year-on-year change in the latest tracked year. Read this alongside the publication lag: some of this is the lag itself, but the multi-year decline through 2024 backs up a genuine pullback in new filing.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | 0 | -100% |
| ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. | 0 | — |
| 3M Innovative Properties Company | 0 | -100% |
| Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Arkema France | 0 | -100% |
| SABIC Global Technologies B.V. | 0 | -100% |
| E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company | 0 | — |
| BASF SE | 0 | -100% |
The landscape data points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate, tracking a competitor, or looking for filing openings.
Dense classes like polymer compositions and shaping of plastics carry heavy prior art; a targeted claim-scope search before filing avoids surprises late in prosecution.
Search this landscape in Eureka →Several of the largest historical filers have gone quiet in the latest tracked year — worth confirming whether that reflects strategy shifts, publication lag, or genuine exit from active filing.
Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka →Thinner classes around base-resin chemistry and recycled-stream processing may offer more room to file a defensible first claim than the crowded compositions space.
Explore white space in Eureka →The leading assignee in this dataset holds 6,799 records, well ahead of the rest of the ranked field, but the top 5 assignees combined only reach 12.6% of all 205,132 records in scope. That means no single company controls the field; instead there's a long tail of companies each holding smaller, more specialized portfolios. Anyone doing competitive tracking should watch the top handful of names for scale but also monitor the broader tail, since meaningful innovation clearly comes from outside the leadership group too.
Filing has slowed markedly: annual filings fell from 718 in 2021 to 296 in 2024, a 59% decline over that three-year span, and the peak filing year across the dataset was 2018. Because patent publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the very latest years in any chart will look artificially low and shouldn't be read as evidence of further decline on their own. But the 2021-to-2024 comparison uses two complete years, so that drop is a genuine signal, not a lag artefact.
Polymer compositions (C08L) carries the largest share at 3.8% of all 205,132 records, followed by polymer processing and solutions (C08J) and shaping of plastics (B29C), each above 2%. Classes tied to genuinely new base-polymer chemistry, like addition polymers and condensation polymers, sit lower at roughly 1.1% each. That distribution suggests most recent patenting activity concerns how thermoplastics are formulated, processed and shaped rather than new polymer backbones themselves.
The thinner IPC classes relative to the dominant compositions and processing categories are a reasonable starting point, along with specific sub-areas such as melt-flow modification for recycled resin streams or moulding-material indexing applications, which see less filing density than core compositions work. That doesn't guarantee an unclaimed niche, but it does mean less prior art to design around. Any serious white-space assessment should still run a targeted search against the specific claim language planned, since class-level density doesn't capture everything a granular search will.
US6277919B1, assigned to 3M Innovative Properties Company and granted in 2001, covers a polymer processing aid composition built on a multimodal fluoropolymer combined with a melt-processable thermoplastic polymer, aimed at improving melt processability. It is one of the more heavily cited records in this corpus, meaning many later filings reference it as prior art. Whether it blocks a specific new formulation depends entirely on whether that formulation's processing-aid chemistry falls within its claimed fluoropolymer structure — a question that needs a claim-by-claim comparison, not a summary.
Go past this page: query the whole thermoplastics patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.