https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/thermoplastics-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Polymers & Composites
Thermoplastics patents: who leads, where filing is slowing, and what's still open
  • Filing has cooled sharply. Annual filings fell from 718 in 2021 to 296 in 2024, a 59% drop over that three-year span — a real slowdown, not a data artefact, since 2024 is the last complete year before publication lag sets in.
  • No single company dominates. The leader holds 6,799 records but the top 5 assignees together account for only 12.6% of all 205,132 records in scope — this is a field with a long tail, not a two-horse race.
  • Recent-year momentum has stalled across the biggest names. Several of the largest historical filers show 0 records in the latest year and -100% year-on-year, consistent with the broader publication-lag-adjusted slowdown rather than any one company exiting the space.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
205.1K
Published Records
13%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-59%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (718 records) with 2024 (296) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 205,132 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the thermoplastics patent record actually shows

Thermoplastics patenting spans a wide processing and formulation stack: polymer compositions, additive packages, layered laminates, and the shaping and moulding equipment that turns resin into parts. The 205,132 records in scope here run from 2015 through the current data cut-off, and the technology classes that carry the most volume — polymer compositions, polymer processing, and shaping of plastics — sit closer to formulation and fabrication than to novel base chemistries. That skew matters for anyone scoping freedom-to-operate: dense classes mean occupied claim space, not necessarily settled science.

Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has declined most years since, with the most recent complete year showing well under half the 2021 filing volume. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the final one or two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than they will eventually turn out to be — but the multi-year decline through 2024 is real and worth taking at face value.

Filing volume by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC6,799
  2. 23M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO6,294
  3. 3PROCTER & GAMBLE CO5,353
  4. 4BASF SE3,853
  5. 5KIMBERLY CLARK WORLDWIDE INC3,552
  6. 6EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO3,396
  7. 7EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC2,841
  8. 8GENERAL ELECTRIC CO2,559
  9. 9SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES BV2,460
  10. 10THE DOW CHEM CO2,101
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoplastics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 205,132-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the most patent activity today.

Filing peaked in 2018, then fell through 2024

Annual filings ran near 800-1,000 through 2018, then eased off; the 718-to-296 drop between 2021 and 2024 (-59%) is the clearest complete-year signal in the dataset. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional given the roughly 18-month publication lag.

Filing peaked in 2018, then fell through 202402505007501,000795201798620182019202020212022202320242025222026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Formulation and processing classes dominate

Polymer compositions (C08L) lead at 3.8% of all records, followed by polymer processing and solutions (C08J) and shaping of plastics (B29C), each above 2%. Addition polymers (C08F) and condensation polymers (C08G) — the classes closest to novel base-resin chemistry — sit further down, near 1.1% each, suggesting most recent activity is in formulating and processing existing polymer families rather than inventing new ones.

Formulation and processing classes dominateC08L · Polymer compositions7,8223.8%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions4,4252.2%B29C · Shaping of plastics4,2922.1%C08K · Use of additives in polymers3,9271.9%B32B · Layered products & laminates3,7471.8%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)2,2601.1%C08G · Condensation polymers2,1571.1%B29K · Plastics moulding materials (i…1,0970.5%Other19,0819.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 205,132 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoplastics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Thermoplastics Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thermoplastics patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
US6277919B12001-08-21

US6277919B1 — Polymer processing additive containing a multimodal fluoropolymer and melt processable thermoplastic polymer composition

3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY

A polymer processing aid composition, a melt processable polymer composition that uses the polymer processing aid, and a method of improving the melt processability of a thermoplastic polymer are provided. The polymer processing aid composition comprises a multimodal fluoropolymer that preferably comprises interpolymerized units derived from an ethylenically unsaturated fluoromonomer tetrafluoroethylene and at least one ethylenically copolymerizable alpha-olefin monomer.Filed by 3M Innovative Properties Company; granted 2001-08-21.

US6277919B1 — patent drawing 1
View full filing →
Most-cited records in the thermoplastics corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5272236AElastic substantially linear olefin polymers5,604
2US3849241ANon-woven mats by melt blowing4,582
3US20100191292A1Oriented polymer implantable device and process for making same1,245
4US6622731B2Bone-treatment instrument and method1,147
5WO1996023010A2alpha -OLEFINS AND OLEFIN POLYMERS AND PROCESSES THEREFOR1,065
6US4539256AMicroporous sheet material, method of making and articles made therewith918
7US6160084ABiodegradable shape memory polymers916
8US20070187857A1Methods for making and using composites, polymer scaffolds, and composite scaffolds780
9US4726989AMicroporous materials incorporating a nucleating agent and methods for making same756
10US20100210745A1Molecular Healing of Polymeric Materials, Coatings, Plastics, Elastomers, Composites, Laminates, Adhesives, a…718

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a ranking of current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoplastics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns come out of the concentration, class and citation data that matter more than the raw record count.

