Book a demo

Thickened and Paste Tailings Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026

Thickened and Paste Tailings Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/thickened-and-paste-tailings-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Tailings Management
Thickened and Paste Tailings Patents: Filing Concentration and Open Claim Space
  • 48.9% of all 184 records in scope sit with just five assignees, and 77.7% sit with ten — this field is tightly held at the top with a long tail below it.
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown, since 2021: the count held flat at 2021 = 2 and 2024 = 2, a 0% change over that span, even as the peak year (2019, 11 filings) is well behind it.
  • Water and separation chemistry dominate the claims, with C02F and B01D covering 45.7% and 36.4% of records respectively, while metal extraction (C22B) appears in only 7.1%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
184
Published Records
49%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CA
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 184 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the thickened and paste tailings patent record shows

Thickened and paste tailings technology sits at the intersection of dewatering chemistry and heavy-industry waste handling. The 184 records in scope, spanning 2015 through the current data cut-off, cluster around a small set of control variables that recur across filings: yield stress control, flocculant dosage, underflow density, rake torque, beach slope angle and water recovery. These are the levers operators actually tune on a deep cone thickener, and the patent language tracks them closely.

Filing activity is concentrated in oil sands tailings management, where thickener underflow chemistry and water recycling carry direct cost and regulatory weight, but the same claim language recurs in mining and mineral processing more broadly. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real activity.

Filing activity by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1THE CHEMOURS CO FC LLC29
  2. 2SUNCOR INC17
  3. 3IMPERIAL OIL RESOURCES LTD16
  4. 4BASF SE15
  5. 5CIDRA CORP SERVICES INC13
  6. 6SYNCRUDE CANADA LTD12
  7. 7EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY(US)11
  8. 8NALCO CO11
  9. 9EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO10
  10. 10CIBA SPECIALTY CHEM WATER TRATMENTS LTD9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickened and Paste Tailings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

The dataset spans 184 published records tied to thickened and paste tailings across the 2015–2026 window, drawn from receiving offices led by Canada, the United States and Australia, with IPC coverage weighted toward water treatment and separation processes.

A field that has plateaued, not accelerated

Filings ran from 10 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2019, then settled into a flat pattern: 2021 and 2024 both recorded 2 filings, a 0% change over that three-year span. Readers should not read the 2025–2026 drop-off as decline; it reflects publication lag rather than a slowdown in underlying R&D.

A field that has plateaued, not accelerated036912102017201811201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Water treatment and separation lead the technology mix

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) appears in 45.7% of records and B01D (separation processes, including filtration) in 36.4%, confirming that dewatering chemistry is the dominant claim territory. C10G (hydrocarbon oils and refining) at 26.6% ties the field to oil sands processing specifically, while C22B (metal extraction) at only 7.1% marks a comparatively thin corner of the claim map.

Water treatment and separation lead the technology mixC02F · Water & wastewater treatment8445.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…6736.4%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining4926.6%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories3418.5%B03D · Flotation3217.4%B03B · Wet separation of solids2111.4%B09B · Solid waste disposal2111.4%C22B · Metal extraction & refining137.1%Other10758.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 184 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickened and Paste Tailings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Thickened and Paste Tailings with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thickened and paste tailings and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The records other filings build on

Representative filing
CA2363932A12003-05-23

CA2363932A1 — Management of segregating industrial tailings by using thickeners producing segregated thickened tailings

OZUM, BAKI

The filing claims a method for managing segregating industrial tailings — including tailings from oil sands, mining and coal — by thickening them into a segregated thickened tailings stream. Thickener underflow becomes the engineered tailings product; thickener overflow becomes release water that is reconditioned and recycled, with fast water recovery identified as the key operational outcome.Filed by OZUM, BAKI; dated 2003-05-23.

View full filing details
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US8424601B2System and method for minimizing the negative enviromental impact of the oilsands industry77
2US20100147516A1System and method for minimizing the negative enviromental impact of the oilsands industry59
3US4399039ATreatment of tailings pond sludge58
4US4437998AMethod for treating oil sands extraction plant tailings48
5US20110061610A1Heat and Water Recovery From Oil Sands Waste Streams31
6US20080099380A1Bitumen and thermal recovery from oil sand tailings30
7US20130075340A1Oil sands fine tailings flocculation using dynamic mixing29
8WO2001016591A1Apparatus and method for detecting the level of a mud bed25
9US20140116956A1Co-processing of fluid fine tailings and fresh oil sands tailings24
10US20110135797A1Flocculation method22

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickened and Paste Tailings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns matter more than the raw counts: where citation weight sits, how tightly the top of the assignee ranking holds the field, and which technology branches carry the bulk of claim density.

