Book a demo

Thermostable Vaccine Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Thermostable Vaccine Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/thermostable-vaccine-formulations-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Thermostable vaccine formulation patents: filing trends and where the field is still open
  • One applicant dominates the ranking. the leading assignee holds 44 of the records tracked in this ranking, against a fifth-place count of 2 and a tenth-place count of 1 — a long tail of single or double-digit filers behind a single lead position.
  • Filing activity nearly tripled between 2021 and 2024. from 2 filings in 2021 to 6 in 2024, a +200% rise over that three-year span, before the most recent two years understate activity due to publication lag.
  • Claims are concentrated almost entirely in one IPC subclass. A61K covers 96.2% of the 53 records in scope, meaning most filing pressure sits on formulation and preparation claims rather than diagnostics or delivery apparatus.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
53
Published Records
+200%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
10
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (6) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers 53 published patent records filed between 2015 and 2026 that describe thermostable or cold-chain-free vaccine formulations, drawing on claims and descriptions referencing lyophilization cycles, sugar glass stabilizers, residual moisture control, potency retention, reconstitution, and controlled temperature chains. The scope is narrow by design: it captures formulation and process patents rather than the broader universe of vaccine composition filings, so the picture here is one of a specialised sub-field rather than vaccine development as a whole.

Filing activity in this set peaked in 2017 at 8 records and has since moved unevenly, with a documented rise from 2021 to 2024 before the two most recent years, which are still being filled in as publications catch up with filing dates.

Filing activity by year
  1. 1The Board of Governors of the Colorado State University System44
  2. 2Soligenix, Inc.27
  3. 3Stabilitech Pharma LLC7
  4. 4NANDI PRADYOT2
  5. 5HASSETT KIMBERLY2
  6. 6CARPENTER JOHN2
  7. 7BREY ROBERT2
  8. 8RANDOLPH THEODORE W1
  9. 9RANDOLPH THEODORE1
  10. 10MSD WELCOME TRUST HELLMAN LAB BVT LTD1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermostable Vaccine Formulations covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 53-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A three-year rise, understated at the edges

Filings rose from 2 in 2021 to 6 in 2024, a +200% increase over that span. 2017 remains the single highest year on record at 8 filings. The 2025 and 2026 figures are not comparable to earlier years yet, because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

A three-year rise, understated at the edges02468820172018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Formulation claims dominate the classification spread

A61K (medicinal preparations) appears on 96.2% of the 53 records in scope, making it the near-universal classification for this dataset. A61P (therapeutic activity) follows at 22.6%. The remaining subclasses — C12Q, G01N, C07H and C12M — each sit under 4%, indicating that measurement, sugar-chemistry and bioreactor angles are rarely the primary claim focus even where they appear.

Formulation claims dominate the classification spreadA61K · Medicinal preparations5196.2%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…1222.6%C12Q · Measuring & testing involving …23.8%G01N · Material analysis & testing23.8%C07H · Sugars & nucleic acids11.9%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus11.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 53 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermostable Vaccine Formulations covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Thermostable Vaccine Formulations with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thermostable vaccine formulations and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this set

Representative Filing
AU2023237223A12023-10-26

Thermostable vaccine compositions and methods of preparing same

SOLIGENIX, INC.

The disclosure provides compositions relating to thermostable vaccine and methods of preparing same, including methods of preparing thermostable vaccines comprising at least one protein antigen, at least one co-adjuvant such as an aluminium-salt adjuvant, and at least one buffering system containing at least one volatile salt such as ammonium salts, to develop a composition capable of eliciting an immune response in a subject.Filed by Soligenix, published 2023-10-26 as AU2023237223A1.

