https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/thickeners-and-clarifiers-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Chemical Process Engineering
Thickeners and Clarifiers Patents: Underflow Control, Mud-Bed Automation and the Leaders Shaping the Field
  • Concentrated at the top. the five most active filers hold 47.4% of all 114 records in scope, and the leading ten hold 72.8% — this is a field with a short list of repeat filers, not a fragmented one.
  • Filing is accelerating, not cooling. after a 2018 peak of 18 filings, activity dipped through the mid-2020s before turning back up, with the midpoint year showing zero filings — the field is re-entering growth, not exiting it.
  • Separation and water treatment dominate the claim map. 96.5% of records sit in B01D (separation processes) and 43.9% in C02F (water and wastewater treatment), while flotation, pulp/paper and metals-extraction crossovers each cover under a fifth of records.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
114
Published Records
47%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-92%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
AU
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent filings at the intersection of mechanical solid-liquid separation and process control: thickener and clarifier vessels, the underflow density and rake torque control loops that keep a mud bed stable, flocculant dosing and mixing systems, and paste thickening for tailings disposal. The scope also captures overflow clarity monitoring, which increasingly ties these mechanical vessels to sensor and control-software claims.

Records span 2015 through the mid-2026 data cut-off, drawing on 114 published records across major receiving offices including Australia, the United States, WIPO/PCT, Europe, Canada and China. Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year shown in any trend chart understates real filing activity.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1NALCO CO13
  2. 2KADANT BLACK CLAWSON LLC11
  3. 3IB OPERATIONS PTY LTD11
  4. 4OUTOTEC OYJ10
  5. 5INTELLISENSE IO9
  6. 6EXTRAKT PROCESS SOLUTIONS LLC8
  7. 7METSO OUTOTEC FINLAND OY7
  8. 8MARMON IND WATER LLC5
  9. 9BAKER HUGHES CO5
  10. 10F L SMIDTH & CO AS4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickeners and Clarifiers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 114 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend

Filings ran at 5 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 18 in 2018, then fell through the following years to a documented zero at the 2022 midpoint before beginning to recover toward the 2026 partial-year figure of 1. Read the tail end cautiously: 2025 and 2026 filings are still being published, so recent-year counts will rise as records clear examination.

Filing trend0510152052017182018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

B01D (separation processes) touches 96.5% of the 114 records, confirming that nearly every filing in scope is anchored in mechanical separation claims. C02F (water and wastewater treatment) reaches 43.9%, marking the split between vessel-mechanics filings and process-chemistry filings. Flotation (B03D, 18.4%), pulp and paper compositions (D21H, 15.8%), wet separation of solids (B03B, 12.3%), addition polymers (C08F, 11.4%), metal extraction (C22B, 10.5%) and crushing/grinding (B02C, 9.6%) each mark a smaller crossover zone. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, these shares add up to well over 100% and should not be summed.

Technology composition by IPC subclassB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…11096.5%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment5043.9%B03D · Flotation2118.4%D21H · Pulp & paper compositions1815.8%B03B · Wet separation of solids1412.3%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)1311.4%C22B · Metal extraction & refining1210.5%B02C · Crushing, grinding & pulverisi…119.6%Other3530.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 114 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickeners and Clarifiers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Thickeners and Clarifiers with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thickeners and clarifiers and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this landscape

Representative Filing
US20220055935A12022-02-24

US20220055935A1 — High rate thickener and eductors therefor

MARMON INDUSTRIAL WATER LLC

A thickener for dewatering fluids with a central well running from near the top of the vessel to a lower cone-shaped portion, a hindered settling zone, and a compressible sediment layer. Eductors in the inlet wells mix incoming slurry with clear fluid, directing flow in counter-circular paths that collide and generate turbulence in the central well before the resulting fluid passes into a lamella-type separator.Filed by Marmon Industrial Water LLC, published 2022-02-24.

US20220055935A1 — patent drawing 1US20220055935A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6758978B1Deep bed thickener/clarifiers with enhanced liquid removal87
2WO1997043027A1Method and apparatus for controlling thickeners, clarifiers and settling tanks40
3US20130008856A1Method For Controlling Solids/Liquid Decant Unit Operations And Systems22
4WO2013171652A1Method of controlling a gravity sedimentation device18
5CN108187375A一种深度圆锥形浓密机长周期稳定运行控制系统14
6US20050155917A1Dilution apparatus for a thickener14
7US7520995B2Dilution apparatus for a thickener14
8CN104524820A一种深锥浓密机12
9US8187470B2Enhancing sedimentation performance of clarifiers/thickeners12
10WO2004082802A1Thickener fitted with vibrator12

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — treat them as a signal of influence on the field's vocabulary, not as a ranking of current relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickeners and Clarifiers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for R&D and IP strategy

Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, technology composition and citation data are read together.