Concentration
12.6% of 205,132
top-5 share of all records

Leadership without lock-up

The leading assignee holds 6,799 records and the top 5 combined reach 12.6% of the entire 205,132-record field. That is meaningful scale for individual players but nowhere near a chokehold — the remaining records are spread across a long tail of filers, which is the pattern you'd expect in a formulation- and processing-heavy field rather than one built on a handful of pioneering compositions.

Based on the assignee ranking of 100 companies.
Momentum
-59% (2021→2024)
filing change, complete years

A genuine pullback, not noise

Filings dropped from 718 in 2021 to 296 in 2024, and several of the historically largest assignees show zero records in the latest tracked year. Because both 2021 and 2024 are complete years for publication purposes, this decline is a real signal about filing appetite, not an artefact of the lag that always understates the most recent year or two.

2025-2026 figures are still filling in and excluded from this read.
Technology mix
3.8% C08L
top single-class share

Formulation and processing lead, base chemistry trails

Polymer compositions, processing and shaping classes each carry more record share than the addition- and condensation-polymer classes that cover new base resins. Filing energy in this corpus is concentrated on how thermoplastics are compounded, processed and layered — additive packages, laminates, moulding — rather than on inventing new polymer backbones.

Class shares are of all 205,132 records; a record can carry multiple classes.
Geography
8,741 US filings
leading receiving office

US and Europe anchor filing activity

The United States receives the largest single share of filings in this corpus, with the EPO and WIPO's PCT route as the next-largest channels and Canada, Australia and the UK trailing behind. That pattern points to where competitive clearance searches and freedom-to-operate work should start, even though it says nothing about where manufacturing or end use actually sits.

Counts by receiving office, not by applicant nationality.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thermoplastics patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoplastics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the ground is open

The ranked leaders sit alongside a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants. Co-assignee pairings show where formal collaboration exists; recent-year momentum shows where even the largest historical filers have gone quiet.

Scale leader
6,799 records
leading assignee

One clear leader, no runaway gap to fifth

The top assignee's 6,799 records lead a field where fifth place still holds 3,552 and tenth place 2,101 — a gradual taper rather than a cliff. That shape suggests durable, broad-based filing programs rather than one company having cornered a specific chemistry.

From the 100-company assignee ranking.
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
identified in the corpus

Joint filings cluster around a handful of relationships

Only ten co-assignee pairings appear in this dataset, and the strongest of them recur across dozens of shared records — evidence of sustained joint development programs rather than one-off co-filings. That concentration also means most filers in this field are going it alone.

Strongest pair recurs across dozens of shared filings.
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several top-10 filers

Even the largest historical filers have gone quiet

Multiple assignees that built substantial historical portfolios show zero records and -100% year-on-year change in the latest tracked year. Read this alongside the publication lag: some of this is the lag itself, but the multi-year decline through 2024 backs up a genuine pullback in new filing.

Latest-year counts are provisional under the ~18-month publication lag.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is thin relative to the core compositions and processing classes:
multimodal fluoropolymer processing aidscondensation polymer base-resin chemistrymoulding-material indexing (B29K) applicationsmelt-flow modification for recycled resin streamslayered laminate barrier structures
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Dow Global Technologies LLC0-100%
ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc.0
3M Innovative Properties Company0-100%
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.0-100%
Arkema France0-100%
SABIC Global Technologies B.V.0-100%
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company0
BASF SE0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoplastics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape data points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate, tracking a competitor, or looking for filing openings.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on your formulation

Dense classes like polymer compositions and shaping of plastics carry heavy prior art; a targeted claim-scope search before filing avoids surprises late in prosecution.

Search this landscape in Eureka →

Track momentum on specific assignees

Several of the largest historical filers have gone quiet in the latest tracked year — worth confirming whether that reflects strategy shifts, publication lag, or genuine exit from active filing.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka →

Scope the under-claimed branches

Thinner classes around base-resin chemistry and recycled-stream processing may offer more room to file a defensible first claim than the crowded compositions space.

Explore white space in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoplastics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about thermoplastics patenting

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermoplastics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Thermoplastics Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole thermoplastics patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.