View full filing
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2012158978A1Thermostable vaccine compositions and methods of preparing same42
2US20130309273A1Thermostable Vaccine Compositions and Methods of Preparing Same34
3US20180092851A1Thermostable Vaccine Compositions and Methods of Preparing Same9
4US20190046632A1Compositions and methods for making and using thermostable immunogenic formulations with increased compatibil…5
5WO2017147318A1Compositions and methods for making and using thermostable immunogenic formulations with increased compatibil…4
6US20200384100A1Compositions and methods for making and using thermostable immunogenic formulations with increased compatibil…3
7US11491111B2Thermostable vaccine compositions and methods of preparing same3
8EP2709657B1Thermostable vaccine compositions and methods of preparing same3
9US10751408B2Compositions and methods for making and using thermostable immunogenic formulations with increased compatibil…2
10US20220265810A1Compositions and methods for making and using thermostable immunogenic formulations with increased compatibil…1

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermostable Vaccine Formulations covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend and the IPC spread are read together.

Concentration
44 vs 2
leader vs fifth place

A single applicant sets the boundary

The leading assignee's 44 records against a fifth-place count of just 2 means most of the claim space that exists has already been staked by one entity. New entrants are more likely to find open ground in adjacent formulation chemistry than in direct reformulation of the lead applicant's core compositions.

Assignee ranking, 10 companies
Momentum
+200%
2021 to 2024 filings

Renewed filing activity after a quiet spell

Filings rose from 2 in 2021 to 6 in 2024. That is a real signal of renewed interest in the space, not an artefact of the dataset window, since 2024 is the most recent year that can be treated as complete.

Filing trend, 2021-2024
Classification
96.2%
of records carry A61K

Claims sit almost entirely in one subclass

With A61K present on 51 of 53 records, the field has not meaningfully diversified into adjacent classifications such as measurement (G01N) or sugar chemistry (C07H), each under 4%. That narrow spread suggests the differentiating claims are more likely to be formulation-specific limitations than classification breadth.

IPC composition, 53 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thermostable vaccine formulations, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermostable Vaccine Formulations covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the collaboration sits

The ranking returns 10 companies. One pairing accounts for the overwhelming majority of joint-assignee activity in this set.

Leader
44 records
of the ranked total

The dominant filer

One applicant holds 44 of the records captured in this ranking, well ahead of every other entity tracked. Its filings anchor the most-cited records in the set, including the top two by citation count.

Assignee ranking
Collaboration
27 co-filings
strongest pair

A university-industry pairing drives joint filing

The strongest co-assignee pair in this dataset appears 27 times, far ahead of the next pairings at 2 each. That gap indicates a single sustained research partnership rather than a broad pattern of co-filing across the field.

Co-assignee pairs, 10 total
Long tail
1 record
tenth place

Most other filers hold a handful of records

Below the leader, the ranking falls off quickly to single and low-double-digit counts, down to 1 record at tenth place. This is a field where a small set of individual inventors and one specialty pharma company account for the rest of the tracked activity.

Assignee ranking, positions 2-10
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth scouting
Branches that appear in the dataset's classification spread but carry little independent claim density.
Residual moisture analyticsSugar-glass excipient chemistryReconstitution device integrationPotency-retention assay methodsBioreactor-compatible drying
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Stabilitech Pharma LLC10%
The Board of Governors of the Colorado State University System0
Soligenix, Inc.0
NANDI PRADYOT0
HASSETT KIMBERLY0
CARPENTER JOHN0
BREY ROBERT0
RANDOLPH THEODORE W0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermostable Vaccine Formulations covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, partnership scouting or white-space filing.

Check freedom-to-operate against the lead applicant

With 44 of the ranked records held by one assignee, any new formulation claim in this space should be checked against that portfolio first, particularly the two most-cited filings.

Run a claims comparison in Eureka

Track the 2021-2024 filing rise as it matures

The +200% increase from 2021 to 2024 is the clearest recent signal in this dataset. Watching which assignees file next, once 2025-2026 data fills in, will show whether this is a broadening trend or one company's cycle.

Set up a monitoring alert in Eureka

Scope claims around the under-claimed sub-areas

Residual moisture analytics, sugar-glass excipient chemistry and reconstitution device integration each show up in the classification spread without carrying independent claim density, which is where a first-mover claim is more likely to hold.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermostable Vaccine Formulations covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on thermostable vaccine patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thermostable Vaccine Formulations covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Thermostable Vaccine Formulations in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole thermostable vaccine formulations corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.