Concentration
72.8% in the leading ten
of all 114 records

A short list of repeat filers controls most of the claim space

With 42 companies ranked overall, the leading ten account for 83 of the 114 records in scope — 72.8%. That leaves a long tail of single- or low-filing entrants working around a densely claimed core, particularly in vessel geometry and rake-torque control.

Freedom-to-operate work should start with the leading ten, not a broad sweep of the full ranking.
Citation influence
87 citations
US6758978B1

The oldest highly-cited record still shapes deep-bed thickener claims

US6758978B1, on deep bed thickener/clarifiers with enhanced liquid removal, carries 87 citations — more than double the next most-cited record. Its vocabulary around liquid removal and bed depth recurs across later filings, making it a useful reference point for claim drafting even though it predates most of the dataset.

High citation counts here reflect age and influence, not current commercial weight.
Technology mix
96.5% B01D
of 114 records

Separation-process claims dominate; chemistry claims are the minority

Almost every record in scope touches B01D separation-process claims, while only 11.4% reach into C08F addition-polymer chemistry. That imbalance suggests flocculant chemistry itself is comparatively under-claimed relative to the mechanical and control-system side of thickening.

Vessel and control-loop claims are crowded; polymer chemistry claims are comparatively sparse.
Filing momentum
18 in 2018
peak year filings

Activity is recovering from a documented trough, not declining

Filings peaked at 18 in 2018, fell to zero at the 2022 midpoint, and are now rising again toward the 2026 partial-year count. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true 2025–2026 filing volume is understated in the raw counts.

Read the final two data-cut years as a floor, not a ceiling.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thickeners and clarifiers, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickeners and Clarifiers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who Is Filing

The competitive landscape

Forty-two companies appear in the ranked assignee list built from these 114 records. The leader holds 13 records; fifth place holds 9; tenth place holds 4 — a steep drop-off that marks where the long tail begins.

Leader
13 records
top-ranked assignee

One filer sets the pace, with a tight group behind it

The leading assignee holds 13 of the 114 records. By fifth place the count has fallen to 9, and by tenth place to 4 — concentration is real but not a single-company monopoly.

Watch the top five as a group; together they hold 47.4% of all records.
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Corporate consolidation shows up directly in the co-assignee data

The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset links two related entities under the Metso Outotec corporate family, appearing together five times — a signature of a merger or internal restructuring carried into the patent record rather than an external collaboration.

Most other co-assignee pairs appear only once, linking a corporate assignee to a named inventor.
Recent activity
0 in latest year
across six tracked assignees

No single leader shows fresh-year filings yet

Across the assignees tracked for recent-year momentum — including Outotec, Nalco, IB Operations, Kadant Black Clawson, Intellisense IO and Baker Hughes — none shows a filing in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the 18-month publication lag rather than a genuine slowdown by these firms.

Expect these counts to update as 2025–2026 filings clear publication.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with thin representation relative to the core separation and water-treatment claims.
Flocculant polymer chemistry (C08F crossover)Metals-extraction paste thickening (C22B crossover)Overflow clarity sensing and feedback controlCrushing/grinding pre-treatment integration (B02C crossover)Pulp and paper clarifier compositions (D21H crossover)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Outotec Oyj0
Nalco Company0
IB Operations Pty Ltd0
Kadant Black Clawson LLC0
INTELLISENSE IO0
Baker Hughes Holdings LLC0
Extrakt Process Solutions LLC0
Outokumpu Oyj0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickeners and Clarifiers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or competitive tracking.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the leading ten

With 72.8% of records held by ten assignees, a targeted FTO search against that group covers most of the crowded claim space before a broader sweep is needed.

Explore in Eureka

Draft around the under-claimed chemistry branches

Flocculant polymer chemistry and metals-extraction paste thickening show thinner claim density than the mechanical vessel core, suggesting room for a first-to-file position.

Explore in Eureka

Track the top assignees for fresh filings as the lag clears

Recent-year momentum currently reads as zero across the tracked leaders because of the 18-month publication lag; re-checking in the next data cut will surface filings that are still in the pipeline.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickeners and Clarifiers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on thickener and clarifier patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thickeners and Clarifiers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Thickeners and Clarifiers in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole thickeners and clarifiers corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.