Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape tracks patent filings at the intersection of mechanical solid-liquid separation and process control: thickener and clarifier vessels, the underflow density and rake torque control loops that keep a mud bed stable, flocculant dosing and mixing systems, and paste thickening for tailings disposal. The scope also captures overflow clarity monitoring, which increasingly ties these mechanical vessels to sensor and control-software claims.
Records span 2015 through the mid-2026 data cut-off, drawing on 114 published records across major receiving offices including Australia, the United States, WIPO/PCT, Europe, Canada and China. Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year shown in any trend chart understates real filing activity.
Two views of the same 114 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Filings ran at 5 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 18 in 2018, then fell through the following years to a documented zero at the 2022 midpoint before beginning to recover toward the 2026 partial-year figure of 1. Read the tail end cautiously: 2025 and 2026 filings are still being published, so recent-year counts will rise as records clear examination.
B01D (separation processes) touches 96.5% of the 114 records, confirming that nearly every filing in scope is anchored in mechanical separation claims. C02F (water and wastewater treatment) reaches 43.9%, marking the split between vessel-mechanics filings and process-chemistry filings. Flotation (B03D, 18.4%), pulp and paper compositions (D21H, 15.8%), wet separation of solids (B03B, 12.3%), addition polymers (C08F, 11.4%), metal extraction (C22B, 10.5%) and crushing/grinding (B02C, 9.6%) each mark a smaller crossover zone. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, these shares add up to well over 100% and should not be summed.
Shares are the percentage of the 114 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thickeners and clarifiers and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA thickener for dewatering fluids with a central well running from near the top of the vessel to a lower cone-shaped portion, a hindered settling zone, and a compressible sediment layer. Eductors in the inlet wells mix incoming slurry with clear fluid, directing flow in counter-circular paths that collide and generate turbulence in the central well before the resulting fluid passes into a lamella-type separator.Filed by Marmon Industrial Water LLC, published 2022-02-24.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6758978B1 | Deep bed thickener/clarifiers with enhanced liquid removal | 87 |
| 2 | WO1997043027A1 | Method and apparatus for controlling thickeners, clarifiers and settling tanks | 40 |
| 3 | US20130008856A1 | Method For Controlling Solids/Liquid Decant Unit Operations And Systems | 22 |
| 4 | WO2013171652A1 | Method of controlling a gravity sedimentation device | 18 |
| 5 | CN108187375A | 一种深度圆锥形浓密机长周期稳定运行控制系统 | 14 |
| 6 | US20050155917A1 | Dilution apparatus for a thickener | 14 |
| 7 | US7520995B2 | Dilution apparatus for a thickener | 14 |
| 8 | CN104524820A | 一种深锥浓密机 | 12 |
| 9 | US8187470B2 | Enhancing sedimentation performance of clarifiers/thickeners | 12 |
| 10 | WO2004082802A1 | Thickener fitted with vibrator | 12 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — treat them as a signal of influence on the field's vocabulary, not as a ranking of current relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, technology composition and citation data are read together.
With 42 companies ranked overall, the leading ten account for 83 of the 114 records in scope — 72.8%. That leaves a long tail of single- or low-filing entrants working around a densely claimed core, particularly in vessel geometry and rake-torque control.
US6758978B1, on deep bed thickener/clarifiers with enhanced liquid removal, carries 87 citations — more than double the next most-cited record. Its vocabulary around liquid removal and bed depth recurs across later filings, making it a useful reference point for claim drafting even though it predates most of the dataset.
Almost every record in scope touches B01D separation-process claims, while only 11.4% reach into C08F addition-polymer chemistry. That imbalance suggests flocculant chemistry itself is comparatively under-claimed relative to the mechanical and control-system side of thickening.
Filings peaked at 18 in 2018, fell to zero at the 2022 midpoint, and are now rising again toward the 2026 partial-year count. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true 2025–2026 filing volume is understated in the raw counts.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thickeners and clarifiers, with the prior art for and against each one.
Forty-two companies appear in the ranked assignee list built from these 114 records. The leader holds 13 records; fifth place holds 9; tenth place holds 4 — a steep drop-off that marks where the long tail begins.
The leading assignee holds 13 of the 114 records. By fifth place the count has fallen to 9, and by tenth place to 4 — concentration is real but not a single-company monopoly.
The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset links two related entities under the Metso Outotec corporate family, appearing together five times — a signature of a merger or internal restructuring carried into the patent record rather than an external collaboration.
Across the assignees tracked for recent-year momentum — including Outotec, Nalco, IB Operations, Kadant Black Clawson, Intellisense IO and Baker Hughes — none shows a filing in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the 18-month publication lag rather than a genuine slowdown by these firms.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Outotec Oyj | 0 | — |
| Nalco Company | 0 | — |
| IB Operations Pty Ltd | 0 | — |
| Kadant Black Clawson LLC | 0 | — |
| INTELLISENSE IO | 0 | — |
| Baker Hughes Holdings LLC | 0 | — |
| Extrakt Process Solutions LLC | 0 | — |
| Outokumpu Oyj | 0 | — |
The landscape points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or competitive tracking.
With 72.8% of records held by ten assignees, a targeted FTO search against that group covers most of the crowded claim space before a broader sweep is needed.
Explore in EurekaFlocculant polymer chemistry and metals-extraction paste thickening show thinner claim density than the mechanical vessel core, suggesting room for a first-to-file position.
Explore in EurekaRecent-year momentum currently reads as zero across the tracked leaders because of the 18-month publication lag; re-checking in the next data cut will surface filings that are still in the pipeline.
Explore in EurekaThe ranked assignee list covers 42 companies built from 114 records, with the top-ranked filer holding 13 records and the fifth-ranked holding 9. The leading five together account for 47.4% of all records, and the leading ten account for 72.8%. That means competitive tracking should focus on this group rather than trying to monitor the full 42-company list, since filing activity drops off sharply after the tenth position.
In this dataset the two terms are searched together because filings often blur the distinction: a thickener is typically claimed around concentrating solids into a dense underflow, while a clarifier is claimed around producing a clear overflow liquid. Many records claim both functions in one vessel, particularly high-rate thickener designs, so IPC classification (chiefly B01D for separation processes) is a more reliable filter than the product name used in the title.
Control-loop claims for underflow density and rake torque sit predominantly in B01D (separation processes), which touches 96.5% of the 114 records in scope. A substantial secondary cluster falls in C02F (water and wastewater treatment) at 43.9%, reflecting that many control claims are framed around treated-water quality rather than mechanical torque alone. Searches limited to a single class will miss real prior art in the other.
Paste thickening for tailings is part of the metals-extraction crossover captured under IPC C22B, which reaches 10.5% of the 114 records in scope — a meaningful but minority share compared to the core separation-process claims. Filing overall peaked in 2018 at 18 records and dipped to zero at the 2022 midpoint before recovering, so any tailings-specific view should be read against that broader recovery pattern rather than assumed to be growing independently.
The clearest gaps sit in branches with thin representation relative to the dominant separation-process core: flocculant polymer chemistry (C08F reaches only 11.4% of records), overflow clarity sensing tied to feedback control, and crossovers into crushing/grinding pre-treatment (B02C, 9.6%) and pulp/paper compositions (D21H, 15.8%). These are areas where the mechanical vessel claims are dense but the adjacent chemistry or sensing claims are comparatively sparse, which is where a first claim is more likely to clear prior art.
Go past this page: query the whole thickeners and clarifiers corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.