Citation concentration
77 citations
top-cited record

Influence sits with a handful of early oil sands filings

The most-cited records — US8424601B2, US20100147516A1, US4399039A and US4437998A — all address oil sands tailings and water recovery specifically, and their citation counts are an order of magnitude above later filings. That pattern favours the oldest, foundational filings, not necessarily the most technically current ones.

Read citation rank as historical influence, not present-day relevance.
Ownership concentration
48.9% / 77.7%
top 5 / top 10 share of 184 records

The field is held tightly at the top

Five assignees account for 90 of the 184 records in scope, and ten account for 143. The leader alone holds 29 records, more than double the fifth-placed assignee's 13 — this is a field where a small group of filers has built dense, overlapping claim positions.

A long tail of single- and few-filing entrants fills the remaining fraction.
Technology weighting
45.7% C02F
share of 184 records

Dewatering chemistry outweighs mineral-specific claims

Water and wastewater treatment (C02F) and separation processes (B01D) together cover the majority of records, while metal extraction (C22B) sits at just 7.1%. Claim activity tracks the dewatering and recycling problem more than any single ore or mineral stream.

Class shares overlap because most records carry more than one IPC code.
Filing momentum
0% change
2021 to 2024 filings

Growth has flattened since the 2019 peak

After peaking at 11 filings in 2019, activity settled to a steady low level: 2 filings in 2021 and 2 in 2024, no net growth across that span. Recent-year momentum tables show the leading assignees with 0 filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with a mature filing base rather than an emerging one.

The 2025–2026 tail is still filling in due to publication lag.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thickened and paste tailings, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickened and Paste Tailings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

The assignee ranking covers 42 companies in total — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the full ranking the dataset returns. Filing activity concentrates sharply at the top, with three co-assignee pairs showing where collaboration has occurred at all.

Leader
29 records
leading assignee

One filer holds more than double the fifth-place count

The top-ranked assignee's 29 records outpace the fifth-placed filer's 13 by more than two to one, and the tenth-placed filer holds 9 — a steep drop-off that marks this as a leader-and-field structure rather than an even spread.

Ranked by families in the assignee ranking.
Collaboration
3 co-assignee pairs
across the dataset

Joint filing is rare and concentrated in one pairing

Only three co-assignee pairs appear across the full dataset. The strongest, at 10 shared records, links an oil sands operator with its upstream research affiliate — a sign that even the collaborative activity that exists tracks internal corporate structure rather than cross-company alliances.

The remaining two pairs each show a single shared record.
Recent momentum
0 filings
latest tracked year, leading assignees

Even the top filers show no latest-year activity

Recent-year momentum data shows the leading assignees — including the largest oil sands and chemicals filers in the ranking — recording 0 filings in the latest tracked year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this reflects incomplete data rather than an actual halt in filing.

Treat the latest one to two years as provisional.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
These sub-areas show thinner claim density relative to the core dewatering and separation classes.
Beach slope angle controlRake torque monitoring for underflow consistencyMetal extraction integration (C22B)Segregated tailings land reclamation methodsDeep cone thickener instrumentation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Chemours Co FC LLC0
E I du Pont de Nemours & Co0
Suncor Inc0
IMPERIAL OIL RESOURCES LTD0
BASF SE0
CIDRA Corp Services Inc0
Nalco Co0
Syncrude Canada Ltd0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickened and Paste Tailings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to a mature, concentrated field with specific technical corners still open. Two directions make sense from here.

Map claim boundaries around the top filers

With 77.7% of records held by ten assignees, freedom-to-operate work should start by mapping the specific claim language of the leading filers' underflow density and flocculant dosage patents before drafting new claims in the same space.

Explore assignee claim maps in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed branches directly

Beach slope angle control and rake torque monitoring show thinner density than the core water-recovery classes. A targeted prior-art search in these branches will show whether that thinness reflects genuine white space or simply narrower filing language.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickened and Paste Tailings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Questions practitioners ask about this field

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickened and Paste Tailings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Thickened and Paste Tailings in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole thickened and paste tailings corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.